![Worlds_Biggest_Diamond[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/worlds_biggest_diamond1.jpg?resize=240%2C180&quality=83)
Tackling mysteries about carbon, possible oil formation and more deep inside Earth
DENVER, Aug. 28, 2011 — How do diamonds the size of potatoes shoot up at 40 miles per hour from their birthplace 100 miles below Earth’s surface? Does a secret realm of life exist inside the Earth? Is there more oil and natural gas than anyone dreams, with oil forming not from the remains of ancient fossilized plants and animals near the surface, but naturally deep, deep down there? Can the greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, be transformed into a pure solid mineral?
Those are among the mysteries being tackled in a real-life version of the science fiction classic, A Journey to the Center of the Earth, that was among the topics of a presentation here today at the 242nd National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society (ACS). Russell Hemley, Ph.D., said that hundreds of scientists will work together on an international project, called the Deep Carbon Observatory (DCO), to probe the chemical element that’s in the news more often than perhaps any other. That’s carbon as in carbon dioxide.
“Concerns about climate change have made millions of people aware of carbon’s role on the surface of the Earth, in the atmosphere and in the oceans,” Hemley said. “The Deep Carbon Observatory will uncover critical information about the movement and fate of carbon hundreds and thousands of miles below Earth’s surface. We call that the deep carbon cycle.”
Hemley said this basic research could have practical implications in the future. Using laboratory equipment that reproduces pressures deep within the Earth, which are thousands to millions of times higher than on the surface, scientists in these labs have discovered a way to convert carbon dioxide into a rock-like material called polymeric carbon dioxide. With further refinements, scientists could enhance its stability closer to the Earth’s surface.
The findings also may lead to new materials for commercial and industrial products. Hemley’s laboratory, for instance, has developed a way to produce “super” diamonds, or high-quality diamonds that are bigger and better than existing ones. Natural diamonds form slowly under the high-pressure, high-temperature conditions that exist deep within the Earth, while today’s synthetic diamonds form under similar conditions in the laboratory. Using a process called chemical vapor deposition, Hemley’s research group made diamonds rapidly and at low pressure. The new diamonds have superior qualities, including extreme hardness, improved transparency and better electrical and temperature properties. The diamonds could lead to improved computer chips that run faster and generate less heat than existing silicon chips, Hemley said. They also show promise for use in advanced cutting-tools, more durable and heat-resistant windows for spacecraft and other applications, he noted.
The DCO project will probe the big mystery about the formation of natural diamonds, including their chemical composition and how they shoot up quickly from deep within the Earth. Scientists can’t directly observe that process at present, as there’s no practical way to travel down 100 miles beneath the surface of the planet. Observations are limited to laboratory simulations of this process for now, said Hemley, who is director of the Geophysical Laboratory at the Carnegie Institution of Washington in Washington, D.C. His laboratory specializes in the chemistry and physics of materials under extreme conditions. Hemley’s presentation at the ACS meeting, entitled “Chemistry of Planetary Gases, Liquids, and Ices in Extreme Environments,” focused on what happens to planetary material under conditions of extreme pressure and temperature, as well as other insights relevant to Earth.
Another area that the DCO will explore is energy. The extent to which hydrocarbons in the Earth form from inorganic processes deep within the Earth rather than only from the fossilized remains of plants and animals remains an important unanswered question. Exploring the nature of carbon deep within the Earth may provide clues on how and to what extent this abiotic process might contribute to energy reserves, Hemley said.
Finally, DCO research has implications in the search for other life forms on Earth and even outer space. Scientists have already identified microbes at about a mile or so deep within the Earth under high temperatures. They suspect that some forms may exist at even deeper levels.
Past studies suggest that bacteria and other life forms can’t survive beyond several thousand atmospheres of pressure. But new studies by scientists in Hemley’s lab show that some bacteria are capable of surviving pressures of up to 20,000 atmospheres. That supports the theory that life might exist in extreme extraterrestrial environments, Hemley noted.
Funding sources for these studies include The Carnegie Institute of Washington, the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
The American Chemical Society is a non-profit organization chartered by the U.S. Congress. With more than 163,000 members, ACS is the world’s largest scientific society and a global leader in providing access to chemistry-related research through its multiple databases, peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. Its main offices are in Washington, D.C., and Columbus, Ohio.
ABSTRACT:
Recent experiments are providing unprecedented insight into the chemistry of planetary materials over a broad range of the conditions, from ambient pressures to several multimegabars and cryogenic temperatures to several thousand degrees. Studies of hydrogen, the most abundant element, reveal new phenomena at high P-T conditions where new chemistry emerges. Related but characteristically distinct behavior is observed in heavier simple diatomics and other planetary volatiles. New phases and chemistry of H2O, CH4, and other planetary ices have been discovered, and the high P-T stability fields of CO2, including melting relations of the polymeric forms, have been documented. Studies of carbon-based materials more broadly are addressing outstanding questions such as the abundance of carbon within our planet, the depth and nature of the deep biosphere, and the implications of the deep carbon cycle for energy and the environment.
