The Sun has changed its character

Guest post by David Archibald

A number of solar parameters are weak, and none is weaker than the Ap Index:

image

Figure 1: Ap Index 1932 to 2026

Figure 1 shows the Ap Index from 1932 with a projection to the end of Solar Cycle 24 in 2026. The Ap Index has not risen much above the previous floor of activity in the second half of the 20th Century. It is also now far less volatile. With now less than a year to solar maximum in 2013, the Ap Index is now projected to trail off to a new low next decade.

image

Figure 2: Mean Field, TSI, F10.7 Flux and Sunspot Count from 2008

This figure is from: http://www.leif.org/research/TSI-SORCE-2008-now.png

What is evident from Figure 2 is that the spikes down in the F10.7 flux and sunspot count are almost to absolute minimum levels. The underlying level of activity is only a little above that of solar minimum.

image

Figure 3: Oulu Neutron Count 1964 – 2026

Similar to the Ap Index, activity is only slightly above levels of previous solar minima. The figure includes a projection to the end of Solar Cycle 24 in 2026 which assumes that the neutron count in the next minimum will be similar to that of the 23/24 minimum. Previous cold periods have been associated with significant spikes in Be10 and C14. Perhaps the neutron count might get much higher yet into the 24/25 minimum.

image

Figure 4: UAH Monthly Temperature versus Low Global Cloud Cover

The cloud cover data for this figure was provided by Professor Ole Humlum. There is a significant relationship between low global cloud cover and global temperature. Assuming that the relationship is linear and remains linear at higher cloud cover percentages, this figure attempts to derive what cloud cover percentage is required to get the temperature decline of 0.9°C predicted by Solheim, Stordahl and Humlum in their paper entitled “The long sunspot cycle 23 predicts a significant temperature decrease in cycle 24” available at: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1202.1954v1.pdf

Figure 4 suggests that the predicted result will be associated with a significant increase in cloudiness.

image

Figure 5: Low Level Cloud Cover plotted against Oulu Neutron Count

This figure, most likely repeating other people’s work, suggests that there is little correlation between neutron count and cloud cover. Higher neutron counts may be a coincident with colder climate than a significant causative factor. Perhaps EUV, the Ap Index and other factors are more significant in climate change. Also, on a planet with a bistable climate of either ice age or interglacial, it may be that accidents of survival of snowpack over the northern summer are also important.

Perth-based scientist David Archibald is a Visiting Fellow of the Institute of World Politics in Washington where he teaches a course in Strategic Energy Policy.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

176 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
pat
July 2, 2012 11:13 am

Ahh. Global Warming has cooled the sun. Just as the models show.

July 2, 2012 11:17 am
July 2, 2012 11:18 am

the Ap Index is now projected to trail off to a new low next decade
If history is any guide, smoothed Ap will reach 13 in cycle 24 [and probably in SC25 as well]:
http://www.leif.org/research/Ap-1844-now.png
so Archiebald’s ‘projection’ does not seem reasonable.
there is little correlation between neutron count and cloud cover
For once Archibald may be correct. The claimed correlation is between LOW clouds and cosmic rays, but as solar activity has decreases [and cosmic rays increased], the low clouds has not followed the claimed relationship: http://climate4you.com/images/CloudCoverAllLevel%20AndWaterColumnSince1983.gif

Rhys Jaggar
July 2, 2012 11:26 am

How much concensus is there that SC24 will finish in 2026? That’s a, what, an 18 year cycle??
I’m not saying Archibald is wrong, I’m saying it’d be interesting to know how certain physicists are on that one.

July 2, 2012 11:27 am

Henry says
Actually, figure 1 clearly shows the downfall of maxima as calculated by me, from 1994/5.
http://www.letterdash.com/henryp/global-cooling-is-here
I also predict the cooling will continue,
until at least 2025

Mark.R
July 2, 2012 11:28 am

The 1.5B$ New zealanders have paid in to the ETS have given us one of the coldest Junes on recorord.
Next thing they be saying is look the tax works.

July 2, 2012 11:29 am

Sun has changed its character
I doubt it.
Sun is doing what it has done many times before. As long as extrapolation of the past is confirmed by present, no major character change.
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/SSN.htm

crosspatch
July 2, 2012 11:31 am

“Ap Index is now projected to trail off to a new low next decade.”
Projected by whom, exactly?

July 2, 2012 11:32 am

Rhys Jaggar says:
July 2, 2012 at 11:26 am
How much concensus is there that SC24 will finish in 2026? That’s a, what, an 18 year cycle??
I’m not saying Archibald is wrong, I’m saying it’d be interesting to know how certain physicists are on that one.

I shall say that Archibald very likely is wrong. There is no evidence for such a long cycle, next minimum more likely in 2021.

July 2, 2012 11:37 am

vukcevic says:
July 2, 2012 at 11:29 am
Sun has changed its character
Sun is doing what it has done many times before.

