Guest essay by Brandon Shollenberger Last week, John Cook published a piece in the Europhysics News magazine in which he, quite literally, fabricates a quote. You can see the details…
Tag: Scientific consensus
An oopsie in the Doran/Zimmerman 97% consensus claim
David Burton writes: I just realized the obvious answer to a question that has been nagging in the back of my mind for nearly a year and a half. In…
Join my crowd-sourced complaint about the '97% consensus'
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley Three-quarters (rounded up to 97.1%) of all commenters expressing an opinion on my recent post about Dana Nuccitelli’s attempt at ex-post-facto justification of the false…
97% Climate consensus 'denial': the debunkers debunked
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley Not the least of many signs that the rationalists who have dared to doubt the official story are winning the debate on the climate is…
Cooks '97% consensus' disproven by a new peer reviewed paper showing major math errors
UPDATE: While this paper (a rebuttal) has been accepted, another paper by Cook and Nuccitelli has been flat out rejected by the journal Earth System Dynamics. See update below. –…
New peer reviewed paper shows only 36% of geoscientists and engineers believe in AGW
From Forbes writer James Taylor: Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists concerning global warming after all. Only 36 percent of geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are creating…
When bad astronomers play 'claimatologists'
Dr. Matt Ridley writes: My recent WSJ article got a reaction from Slate:
The mental effect of the '97% consensus' myth spans politics
But, we all know that 97% consensus talking point is simply based on a handful of actual climate responding to a broad questionnaire combined with some statistical spin to give…
You must be logged in to post a comment.