Antarctic Warming? Part 2 – A letter from a meteorologist on the ground in Antarctica

UPDATE 1/25: Mr. Hays has has provided a follow up letter, posted at the bottom of this article. – Anthony

This letter below, reprinted with permission, is from Ross Hays. Ross was a CNN meteorologist for many years. He works for NASA at the Columbia Balloon Facility.

ross-hays-mt-erebus
Ross Hays with Antarctica's Mount Erebus volcano in the background

In that capacity he has spent much time in Antarctica.  He obviously can’t speak for his agency but can have an opinion which he shared with several people. It is printed below in entirety, exactly as he sent it to Eric Steig today, the lead author of the University of Washington paper highlighted in a  press release yesterday that claims there is a warming in Antarctica. There were some of the pronouncements made in the media, particularly to the Associated Press by Dr. Michael Mann, that marry that paper with “global warming”, even though no such claim was made in the press release about the scientific paper itself.

I agree with Ross Hays. In my opinion, this press release and subsequent media interviews were done for media attention. The timing is suspicious,  with the upcoming  Al Gore’s address to congress, he can now say: “We’ve now learned Antarctica is warming”. A Google News search shows about 530 articles on the UW press release in various media.

I ask my readers that share this opinion to consider writing factual letters to the editor (in your own words) or make online comments if any of these media outlets are near you. – Anthony

letter dated 1/22/09

Eric,

Let me first say that this is my own opinion and does not represent the agency I work for. I feel your study is absolutely wrong.

There are very few stations in Antarctica to begin with and only a hand full with 50 years of data. Satellite data is just approaching thirty years of available information.  In my experience as a day to day forecaster that has to travel and do field work in Antarctica the summer seasons have been getting colder. In the late 1980s helicopters were used to take our personnel to Williams Field from McMurdo Station due to the annual receding of the Ross Ice Shelf, but in the past few years the thaw has been limited and vehicles can continue to make the transition and drive on the ice. One climate note to pass along is December 2006 was the coldest December ever for McMurdo Station. In a synoptic perspective the cooler sea surface temperatures have kept the maritime storms farther offshore in the summer season and the colder more dense air has rolled from the South Pole to the ice shelf.

There was a paper presented at the AMS Conference in New Orleans last year noting over 70% of the continent was cooling due to the ozone hole. We launch balloons into the stratosphere and the anticyclone that develops over the South Pole has been displaced and slow to establish itself over the past five seasons. The pattern in the troposphere has reflected this trend with more maritime (warmer) air around the Antarctic Peninsula which is also where most of the automated weather stations are located for West Antarctica which will give you the average warmer readings and skew the data for all of West Antarctica.

With statistics you can make numbers go to almost any conclusion you want. It saddens me to see members of the scientific community do this for media coverage.

Sincerely,

Ross Hays

Follow up letter, sent 1/24 and posted on 1/25 with permission:

Anthony,

A prerequisite to going to work for the Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility was to pass an Antarctic physical. During the southern summer each year CSBF launches large (up to 40 million cubic feet) scientific balloons that orbit Antarctica for up to 42 days with scientific experiments. Most of the payloads are astrophysics, but scientific balloons discovered the ozone hole over Antarctica.

The meteorologist job is to do daily forecasts for our launch site at Williams Field near McMurodo Station on Ross Island. When campaigns are going on daily briefings are provided to personnel and a written summary is provided for daily situation reports sent to the Balloon Program Office at Goddard Space Center. We also monitor the stratospheric winds while the payloads are being readied to launch and to make sure the winds are in the correct direction and the balloon will stay over the continent. We also forecast payload termination and impact areas.

I have only done two tours on the Ice but have provided forecasts from Palestine, Texas on the years between after the balloon launches we take over forecasts for the payload and handle termination from our command center. I will be returning to the Ice in November.

My main problem with the study is the data sets. I know of only 4 stations for all of Antarctica that have fifty complete years of data. I am trying to find the exact number now. Most stations have been on and off in operation for a few seasons during field experiments. One of our retired meteorologists, Glenn Rosenberger was a US Navy meteorologist that did tours in Antarctica. He helped install the first automated weather stations on the continent: In conjunction with Stanford University, believe it was in 1978-1979 that 4 were put on the ice.  One was on Minna Bluff, one on the Plateau, one on the slope of Eribus.  They were powered by the RTG (radiological thermoelectric generators) and the I was the Radiological Officer for the command.  There is just not enough data to support the results in my opinion.

The discussion about the warming in West Antarctica is also questionable to me since the majority of stations with several years of data are on the Antarctic Peninsula, which is surround by warmer maritime air, and doesn’t give a good balance over the interior.

