Global warming is making monster marmots

Well not really, but the headline above is almost as silly as the paper. From the “I can’t stop laughing department”, some “it can’t be anything else but global warming climate change” silliness in Nature. No mention of PDO or other cycles.

They're bigger, meaner, fluffier and growing faster than pre AGW Marmots - keep watch in your backyard

In other news, Former Governor Sarah Palin is blamed for starting all this by making it Marmot Day instead of Groundhog Day in Alaska. As everyone knows, marmots can’t forecast a darn thing, but they can model. /sarc From a KU press release:

Climate change causes larger, more plentiful marmots, study shows

Finding by University of Kansas researchers is likely to have implications for many creatures that hibernate

LAWRENCE — This week, one of the world’s foremost scientific journals will publish results of a decades-long research project founded at the University of Kansas showing that mountain rodents called marmots are growing larger, healthier and more plentiful in response to climate change.

The groundbreaking study, published in Nature, is the first to reveal that changes in seasonal timing can increase body weight and population size simultaneously in a species — findings likely to have implications for a host of other creatures, especially those that hibernate.

Established by Kenneth Armitage, KU professor emeritus of ecology and evolutionary biology, the long-standing investigation tracks yellow-bellied marmots in Colorado.

“We started this research in 1962, and every summer we’d record basic demography such as the age of the animals, gender, body mass, who survived and who reproduced,” Armitage said. “At the time we started, we had no idea that climate change was going to be a problem. But we collected that basic demography to use as a foundation for other kinds of study.”

Largely because of the KU researcher, yellow-bellied marmots have proven to be a valuable model organism for understanding larger questions. Armitage said that he first chose to study the marmot because it lives in easy-to-find burrows and is active in the daytime, so it is readily observable.

“I didn’t intend to spend 40 years studying marmots, but new questions kept coming up — physiological, hibernation, genetics and so on,” Armitage said. “It turned out that long-term studies of our kind are quite rare. Yet, it’s precisely the kind of data that you need to determine what climate change is going to do.”

The climate-change findings result from collaboration between a number of international researchers who used fieldwork by Armitage to underpin their analyses. Both Arpat Ozgul, lead author of the study from Imperial College London, and Dan Blumstein, a co-author from the University of California-Los Angeles, previously have worked with Armitage on the marmot project.

Using data collected between 1976 and 2008, the authors conclude that a longer growing season has boosted marmots’ individual size, overall strength and general population. The average weight of fully grown marmots jumped from 6.82 pounds in the early years of the study to 7.56 pounds in the later half of the study.

Additionally, the population growth of marmots increased from 0.56 marmots per year from 1976 to 2001 to 14.2 marmots per year from 2001 to 2008.

“The warming results in earlier snowmelt, which means that plants appear sooner and the marmots come out of hibernation earlier,” said Armitage. “They have more fat left which provides them energy to start foraging. Then they can start reproducing so their young are born earlier and have time to get fat enough to survive hibernation. Most importantly, the reproductive female can survive better. Being able to wean her young earlier, she has a longer season and survival of adult females has increased over the last years.”

Although Armitage is happy to see the yellow-bellied marmot thrive, the KU researcher cautioned that the boom in marmots is temporary; he expects that warming could harm them in the long run because of changes in snow patterns.

“This benefit to marmots is probably short-lived,” he said. “Snow patterns both benefit and harm marmots. Prolonged snow cover in the spring increases mortality and reduces reproduction. But if there’s less snowmelt to nourish plants that marmots forage in the summer, it will severely affect them. In droughts, we’ve had very high mortality.”

###
Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 1 vote
Article Rating
134 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
crosspatch
July 21, 2010 7:38 pm

It couldn’t possibly be due to reductions in pollution levels and improvements in their native habitats over the past 40 years, could it? Or maybe the return of predatory species has allowed those who remain to have a larger food supply and grow larger because there is less competition for available food.
There could be a bazillion reasons and a half a degree of warming over 100 years probably isn’t it.

Sean Peake
July 21, 2010 7:43 pm

Poor marmots. Screwed by their own success. Marmots have been surviving in hostile alpine environment long before we came on the scene here in North America. The same old good news-bad news story from environmentalists. They should stick with polar bears.

Layne Blanchard
July 21, 2010 7:48 pm

And we paid how much to Ken Armitage for 40 years studying a useless rodent? Looks like the climate angle was thrown in to keep the money flowing…

savethesharks
July 21, 2010 7:50 pm

So I guess that could be translated over to our species….
“Global Warming….is making monster politicians.”
Enter Waxman, Gore, Markey….

Ray
July 21, 2010 7:52 pm

If they are bigger, they dig bigger holes. Could they make a hole big enough to swallow all those stupid scientist and politicians that don’t get it?
Marmots must be related to bankers… it times of economic crisis, they get fatter.

Robert Kral
July 21, 2010 7:53 pm

And they have continuous weather records, from all their field sites, dating back to 1962, right? Right? Bueller? Bueller?

July 21, 2010 7:54 pm

OK, OK, OK…
This is an obvious NEGATIVE FEEDBACK system.
Here’s the way it works:
1. GoreBull warming causes more “Groundhogs” to be born.
2. Punxsutawney Phil has Punxsutawney Fillipai, Punxsutawney George, Punxsutawney Albert, Punxsutawney Jones and Punxsutawney Mann are surrounding Punxsutawney Phil when he comes out on Groundhog day. He sees no shadow.
3. Winter is lengthened by 6 weeks.
4. The Earth cools.
5. Punxsutawney Albert, Punxsutawney Jones and Punxsutawney Mann die from lack of food.
6. Punxsutawney Phil SEES his shadow and the winter is shortened.
7. The climate warms up.
8. Punxsutawney Albert Jr., Punxsutawney Jones Jr. and Punxsutawney Mann Jr. are born.
9. Go back to step 2.
As you can see, this is a perfect “negative feedback” system, and the climate is stable.
EAT YOUR HEART OUT DR. SPENCER!
Max

ianpp
July 21, 2010 7:55 pm

Oh no.. not only will my children live in an ice free world, they will be terrorized by giant flower eating Marmots. BTW if he was studying the Vancouver Island Marmot population he may have had the exact opposite conclusion.

