On this July 4th, thank "climate disruption" for saving the USA in 1814

The President's House.
The White House ruins after the conflagration of August 24, 1814. Watercolor by George Munger, displayed at the White House - Image via Wikipedia - click on the image to find out what the s-shape is.

This is a little known story about how a tornado saved the United States from the British in the War of 1812 as they started to burn Washington, DC. Just having come from there for ICCC6, and this being Independence Day, I thought this story would be appropriate. Back then, they called it an “act of God”, if it happened today, we’d have the alarmosphere squawking that it was “climate disruption” caused by CO2. Enjoy the story – Anthony

The Tornado and the Burning of Washington, August 25, 1814

This is an excerpt from the book Washington Weather

During the summer of 1814, British warships sailed into the Chesapeake Bay and headed towards Washington. The warships sailed up the Patuxent River and anchored at Benedict, Maryland on August 19,1814. Over 4,500 British soldiers landed and marched towards Washington. The British mission was to capture Washington and seek revenge for the burning of their British Capitol in Canada, for which they held the United States responsible. A force of 7,000 Americans was hastily assembled near the Potomac River to defend Washington. During the afternoon of August 24, in 100°F heat, the two armies clashed.

The British Army quickly routed the less disciplined American volunteers, mostly due to a series of American blunders and a new British rocket that did little damage, but unnerved the raw American troops with a very loud, shrill noise. President Madison and Secretary of State Monroe, who had led a group of officials to watch the battle, were almost captured in the confusion. It was noted that the 100°F temperatures added to everyone’s discomfort.

After the battle, the British Army marched quickly into Washington while American soldiers, United States government officials, and residents fled the city. There were no officials left in Washington from whom the British could seek terms of surrender. The British admiral ate dinner in the White House, then gave the order to set fire to Washington. Within hours, the White House, the Capitol, and many other public buildings and residences were burning.

On the morning of August 25, Washington was still burning. Throughout the morning and early afternoon, the British soldiers continued to set fires and destroy ammunition supplies and defenses around the city. As the soldiers spread fire and destruction throughout the city, the early afternoon sky began to darken and lightning and thunder signaled the approach of a thunderstorm. As the storm neared the city, the winds began to increase dramatically and then built into a “frightening roar.” A severe thunderstorm was bearing down on Washington, and with it was a tornado.

The tornado tore through the center of Washington and directly into the British occupation. Buildings were lifted off of their foundations and dashed to bits. Other buildings were blown down or lost their roofs. Feather beds were sucked out of homes and scattered about. Trees were uprooted, fences were blown down, and the heavy chain bridge across the Potomac River was buckled and rendered useless. A few British cannons were picked up by the winds and thrown through the air. The collapsing buildings and flying debris killed several British soldiers. Many of the soldiers did not have time to take cover from the winds and they laid face down in the streets. One account describes how a British officer on horseback did not dismount and the winds slammed both horse and rider violently to the ground.

The winds subsided quickly, but the rain fell in torrents for two hours. (There may have been a second thunderstorm that followed quickly after the first thunderstorm.)  Fortunately, the heavy rain quenched most of the flames and prevented Washington from continuing to burn. After the storm, the British Army regrouped on Capitol Hill, still a bit shaken by the harsh weather.

They decided to leave the city that evening. As the British troops were preparing to leave, a conversation was noted between the British Admiral and a Washington lady regarding the storm:  The admiral exclaimed, “Great God, Madam! Is this the kind of storm to which you are accustomed in this infernal country?” The lady answered, “No, Sir, this is a special interposition of Providence to drive our enemies from our city.” The admiral replied, “Not so Madam. It is rather to aid your enemies in the destruction of your city.”

The United States Capitol after the burning of...
The United States Capitol after the burning of Washington, D.C. in the War of 1812. Watercolor and ink depiction from 1814, restored. Image via Wikipedia

Hours later, the British forces left Washington and returned to their ships on the Patuxent River. The journey back was made difficult by the numerous downed trees that lay across the roads. The war ships that lay waiting for the British force had also encountered the fierce storm. Wind and waves had lashed at the ships and many had damaged riggings. Two vessels had broken free from their moorings and were blown ashore.

President Madison and other government officials returned to Washington and began the difficult process of setting up government in a city devastated by fire and wind. Never again would the British Army return to the city, and only rarely would Washington suffer damaging tornadoes.

===============================================================

The 26 hour occupation of Washington DC

I found this short description on Wikipedia interesting:

Less than a day after the attack began, a sudden tornado passed through part of the city, killing British troops and American civilians alike, tossing cannons, and putting out most of the fires.This forced the British troops to return to their ships, many of which were badly damaged by the storm, and so the actual occupation of Washington lasted about 26 hours.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

71 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Phil's Dad
July 4, 2011 6:41 pm

Just a family disagreement. Seems the previous generation put a stop to it.

