![latest_512_4500[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/latest_512_45001.jpg?resize=512%2C512&quality=83)
See: BREAKING – major AAS solar announcement: Sun’s Fading Spots Signal Big Drop in Solar Activity
From NASA’s Jet Propulsion Lab website:
Since 1611, humans have recorded the comings and goings of black spots on the sun. The number of these sunspots waxes and wanes over approximately an 11-year cycle — more sunspots generally mean more activity and eruptions on the sun and vice versa. The number of sunspots can change from cycle to cycle, and 2008 saw the longest and weakest solar minimum since scientists have been monitoring the sun with space-based instruments.
Observations have shown, however, that magnetic effects on Earth due to the sun, effects that cause the aurora to appear, did not go down in synch with the cycle of low magnetism on the sun. Now, a paper in Annales Geophysicae that appeared on May 16, 2011 reports that these effects on Earth did in fact reach a minimum — indeed they attained their lowest levels of the century — but some eight months later. The scientists believe that factors in the speed of the solar wind, and the strength and direction of the magnetic fields embedded within it, helped produce this anomalous low.
“Historically, the solar minimum is defined by sunspot number,” says space weather scientist Bruce Tsurutani at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., who is first author on the paper. “Based on that, 2008 was identified as the period of solar minimum. But the geomagnetic effects on Earth reached their minimum quite some time later, in 2009. So we decided to look at what caused the geomagnetic minimum.”

Geomagnetic effects basically amount to any magnetic changes on Earth due to the sun, and they’re measured by magnetometer readings on the surface of the Earth. Such effects are usually harmless, with the only obvious sign of their presence being the appearance of auroras near the poles. However, in extreme cases, they can cause power grid failures on Earth or induce dangerous currents in long pipelines, so it is valuable to know how the geomagnetic effects vary with the sun.
Three things help determine how much energy from the sun is transferred to Earth’s magnetosphere from the solar wind: the speed of the solar wind, the strength of the magnetic field outside Earth’s bounds (known as the interplanetary magnetic field) and which direction it is pointing, since a large southward component is necessary to connect successfully to Earth’s magnetosphere and transfer energy. The team — which also included Walter Gonzalez and Ezequiel Echer of the Brazilian National Institute for Space Research in São José dos Campos, Brazil — examined each component in turn.
First, the researchers noted that in 2008 and 2009, the interplanetary magnetic field was the lowest it had been in the history of the space age. This was an obvious contribution to the geomagnetic minimum. But since the geomagnetic effects didn’t drop in 2008, it could not be the only factor.
To examine the speed of the solar wind, they turned to NASA’s Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE), which is in interplanetary space outside the Earth’s magnetosphere, approximately 1 million miles toward the sun. The ACE data showed that the speed of the solar wind stayed high during the sunspot minimum. Only later did it begin a steady decline, correlating to the timing of the decline in geomagnetic effects.
The next step was to understand what caused this decrease. The team found a culprit in something called coronal holes. Coronal holes are darker, colder areas within the sun’s outer atmosphere. Fast solar wind shoots out the center of coronal holes at speeds up to 500 miles per second, but wind flowing out of the sides slows down as it expands into space.
“Usually, at solar minimum, the coronal holes are at the sun’s poles,” says Giuliana de Toma, a solar scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research whose research on this topic helped provide insight for this paper. “Therefore, Earth receives wind from only the edges of these holes, and it’s not very fast. But in 2007 and 2008, the coronal holes were not confined to the poles as normal.”

Those coronal holes lingered at low latitudes to the end of 2008. Consequently, the center of the holes stayed firmly pointed towards Earth, sending fast solar wind in Earth’s direction. Only as they finally appeared closer to the poles in 2009 did the speed of the solar wind at Earth begin to slow down. And, of course, the geomagnetic effects and sightings of the aurora along with it.
Coronal holes seem to be responsible for minimizing the southward direction of the interplanetary magnetic field as well. The solar wind’s magnetic fields oscillate on the journey from the sun to Earth. These fluctuations are known as Alfvén waves. The wind coming out of the centers of the coronal holes has large fluctuations, meaning that the southward magnetic component – like that in all the directions — is fairly large. The wind that comes from the edges, however, has smaller fluctuations, and comparably smaller southward components. So, once again, coronal holes at lower latitudes would have a better chance of connecting with Earth’s magnetosphere and causing geomagnetic effects, while mid-latitude holes would be less effective.
Working together, these three factors — low interplanetary magnetic field strength, combined with slower solar wind speed and smaller magnetic fluctuations due to coronal hole placement — create the perfect environment for a geomagnetic minimum.
Knowing what situations cause and suppress intense geomagnetic activity on Earth is a step toward better predicting when such events might happen. To do so well, Tsurutani points out, requires focusing on the tight connection between such effects and the complex physics of the sun. “It’s important to understand all of these features better,” he says. “To understand what causes low interplanetary magnetic fields and what causes coronal holes in general. This is all part of the solar cycle. And all part of what causes effects on Earth.”
Written by Karen C. Fox
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
The “big question” by alarmists is, how can it get warmer on earth during a solar minimum ?
I told everyone that when I got my H alpha solar telescope a year ago that sun spots would be a thing of the past. They all laughed at me. Now will you believe me?
Summary
In 1990, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) noted that the greatest single
impact of climate change could be on human migration—with millions of people displaced by
shoreline erosion, coastal flooding and agricultural disruption. Since then various analysts have tried
to put numbers on future flows of climate migrants (sometimes called ‘climate refugees’)—the most
widely repeated prediction being 200 million forced climate migrants by 2050.
http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2007-2008/papers/brown_oli.pdf
They were right. but for some other reasons.
