From a Louisiana State University Press Release Oct 1, 2009
Algae and Pollen Grains Provide Evidence of Remarkably Warm Period in Antarctica’s History
Palynomorphs from sediment core give proof to sudden warming in mid-Miocene era

The ANDRILL drilling rig in Antarctica
For Sophie Warny, LSU assistant professor of geology and geophysics and curator at the LSU Museum of Natural Science, years of patience in analyzing Antarctic samples with low fossil recovery finally led to a scientific breakthrough. She and colleagues from around the world now have proof of a sudden, remarkably warm period in Antarctica that occurred about 15.7 million years ago and lasted for a few thousand years.
Last year, as Warny was studying samples sent to her from the latest Antarctic Geologic Drilling Program, or ANDRILL AND-2A, a multinational collaboration between the Antarctic Programs of the United States (funded by the National Science Foundation), New Zealand, Italy and Germany, one sample stood out as a complete anomaly.

“First I thought it was a mistake, that it was a sample from another location, not Antarctica, because of the unusual abundance in microscopic fossil cysts of marine algae called dinoflagellates. But it turned out not to be a mistake, it was just an amazingly rich layer,” said Warny. “I immediately contacted my U.S. colleague, Rosemary Askin, our New Zealand colleagues, Michael Hannah and Ian Raine, and our German colleague, Barbara Mohr, to let them know about this unique sample as each of our countries had received a third of the ANDRILL samples.”
Some colleagues had noted an increase in pollen grains of woody plants in the sample immediately above, but none of the other samples had such a unique abundance in algae, which at first gave Warny some doubts about potential contamination.
“But the two scientists in charge of the drilling, David Harwood of University of Nebraska – Lincoln, and Fabio Florindo of Italy, were equally excited about the discovery,” said Warny. “They had noticed that this thin layer had a unique consistency that had been characterized by their team as a diatomite, which is a layer extremely rich in fossils of another algae called diatoms.”
All research parties involved met at the Antarctic Research Facility at Florida State University in Tallahassee. Together, they sampled the zone of interest in great detail and processed the new samples in various labs. One month later, the unusual abundance in microfossils was confirmed.
Among the 1,107 meters of sediments recovered and analyzed for microfossil content, a two-meter thick layer in the core displayed extremely rich fossil content. This is unusual because the Antarctic ice sheet was formed about 35 million years ago, and the frigid temperatures there impede the presence of woody plants and blooms of dinoflagellate algae.
“We all analyzed the new samples and saw a 2,000 fold increase in two species of fossil dinoflagellate cysts, a five-fold increase in freshwater algae and up to an 80-fold increase in terrestrial pollen,” said Warny. “Together, these shifts in the microfossil assemblages represent a relatively short period of time during which Antarctica became abruptly much warmer.”
These palynomorphs, a term used to described dust-size organic material such as pollen, spores and cysts of dinoflagellates and other algae, provide hard evidence that Antarctica underwent a brief but rapid period of warming about 15 million years before present.
LSU’s Sophie Warny and her New Zealand colleague, Mike Hannah, sampling the ANDRILL cores at the Antarctic Research Facility.
“This event will lead to a better understanding of global connections and climate forcing, in other words, it will provide a better understanding of how external factors imposed fluctuations in Earth’s climate system,” said Harwood. “The Mid-Miocene Climate Optimum has long been recognized in global proxy records outside of the Antarctic region. Direct information from a setting proximal to the dynamic Antarctic ice sheets responsible for driving many of these changes is vital to the correct calibration and interpretation of these proxy records.”
These startling results will offer new insight into Antarctica’s climatic past – insights that could potentially help climate scientists better understand the current climate change scenario.
“In the case of these results, the microfossils provide us with quantitative data of what the environment was actually like in Antarctica at the time, showing how this continent reacted when climatic conditions were warmer than they are today,” said Warny.
According to the researchers, these fossils show that land temperatures reached a January average of 10 degrees Celsius – the equivalent of approximately 50 degrees Fahrenheit – and that estimated sea surface temperatures ranged between zero and 11.5 degrees Celsius. The presence of freshwater algae in the sediments suggests to researchers that an increase in meltwater and perhaps also in rainfall produced ponds and lakes adjacent to the Ross Sea during this warm period, which would obviously have resulted in some reduction in sea ice.
These findings most likely reflect a poleward shift of the jet stream in the Southern Hemisphere, which would have pushed warmer water toward the pole and allowed a few dinoflagellate species to flourish under such ice-free conditions. Researchers believe that shrub-like woody plants might also have been able to proliferate during an abrupt and brief warmer time interval.
“An understanding of this event, in the context of timing and magnitude of the change, has important implications for how the climate system operates and what the potential future response in a warmer global climate might be,” said Harwood. “A clear understanding of what has happened in the past, and the integration of these data into ice sheet and climate models, are important steps in advancing the ability of these computer models to reproduce past conditions, and with improved models be able to better predict future climate responses.”
While the results are certainly impressive, the work isn’t yet complete.
“The SMS Project Science Team is currently looking at the stratigraphic sequence and timing of climate events evident throughout the ANDRILL AND-2A drillcore, including those that enclose this event,” said Florindo. “A broader understanding of ice sheet behavior under warmer-than-present conditions will emerge.”
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
But but but… Until we started burning fossil fuels the Antarctic was always cold. I know because the science is settled.
