Premonitions of the Fall (in temperature)

Guest post by David Archibald

The first prediction of the current climatic minimum was made by Hubbert Lamb in 1970 in a report (Weiss and Lamb) for the German Navy. He did it by making a reconstructed record of the average frequency of south-westerly surface winds in England since 1340. Quoting Lamb “We sense a cycle or periodicity of close to 200 years in length.” and “There may be a valuable indication of the origin of this apparent 200 year recurrence tendency, in that the sharp declines of the south-westerly wind indicated in the late 1300s, 1560s, 1740s-1770s and now, in each case fell at about the end of a sequence of sunspot cycles which built up to periods of exceptionally great solar disturbance (around 1360-80, the 1570s, the 1770s, the 1950s and more recently). The frequency maxima of the south-westerly wind, and evidence of warm climate periods in Europe sustained over several decades, all bear a similar relationship to these variations of the Sun’s activity.”

Following is Figure 11.6 from Lamb’s 1988 book “Weather, Climate and Human Affairs”:

clip_image002

The frequency of the southwest wind at London is shown by the solid line. A tentative forecast (broken line) is made simply by moving the whole curve 200 years to the right, i.e. the forecast implied by accepting the apparent 200 year recurring oscillation shown by the series.

The most successful prediction of the current minimum, in terms of lead time and detail, was made by two researchers in the US later that decade. Using tree ring data from redwoods in Kings Canyon in California, in 1979 Libby and Pandolfi forecast that, “by running this function into the future we have made a prediction of the climate to be expected in King’s Canyon; the prediction is that the climate will continue to deteriorate on the average, but that after our present cooling-off of more than the average decay in climate, there will be a temporary warming up followed by a greater rate of cooling-off.”

In a Los Angeles Times interview, Libby and Pandolfi gave a more detailed forecast:

“The forecast is for continued cool weather all over the Earth through the mid-1980s, with a global warming trend setting in thereafter for the rest of the century – followed by a severe cold snap that might well last through the first half of the 21st century.”

“Both the isotope record and the thermometer record show neat agreement for the cold decades at the ends of the 17th and 18th centuries, when temperatures fell by 1-10th to 2-10ths of a degree.”

“More recently, the world has enjoyed an agricultural boom during the past 70 years or so. The Earth’s annual average temperature has risen by about 1 to 1½ degrees, about as much of an increase as the decrease during the Little Ice Ages, during this interval.

When she and Pandolfi project their curves into the future, they show lower average temperatures from now thorugh the mid-1980s. “Then,” Dr. Libby added, “we see a warming trend (by about a quarter of 1 degree Fahrenheit) globally to around the year 2000. And then it will get really cold – if we believe our projections. This has to be tested.”

How cold? “Easily one or two degrees,” she replied, “and maybe even three or four degrees.”

The remarkable thing about the Libby and Pandolfi prediction is that they got the fine detail right, up to the current day, which gives a lot of credence to their projection for the next fifty years.

In 2003, two solar physicists, Schatten and Tobiska, published a paper which included the following prediction: “The surprising result of these long-range predictions is a rapid decline in solar activity, starting with cycle #24. If this trend continues, we may see the Sun heading towards a “Maunder” type of solar activity minimum – an extensive period of reduced levels of solar activity.”

The next prediction of the current minimum was made by Clilverd et al in 2006 using low-frequency solar oscillations:

clip_image004

Clilverd predicted that Solar Cycles 24 and 25 would have amplitudes similar to that of Solar Cycles 5 and 6 of the Dalton Minimum before a return to more normal levels mid-century.

A Finnish tree ring study (http://lustiag.pp.fi/holocene_trends1000_INQUA.pdf) followed in 2007 – Timonen et al. This is a portion of a figure from that study showing a forecast cold period starting about 2015 that is deeper and broader than any cold period in the previous 500 years:

clip_image006

Summary

Libby and Pandolfi provided timely warning of the current cooling more than thirty years ago, through the proper use of tree ring data. Given the enormous societal and financial consequences of that cooling, it would be good application of climate research funds to have a number of groups replicate and update the Libby and Pandolfi work.

