Scientists Issue Unprecedented Forecast of Next Sunspot Cycle

This is an official NCAR News Release (National Center for Atmospheric Research) Apparently, they have solar forecasting techniques down to a “science”, as boldly demonstrated in this press release. – Anthony

Scientists Issue Unprecedented Forecast of Next Sunspot Cycle

BOULDER—The next sunspot cycle will be 30-50% stronger than the last one and begin as much as a year late, according to a breakthrough forecast using a computer model of solar dynamics developed by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). Predicting the Sun’s cycles accurately, years in advance, will help societies plan for active bouts of solar storms, which can slow satellite orbits, disrupt communications, and bring down power systems.

The scientists have confidence in the forecast because, in a series of test runs, the newly developed model simulated the strength of the past eight solar cycles with more than 98% accuracy. The forecasts are generated, in part, by tracking the subsurface movements of the sunspot remnants of the previous two solar cycles. The team is publishing its forecast in the current issue of Geophysical Research Letters.

“Our model has demonstrated the necessary skill to be used as a forecasting tool,” says NCAR scientist Mausumi Dikpati, the leader of the forecast team at NCAR’s High Altitude Observatory that also includes Peter Gilman and Giuliana de Toma.

Understanding the cycles

The Sun goes through approximately 11-year cycles, from peak storm activity to quiet and back again. Solar scientists have tracked them for some time without being able to predict their relative intensity or timing.

Scientists

NCAR scientists Mausumi Dikpati (left), Peter Gilman, and Giuliana de Toma examine results from a new computer model of solar dynamics. (Photo by Carlye Calvin, UCAR)

Forecasting the cycle may help society anticipate solar storms, which can disrupt communications and power systems and affect the orbits of satellites. The storms are linked to twisted magnetic fields in the Sun that suddenly snap and release tremendous amounts of energy. They tend to occur near dark regions of concentrated magnetic fields, known as sunspots.

The NCAR team’s computer model, known as the Predictive Flux-transport Dynamo Model, draws on research by NCAR scientists indicating that the evolution of sunspots is caused by a current of plasma, or electrified gas, that circulates between the Sun’s equator and its poles over a period of 17 to 22 years. This current acts like a conveyor belt of sunspots.

The sunspot process begins with tightly concentrated magnetic field lines in the solar convection zone (the outermost layer of the Sun’s interior). The field lines rise to the surface at low latitudes and form bipolar sunspots, which are regions of concentrated magnetic fields. When these sunspots decay, they imprint the moving plasma with a type of magnetic signature. As the plasma nears the poles, it sinks about 200,000 kilometers (124,000 miles) back into the convection zone and starts returning toward the equator at a speed of about one meter (three feet) per second or slower. The increasingly concentrated fields become stretched and twisted by the internal rotation of the Sun as they near the equator, gradually becoming less stable than the surrounding plasma. This eventually causes coiled-up magnetic field lines to rise up, tear through the Sun’s surface, and create new sunspots.

The subsurface plasma flow used in the model has been verified with the relatively new technique of helioseismology, based on observations from both NSF– and NASA–supported instruments. This technique tracks sound waves reverberating inside the Sun to reveal details about the interior, much as a doctor might use an ultrasound to see inside a patient.

Figure Comparison

NCAR scientists have succeeded in simulating the intensity of the sunspot cycle by developing a new computer model of solar processes. This figure compares observations of the past 12 cycles (above) with model results that closely match the sunspot peaks (below). The intensity level is based on the amount of the Sun’s visible hemisphere with sunspot activity. The NCAR team predicts the next cycle will be 30-50% more intense than the current cycle. (Figure by Mausumi Dikpati, Peter Gilman, and Giuliana de Toma, NCAR.)

Predicting Cycles 24 and 25

The Predictive Flux-transport Dynamo Model is enabling NCAR scientists to predict that the next solar cycle, known as Cycle 24, will produce sunspots across an area slightly larger than 2.5% of the visible surface of the Sun. The scientists expect the cycle to begin in late 2007 or early 2008, which is about 6 to 12 months later than a cycle would normally start. Cycle 24 is likely to reach its peak about 2012.