I hope this gives you some idea about me.

Sincerely,

Ross Hays

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
235 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John Plaice
January 22, 2009 8:32 pm

According to the Cryosphere Today, a huge chunk of ice disappeared overnight
off the coast of Labrador. I wonder where in cyberspace it ended up?
http://igloo.atmos.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/test/print.sh?fm=01&fd=21&fy=2009&sm=01&sd=22&sy=2009

Douglas DC
January 22, 2009 8:33 pm

When is the AGW agitprop going to stop?When the Glacial front gets to Cleveland?

Graeme Rodaughan
January 22, 2009 8:47 pm

I wonder if any Main Stream Media outlet will dare to publish this letter?

Graeme Rodaughan
January 22, 2009 8:49 pm

Congratulations to Ross Hays for his honesty and courage in the face of the “consensus”.

Darrin
January 22, 2009 8:50 pm

The following is posted as part of the environmental agenda on http://www.whitehouse.gov today. Here we go!
“Reduce our Greenhouse Gas Emissions 80 Percent by 2050
Implement an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by 2050. Make the U.S. a Leader on Climate Change”.

James H
January 22, 2009 8:53 pm

Something tells me that Mann is not overly concerned about this opinion.

January 22, 2009 8:54 pm

It’s a fairly strong accusation to make that scientists are releasing their results purely for maximum media/political impact. Not a claim I’d want to make without significant evidence…
REPLY: I think the evidence is in the quotes made today by co-authors Michael Mann and Drew Shindell. While the scientific paper makes no attribution to global warming or GHG’s they do make those linkages in quotes to the Associated Press. If they had left the paper unconnected to this political issue of global warming, then I don’t think these kinds of opinions about media attention would be forming. – Anthony

January 22, 2009 8:57 pm

Besides, Hays presents nothing more than anecdotal evidence, some of which is completely meaningless (“December 2006 was the coldest December ever for McMurdo Station”).
REPLY: Read carefully again. He presented a mechanism to explain the warming of west Antarctica. – Anthony

hunter
January 22, 2009 9:00 pm

This latest work by Mann is just another stage prop for Gore’s next show before the Senate.
The authors know it is garbage, but it is not meant to be a scientific tool. It is a sales aid for AGW promoters.

January 22, 2009 9:00 pm

Thanks for sharing this. My gut tells me this is the real story — though I am certainly no scientist.

Leon Brozyna
January 22, 2009 9:11 pm

After seeing the nature of the response to his work, perhaps Professor Steig will exercise greater care in the future when selecting coauthors.

Nick
January 22, 2009 9:15 pm

I am going to have to say that Hays has failed scientifically to make his point by saying basically that it seems colder to him. I am glad to see that he questioned the methodology, specifically the sampling method, but his apparent argument against the use of statistics is weak.
I think that the focus here should be on the sampling method rather than the broader discipline of quantitative analysis.

Neil Crafter
January 22, 2009 9:16 pm

naught101 (20:57:58) :
Besides, Hays presents nothing more than anecdotal evidence, some of which is completely meaningless (”December 2006 was the coldest December ever for McMurdo Station”).
Completely meaningless? He’s there on the ground in Antarctica working as a meteorologist – where are you that you can say that? Your comment beggars belief.
Well done Ross Hays for coming out and saying this in the face of this kind of opposition.

Eric Anderson
January 22, 2009 9:24 pm

naught101 wrote: “Besides, Hays presents nothing more than anecdotal evidence, some of which is completely meaningless (”December 2006 was the coldest December ever for McMurdo Station”).”
Is this really anecdotal evidence, or is it a statement based on actual December temperatures at McMurdo? Should be easy enough to verify.

January 22, 2009 9:26 pm

It has been known for several years now that Antarctica can show both cooling and warming trends depending on the start date of the trend. The warming trend is dependent on starting 50 years ago. For the last 20-30 years the trend shows cooling.
The people who push the warm trend argue that their start point utilizes the “full data” set. But I think that choice is just opportunistic BS. The more interesting trend is that Antarctica has been definitely cooling these past 20-30 years just as Ross Hayes has observed, and that cooling is during the same time period that the AGW crowd claims that the global temperatures uncoupled from natural variation and thus they must conclude that the past 20-30 year of warming must be man made..
Antarctica remains a very embarrassing contradiction. So they hide the recent cooling in a re-hash of the 50 year warming trend and ignore the cooling trend.
It is a most interesting irony that the Antarctica peninsula has been warming consistently whether the global temperature have risen or fallen. The Antarctic peninsula is in fact the best example of something that has uncoupled from natural variations and atmospheric temperature trends. And ironically it suggests that something other than CO2 is the driving force. Vulcanism may be a possible answer.
See map:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/29/Global_Cooling_Map.png

January 22, 2009 9:35 pm

What a great letter. It explains the nearby RSS UAH satellite lower troposphere measurements, increase in ice as well as the politics.