References

Clilverd. M.A., Clarke, E., Ulich, T., Rishbeth, H. and Jarvis, M.J., 2006 “predicting Solar Cycle 24 and beyond” Space Weather, Vol. 4, So9005, doi:10.1029/2005SW000207

Libby, L.M. and Pandolfi, L.J. 1979, Tree Thermometers and Commodities: Historic Climate Indicators, Environment International Vol 2, pp 317-333

Schatten, K.H. and W.K.Tobiska 2003, Solar Activity Heading for a Maunder Minimum?, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 35 (3), 6.03

Timonen, M., Helema, S., Holopainen, J., Ogurtsov, M., Eronen, M., Lindholm, M., Merilainen, J and Mielikainen, K. 2007 “Climate patterns in Northern Fennoscandinavia during the Last Millenium” Xvii INQUA Congress

Weiss, I. and Lamb, H.H. 1970 ‘Die Zunahme der Wellenhohen in jungster Ziet in den Operationsgebieten der Bundesmarine, ihre vermutliche Ursachen and ihre voraussichtliche weitere Entwicklung, Fachlich Mitteilungen, Nr. 160, Porz-Wahn, Geophysikalisher Bertungsdiesnt der Bundeswehr.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
198 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Keith Pearson, Formerly bikermailman, Anon No Longer
May 20, 2012 8:27 am

Fantastic work collating these together, Mr Archibald, and many thanks! To paraphrase James Carville, “It’s the Sun, stupid!”. (for non-Americans, in 1992, while running Bill Clinton’s campaign, he coined the phrase ‘it’s the economy, stupid’)

tallbloke
May 20, 2012 8:39 am

Looks about right and agrees with our prediction too.
http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2012/05/20/2011/02/21/tallbloke-and-tim-channon-a-cycles-analysis-approach-to-predicting-solar-activity/
Interdisciplinary work on this could be fruitful. That’s probably why it is discouraged in the climate field so far as any astrophysics is concerned.

May 20, 2012 8:39 am

It would be quite ironic if the very things globalwarmists are trying to get rid of are the very things which prevent complete freezing.

May 20, 2012 8:43 am

It is supposed to cool down anyway since the Modern warming like the THREE previous warming periods last around 350 years and this current warming is about that old already.
http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/thread-188-post-3123.html#pid3123

May 20, 2012 8:52 am

If the world keeps “Warming” via adjustments to historical temps, and the solar system starts a cool down cycle due to lack of sunspots, I can see the warmest declaring the hottest year ever when its snowing in July…

MikeN
May 20, 2012 8:55 am

The fine detail? a quarter of a degree fahrenheit isn’t the same as .7 degrees Celsius.

German Lurker
May 20, 2012 8:59 am

“Die Zunahme der Wellenhohen in jungster Ziet” should read “Die Zunahme der Wellenhöhen in jungster Zeit”

jim2
May 20, 2012 8:59 am

But! But! Even if the global temp falls by 4 C, we still are hotter than we would have been because of ACO2. Don’t you guys know anything???

Gail Combs
May 20, 2012 9:03 am

E M Smith (ChiefIO) had a post a few years ago about bond events: So what is a Bond Event? They are abnormally cold periods that happen about every 1470 years. We are likely headed into one now, IMHO.
Bond Events do occur and here is one paper on the subject: The Physical Evidence of Earth’s Unstoppable 1,500-Year Climate Cycle
The only question is about whether or not the “Little Ice Age” was a Bond Event. E.M Smith goes into further detail as to why he thinks it was not in his thread Intermediate Period Half Bond Events If Smith is correct about his timing then we are facing another Bond Event.

Pamela Gray
May 20, 2012 9:03 am

Here we go again. Is there no end to wriggle matching?
The null hypothesis: The oceans circulate a HUGE amount of various oceanic conditions as Earth cranks the wheels of the overturning ocean circulation, the educated guess being around 600 years, more or less, for a complete cycle of one pool of water making it back to its starting point. The overturning ocean circulation brings bottom water up to the top in an entirely different spot on the globe, and top water down to the bottom, also in an entirely different spot on the globe.
The condition of that top water is then affected even more by Earth’s atmospheric oscillations as it rides the circulation on the top, letting in more or less shortwave radiation from our Sun into that top layer. Those conditions, the top layer of the oceans and atmospheric conditions, create whatever weather we have and is the source of both short and long term oscillations.
Eventually, that top layer, along with its weather patterns, will sink to the bottom, waiting its turn to rise to the top to live its life again in a new but related generation. Almost like the seasonal change between Winter and Summer, but on much longer time scales. In Winter, it hybernates at the bottom. In Summer, 100’s of years later, it rises to the top and blooms forth with weather patterns and variations, similar too, maybe, but not an exact duplicate of its parent.
Solar variations don’t have nearly the energy our variable oceans and atmosphere have in creating the conditions we feel. Solar variations, in all its forms, are buried in the extremely energetic noise of the intrinsic factors of an active planet.
CO2 rides on the coattails. Solar variations can be considered a constant.
Case closed.