By analyzing recent solar cycles, the scientists also hope to forecast sunspot activity two solar cycles, or 22 years, into the future. The NCAR team is planning in the next year to issue a forecast of Cycle 25, which will peak in the early 2020s.

“This is a significant breakthrough with important applications, especially for satellite-dependent sectors of society,” explains NCAR scientist Peter Gilman.

The NCAR team received funding from the National Science Foundation and NASA’s Living with a Star program.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

The date of this NCAR News Release is March 6, 2006

Source: http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2006/sunspot.shtml

(hat tip to WUWT reader Paul Bleicher)

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

213 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
a jones
May 30, 2009 6:16 pm

Yes I thought I had seen that one before: seems there prediction is not only out of date so is there model.
A superb example of what happens if you build models on past data and expect them to predict the future without any sound understanding of the underlying physical mechanism.
Kindest Regards

Rick Sharp
May 30, 2009 6:18 pm

FOR SALE: One 2006 Predictive Flux-transport Dynamo Model. Make offer…..

Steve
May 30, 2009 6:18 pm

Is this another case of OOPs? Did they mean 2012 maybe?

Mom2girls
May 30, 2009 6:19 pm

They might have fared better picking lottery numbers.
How much do these guys pull down in a given year anyways. And what sorts of bennies do they get?

John Egan
May 30, 2009 6:22 pm

Egg
+
Face

May 30, 2009 6:25 pm

Well ninety-eight percent isn’t one hundred percent. I’m sure they will get the next 49 cycles correct.

Jason
May 30, 2009 6:25 pm

So they modeled the past with existing data to 98%, but failed 100% when they entered the unknown (future)? Deja vu.

Robert Wood
May 30, 2009 6:30 pm

Perhaps Leif can come to the aid of my confused mind.
As we don’;t udnerstand the Sun, how can we have an accurate model of it? Or am I being pedantic?
Secondly, tweaking an arbitary model tof the Sun to match the previous solar cycles does not invest the model with “predictive skill”. It simply means one has tweaked a computer program to produce the desired result … a posteriori.

Dodgy Geezer
May 30, 2009 6:38 pm

I can’t see what the problem is. Their prediction seems to be spot-on. Of course, first you have to apply the corrections to the raw sunspot data to bring it into line with reality…

Steptoe Fan
May 30, 2009 6:39 pm

WOW !
I am shocked, just stunned !
Imagine, a group of politically correct, rainbow of diversity, product of current public school dogma types, masquerading as scientists publishing such a robust report !
Your going to tell me that their work was done in collaboration with the U of Washington’s climate research center ? ! NO !
Well, the scientific community can certainly sit back and have a cold one now, this debate is over !

Jeremy
May 30, 2009 6:47 pm

The photo is priceless. This to me summarizes the complete lack of scientific approach to everything these days. Everyone sits round a PC and blindly believes whatever nonsense it spews out.
No first principles. No cause and effect. No understanding of physics. mathematics or even statistics. Just run any number of widely available computer modeling programs, fit the historical data and hey presto another science breakthrough.
It would be funny if it wasn’t so very pathetically sad.

May 30, 2009 6:48 pm

You sucked me in. I read the whole thing and finally saw the the date the prediction was issued. I should have been more wary when reading as our own site publishes failed computer model prediction stories all the time. In fact, we have a site category that lists these stories (“Failed Predictions – Model/Human”), here:
http://www.c3headlines.com/predictionsforecasts/
Needless to say, scientists who develop computer models, and come to believe in their amazing forecasting ability, should really stay away from press releases on roll-out. Since that won’t happen, it would be great if at some point computer model scientists would gain some perspective and humility from the constant failures.
C3H Editor

mark
May 30, 2009 6:48 pm

How much of your taxs were used to make a 2006 Predictive Flux-transport Dynamo Model. i ask for your money back.