If the energy in fossil fuels does not come from the Sun, then it must originate in the residual energy of planet formation.
The real issue is the idea that the Earth’s surface must be rid of all traces of carbon in order to save it. In that thinking, Life is the enemy, and the ultimate goal is to transform the Earth into a pet rock, barren and desolate. Better living though chemistry, automation and artificial intelligence.
Terminator is born.
“The diamonds could lead to improved computer chips that run faster and generate less heat than existing silicon chips, Hemley said. They also show promise for use in advanced cutting-tools, more durable and heat-resistant windows for spacecraft and other applications, he noted.”
Seems like interesting potential.
“then it must originate in the residual energy of planet formation.”
Not necessarily…there are theories that there is a nuclear fission process going on in the earth’s core.
“…from the fossilized remains of plants and animals…”
I wonder how these remains got there where they are now without being “eaten” when they were at the surface. It is a huge amount. All of, say, human “material” buried at one place would not yield enough fuel to last one day of our current consumption. Also, the process to cover thick layers of remains must be a cold one to avoid oxidation. Ice ages appearing very suddenly come to mind. When CO₂ concentration was very high such that trees stood so close together they hadn’t even the space to fall over and new plants grew on top of them, maybe. Imagine that.
Couple of points:
I thought that ALL oil deposits contain micro fossils, and so MUST be organic in manufacture. Coal certainly does, I have the impressions of fern leaves to prove it.
Regards diamonds, a ‘showman’ scientist in the UK made them by leaving an acetylene torch burning against some metal for 8 hours. The resulting diamonds were not very big, but were confirmed as perfect diamonds (some uncontaminated) by spectral and molecular analysis.
.
About time there is open discussion on “fossil” oil. Lets see some proof. What are the time lines for the break down of what kind of fossils that produce oil? How come these huge quantities of oil are even available now? Never mind what the Russians and other countries are finding miles down in fossil free rock.
Soon we’ll hear about how we evil humans are filling up earth’s core with carbon…and that a super team is volunteering to “Save” us.
Certainly petroleum has been found in crystalline rock but whether that is as a source rock or a store rock is the discussion. It would be very exciting if this energy source were to be formed in the deep earth.
If it was worries about climate change and the AGW rubbish that routed research into this field then at least one good thing has surfaced from the mishmash.
“They also show promise for use in advanced cutting-tools, more durable and heat-resistant windows for spacecraft and other applications, he noted.”
This will undoubtedly be of great interest in nations with manufacturing industry and manned spacecraft. Perhaps the DCO will be able to sell them some know-how.
I want my potato diamond. Or at least a pay-off for the tease (the headline).
let me guess… they need more funding?
————
Not necessarily…there are theories that there is a nuclear fission process going on in the earth’s core.
————
That would be strange, as AFAIK major fissile elements are litophiles, bonding strongly to oxygen and thus are not likely to sink deep into core.
Where can we get the superior diamonds at, does anyone know? I want the most beautiful diamond possible for the most beautiful woman.
Ralph says:
August 29, 2011 at 1:13 am
Couple of points:
I thought that ALL oil deposits contain micro fossils, and so MUST be organic in manufacture. Coal certainly does, I have the impressions of fern leaves to prove it.
************************************************************************
Still in dispute, but please see http://www.gasresources.net/ for a very good start in the discussion of where oil comes from. (Lots of reading, but worth it, in my opinion).
As for coal, even more arguments, but Thomas Gold’s “Deep Hot Biosphere” also has some interesting thoughts on coal production (even if some think he has “borrowed” from the Russian oil story).
Steve
About abiotic iol theory: If one considers the incredibly immense amount of carbon (dioxide) being exhausted continuously by volcanoes, it is very easy for one’s mind to wonder about the possibility of other abiotic carbon based molecules, such as methane, propane, buthane, crude oil being formed through very high pressures and temperatures.
The Russians were the first to consider the abiotic theory. I have even read reports of Russian oil wells deep enough for the source to be surely abiotic. These wells never dry up. Also I have read reports saying that depleted oil wells have been found productive again after some years of being considered as dry.
There is one thing that cannot be disputed: The re is a lot of carbon down there and it is what gives live on the surface of the planet. Burning oil, gas and coal (which is just 3% of all CO2 in the atmosphere is helping greening the planet.
I just hope that the carbon stored in the ebowels of the planet would last forever.
“Is there more oil and natural gas than anyone dreams, with oil forming not from the remains of ancient fossilized plants and animals near the surface, but naturally deep, deep down there? ”
But the science is settled! the science is settled! the science is settled! the science is settled!
Explanation: one of my grandsons’ favourite toys is a parrot with an inbuilt recorder. When you press a button it will record and repeat what you’ve said in a maniacal high pitched voice for a time limit.
At a family gathering years ago, after maybe a bit too much wine an older female relative of great decorum once shouted, “Get f****d” to the parrot, and it duly screeched its responses to the hilarity of the younger generation and the consternation of the older generation.
