
Study based on fossil sloth dung found in desert caves and packrat middens
From the US Geological Survey, because doing mapping and boundary lines are sooo yesterday:
Uncertain Future for Joshua Trees Projected with Climate Change
FLAGSTAFF, Ariz. — Temperature increases resulting from climate change in the Southwest will likely eliminate Joshua trees from 90 percent of their current range in 60 to 90 years, according to a new study led by U.S. Geological Survey ecologist Ken Cole.
The research team used models of future climate, an analysis of the climatic tolerances of the species in its current range, and the fossil record to project the future distribution of Joshua trees. The study concludes that the species could be restricted to the northernmost portion of its current range as early as the end of this century. Additionally, the ability of Joshua trees to migrate via seed dispersal to more suitable climates may be severely limited.
“This is one of the most interesting research projects of my career,” said Ken Cole, a USGS ecologist and the study’s lead author. “It incorporated not only state-of-the-art climate models and modern ecology, but also documentary information found in fossils that are more than 20,000 years old.”
By using fossil sloth dung found in desert caves and packrat middens — basically, the garbage piles of aptly named packrats — scientists were able to reconstruct how Joshua trees responded to a sudden climate warming around 12,000 years ago that was similar to warming projections for this century. Prior to its extinction around 13,000 years ago, the Shasta ground sloth favored Joshua trees as food, and its fossilized dung contained abundant remains of Joshua trees, including whole seeds and fruits. These fossil deposits, along with fossil leaves collected and stored by packrats, allowed scientists to determine the tree’s formerly broad range before the warming event.
The study concluded that the ability of Joshua trees to spread into suitable habitat following the prehistoric warming event around 12,000 years ago was limited by the extinction of large animals that had previously dispersed its seeds over large geographic areas, particularly the Shasta ground sloth. Today, Joshua tree seeds are dispersed by seed-caching rodents, such as squirrels and packrats, which cannot disperse seeds as far as large mammals. The limited ability of rodents to disperse Joshua tree seeds in combination with other factors would likely slow migration to only about 6 feet per year, not enough to keep pace with the warming climate, Cole and his colleagues concluded.
The Joshua tree, a giant North American yucca, occupies desert grasslands and shrublands of the Mojave Desert of California, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah; Joshua Tree National Park in California is named after this iconic species. The Joshua tree is known for its distinctive shape and height of up to 50 feet.
Results of the study, “Past and ongoing shifts in Joshua tree distribution support future modeled range contraction,” appear in a current edition of “Ecological Applications.” The research team included Kenneth L. Cole, U.S. Geological Survey; Kirsten Ironside, Northern Arizona University; Jon Eischeid, NOAA Earth Systems Research Laboratory; Gregg Garfin, University of Arizona; Phillip B. Duffy, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and University of California; and Chris Toney, USDA Forest Service.
But the seeds could be dispersed by a new species of large mammal — man.
“The research team used models of future climate,……..” YAWN!
I don’t see any decline in Joshua trees. They do quite well in blazing heat and bitter cold.
Biggest thing that kills them is too much water and being knocked over from strong winds.
Are they implying that there was a similar spike in temps before AGW?
Let me see if I’ve got this. It’s been fine in the Mojave Desert for 12000 years but now it’s doomed. Who could argue with that?
gee, maybe their territory shrank during the Little Ice Age ? who knows ? certainly not this bunch of morons …
Looks like this is the stuff they are referring to for the dramatic climate change 11700 years ago.
http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Greenland_Ice_Cores_Shows_Drastic_Climate_Change_Near_End_Of_Ice_Age_999.html
Not even Hansen has got our temperatures changing this much! Can anybody tell me how the climate changed so much then (if the ice cores are reliable, of course) without the demon CO2 to drive it?
I always find it puzzling that a 0.7 degree temperature change that humans wouldn’t notice is supposed to kill all other life on this planet. The Joshua tree survives an 80 to 100 degree temperature shift from night to day on most days but don’t add an extra 0.7 degrees or its game over. I am insulted that these researchers think I am stupid enough to believe this crap.
