Next financial crisis ‘to be triggered by uninsurable homes’

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

Next financial crisis ‘to be triggered by uninsurable homes’ – Daily Telegraph

The Piss Poor Telegraph has really embarrassed itself this time with a new story here.

According to the article:

Britain faces the threat of a financial crisis as climate change makes homes harder or even impossible to insure, experts have warned.

Senior figures in the City of London have said insurance companies will raise prices on home insurance, exclude protection, or pull cover from the market altogether in the face of growing ecological risks such as flooding, subsidence and wildfires.

They have written to policymakers in government, the financial regulator and the Bank of England, claiming insurers are not being truthful about the true scale of the growing problem.

Represented by a whistleblowing organisation called Inside Track, a number of senior industry figures have warned insurers are underpricing the risk of changing weather patterns, either through insufficient forecasts or by dismissing modellingnumbers to “concentrate on doing deals while times are good”.

There is no evidence that the warning has come from “senior figures in the City”, or that they even have any expertise at all.

Nor of course is any evidence provided that climate change is a problem.

Inside Track are a shady outfit, funded by far-left climate charities including the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation.

According to their website:

There are millions of senior professionals going to work each day with a sense that they are, in some way, working against the world they want to live in.

They may well have colleagues they love and find their work stretching and fulfilling. Their companies are neither innately good nor bad, they are just doing what every company in their industry does.

These professionals often know what needs to change, they have ideas for how the change could happen but they are isolated.

There simply isn’t the infrastructure or opportunity for them to make a difference. Their sense of professionalism and their sense of citizenship are in conflict. They feel like there’s nothing they can do so they put their heads down and get on.

If this sounds like you, we’d like to talk.

We are currently building highly confidential Insider Movements in a number of industries. We have created a way for you to be part of a movement for change in your industry while protecting your confidentiality.

We are not looking to receive confidential documents or identify the ‘worst’ companies, but are interesting in speaking to you as an expert in your industry about what common practice looks like across it.

Your role will be to share insights about how your industry is most materially impacting the world, socially and environmentally. You will then advise us on which stakeholders should hear this information and how best we should deliver it to them. You will do this as an individual, not a representative of your firm, and you will be asked to keep your involvement confidential.

Of course you won’t be the only one. You will be part of a movement made up of peers of senior executives from different functions and different companies across your industry. It will be your collective insight which leads to these representations to critical stakeholders. Some people will want to meet with others in the group, but for most it will be an individual experience of a collective journey.

We don’t want your industry to close, we don’t want to boycott it, we know it isn’t evil. Our aim is to spotlight and shift the cultures, structures, norms and incentives preventing it from fulfilling a more positive role in society.

This may be out of your comfort zone, different from anything you have done before but we are asking you to do something meaningful today. Reach out.

https://www.insidetrack.org.uk

All of these whistleblowers are given anonymity, so the writers of this new warning could be any bunch of cranks:

If this was a genuine issue, surely these “experts” would have published a proper analysis, backed up with verifiable data. Instead they slink in the shadows, relying on the Telegraph give them credibility.

Inside Track’s BlueSky page leaves no doubt where they stand regarding climate change. For example:

https://web-cdn.bsky.app/profile/insidetrackuk.bsky.social

Quite why the Telegraph gives them column inches is a mystery.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
27 Comments
Bruce Cobb
October 16, 2026 3:01 am

We are not looking to receive confidential documents or identify the ‘worst’ companies, but are interesting in speaking to you as an expert in your industry about what common practice looks like across it.

Heh. Maybe first they should be “interesting” in learning to speak English.
Translation: They want you to snitch for them, but don’t worry; your “secret” is safe with them.

Scarecrow Repair
October 16, 2026 3:07 am

My home in the boonies had to switch to California’s FAIR plan, supplemental fire insurance. Separate bills and other weirdity, but without looking them up and fussing with the calculator, my memory is the two come to $700/month for a 2BR home. ±$100/month.