Tim
January 22, 2009 9:46 pm

I’m not clear on this:
“There was a paper presented at the AMS Conference in New Orleans last year noting over 70% of the continent was cooling due to the ozone hole. We launch balloons into the stratosphere and the anticyclone that develops over the South Pole has been displaced and slow to establish itself over the past five seasons.”
So is he attributing the cooling to the ozone hole or something else?
Anyone?

Fred Gams
January 22, 2009 9:48 pm

Politically, I think we should let the alarmists implement some of their ridiculous ideas and then watch them crash and burn like they are about to do in the UK/EU.
They’ll be completely discredited after a short period of pain. I’m afraid that if we are able to stop them politically, this nonsense will drag on for decades.

mbabbitt
January 22, 2009 10:02 pm

A pox on all of their data manipulation houses!

maksimovich
January 22, 2009 10:05 pm

“The pattern in the troposphere has reflected this trend with more maritime (warmer) air around the Antarctic Peninsula which is also where most of the automated weather stations are located for West Antarctica which will give you the average warmer readings and skew the data for all of West Antarctica.”
http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh133/mataraka/ozoneap.jpg
So spatial drift in the minima and maxima of ozone over the Antarctic Peninsula is clearly obvious.

sdk
January 22, 2009 10:17 pm

In Seattle, I have sent the following letter to the Editor, Seattle Times.
************************************************************************************
Editor:
The Seattle Times takes bad science and packages it as breaking news.
The newspaper printed a story by reporter S Doughton regarding a ‘study’ from the University of Washington about warming of the Antarctic continent ( UW study says Antarctica now feeling the heat, too, originally published Jan. 21, 2009 ).
There were some pronouncements made in the media, particularly to the Associated Press by a Dr. Michael Mann, that marry the UW paper with “global warming”, even though no such claim was made in the press release about the scientific paper itself.
In my opinion, this press release and subsequent Times usage, was done for media attention, most likely to coincide with Al Gore’s upcoming address to congress, so that he could announce “We’ve now learned Antarctica is warming”. A Google News search shows about 530 articles on the UW press release in various media.
A response to Eric Steig has been published at the web site http://www.wattsupwiththat.org. by Ross Hays. Ross was a CNN meteorologist for
many years. He works for NASA at the Columbia Balloon Facility in the Antarctic.
Faulty science does not belong in any newspaper unless reported as such, reporter agendas, of merit, belong on the opinion pages. Apparently, the Seattle Times will stop at nothing to push its own agenda.
Steven Keeler
************************************************************************************
I have also sent an email to Mr. Steig at the University of Washingtons Quaternary Research Center ( steig@ess.washington.edu ) . In my opinion, his interpolations, as stated, are an embarrassment to computer scientists in particular and to my home state as well .

REPLY:
Thank you, but just a point to consider. Newspaper editors regularly reject letters that are copied almost verbatum from websites. Using my text will probably disqualify your letter. I encourage voicing opinions in your own words. – Anthony

Tim
January 22, 2009 10:21 pm

Very interesting, Maksi…

Jim G
January 22, 2009 10:22 pm

The trend for sea ice extent trend is clearly growing for the last 20 years.
Do you really think it would be growing if it were getting warmer?
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/current.anom.south.jpg
The anomoly for 2008 was almost 2 million km^2.
Would this also be a sign of warming?

January 22, 2009 10:23 pm

More anecdotal evidence from the field:
From a recent post: “In a document published January 19th, NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center (NCEP) has officially put the stamp on the cold water conditions we’ve seen growing in the equatorial mid and eastern Pacific. ………… This does not bode well for California’s drought conditions, which are likely to continue due to this renewed La Niña event.”
Down here in the southern part of the state, in December, we had a heavy accumulation of snow and an extended cold snap, highly unusual and unseen in the 20 years I’ve lived here. As I type, it’s raining, with more predicted for next week, starting on Monday. Drought? Warming? I guess it depends on where you happen to be, and if you stick your head out the window and it hits you in the face. If you’re sitting in a controlled climate building, analyzing ‘adjusted’ satellite data, it apparently looks warm and dry.
Why are we paying these guys to bamboozle us?

sdk
January 22, 2009 10:24 pm

and as you may be wondering, Mr. Steig is a ‘no show’ regarding a response to my email.
REPLY: he is probably inundated today, give him time. – Anthony

1 2 3 10