More Leaks – Copenhagen in disarray

Planet
Leaks may soon deflate this balloon

Leaking, again? These aren’t the CRUTape documents, but secret docs from “the Circle of Commitment”  describing the way some manipulators wanted Copenhagen’s agreement to pan out. See it here

This quote (from the Guardian article) sums it up pretty well:

“It is being done in secret. Clearly the intention is to get [Barack] Obama and the leaders of other rich countries to muscle it through when they arrive next week. It effectively is the end of the UN process,” said one diplomat, who asked to remain nameless.

At least one person had scruples, or we wouldn’t be hearing about it now.

From news.com.au

Copenhagen conference in ‘disarray’

TALKS at the United Nations climate change conference in Copenhagen have broken down over leaked documents indicating that wealthier nations would be given more power in future climate change negotiations.

The documents seem to allow a handful of rich countries to have larger emissions and more control over future talks within a “circle of commitment” and have enraged delegates from developing countries.

The US, UK, and Denmark are among the countries included in the so-called “Danish text.”

The document also sets unequal limits on per capita carbon emissions for developed and developing countries in 2050; meaning that people in rich countries would be permitted to emit nearly twice as much under the proposals.

The secret draft agreement worked on by a group of individuals known as “the circle of commitment” – understood to include the UK, US and Denmark –  has only been shown to a handful of countries since it was finalised this week, The Guardian reports.

The agreement, leaked to the paper, is a departure from the Kyoto protocol’s principle that rich nations, which have emitted the bulk of the CO2, should take on firm and binding commitments to reduce greenhouse gases, while poorer nations were not compelled to act.

The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank; would abandon the Kyoto protocol – the only legally binding treaty that the world has on emissions reductions; and would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions.

The document was described last night by one senior diplomat as “a very dangerous document for developing countries. It is a fundamental reworking of the UN balance of obligations. It is to be superimposed without discussion on the talks”, the paper reports.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

194 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Great and Mighty Gore!
December 8, 2009 8:29 am

That’s either an enormously thick-skinned balloon,it’s sited atop an enormously high building or children aren’t allowed air-rifles in Denmark.

Dave in Canada
December 8, 2009 8:31 am

Things have certainly been getting interesting lately….is this a sign of a revolution from within AGW circles?
I wonder.

Douglas DC
December 8, 2009 8:32 am

Great and Mighty-
It’s a bubble that is about to burst.

jmacqueen
December 8, 2009 8:33 am

What do you expect?
Copenhagen is not about climate, it is about money.

Archonix
December 8, 2009 8:35 am

They wouldn’t have been able to sell this at home if we were obligated to live in the same penurious conditions as they want to impose on the rest of the world.

Edbhoy
December 8, 2009 8:35 am

Is the circle of commitment circling the wagons?

Ron H.
December 8, 2009 8:36 am

Any of the UN officials at Copenhagen who are concerned about these leaks can find a solution by clicking on the Google ad for “Acme Leak Detection and Plumbing” I see at the bottom of this post. :-:
Ron

December 8, 2009 8:39 am

That’s the icing on the cake… or should I say Danish? (couldn’t resist, sorry)

wuberman
December 8, 2009 8:39 am

Take any and all agreements signed at Copenhagen by the left and right corners, rip… fold in half and rip again. Continue until a pile of fire starter is achieved. Strike match, enjoy the warmth. Mr Harper are you listening?

Sue
December 8, 2009 8:39 am

Which crook is better at handling the money? The UN? Or the World Bank? I think that is the only issue they are fighting over. Who controls the money. Which is what climate change has been about from the beginning.

Annei
December 8, 2009 8:41 am

I didn’t think my jaw could drop any further…

Denbo
December 8, 2009 8:42 am

I am skeptical of this story.
If they drafted such a document and yet left out China and India those countries would head for the door in a heartbeat. Unless of course they ARE named in the list of ‘rich countries’ or perhaps they are given a separate but equally juicy deal.

Telboy
December 8, 2009 8:42 am

To misquote the A Team – “Don’t you just love it when a scam falls apart?”

Michael Alexis
December 8, 2009 8:42 am

Pay no attention to those statists behind the curtain.

December 8, 2009 8:43 am

The Circle of Commitment document is here.
It has this sentence: “Support the goal of a peak global emissions as soon as possible, but no later than [2020] ….”
where the square brackets indicate that the final number is to be filled in.
Peak global emissions in only 11 years !!
These people either are stupid or they can’t do arithmetic.

Scott Covert
December 8, 2009 8:44 am

What can I say?
I’m shocked and bewildered.
(That we got to hear about it BEFORE it was signed into law)

Steve
December 8, 2009 8:45 am

Un.
Raveling.

Indigo
December 8, 2009 8:45 am

Hurray – first cheering thing I’ve read all day about Copenhagen – how do we tell the developing countries: just follow your instincts and learn from history – in the last 60 years, when have developed countries ever done anything but bankroll your dictators and buy your exports (from oil to coffee) other than at prices determined to keep you enslaved economically.

maarten
December 8, 2009 8:45 am

It’s quite humorous how serious these would-be signatories are – their sense of power to influence planetary climate regimen – “to hold temperature rises to 2 degree Celsius”. I am sure Mother Earth will have the final say on this figure regardless of posturing humans’ “commitments”.

Denis
December 8, 2009 8:46 am

I have been traumatized and have lost money because I thought the science was settled.
I made decisions that rid myself of actual opportunities because of that ‘settled science’.
When I found out that the ‘settled science’ was fabricated I was gutted.
I now wish to find out how many people will be prepared to join me in a class action against the proponents of AGW so that I can recover the income I have lost and compensate me for the trauma and stress I have experienced because of their false statements.
And, I do not need anyone to join my action.
Kind regards
Denis

Robert M.
December 8, 2009 8:46 am

JMacqueen is right, this is about the money. BO and company get to add a huge source of tax revenue that has no strings attached. No one will really be able to tell if emissions get reduced or not. The rest of the world will be repressed as usual, only this time we are doing it to them instead of them doing it to themselves.

Viking141
December 8, 2009 8:46 am

@jmacqueen. Absolutely! Its about maintaining the status quo. Its about maintaining the Wests competitive and industrial edge over the rapidly industrialising deloping nations akin to keeping your foot on their heads to stop them getting further up the ladder than you. All this climate hooey is just a smokescreen.

John Cooke
December 8, 2009 8:46 am

Hmmm … odd, nothing on BBC News 24 or their website about this yet 😉

David L. Hagen
December 8, 2009 8:48 am

Greenpeace weighs in with:Draft climate proposal leaks out in Copenhagen
December 8, 2009 | 8:08 am

“The Danish proposal falls far short of emissions cuts needed, and remains vague on the climate cash,” Oxfam International, a group concerned with climate and global poverty issues, said in a press release after obtaining the draft text.
The World Wildlife Fund’s Kim Carstensen said in a statement that the text is “weak and reflects a too elitist, selective and non-transparent approach by the Danish presidency.”

December 8, 2009 8:49 am

No wonder Obama shifted his arrival from the beginning [embarrassing Climategate] to the end [sign on the dotted that gives him leverage].
I’m still reeling from the attempt by the EPA to classify CO2 as a pollutant – [snip]?
It is beyond parody – do these people know nothing at all?
I keep telling friends that CO2 is the building block of life and is a tiny fraction of the atmosphere – they go ‘no – it’s bad for us – look at the drowning polar bears’.
I can’t believe that in 2009, the average person has zero grasp of even the most basic facts of how life on Earth works.

1 2 3 8