Frank K.
July 4, 2011 6:48 pm

“It was noted that the 100°F temperatures added to everyone’s discomfort.”
Whoa…hold on!! How could this be? 100°F?? Everyone knows that the Earth was cold in the 19th century before we started burning fossil fuels!
/cagw

Bill Marsh
July 4, 2011 6:57 pm

Semper Fi, do or die, …

Jared
July 4, 2011 7:24 pm

It was 100 degrees back then, but now due to horrible man it would be 100.6 degrees. The travesty.

Hoser
July 4, 2011 7:35 pm

Years ago, I’d heard it was a hurricane. The event possibly was known as the “Hurricane of Providence”. I have not found a second reference to confirm the name. Apparently, the hurricane spawned a tornado.
http://symonsez.wordpress.com/2010/06/18/hurricane-of-providence-saved-washington-dc-and-perhaps-the-nation/
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Burning_of_Washington

July 4, 2011 7:55 pm

That was the day the ORIGINAL 13th Amendment was delivered to the Library of Congress.
The just-ratifed (by NH) Amendment banned members of the BAR from serving in Congress and, the British were attempting to destroy all records of it.
America, look at Washington, DC… what is the percentage of attorneys to non-attorneys… hmmm.

July 4, 2011 7:57 pm

100*F, or 100*C?
LOL
Let’s see: East Coast of the USA, in July, 100*F and probably 95% humidity – if I remember correctly. NORMAL!

Brian H
July 4, 2011 7:59 pm

Frank K. says:
July 4, 2011 at 6:48 pm
“It was noted that the 100°F temperatures added to everyone’s discomfort.”
Whoa…hold on!! How could this be? 100°F?? Everyone knows that the Earth was cold in the 19th century before we started burning fossil fuels!
/cagw

Severe weather (and variability) and storms are much worse in cold global conditions, due to the increased steepness of the temp. gradients tropics-poles. The ‘meeting line’ between cold and warm air masses also moves further south.

rbateman
July 4, 2011 8:15 pm

Frank K. says:
July 4, 2011 at 6:48 pm
Just because the climate turned cold does not mean you cannot have hot weather.
I believe David Archibald and others have covered this point. In a cold climate, you have regular weather plus brutally cold weather. The really bad winters hit randomly, and often bunch up in 2 to 3 year onslaughts. That’s a climactic warning shot across the bow: Do not be fooled by one hot summer in an otherwise cold climate. The past 3 winters should suffice to drive home where the climate is heading. It drove the British out in 1814, and it hit the US this year, as the southerly bounds of cold air clashed with Gulf air. 2 years later, 1816, we all know what that was called. Does history repeat itself? Ask Joe Bastardi. He knows this stuff.

July 4, 2011 8:16 pm

“Many of the soldiers … laid face down in the streets.” The past tense of the intransitive verb to lie is lay, not laid.

savethesharks
July 4, 2011 8:21 pm

Jeff Brodhead says:
July 4, 2011 at 7:57 pm
100*F, or 100*C?
LOL
Let’s see: East Coast of the USA, in July, 100*F and probably 95% humidity – if I remember correctly. NORMAL!
==========================
Yes, Jeff, except your humidity number for our summers here is off by an order of magnitude.
It is usually about 950%.
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA

July 4, 2011 8:36 pm

Interesting! But the idea that the tornado stopped the Brits doesn’t really hold water.
Basically the Brits had burned everything that would burn, and then the tornado came along and destroyed several things that wouldn’t burn. It didn’t stop the Brits, it picked up where they left off!

Editor
July 4, 2011 8:40 pm

Jared says:
July 4, 2011 at 7:24 pm
> It was 100 degrees back then, but now due to horrible man it would be 100.6 degrees. The travesty.
GISS probably corrects it to 96.6°F.