Before my retirement, I was involved with diamonds (industrial, not gems). Artificial (“Man Made” is a GE trademark) diamonds have been around for decades, including a low pressure vapor deposition method. They have some industrial uses, but no great advantage (even price) over natural diamonds. There may be something “new” in this study, but claims of “super diamonds” are not. Sounds like “Bad Science” to me.
Having said that, carbon is an interesting element. When I was in school, it came in three forms – diamond, graphite, and amorphous carbon. New forms have been discovered – “bucky-balls” (named after Buckminster Fuller), tubes, etc. That’s elemental carbon. Compounds of carbon range from… well, CO2 to… “us”. It will do no harm to study it further…
Best,
Frank
Diamond windows for manned spacecraft eh? Larry Niven postulated entire spacecraft with transparent hulls, advertised as being capable of passing through the upper atmosphere of a star without damage, ;<)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Products_%28Larry_Niven%29#General_Products.27_.234_hull
Either there’s life on Io, Titan and other moons or geologic processes make methane. If it’s geology then how hard is it to believe other more complex hydrocarbons are made in geologic processes?
Richard111 says:
August 29, 2011 at 1:19 am
“About time there is open discussion on “fossil” oil. Lets see some proof. What are the time lines for the break down of what kind of fossils that produce oil?”
This paper from 2002 explains the chemistry pretty well, and claims that heavier hydrocarbons are not likely to be made from decaying matter.
http://www.pnas.org/content/99/17/10976.full
I’ve often visualised oil as being the superheated remains of carbon bearing rock subducted under the mantel and then almost flowing in a river system under the mantel – trying to go up!!! In effect, oil are inverted lakes into which flows organic liquids from decomposition of carbon containing rocks.
In effect, you could almost view the topology of the mantel UPSIDE DOWN. Subduction zones would be the mountains, and thin oceanic crusts would be the seas, with oil flowing “down” from the subduction zones to the oil seas where we harvest it. Obviously this is all in the rock, and it’s more a series of pathways through the rock, but basically, it has to flow upward.
Sounds too fantastic? Well, think about it this way, the volcanoes around the world are all close to subduction zones and they spew forth the lighter rock that appears to have been subducted, so what happens to all the carbon bearing materials? A lot comes out as CO2, but what about all the carbon which is not oxidised?
“I thought that ALL oil deposits contain micro fossils, and so MUST be organic in manufacture. Coal certainly does, I have the impressions of fern leaves to prove it.”
from the book below, plants contain magnesium based porphyrins, animals contain iron based porphyrins. the porphyrins (microfossils) in oil are not magnesium or iron based, they are largely vanadium, nickel, gold and heavier metal based porphyrins. if these oil porphyrins come from biological matter, then we should expect most of them to be magnesium and iron, but we don’t see any. more likely life came from oil than the other way around. you may have impressions of ferns in coal, but does that prove it? what about fern fossils where half of the fossil is coal and the half of the fossil is rock?
http://www.amazon.com/Deep-Hot-Biosphere-Fossil-Fuels/dp/0387952535/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1314619984&sr=8-1
Ralph, one of the theories of coal formation is that abiotic methane and oil seep upward into a swamp, which both removes oxygen from the water and loads the plants (or peat) with hydrocarbons. Burial of the resulting mess then creates very interesting fossilization situations. A variation is that a layer of buried organic matter gets infused with hydrocarbons when a seep hits an impermeable cap layer — the permeable organic layer becomes coal because the hydrocarbons can seep through it, rather than the organic matter being the origin of the hydrocarbons.
Two comments: Abiogenetic gas is a fact – methane from carbonates and H2O isn’t difficult at the pressures and temperatures deep in the earth. Polymerization of the gas to liquid is more of a problem, but, in principle, could at least theoretically occur.
Diamonds from gas phase, are reasonably easy to produce, and are commercially used in some high-priced cutting tools. Diamond plated edges are SHARP! They also oxidize when they get too hot, so don’t expect to see them for kinetic machining (the kinetic energy in the workpiece is used to melt the chip for easier removal – sparks literally fly).
Ralph says:
August 29, 2011 at 1:13 am
Couple of points:
I thought that ALL oil deposits contain micro fossils, and so MUST be organic in manufacture. Coal certainly does, I have the impressions of fern leaves to prove it.
———
All oil fields contain chemical markers that can be traced to the organic sedimentary source rock.
——-
John Marshall says:
August 29, 2011 at 1:42 am
Certainly petroleum has been found in crystalline rock but whether that is as a source rock or a store rock is the discussion. It would be very exciting if this energy source were to be formed in the deep earth.
———
All oil found in non-sedimentary rocks can be shown to have migrated through cracks.
Carbonate rocks are subducted back into the asthenophere, so carbon is getting into the depths, likely many hundreds of miles down as the subducting slab melts. Thus any such carbon compounds that one claims is abiotic is in fact just recycled biotic carbon.
joshua Corning says:
August 29, 2011 at 12:36 am
““then it must originate in the residual energy of planet formation.”
Not necessarily…there are theories that there is a nuclear fission process going on in the earth’s core.”
That’s a fact, not a theory. It’s why petroleum contains a varying amount of Helium – alpha particles are Helium cores.