Has Nature Communications committed reckless endangerment?

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley Here is an update on the case against Nature Communications and against the soi-disant “University” of California at Merced and various of its denizens in…

The moral case for honest and competent climate science

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley My previous posting was published while I was traveling from Scotland, where I had been scrambling up mountains in the freezing sleet, to my fragrant…

Mathematical modeling illusions

The global climate scare – and policies resulting from it – are based on models that do not work Dr. Jay Lehr and Tom Harris For the past three decades,…

The Debate Continues: More discount rates and candy-canes

Guest post by Mark Freeman On 11th January, Lord Monckton of Brenchley kindly replied (“Of discount rates and candy-canes”) to a guest post of mine on WUWT concerning Nordhaus’ choice…

Monckton responds to Peter Hadfield aka "potholer54" – plus Hadfield's response

UPDATE: Below is Peter Hadfield’s response in entirety, submitted Feb 7th, 2012. I’ve made only some slight edits for formatting to fit. Comments are open. – Anthony By Christopher Monckton…

Don't mock the Monck

Apparently, Monckton is a member of the House of Lords, according to constitutional lawyer in England. I don’t have a dog in this fight, I’m just in it for the…