… and here I was told the recent Arctic melting was “unprecedented”. My, my but we have a plethora of “unprecedented” events coming to light in the Earth’s history these days. These events happen so frequently, they almost seem normal in the evolution of the planet. Oh wait, maybe temp fluctuations are normal. Who’da thunk it …
We need more climate crackpots like Bill Maher to come out of the woodwork. Bill had done so much in recent days to raise awareness about the issue for the sheeple. Problem is, the sheeple are discussing among themselves the true science behind the issue.
Most comments over at Huffington Post engage in moronic name calling, but many good posters are discussing the factual science behind the issue, and the sheeple are learning. I was surprised myself at the number of intelligent people that have infiltrated the site.
Bill Maher Slams GOP Climate Change Skeptics: They’re “So Stupid They Make Me Question Evolution” (VIDEO)
Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/03/bill-maher-slams-gop-clim_n_308501.html
Wow, that happened 11-16 million years ago.
Further proof that it was a man made event from burning hydrocarbons….
Electric cars will fix it.
Oh wait, we in the US mostly burn hydrocarbons to generate electricity. And they want hydro-electric plants removed. No nuclear. And the transmission of electricity from distant sources of generation loose significant portions that that electricity which is generated in step-up, step-down, transmission lines, etc, before you can even charge that (non-hybrid) electric car….
Dang, this is really really confusing.
Fascinating report.
The mystery and the sudden temperature switches which cause glaciation periods and warming are not anywhere near being fully understood.
Though we are in a warm period, at anytime the world could be plunged into a massive freeze, we would do well to extend funding and to promote further research into this enigmatic and vitally important natural phenomena.
Studies like the above will show how warming/climate forcing occurs and maybe help us understand the temperature processes/fluctuations around the polar regions.
Antarctica warmed up and the icesheets half-melted about 27 million years ago. This warmer period lasted until about 14 million years ago when Antarctica reglaciated and ice-sheets started forming on Greenland as well.
There were several warm(er) spikes in the period, so these researchers just found one of them. There is temp data with resolution as low as 1,000 years (average about 10,000) covering this period.
This is a crying shame. Thousands of Great, Hard-Working Scientists, like these, out there advancing our knowledge, and everything gets hijacked by a group of politically-connected jerks.
“The Antarctic ice sheet was formed about 35 million years ago”…
I’m puzzled. I didn’t think the Antarctic cores went back nearly that far. Here I am looking at a graph from Vostok that goes back 450,000 years… Epica goes back 800,000 years (I thought that was considered to be a great extension).
WUWT??
Thank you Anthony for bringing some real science to the table. Hopefully our current AGW fixated government will not be able to Czar out science and Czar out communication. But then maybe a refutation of this discovery will be made by a tree in Siberia.
Fighting climate change is a battle no one can win. It’s sort of like Afghanistan. Afghanistan is the country other countries go to die.
Gosh, think of all those phony computer model research grants that may be threatened.
I have been reading this and other climate related blogs for a while now. I have come to one inescapable conclusion.
There are no true climate sceptics!
I forgot to add that there is no correlation at all to CO2 levels during this period.
CO2 was at a nice and toasty 240 ppm (glaciers in Canada kind of levels that is) during the warm spike found by these researchers. For the most of the period when Antarctica was melting back, CO2 levels were falling.
Lucy Skywalker (10:18:36) :
I’m puzzled. I didn’t think the Antarctic cores went back nearly that far. Here I am looking at a graph from Vostok that goes back 450,000 years
You are looking at ice cores. The article is about sediment cores…
Boy oh boy. the gods are really smiling down on us.
1) Obama is not a god and has lost the Olympics in Copenhagen where the climate summit will be in December. A double whack because the sheeple will remember the word Copenhagen and associate it with Obama and failure.
2) The sinister CO2 satellite, cloaked in goodness, crashed into the Antarctic. My opinion, but I was speculating on how they were going to use it against us. By manipulating its data perhaps?
3) They have put the Sun to sleep. Our ace in the hole. Our trump card. Their is nothing TPTB can do about that. Baby it’s getting cold outside.
All those dinosaurs driving SUVs. They were way more advanced that we thought….
Should have read ‘more real science’, no disrespect to this site intended.
Lucy, those are sediment cores not ice cores.
Can’t help but think that the phrase “This event will lead to a better understanding of global connections and climate forcing, in other words, it will provide a better understanding of how external factors imposed fluctuations in Earth’s climate system,” will be easily highjacked and turned into “evidence of tipping points”…
Cheers
Mark
With dust-sized palynomorphs, how do they distinguish between local production and wind-borne deposition? After all, it is found in just one “anomalous” core .
Lucy
The funding for the Million Year Core was recently approved. It will be some time before bedrock is reached.
I can’t wait to read stories about how sea life is exploding because of plankton, seaweed, and other life forms eating the elevated CO2. What a great planet we live on.
Leif, Antonio: I guessed that, should made it clear – I deliberately gave the quote about the ice SHEET that is mentioned in the article. Can you answer me now?
“An understanding of this event, in the context of timing and magnitude of the change, has important implications for how the climate system operates and what the potential future response in a warmer global climate might be,” said Harwood.”
Harwood goes from saying “has important implications for how the climate system operates” which is good, then goes on to say “and what the potential future response in a warmer global climate might be”
Makes me think he is buttering both sides of his bread.
Oceanic circulation patterns were much different 15 million years ago before the uplift of the Central American isthmus. Too much shouldn’t be read into this data until it’s integrated with what already is known and what still is to be discovered.