Agricultural disruption is still a good one.
Here we have the “Fallen Angels” scenario. http://www.amazon.com/Fallen-Angels-Larry-Niven/dp/0743471814/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1308085879&sr=1-1
Silly people!
The low geomagnetic field can be easily explained.
Magnetism is affected by temperature and goes away at a certain point (Curie temperature). Obviously the earth is approaching it’s Currie temperature (due to global warming) and is losing its magnetic field.
and 2008 saw the longest and weakest solar minimum since scientists have been monitoring the sun with space-based instruments.
===============================================================================
I hate it when people do this…..it’s like they are trying to hide something or fudge something
Why not just say “since 1965” or something like that?
Does anyone know what time frame they are talking about?
So when we enter another Maunder Minimum-style Little Ice Age, will it be blamed on CO2?
I’m sure the Rube Goldberg-style explanation of how global warming caused it is being crafted as we speak (or type).
Latitude : The first space-based solar observing satellite was OSO1, launched in 1962.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSO_1
This is of course the biggest story on climate ever for our generation. Unfortunately like climate it is a very slow process and we may not experience the worst parts of it. However our children and theirs are likely to and this could have incredible repercussion (s@ur momisugly@@ur momisugly, im sounding like the worst type warmistas Joe Romm etc)!. I am now living in a tropical country and seriously considering becoming a citizen so I can stay here when the ice creeps over New York. This is one of the reasons. I would be interested in getting feedback on the time lapse for the real cold to start based on this suns last 11 years activity
“The “big question” by alarmists is, how can it get warmer on earth during a solar minimum ?”
What I believe is a major contributor is a change in the spectral balance of solar radiation. While the total TSI might not change much, if the spectral distribution of that energy changes, it can have considerable impact. I recently read that recent measurements of the Sun showed less energy in the UV portion of the spectrum. UV light penetrates deeper into the ocean than any other portion of the spectrum. It is also the most energetic of the light reaching Earth. It might be that this reduced UV is resulting in less energy absorption by the oceans. This would be reflected by cooler atmospheric temperatures.
Does anyone know if a site that provides public access to solar spectral distribution data that can be viewed and tracked over time?
Did Miss C Fox mean to say “effect on climate.
Is the Sun getting tired of all that malarky about a warming effect of CO2 and going to teach us something about magnetic solar cooling?
This is the one thing that I think will stop the whole global warming movement in its track MSM are now disseminating the story worldwide http://news.google.com.au/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=solar+activity&btnmeta_news_search=Search+News
Latitude says:
June 14, 2011 at 2:24 pm
Does anyone know what time frame they are talking about?
Since 1962, but this is again a bit misleading, as the solar wind in 2008-2009 was down to what it was around 1900, so it is not that the recent minimum is unprecedented. BTW, shouldn’t the climate now not be like that around 1900 is the sun is a major driver? Or are we still climbing out of the Little Ice Age, and perhaps will continue to do that as long as temperatures go up? 🙂
Just heard on the radio about the prediction of a minimum. No mention of how it would effect weather, though. Did the Maunder Minimum correspond to a cold period?
Leif: “Or are we still climbing out of the Little Ice Age, and perhaps will continue to do that as long as temperatures go up”
Good question. I’m trying to see what the state of the PDO and AMO were at that time. These factors could answer your question… Where’s BobTisdale when you need him?
Aren’t we into the 12000 year area of an Interglacial period? Don’t these periods last around 12000 years?
Maybe we need to get some solar panels to keep the house going when the magnetic stuff happens and wipes out the electicity grid!
Maybe the sun did it!
We it seems have plenty of room for speculation on the beginning of the next cold period. I, for what it is worth, think that we have already entered the next cold/cool period. The real question is how cold and how long. By time frames we are at a point where several of the sun’s cycles are coming into sync at least according to several of the articles I have read here on WUWT. Perhaps it may be time for we in the deep south of the US to start looking at food crops needing shorter growing periods. I did hear on the news that the congress was considering removing the “bonus for ethanol production” dumb thing to start with. Any way just my scattered thoughts.
Bill Derryberry
Lief, no, but we should be heading there.
Lief, only if the activity was similarly high prior to 1900.
Aaron, please learn to spell Leif’s name correctly
Roberto Carioca says:
June 14, 2011 at 2:52 pm
And meantime nobody has a clue that it is happening thanks to the fact that media science editors have been carrying water for the global warming crowd. But we do! Heck, we even have our very own tamed solar physicist! The next 20-30 years should be interesting. I expect we will all be watching the Watts Up With That? Network by then.
Sean Peake says: “Where’s BobTisdale when you need him?”
Right here reading your comment and wondering what you’d like to know.
Thanks Anything, thanks Leif
I hate it when people do that. He obviously knew that time frame.
Leif Svalgaard says:
June 14, 2011 at 3:13 pm
BTW, shouldn’t the climate now not be like that around 1900 is the sun is a major driver?
====================================================================
dunno, is there a lag involved?
Do we even know that?
The 1920’s were a mess, and that led to the 30’s-40’s drought and dust bowl.
Thanks.
Sorry Leif, fingers and brain don’t always co-operate. Pain, swelling, nerve problems. Of course, that’s only an excuse, lately I’ve have the phonic Leef in my head rather than Life.
Hi Bob, please tell the proles (like me) the climatic implications of a Maunder Minimum. I’m asking because the radio report I heard didn’t mention the implications at all.