April – another record month at WUWT

The hits just keep on coming. 1,672,437 page views this month, up from 1,478,801 page views in March.

wuwt_stats_april09-510

After posting last months stats, there was some discontent by some angry and somewhat incredulous bloggers that it might be an April Fools joke of some sorts. Sorry, no such luck.

But what was humorous, was one particular blogger (Joe Romm) who said:

It is absurd to publish one’s page views to 7 significant digits without caveats — even 2 is stretching it.

I got a huge chuckle out of that. So just to show that the stats are indeed real, and accurate down to that 7th digit (since they come from the WordPress internal traffic counter), I’m expanding this month’s report.

Joe, this report’s for you. Here is a screencap showing my WordPress internal report page, with all 7 digits, sans caveats. No caveats are needed since the WordPress numbers are actual, not estimated, and not drawn from router statistics.

wuwt_stats_april09_fullpage
click for a larger image

Maybe Joe will reciprocate and post a screencap his own internal stats page.

The graph on this page above differs a bit from the headline graph (which is graphically edited to move the title inwards and downwards to fit nicely on the page) because it was snapped after 00GMT (5PM PST) and it shows the new month of May stats also, which are of course quite low by comparison.

So the numbers are real, from WordPress.com (where my blog is hosted) and exact to the 7th digit, despite angry accusations otherwise.

In that blog post, Joe Romm also showed an Alexa graph to prove his point, saying:

Interestingly, there is one independent source that suggests Watts’ page views and mine are in fact the same (and hence possibly around 1.4 million).  If you go to the Web traffic ranking and comparison site Alexa, go to page views, and type in wattsupwiththat.com, you’ll get this graph:

So at best I am just negating the disinformation Watts is spreading.  Sigh.  And lest there be any doubt, WattsUpWithThat is in fact an extremist anti-scientific denialist website, as his recent posts make clear.

Gosh, all that angry prose from a traffic report? I don’t much care whether WUWT beats Climate Progress in traffic or vice versa, but I do care when the proprietor suggests that by printing my own internal stats page I’m spreading disinformation. Of course, I don’t expect an apology, but I wanted WUWT readers to know.

OK, following Joe’s lead, lets look at Alexa this month.

Pageviews: we are still about the same in April according to Alexa.

climateprogress-vs-wuwt_pv

Though over the longer 6 month term, WUWT is slow and steady while Climate Progress runs hot and cold.

climateprogress-vs-wuwt_pv6mo

Joe didn’t show the other interesting comparative statistics from Alexa though, so I thought WUWT readers might enjoy seeing them.

Here is Traffic Rank over 6 months:

climateprogress-vs-wuwt_traffic6mo

And here is Reach:

climateprogress-vs-wuwt_reach6mo

But having been labeled a “spreader of disinformation”, please, don’t take my word for it, visit Alexa and see for yourselves. Here is the link.

Some people might wonder why I post my web stats each month. Some might say I’m tooting my own horn, well maybe a bit, I’m admittedly proud of WUWT.

But there’s a bigger reason. WUWT has thousands of visitors, many of whom are regulars who see this blog as something they relate to and grow with. Many visit daily or even more often. There’s a sense of pride and ownership with all of you, too. Without its readers, content contributors, and those tireless volunteer moderators that keep the snark under control, WUWT would be nothing. I try not to lose sight of that. This is my monthly reminder to myself that this is a team effort.

As this blog expands its reach, it seems only fair that my readers also get to share in seeing the growth. I listen to my readers, who are often more insightful than I am, and they offer wonderful suggestions and topics.

I thank you all for making WUWT one of top science blogs on the Internet today.

And thanks to you to Joe, for bringing up this topic last month.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

142 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ron de Haan
April 30, 2009 7:59 pm

This is an amazing blog indeed.
Who needs the main stream media?

John in NZ
April 30, 2009 8:05 pm

You have every right to be proud.
I recommend WUWT to anyone and everyone.

Robert Boyd
April 30, 2009 8:07 pm

As one who found your site last summer, I am constantly amazed at the quality of your site and those who frequent here. Thanks for your good work. BTW you didn’t need to prove your stats to me, I trust your integrity simply by the way you run your site. Pure class.

Robert
April 30, 2009 8:13 pm

WattsUpWithThat is in fact an extremist anti-scientific denialist website, as his recent posts make clear.
Dude, doesn’t that just give you a warm fuzzy.
Oops I mean…
Bad boy Anthony, no biscuit for you!
Seriously though, I love WUWT keep up the good work.

Ryan
April 30, 2009 8:15 pm

I’m one of the new people that jut started faithfully reading WUWT after hearing about it on Rush. Great site, keep up the good work. I have since spread the word to anyone that will listen.

April 30, 2009 8:16 pm

I love this site. I am here almost daily. Thank you very much.

Leon Brozyna
April 30, 2009 8:21 pm

Once again, another well deserved good month.
About as I suspected it would be. Now if we can see those total hits top 14 mil next month …
And here’s an Alexa comparison between WUWT and the other also rans, ClimateCrisis.net and RealClimate.org:
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/wattsupwiththat.com+realclimate.org+climatecrisis.net
Looking at all the measures, WUWT keeps pulling ahead, nice and slow and steady. More reality, less posturing.

J.Lee
April 30, 2009 8:22 pm

This is not only the best climate related site, it may be the best site absolutely.