Paul
May 20, 2012 9:05 am

It’s good to see Leona Libby getting a mention. May I recommend her book (out of print) “Past Climates- Tree Thermometers, Commodities, and People.. To quote from her preface:- “The method of tree thermometry depends on measuring the ratios of stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen in tree rings. These elements derive from rain and snow, which orignate as water vapor distilled from the surface of seas. Variations in sea surface temperature cause variation in stable isotopes in the distilled water vapor and therefore changes in the ratios as they are stored year by year in tree rings. By evaluating their changes in tree rings, we are able to determine climate changes in the past, as far back as tree rings may be secured. By applying the method of Fourier analysis to the stable isotopemeasurements in trees, we can predict climate changes in the near future.”

ferd berple
May 20, 2012 9:08 am

Conducting research similar to Eddy’s, Russia’s Eugene Borisenkov** discovered a quasi 200- year cycle of global cooling during the past 7,500 years that correlates to times of sunspot minima similar to the Maunder minimum.
** Eugene Borisenkov (Climate variations during the last millennium. Leningrad. 1988. p. 275)

Raymond Kuntz
May 20, 2012 9:17 am

We better pray that the Warmistas a correct, we may need all of the Global warming we can get.

Nerd
May 20, 2012 9:17 am

Well, that is certainly a real doom to worry about.

beesaman
May 20, 2012 9:20 am

Come on, we all know that the solar and water vapour variations are easily overwhelmed by that god of trace gases CO2, tut tut any idiot knows that (sarc comes so easily)…

Adam Gallon
May 20, 2012 9:25 am

Interesting, but with tree rings involved, I’m more than a tad sceptical!
The work by Lamb, is more interesting.
We’ve had more than our fair share of Northerly winds, as of late.
Ridiculously cold again today, for late May!

mike about town
May 20, 2012 9:38 am

man…right now those predictions look VERY prescient. i am curious to see if the next El Nino provides us with a new “hottest” year or if we have already begun our descent.

High Sierra Howard
May 20, 2012 9:43 am

David,
The Libby and Pandolfi article is a great find. Do you have a link to it? If this comes to pass, the citrus groves of central California will be a thing of the past.
Thanks for all the work you do. Sincerely.

Annie
May 20, 2012 9:43 am

It’s perishing cold here in North Yorkshire. Heaven help us if there is cooling.

Ian W
May 20, 2012 9:45 am

All this makes Harold Ambler’s book “Don’t Sell Your Coat” very topical

Thomas
May 20, 2012 9:46 am

“Libby and Pandolfi provided timely warning of the current cooling”
What current cooling?

Another Gareth
May 20, 2012 9:48 am

You’re gonna need a bigger coat.

Bill H
May 20, 2012 9:52 am

One thing I noticed right off was the leveling of temps prior to the major fall off and that it lasts about 15 years… we have had our Oceanic reserve giving us heat back for some 15 years now. It is waning and now comes the rapid fall into cooling..
If they are correct were about to have one hell of a ride down the slope.

R.S.Brown
May 20, 2012 9:55 am

The following link:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0160412079900072
Leads us to an abstract from Environment International, Volume 2, Issues 4–6, 1979, Pages 317–333,
Titled
Tree thermometers and commodities: Historic climate indicators
L.M. Libby, Enironmental Science and Engineering, University of California
at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, U.S.A. and L.J. Pandolfi , Global
Geochemistry, Santa Monica, CA, U.S.A.
Abstract

In four modern trees, hydrogen and oxygen isotope ratios track the modern temperature records.
In a 2000-yr sequence of a Japanese cedar, there are the same periodicities of variation of D/H and O18/O16 as have been found in O18/O16 in a Greenland ice well.
The same periodicities are found in uranium and organic carbon concentrations versus depth in a sea core from the Santa Barbara Channel, and in carbon-14 variations in a sequence of Bristlecone pine from southern California.
In a 2000-yr sequence of Japanese cedar and in a 1000-yr sequence of European oak D/H and O18/O16 are related to each other by a slope of 8, just as they are in world-wide precipitation.
In a 72-yr sequence of Sequoia gigantea, measured year by year for its oxygen isotope ratios, the 10.5-yr cycle of sunspot numbers found, but not the 21-yr cycle of sunspot magnetism; this we believe indicates that the sun is affecting the earth’s climate with non-magnetic particles, probably photons.
All these phenomena are related to periodic changes in sea surface temperature caused by periodic changes in the sun.

High Sierra Howard
May 20, 2012 9:58 am

@Paul
Thanks for the recommendation of “Past Climates- Tree Thermometers, Commodities, and People” by Leona Libby. I just purchased a used copy on Amazon for 30 cents!

1 2 3 8