JR
May 30, 2009 6:50 pm

Good one! I didn’t catch on till nearly the end of the article.
OT – browsing NCAR/UCAR pages led to this item highlighted in UCAR’s “Press Clips”:
http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/is_there_a_better_word_for_doom/
featuring Michael Mann, Gavin Schmidt et al.

Jon Jewett
May 30, 2009 6:50 pm

Anthony
Thank you. We need to remind everyone of this type of thing.
Regards,
Steamboat Jack

Cary
May 30, 2009 6:51 pm

Of all the thousands of stock trading systems that are back tested and are going to make you a fortune, non have yet found the capacity to read the future.
Idiots are always willing to accept a forcast of the future as if it already existed.

R John
May 30, 2009 6:55 pm

Maybe they should have talked to NASA as they have revised their predictions dramatically downward.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/29may_noaaprediction.htm

Mike Ramsey
May 30, 2009 6:58 pm

IMPORTANT NOTE:
The date of this NCAR News Release is March 6, 2006
 
Did they ever publish a correction?  Perhaps even an apology?
–Mike Ramsey

Steve Fitzpatrick
May 30, 2009 7:02 pm

Like I’ve said several times before, any model is only as good as it’s forecasts, not it’s hindcasts. I sure hope the climate modelers think about this story before the the next time they tell us how certain they are about the future climate.
But just the same, funny, very funny.

WestHoustonGeo
May 30, 2009 7:06 pm

I seem to remember that, back when they said that, they had the audacity to say that they were pretty much infallible in this field.
Hubris. Overwheenin’ Pride. Arogance.
The best advice I can offer to these folk is:
Atone, ye sinners, and ye shall be forgiven!
🙂

James H
May 30, 2009 7:13 pm

Natural variability is currently “masking” the solar activity. Once this temporary condition eases, the sunspots, storms, and cycles will come back with a vengeance unless we change our polluting ways.
(removes tongue from cheek)

Pbleic
May 30, 2009 7:18 pm

Mausumi Dikpati (leader of the forecast team) is not giving up on this prediction! Last month, this article ( http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17102-solar-cycle-will-be-weakest-since-1928-forecasters-say.html ) had the following to say:
“The panel now expects the sun’s activity will peak about a year late, in May 2013, when it will boast an average of 90 sunspots per day. That is below average for solar cycles, making the coming peak the weakest since 1928, when an average of 78 sunspots was seen daily.”

“But not everyone on the panel expects the coming cycle to be weaker than average. “The panel consensus is not my individual opinion,” says panel member Mausumi Dikpati of the High Altitude Observatory in Boulder, Colorado.
Dikpati and her colleagues have developed a solar model that predicts a bumper crop of sunspots and a cycle that is 30% to 50% stronger than the previous cycle, Cycle 23.
Because it is still early in the new cycle, it is too soon to say whether the sun will bear out this prediction, Dikpati says. “It’s still in a quiet period,” she told New Scientist. “As soon as it takes off it could be a completely different story.””

May 30, 2009 7:27 pm

“The contrarian disinformation machine often employs charismatic, rhetorically talented advocates who deliver their messages of doubt and confusion in carefully measured and focus-group-tested aphorisms.” M. Mann
WUWT is a “contrarian disinformation machine…deliver(ing)…aphorisms”
aphorism: a succinct statement expressing an opinion or a general truth

tokyoboy
May 30, 2009 7:29 pm

I’m sure the chief forecaster is old enough not to be alive in 2012 or so.

King of Cool
May 30, 2009 7:36 pm

This reminds me of all the betting schemes on horse races and football matches etc that I get sent through the mail that are going to make my fortune. They claim a positive % success rate and have past results to prove it.
Often wonder why they are telling me this instead of making their own fortunes. This forecasting principle obviously applies now to the new AGW Industry who are creaming us all off on predictions that no-one can guarantee – and no doubt will go on ad infinitum.

1 2 3 9
Verified by MonsterInsights