Doug in Seattle
July 4, 2011 8:41 pm

I too had heard this was a hurricane rather than a tornado.

vigilantfish
July 4, 2011 8:55 pm

“The British mission was to capture Washington and seek revenge for the burning of their British Capitol in Canada, for which they held the United States responsible.
———
A strange turn of phrase. I’m American-born, and now also a Canadian citizen, living in the once-capital of Upper Canada, then known as York, but now called Toronto. There is no question that this city was burned and looted by American forces in 1813 – including private residences and private property, which was the grounds upon which the British government authorized the retaliatory attack. Unfortunately there were casualties on both sides, but the incident does add some much-needed excitement to Canadian history.
The British-built Fort York near Lake Ontario in downtown Toronto today is a museum well worth visiting, and summer visitors are much less likely to encounter crippling 100 degree F temperatures (which is, incidentally, generally the temperature range I’ve experienced during my visits to beautiful Washington). Tornadoes may be about as common here as in Washington. I’m glad the two nations have largely overcome their differences since then, but saddened by the post-9/11 need for heightened security at the Canada-US borders.

u.k.(us)
July 4, 2011 9:17 pm

David Thomasq says:
July 4, 2011 at 8:16 pm
“Many of the soldiers … laid face down in the streets.” The past tense of the intransitive verb to lie is lay, not laid.
=========
Is this all you took away from this post? 🙂

Hoser
July 4, 2011 9:25 pm

David Thomasq says:
July 4, 2011 at 8:16 pm
“Many of the soldiers … laid face down in the streets.” The past tense of the intransitive verb to lie is lay, not laid.

However, it is correct to say politicians in Washington, D.C., lied down in the street.

Michael
July 4, 2011 10:25 pm

After all we’ve been through, we finally have “Global Cooling”
Here’s proof;
China Coal Consumption Linked To Global Cooling
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/04/global-warming-china-air-pollution_n_889897.html#comments

Ed Dahlgren
July 4, 2011 10:27 pm

[blockquote]vigilantfish says:
July 4, 2011 at 8:55 pm
Unfortunately there were casualties on both sides {of the Battle of York}….[/blockquote]
Including the death of U.S. Brigadier General Zebulon Pike (Jr.), leader in 1806 – 1807 of what is now considered an espionage mission into northern Mexico (now southern Colorado and New Mexico) and the man after whom Pikes Peak was named.
— Ed

Ed Dahlgren
July 4, 2011 10:29 pm

vigilantfish says:
July 4, 2011 at 8:55 pm
Unfortunately there were casualties on both sides {of the Battle of York}….

Including the death of U.S. Brigadier General Zebulon Pike (Jr.), leader in 1806 – 1807 of what is now considered an espionage mission into northern Mexico (now southern Colorado and New Mexico) and the man after whom Pikes Peak was named.
– Ed

AlanG
July 4, 2011 10:34 pm

I remember sitting in the senate public gallery some years ago listening to the tour guide talking about the fire. The audience seethed with indignation. There was no mention of the burning of Toronto of course. Nowadays we Brits would probably be cheered. Tea (party) anyone? Anyway, Washington was only a village then. Still is, populated by village idiots.

rbateman
July 4, 2011 10:43 pm

polistra says:
July 4, 2011 at 8:36 pm
The British General was just as horrified by the climate catastrophe as today’s alarmists are hyping up things that we already know happen.
Imagine, though, 197 years ago, 100 degree heat in Washington DC, no pavement, tarmacs or parking lots, and the soldiers are fighting and BURNING. No, it wasn’t the heat and smoke and raging fires that got to the General, it was the storm coming out of nowhere that flung thier canon and made the soldiers hit the dirt, plus the damaged fleet.
The poor General experienced something the Brits were totally oblivious to. He didn’t freak out, though, but he had enough sense to beat feet.
Point is, if something in the weather were to happen tomorrow that had not been documented before, the headlines would be Run For Your Lives…It’s Global Warming.

James Evans
July 4, 2011 10:58 pm

Standing outside the Whitehouse a number of years ago, I made a joke about the building being burned down in 1814. My two friends, noticing the men in black on the roof, quietly moved to one side. I thought at the time that this illustrated how the events of 1814 are an issue which clearly still has the ability to divide us – if only between those with good enough eyesight to spot the snipers on the roof, and those without.

Martin Brumby
July 4, 2011 11:02 pm

Well, that’s what you get from burning a load of stuff.
Produces lots of that dreadful pollutant CO2, you know.
It is scientifically proven that CO2 causes lightening / thunder / frightening roars / tornados / winds / rain in torrents / buckling bridges / loose cannon / flying feather beds and broken rigging.
That’s why we have to “decarbonise the economy”. NOW!
\sarc.

Perry
July 4, 2011 11:16 pm

It would appear from the description that a Divine Wind saved the USA, in a similar manner to the Kamikaze typhoons that rescued the Japanese from Kublai Khan’s troops.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamikaze_%28typhoon%29
In its way, the Washington tornado event was as portentious as the moment King Harold II removed his helmet to mop his brow during the Battle of Hastings in 1066 & copped a Norman arrow in his eye.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_hastings
By such small incidents are the fates of nations determined.

1 2 3
Verified by MonsterInsights