From the NASA Jet Propulsion Lab

NASA Satellites Detect Pothole on Road to Higher Seas
An Update from NASA’s Sea Level Sentinels:
Like mercury in a thermometer, ocean waters expand as they warm. This, along with melting glaciers and ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica, drives sea levels higher over the long term. For the past 18 years, the U.S./French Jason-1, Jason-2 and Topex/Poseidon spacecraft have been monitoring the gradual rise of the world’s ocean in response to global warming.
While the rise of the global ocean has been remarkably steady for most of this time, every once in a while, sea level rise hits a speed bump. This past year, it’s been more like a pothole: between last summer and this one, global sea level actually fell by about a quarter of an inch, or half a centimeter.
So what’s up with the down seas, and what does it mean? Climate scientist Josh Willis of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., says you can blame it on the cycle of El Niño and La Niña in the Pacific.
Willis said that while 2010 began with a sizable El Niño, by year’s end, it was replaced by one of the strongest La Niñas in recent memory. This sudden shift in the Pacific changed rainfall patterns all across the globe, bringing massive floods to places like Australia and the Amazon basin, and drought to the southern United States.
Data from the NASA/German Aerospace Center’s twin Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (Grace) spacecraft provide a clear picture of how this extra rain piled onto the continents in the early parts of 2011. “By detecting where water is on the continents, Grace shows us how water moves around the planet,” says Steve Nerem, a sea level scientist at the University of Colorado in Boulder.
So where does all that extra water in Brazil and Australia come from? You guessed it–the ocean. Each year, huge amounts of water are evaporated from the ocean. While most of it falls right back into the ocean as rain, some of it falls over land. “This year, the continents got an extra dose of rain, so much so that global sea levels actually fell over most of the last year,” says Carmen Boening, a JPL oceanographer and climate scientist. Boening and colleagues presented these results recently at the annual Grace Science Team Meeting in Austin, Texas.
But for those who might argue that these data show us entering a long-term period of decline in global sea level, Willis cautions that sea level drops such as this one cannot last, and over the long-run, the trend remains solidly up. Water flows downhill, and the extra rain will eventually find its way back to the sea. When it does, global sea level will rise again.
“We’re heating up the planet, and in the end that means more sea level rise,” says Willis. “But El Niño and La Niña always take us on a rainfall rollercoaster, and in years like this they give us sea-level whiplash.”
For more information on NASA’s sea level monitoring satellites, visit: http://sealevel.jpl.nasa.gov/ , http://sealevel.colorado.edu , http://www.csr.utexas.edu/grace/ and http://grace.jpl.nasa.gov/ .
h/t to WUWT reader “Pete”
==========================================
[UPDATE by willis]
I trust that Anthony won’t mind if I expand a bit on this question. NASA adduces the following map (Figure 2) showing where they claim the water went.
Figure 2. GRACE satellite changes in land water. Note that for all of the screaming about Greenland melting … it gained ice over the period of the year. In any case, red and blue areas are somewhere near equal, as would be more apparent if they didn’t use a Mercator projection that exaggerates the blue area in the Northern hemisphere.
The sea level was going up at about 3 mm per year. In the last year it fell about 6 mm. So that’s a change of about a centimetre of water that NASA says has fallen on land and been absorbed rather than returned to the ocean. But of course, the land is much smaller than the ocean … so for the ocean to change by a centimetre, the land has to change about 2.3 cm.
To do that, the above map would have to average a medium blue well up the scale … and it’s obvious from the map that there’s no way that’s happening. So I hate to say this, but their explanation doesn’t … hold water …
I suspected I’d find this when I looked, because in the original press release the authors just said:
“This year, the continents got an extra dose of rain, so much so that global sea levels actually fell over most of the last year,” says Carmen Boening.
When people make claims like that, with no numbers attached, my Urban Legend Detector™ goes off like crazy … and in this case, it was right.
Best to all, thanks to Anthony.
w.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

“This year, the continents got an extra dose of rain, .”
I wonder how much of it fell on Antarctica as snow?
Infuriating.
It’s getting harder and harder to be warmist these days. One have to explain away:
– cooling
– decreasing sea level
– increasing global sea ice (coming soon)
– decreasing atmospheric CO2 (coming soon)
…
The post reads: “Willis said that while 2010 began with a sizable El Niño, by year’s end, it was replaced by one of the strongest La Niñas in recent memory.”
The only ENSO index showing the 2010/11 La Nina as being “the strongest La Niñas in recent memory” is the MEI. It’s not the strongest based on NINO3.4 SST anomalies or NINO3.4 Sea Level anomalies:
http://i53.tinypic.com/wi4lc0.jpg
We discussed the impacts of ENSO on Sea Level not too long ago, beating NASA to the punch on this one:
http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/1st-quarter-2011-sea-level-anomaly-update-and-an-initial-look-at-the-impacts-of-enso-on-global-sea-level/
And the cross post here at WUWT:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/08/18/tisdale-on-2011-sea-level-changes/
So, like how long does it take rain to make it back to the ocean? When it rains here in New Hampshire, the river level respond quickly, then drop over a few days. In the summer, trees suck the ground dry pretty quickly.
OTOH, how long does it take snow to make it back to the ocean? It has to melt first. Perhaps not all of the snow from last winter melted yet, it certainly took (is taking) its jolly good time in the northwest US and I hear is piling up in New Zealand.
Or perhaps I’m just having trouble wrapping my head around “sea level has hit a pothole.”
Hmm. When we were discussing the divergence between Detrended Sea Level Anomalies and the MEI…
http://i51.tinypic.com/b5l007.jpg
…on this thread…
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/08/18/tisdale-on-2011-sea-level-changes/
…I don’t recall precipitation being discussed. That’ll give me another place to look if I ever get back to it again.