April 30, 2009 8:23 pm

Anthony;
It is crunch time in the U.S.
I donated $50 to CA a couple weeks ago for some computer equipment.
I will donate $50 to Icecap for his activism.
And I just donated $50 to WUWT, the Best Science Blog in 2009.
I’ve spread the wealth (what’s left of it).
Hope I don’t have to defend Texas (the CO2 capital of the US) in the next few years.
REPLY: Thanks so much Tom! Let us know when you’ve barricaded yourself in the Alamo, we’ll send help. – Anthony

Leon Brozyna
April 30, 2009 8:24 pm

I forgot to mention — you finished the 2008 with over 6 mil – another 6 mil in 4 months. Not a bad piece of work.

jlc
April 30, 2009 8:24 pm

Anthony – WUWT has become far and away my favourite blog. I, in turn, would like to thank you, the guest contributors, the moderators and the many remarkably knowledgeable and well-informed commentators.
I don’t comment often (only when I have something useful to add), but I do check in every day.
Jack

Joseph
April 30, 2009 8:27 pm

Congratulations on your continued success Anthony. You deserve it.
[snip – sorry, I know you are defending me, but I won’t allow such labeling of Mr. Romm here – Anthony]

April 30, 2009 8:30 pm

Anthony;
Not the Alamo this time.
It starts will all the Texas refineries going down for maintenance at the same time.

Dave the Denier
April 30, 2009 8:31 pm

Congrats, Anthony!
You seem like a great guy. I found WUWT from a link on Instapundit last June and now visit several times daily to look for new posts and to read comments. I’m a non-scientist (small business owner) and I cannot believe how much I have learned from this site. I also enjoy the increasing presence of Steven G.
Based on WUWT tripling hits since April 2008 at an increasing rate, I predict a 6x increase for the next 12 months and 10,000,000 hits for April 2010! That should mean at least a 20x increase in slanderous comments from the Joe Romms of the warmist world. Hey, maybe even Gore or Hansen will slam Anthony or the blog by name in the next year 🙂

jorgekafkazar
April 30, 2009 8:34 pm

I don’t understand the charts. Percent of what? And why is the Alexa Traffic Rank ordinate inverted? And have you noticed that climate progress’s Reach graph follows a sine curve closely matching the motions of the solar barycenter as influenced by the planet Treblo? I have a chart that I’ll gladly upload…
Just kidding.

April 30, 2009 8:34 pm

I am just a regular guy who wishes he had done better in school. We all have a civic duty to understand the issues that effect us – especially Climate Change! WUWT is a great source of information.
In this field, it is essential to be able to prove any “statistic”; great work.

April 30, 2009 8:35 pm

And while the refineries are down for maintenance, they’ll have to be refitted with some CO2 removers. May take awhile. Might keep one going for in state gasoline use tho.

pyromancer76
April 30, 2009 8:36 pm

Anthony, this is the greatest community, the science topics continue to expand, the debate and discussion deepens, and your team of volunteers are amazing. Congratulations and much appreciation to all. Climate science might become science again to a very large population of curious and contented readers.
REPLY: And a special thank you to you also for the nice cards. – Anthony

Carrick
April 30, 2009 8:36 pm

Congrats Anthony. Your hard work is paying off.
Kudos for the guest posts that you’ve been adding to the blog content. It is helping to make this a world class blog.
I seriously wonder why people like Joe Romm think that skepticism is harmful to science. To me it’s the opposite, blind, unquestioning belief in a scientific theory or hypothesis undermines any scientific value it might have had.

Squidly
April 30, 2009 8:40 pm

I love this site! Anthony and everyone here should be very proud, and Romm should be very ashamed.
Keep up the great stuff people!

JFA in Montreal
April 30, 2009 8:41 pm

Don’t you think that that graphs looks a bit like an elevated hockey stick when the blade is seen square from the front ? 😀

Steven Goddard
April 30, 2009 8:42 pm

Too bad #1 science blog WUWT can’t be more factual like #2 Pharyngula – which has a lead story today linking church attendance with torture and immorality.
REPLY: Hmmm, he’s also asking his readers to help him win an iPod Touch. – Anthony

April 30, 2009 8:49 pm

So Romm calls this an “anti-scientific” website? His debate with Morano was just that–anti-scientific. I don’t remember him citing scientific studies in any of his arguments. All they contained was alarmist hogwash sprinkled with ad hominem attacks.

April 30, 2009 8:50 pm

Congrats; it’s a great site, though the comment threads are so darned long (and interesting!) that I don’t have time to read through them all.
One nit to pick: I know that it would be impossible to police the comments for grammatical infelicities, but the top posts could all use more editing, specifically for the all-too-common confusion of:
its = the possessive of it;
it’s = contraction of ‘it is’.
Not to mention your/you’re, their/they’re, to/too/two, etc., and the chronic use of ‘s for plurals.
After all, no reason for scientists, engineers, and technical folk to give the appearance of being illiterate boobs; it just gives ammunition to the opposition who say, “It’s only a blog; it’s not peer-reviewed.”
/Mr Lynn
REPLY: Guilty as charged. I have compulsive-possessive disorder. It’s an illness that can be treated though. 😉
Part of this has to do with spending the majority of my life speaking to a camera on television. Writing is something I never did much of until I started blogging. Rusty wordsmith am I. – Anthony

savethesharks
April 30, 2009 8:56 pm

Congrats for a great site!
And if you see a sudden trough in the graph watch out for that Draupner wave…

1 2 3 6
Verified by MonsterInsights