Barry L
July 21, 2010 8:01 pm

Sounds similar to snowshoe hares to me:
Astrology for snowshoe hares – population cycle linked to sunspots and solar cycle:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1169/is_n4_v33/ai_16971133/
Perhaps the marmots are in sync too.

Douglas Dc
July 21, 2010 8:02 pm

As a Kid my Pop and I hunted Marmots for target practice, used a .22 mag if they get bigger maybe an 3.06! How about a Boone and Crockett record, weight dressed, width
of front teeth, amount of Urine Smell ( real reason for yellow bellied Marmots).
“Careful son, they charge when wounded!”
Somebody got some grant money…

R Shearer
July 21, 2010 8:03 pm

I haven’t seen a marmot in about 2o years. I thought climate change killed them all.

Ed Caryl
July 21, 2010 8:03 pm

All animal populations cycle. Including marmots and their competition. Their competition includes anything that also eats their forage. I suspect there are fewer sheep grazing the high country.

Chris1958
July 21, 2010 8:07 pm

Has anyone looked at the methane content of marmot flatus – this could be the positive feedback that tips our world beyond redemption 🙂

Evan Jones
Editor
July 21, 2010 8:14 pm

The Marmot That Ate Cincinnati.

Evan Jones
Editor
July 21, 2010 8:14 pm

Be very afraid.

John from New Zealand
July 21, 2010 8:14 pm

I don’t know about the Marmots, but the rats and weasels are certainly getting fatter.

July 21, 2010 8:20 pm

We had a Master’s thesis from the Sierra Nevada Field Campus study the robust marmot population in the Sierra Nevada’s Sierra Buttes region in the 70’s. The population soon crashed and virtually disappeared during the 80’s and 90’s. The marmots have just started to approach previous levels these past few years.
And it doesn’t surprise me that this new study is getting published in Nature. Judging from past biology and global warming papers like the horrendous Parmesan papers, all that is required is the thinnest of connections to global warming. And those connections are often contradicted by other well established research. Parmesan’s Edith Checkerspot paper claimed extinctions due to global warming. But over 20 years of studies and controlled experiments demonstrated the butterflies’ larvae would move to open ground, and sunbathe to raise their body temperatures on average of 10-12 degrees higher than the ambient temperatures. Nature also published most of the crap biology by Pounds blaming the frog deaths on global warming with “99% certainty”, despite abundant proof of introduced Chytrid fungus which is activated at cooler temperatures. Nature’s advocacy science has corrupted good science.

tom
July 21, 2010 8:22 pm

The brainwashed masses will ‘deduce’ that man caused these FREAKS OF NATURE because we drive cars, cool our homes and prefer a warm home to a frosty home in the winter.
The breeding/feeding season is longer. So what? Prove it’s caused by man.

Howarth
July 21, 2010 8:26 pm

It was probably a good study with 40 years of accurate data. To bad he threw it all away with an absolutely idiotic AGW tie in. Did he every stop to think these guys are getting fatter because of lack of predators? I bet wolves and grizzlies just don’t bother those over grown marmots like they used to giving them ample time to forage for what ever marmots eat. What a waste.

Gary
July 21, 2010 8:30 pm

Um… Charles Darwin figured this out in 1859…

Randle Dewees
July 21, 2010 8:33 pm

Way more human activity in the mountains = way more backpacker food absconded with by the little bastards.
And this must be a typo, shouldn’t it be 0.56 to 1.42? Otherwise we in trouble.
“Additionally, the population growth of marmots increased from 0.56 marmots per year from 1976 to 2001 to 14.2 marmots per year from 2001 to 2008.”

Doug in Seattle
July 21, 2010 8:33 pm

In 1980 I spent several days at a mostly deserted alpine mineral exploration camp at Howard’s Pass in the Selwyn Mountains of the NWT (Canada). The camp was overrun by marmots who lived under the camp buildings and in collapsed stacks of drill core boxes.
I spent two summers working in the area and saw a lot of marmots, but never in the numbers present in this one place.
From my own experience I could conclude that proximity to human disturbance (camp buildings, air strip, core boxes, etc.) can positively affect marmot populations. I doubt however that I would get the funding that is likely behind a marmot study that uses climate change in its grant application.

Jimbo
July 21, 2010 8:38 pm

OT – This makes me angry and sad :>(
BBC – “A delicate, blue-hued insect has re-appeared in the UK after an interval of more than half a century……”The spread northwards across the continent seems to be associated with climate change.”
So what the hell caused them to be present in the UK over 50 years ago????
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-10718550

Dr A Burns
July 21, 2010 8:40 pm

Colorado maximum temperatures have been declining, not rising:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/07/09/colroado-summer-trends/
Mean temps have changed less that 0.1 dg F
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/07/11/rocky-mountain-highs/
Areas of warming in Colorado seem to be UHI related:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/11/a-uhi-tale-of-two-cities/

wayne
July 21, 2010 8:42 pm

This doesn’t have anything to do with the decrease in wolf population, windmill-ground hawks and eagles, or some of those other inconvenient factors does it?

1 2 3 6