So , sea levels have dropped globally because of heavy precipitation , eh ? This sounds like the same reasoning that leads to “experts” claiming that cooling is masking the warming . Or that the Mt. Pinatubo eruption is somehow responsible for the flattening of temps over a decade after the fact .
Two points:
@ur momisugly Bob Tisdale, Willis said “one of the strongest La Niñas” but you are criticizing him as if he said “the strongest La Niñas”. Surely you understand the difference.
Second point, perhaps some of this extra precipitation (which is lowering sea levels) will see fit to stay underground and help recharge the world’s aquifers — the same aquifers that have been raising sea level as we pumped them dry to run into the sea.
Doesn’t this depend on how long Willis’s memory is?
Obviously this could have nothing to do global temps flat-lining for the past 10 years. If that was the case, and all other variables equal, that could mean the sea level rise deceleration has reached a point where we’ll see no more increases for a decade or two – or even some more reductions.
“JPL oceanographer AND climate scientist”
###
I guess all it takes is staying on-message to be ranked a climate scientist.
I don’t see what all the questioning is about. Zero said he was going to lower the sea level and he did! Just sayin’.
Only some rainwater, less than 30% (according to the USGS), makes it back to the ocean, the rest goes underground or back into the sky.
http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/earthrain.html
But I guess any excuse will do for pretending that natural cycles are more important than man made models. But that’s the curse of AGM (Anthropogenic Global Modelling)…..
“We’re heating up the planet, and in the end that means more sea level rise,” says Willis.
This line pretty much sums up this mindless bit of press release pablum.
Let’s see, looks like we are headed to a double dip La Nina so if Josh is correct, we may not see the bottom of the pot hole until some time next summer. Gavin Schmidt has maintained that sea level change (which is related to total ocean heat content) is a good indicator of climate direction. This will be interesting to watch.
“Like mercury in a thermometer, ocean waters expand as they warm.”
But oceans do not warm.
http://climexp.knmi.nl/data/ihadsst2gl_2001:2011a.png
“This, along with melting glaciers and ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica..”
Antarctica cools in the last decades and sea ice pack grows. What’s meting exactly there?
Josh is an as*****.
“Willis cautions that sea level drops such as this one cannot last, and over the long-run, the trend remains solidly up”
So, sea level decrease cannot happen? What about the LIttle Ice Age and all of the other evidence of changing sea level up and down over the ages? SUre the trend is upwards at the moment, but knowing that climate both warms and cools, he sure seems bent on seeing it only one way, particularly in the face of two cooling ocean cycles and a somnambulant Sun.
“We’re heating up the planet, and in the end that means more sea level rise,” says Willis.
The fact that warming has not occurred in 15 years or so does not seem to affect his world view. He reminds me of those who think that the Flintstones is a documentary.
I am getting confused again. Last year the Warmista were telling me that the floods and droughts were because of global warming. Now they need to have the floods and droughts caused by La Nina/El Nino so that they can use it to explain falling sea levels, but Global warming is still going to make the sea level rise again after its finished whatever it is off doing this year, (Alerting Aliens to our presence perhaps). I need them to get their story straight. It is enough to make one want to row to a random point in the Canadian arctic to get away from it all.
TheGoodLocust says:
August 24, 2011 at 8:25 am
lex parsimoniae is decidedly absent from the typical hysteric’s toolbox. Elegant simplicity is so yesterday… When you are the product of years of elaborate conspiracy theories and a general lack of professional accountability, it is an easy jump to the convoluted and labyrinthine “CO2 causes everything” consensus.
We’re heating up the planet, and in the end that means more sea level rise,” says Willis.
That is only partly true. I found the CO2 acts as a fertilizer, increasing vegetation.
It is the increased vegetation causing the (extra) warming
So now what?
We have to tell the greenies to stop planting trees and gardens.
http://www.letterdash.com/HenryP/more-carbon-dioxide-is-ok-ok
Doesn’t La Nina reduce energy transfer from ocean to air such that ocean heat content and thus ocean volume should RISE and not fall ?
Bob Tisdale has previously referred to El Nino as a discharge of energy and La Nina as a recharge.
If that were so then the only reason for a FALL during La Nina would be a reduction of solar energy getting into the oceans sufficient to more than offset the recharge ability of the La Nina.
That puts global albedo back in the frame because it seems to have been increasing over recent years.
As regards the speculation about the missing volume having gone into more rainfall over land isn’t that effect an order of magnitude or more LESS than that required to alter total ocean volume by the amount implied from the observations ?
Pullease. Water flows down hill?
And it never gets captured in aquifers or underground streams and lakes?
My biggest problem with this cm level data here is the overall accuracy of 3 cms:
http://sealevel.jpl.nasa.gov/technology/
So all this is basically in the noise.
Dr. Jay Cadbury, phd.
This is a little bit off topic, but I find it hysterical that Lucia who runs the Blackboard site will not post temperatures of the arctic. She is obsessed with ice melting but apparently doesn’t want to understand why the ice is melting. It is truly amazing that they scream about the northern ice cap melting but refuse to show temperatures. I guess the only answer is that global warming is affecting the wind patterns.
That’s quite a pothole for one year. Biggest drop in two decades. Even with southern New England’s oscillating freeze/thaw winters, we don’t get them that deep.
Can someone please show on that chart above when there were el nino’s and la nina’s? Then we can check whether or not the present drop is concurrent to some/all of them? It will also help to know wether each of them is causing a predictable trend (assuming of course that the ‘mean sea level’ is accurate or sensible).
The comment “…and over the long-run, the trend remains solidly up.” is borderline non-sequitur. Trends only apply to data that you already have, not the unknown future data.