What was probably meant was that the change is with reference to the past few centuries. If so, the Livingston & Penn effect [if real] would be as significant change.
From Hugh Hudson’s summary of the 2nd SSN workshop http://www.leif.org/research/SSN/Hudson.pdf
“Livingston-Penn effect
• There’s no question that something is happening that
we have not seen before
– We should be proud of this, and exploit it
– We should ignore wild-sounding claims about
sunspots disappearing completely
• The data are weak, but the theory is weaker”

sean2829
July 2, 2012 11:46 am

What I’ve noticed over the last few years is an unusually high north south meandering of the jet stream leading to some very high temperatures and some very low temperatures. I realize a large part of this may be just the cold phase of the PDO but can the amplitude of the north south jet stream meandering be affected by the state of the sun or the change in state of the sun? We certainly seem to have stronger blocking patterns since solar minimum and there have been several times in the last few years where high pressures over the poles have led to strong cold spells in the temperate lattitudes of the northern and sounther hemisphere. In other words what I am trying to say is the weak sun’s signal more likely to be found in increased variability at certain latitudes rather than in changes in the averages.

July 2, 2012 11:53 am

I know that Dr. Hathaway occasionally looks at the WUWT solar threads, (banned his You Tube interview featured on my website), most likely is annoyed by my mocking of his SC24 forecast, I suspect he knows it was related to a comment in an email to the world renown solar scientist (definitely not our Dr. S), and I am calling an end to it.
So if Dr. Hathaway pops along to WUWT I would like him to know that I shell not again disparagingly refer to his SC24 prediction and eventually will delete references to it.
His prediction went wrong because he misunderstood results of Dr. Joan (sister of Richard) Feynman’s work.
Why I am doing it now ?
“We don’t know why this works,” says Hathaway. The underlying physics is a mystery. “But it does work.”
http://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2006/12/21/21dec_cycle24_resources/hathaway1_strip2.jpg
because I think I found out why it works.

July 2, 2012 11:56 am

Henry@sean2829
Keep ur eyes on maxima and you will know what the sun is doing…

daveburton
July 2, 2012 11:57 am
Scarface
July 2, 2012 11:57 am

Dutch scientist De Jager predicts: No big minimum like the Maunder Minimum expected
http://www.cdejager.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/2012-sudden-trans-JSWSC-2-A073.pdf
Found via: De staat van het klimaat ( http://www.staatvanhetklimaat.nl/2012/06/28/de-jager-geen-groot-minimum-in-het-verschiet/ )

KevinM
July 2, 2012 11:59 am

That chart-graphic looks OK to me up until the crazy brown-line appended projection.
Not saying I have a science argument, just an aesthetics one. How about some dotted min-max lines around a confidence interval or something.

speed
July 2, 2012 12:16 pm

The Sun has changed its character … sounds like the first line of a Sci Fi thriller.

July 2, 2012 12:20 pm

vukcevic says:
July 2, 2012 at 11:53 am
His prediction went wrong because he misunderstood results of Dr. Joan (sister of Richard) Feynman’s work.
Not true, it went wrong because he peaked the wrong peak: slide 25ff of http://www.leif.org/research/Predicting%20the%20Solar%20Cycle%20%28SORCE%202010%29.pdf
because I think I found out why it works.
It actually doesn’t work. What does work is the polar fields and proxies for those: slides 22 and 23 of the above.

Bloke down the pub
July 2, 2012 12:22 pm

I suppose it was a foregone certainty that as soon as I bought solar panels the sun would go to sleep.

SteveSadlov
July 2, 2012 12:36 pm

Thankfully ENSO is now into El Nino territory. It may counteract some of the negative effects.

July 2, 2012 12:42 pm

Forget abt the clouds and jets. I think it is the sun and related to the activity of the sun: the amount of ozone, that determines the development of temperature on earth.

Coldlynx
July 2, 2012 12:43 pm

Leif, I think You looked at wrong picture at Climate4you
Here is the one for tropical clouds and global temperatures:
http://climate4you.com/images/HadCRUT3%20and%20TropicalCloudCoverISCCP.gif

July 2, 2012 12:45 pm

it went wrong because he peaked the wrong peak: slide 25ff
( rem- if he picked correct peak it would have worked )
It actually doesn’t work.
countratant ?

Luther Wu
July 2, 2012 1:07 pm

Bloke down the pub says:
July 2, 2012 at 12:22 pm
I suppose it was a foregone certainty that as soon as I bought solar panels the sun would go to sleep.
______________________
Meanwhile, just think how you’re saving the planet.

commieBob
July 2, 2012 1:09 pm

Off topic and late but perhaps amusing …
There’s a story on Slashdot blaming the failure of Rio+20 on Intellectual Property owners. http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/07/02/1738214/intellectual-property-rights-the-quiet-killer-of-rio20

“Richard Phillips, president of the Intellectual Property Owners Association, sent a powerful message … And the IPO’s chilly message set the tone for what many pundits and participants considered a disappointing Rio+20 conference yielding few substantive results.”

The mind boggles.

1 2 3 8