I am quite apalled.
If the Joshua tree becomes extinct, then we will all be doomed.
Help – just what can we do to save ourselves?
/sarc off
Alas- the baloney from these types is astounding and seemingly never ending. I think a look at the funding will tell the tale as usual.
Aren’t we supposed to cheer for the “survival of the fittest” as the Joshua tree and the sloth are apparently following “Darwinian” evolution?!
Or is this an appeal to a higher law?
If so, which law, and is that appeal proper?
Sorry on the previous post replace that 0.7 degrees with 1.12 degrees F
Study based on fossil sloth dung…
This is the point where I had to stop for a giggle break.
I’ve got a hotter model and I say those Joshua trees will be gone in 30 to 60 years! (Now, where do I sign up for the USGS and get unlimited funding for modeling??)
It’s interesting how as the “science is settled” short-term climate predictions are steadily being discredited, new studies/ statements are appearing that extend the time-scales way beyond any currently interested person’s ability to challenge.
It is of great comfort however to learn that “state-of-the-art climate models” were used in this case rather than the older sort, which are clearly no longer state-of-the-art.
Brace yourselves for a veritable pandemic of further such research.
There may be another explaination if, in fact, the Joshua Tree population has/is declining. Perhaps the Ground Sloth eating the seeds was an element of the life cycle of the Joshua Tree. It wouldn’t be the first time.
Similar to the Dodo and the Calvaria tree in Mautitius.
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/plants/planet.html
“Some biologists believe the dodos ate the tree’s fruit, and that the trip through the bird’s stomach helped prepare the seeds for germination. But now that their partner in life is gone, only a few calvaria survive.”
Oh great, now the fossil sloth dung proxy.
After that warming 12000 years ago, did they hide the decline?
Models models, I am not scared from these flimsy predictions.
Does anyone have the temperature trend data for the Mojave Desert or near the Joshua Tree National Park?
This is the usual WUWT way to put the first stake through the heart of this dung.
-Jay
This study is based on the premise that changes in climate at the end of the last ice age are comparable to what we can expect in the near future. That’s a pretty big assumption, which, as far as I am aware, can only be supported by models.
Even so, if the Joshua trees survived the transition from ice age to present, which they apparently did (otherwise why are they there now), then why would anyone assume they would suffer through another such change?
The author’s assumption is that fossil dung is evidence that now extinct giant sloths were the primary way of spreading seeds. From that I would have to assume (great word) that there are no Joshua trees left in the SW, and that this study was a product of an over developed imagination of some “geological” ecologists.
Please… make the bad men stop. My brain can’t take it anymore.
Computer models, assumptions, guesses, wild projections, complete disregard for previous changes … what do you know? There really is a consensus!
Noted moonbat Ken Cole is at it again. Nothing about this study makes any sense. I guess the team thinks everyone is either a brainwashed greeny or is completely ignorant of the real geo-history of the American SW!
Bob (Skeptical Redcoat)
Not just Models Bob, State-of-the-Art Models.
Call me a crazed mathematician, but isn’t there something wrong with this statement?
I mean, if ground sloths went extinct 13,000 years ago, how much can they tell us about climate warming 12,000 years ago?
Shows the dangers of “science by press release”, I guess. Anyone have a copy of the actual paper?
w.
REPLY: I wondered how long it would be before somebody noticed that, good for you Willis. – A
So what happened 6000 years ago when it was 4 degrees warmer? Did the Joshua trees survive?
http://westinstenv.org/wp-content/postimage/Lappi_Greenland_ice_core_10000yrs.jpg
Squirrels and packrats only move 6′ per year? This would be incredibly slow for a snail!
So ground squirrels and pack rats only move 6 ft a year…
…and irritable climate syndrome will move faster than that
Is there nothing these scientists don’t know??
Seems they would be worried about all of those very slow squirrels and pack rats…………