
Excerpts from the Telegraph article
By Geoffrey Lean, in Bali
Rajendra Pachauri, the controversial Chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is to face an international inquiry into the performance of his organisation.
Environment and Climate ministers meeting in closed session in Bali last night insisted that an independent review should be carried out following the publicising of mistakes in its last report, and a row surrounding Dr Pachauri’s robust response to his critics. If his management is found to be at fault his position could become untenable.
Participants in the unprecedented meeting – held at the annual assembly of the Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) Governing Council in Bali – were sworn to secrecy over the decision and it is only expected to be announced after its detaled scope and composition have been worked out by UNEP and the World Meteorological Organisation, the two UN agencies that oversee the IPCC’s work.
…
The review is to report by August to allow time for its conclusions – and Dr Pachauri’s position – to be assessed before the IPCC meets for its own annual assembly in Korea in October.
Achim Steiner, UNEP’s Executive Director said that the IPCC faced a “crisis of confidence” with the public. , According to participants at the meeting, Dr Pachauri expressed regret for any mistakes that had been made, but stopped short of apologising for them. “He gave the impression of making an apology without actually doing so”, said one.
The participants add that he admitted only one mistake, a discredited prediction that the glaciers of the Himalayas would entirely melt away by 2035, for which the IPCC has already apologised. They say he described other alleged errors – such as a prediction that food production in parts of Africa might be cut in half by 2020 or the citing of studies by pressure groups rather than peer-reviewed research – as misunderstandings.
…
Their main concern has been over the aggressive way in which Dr Pachauri has responded to criticism, beginning with denouncing Indian research suggesting that the glaciers were not melting so rapidly as “voodoo science”. Many wish he would resign,. But he was reelected unopposed less than 18 months ago,and has often rejected doing so.
====================================
For a complete report, read the Telegraph article
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Cover your Butts boys.
The calvary is a coming!
IPCC in damage control mode.
“Participants in the unprecedented meeting – held at the annual assembly of the Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) Governing Council in Bali – were sworn to secrecy over the decision”
Well they sure as hell aren’t very good at keeping a sworn secret if it has already been leaked to the media! (Mental note: Never tell a UN bureaucrat my deepest darkest secrets.)
They sure took their sweet time… He’ll be gone, replaced by another true believer… IF there are any credible believers left.
Lean is a long time apologist for the AGW crew.His blogs attract a lot of ridicule on the DT site. Just FYI
climategate and the power of the bogs, are the wheels coming off.
Only 1 mistake and everything else was just a “misunderstanding”
I’m curious if he read Gavin’s statement verbatim or if he rewrote it to give a little Love Guru flavor?
Good news and I had to chuckle at reading this straight after reading about Glencoe ski centre receiving record snow:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/highlands_and_islands/8538404.stm
Robust!
On of the great villians of the global warming fraud. Pachauri- may his name live on in infamy.
Wait. The EPA is relying on his IPCC reports for story time. The EPA is not a research set up but relies on the IPCC for research which also doesn’t do research but does publish lengthy newsletters.
Patchy gate!
Robusted.
Live by the sword…….
Participants in the unprecedented meeting – held at the annual assembly of the Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) Governing Council in Bali – were sworn to secrecy over the decision and it is only expected to be announced after its detaled scope and composition have been worked out by UNEP and the World Meteorological Organisation, the two UN agencies that oversee the IPCC’s work
Why a meeting in a paradise south pacific island?. Don´t be naive, everything will be just “roses, roses” for Little ugly Patchee…
Here is what I don’t get.
These organizations are under the same umbrella of the UN and the same scientists in the same field will be reviewing what ever documents that Dr Pachauris office will allow.
This is really the UN having a scape goat for shooting off at the mouth. It will have nothing to do with the science as this would put both organizations into the frying pan.
Will research documents be opened up?
Not likely!
“The mills of God grind slowly, but they grind exceeding small.”
All a misunderstanding….
These misunderstandings are projected to cost us Trillions of dollars…..
Rather expensive misunderstandings that….
Will watch with interest…and not a small amount of cheering…
(assuming whitewash is not the colour of choice…)
Unfortunately I think this ‘crisis of confidence’ should claim many more
scalps before its over….
cheers
Jim
[Moderators… I have changed to a full name from my previous]
Their main concern has been over the aggressive way in which Dr Pachauri has responded to criticism,
And they refer to skeptics as “deniers”!
What ever happened to accountability? Oh yeah, right, that line is far away from the money wicket….
Hopefully a bloodbath will ensue and a new sheriff will install law and order to the wild, wild west of the climate frontier….when that happens we will just have to watch out for all of those flying pigs.
part of me hopes he stays there for a while longer… I have no faith in the IPCC whatsoever, and he is now a liability to them
The longer he stays, the less credible they are – the higher the chance of a complete clean slate start again approach
Too late,too little, but possibly a first step to scrap the whole IPCC altogether.
I agree, Pachauri should stay as head of the IPCC. He is unwittingly our greatest ally!
Six Phases of a Project
* Enthusiasm
* Disillusionment
* PANIC
* Search for Guilty
* Punishment of Innocent
* Praise & Honors for Non-Participants
chickens, home , roost. But he’s made his money
dfrith (05:31:07) :
The review is to report by August to allow time for its conclusions – and Dr Pachauri’s position to be assessed before the IPCC meets for its own annual assembly in Korea in October.
On topic – good; either way this goes I think it’s positive. If he stays the IPCC will be seen to be a whitewashing political outfit, if he goes the IPCC will have tacitly admitted that the science is suspect.
Off topic – now it’s the whales (or at least the hunting thereof): http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8538033.stm – definitely one for my “save this and send it back to the authors when it all comes crashing down”.
Cheers
Mark