Randle Dewees
Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
October 16, 2026 5:05 am

My cabin up at Kennedy Meadows (South Sierra). In 2021 FAIR backed insurance was $1600 for the year. 2022 it went to $2000. In 2023 the cost more than doubled to $4,500 (375/month). This was for a stripped policy with a 20% deductible. No doubt it would have kept jumping up. In 2023 we went bare – we were basically betting a large sum that the cabin would burn down. If it does burn, we are left with 5 acres of denuded relatively low value land.

Bryan A
Reply to  Randle Dewees
October 16, 2026 6:10 am

They obviously want you to live like Ted Kaczynski, in a cabin that can be rebuilt for $200 in ten minutes. And for that they will charge a measly $400 per month in insurance

Beta Blocker
Reply to  Randle Dewees
October 16, 2026 7:45 am

Friends across the road are in the process of building a retirement home a hundred miles north of here on five acres of land they own in the woods south of Cheney, Washington.

A wildfire passed through those woods in 2021. It destroyed their construction shed and all its building material contents, and melted their backhoe tractor — forcing them to start over from the beginning.

Because of the certainty of another similar wildfire at some point in the future, they cannot get home insurance at all. They will have to self-insure and assume all the risk themselves.

The new house will use insulated concrete form construction (ICF) for the walls, steel trusses for the roof beams, a metal roof, and metal siding. Ventilation of the roof eves will be done using methods which don’t allow entry of fire or burning embers under the eves. The structure will be surrounded by 100 feet of gravel on all sides.

The house will still be standing after the next wildfire comes through, and will only need a new coat of paint afterwards.

Randle Dewees
Reply to  Beta Blocker
October 16, 2026 8:13 am

Our cabin was built in 1980 of wood, and when it burns, it will burn mightily.

MarkW
Reply to  Randle Dewees
October 16, 2026 9:38 am

If the insurance per year is more than around 10% of the cost of re-building, then the insurance is a waste of money. Take the money you would have spent on insurance and put it into the bank. Long term, you come out ahead.

Randle Dewees
Reply to  MarkW
October 16, 2026 10:47 am

My rational for canceling in 2023 – even though 4K was only about 2% of the rebuild cost (2,400 sq ft) I thought with the premium cost geometrically increasing I’d end up canceling anyway in a year or two. I can do the math and odds in my gut, and I guess I’m already about $15K ahead now.

The cabin is a toy. It was purchased on a whim, and it can burn down and the financial impact on our estate is basically zero. I kind of wish we had not bought it – old cabins are work pits. My wife loves it. I certainly would have no interest in rebuilding, the best thing about the place is the trees, and I would not want to go back to a fire scar.

Mike Larkin
October 16, 2026 3:11 am

If MI5 was a genuine domestic threat counter intelligence organisation they should be all over this mob like a case of measles.

SxyxS
Reply to  Mike Larkin
October 16, 2026 3:20 pm

Mi5 , like all other 3 letter agencies work for the domestic threat.

October 16, 2026 3:53 am

“Senior figures in the City of London …”

Is it the actual city that is refered to or is it the Club of Thieves, where Queen Elizabeth II was the previous head …?

atticman
Reply to  SasjaL
October 16, 2026 4:37 am

I really can’t see what you’re getting at.

Reply to  atticman
October 17, 2026 12:10 am

I believe the reference is to a conspiracy theorist’s nonsense, supposedly because QEII couldn’t “steal” as much money as her predecessors.

2hotel9
October 16, 2026 4:37 am

So they are creating a “problem” to increase their profits. Got it.

Bryan A
Reply to  2hotel9
October 16, 2026 6:12 am

A “Non-Problem”…Yes!

Coach Springer
October 16, 2026 5:17 am

Blaming affordability issues on weather? Sounds like the modern version of the witch doctor.

strativarius
October 16, 2026 5:17 am

Senior figures in the City of London

Bankers.

Do they also use RCP8.5 in their ‘modelling’?

Bryan A
October 16, 2026 6:05 am

If these “Senior Executives” truly exist, they need to come into the Light and Identify themselves as such. Nothing dispels the darkness of unfettered malignancy like the Light of Truth.
Come forward and make your truth known in the light of prominence and not the darkness of anonymity

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Bryan A
October 16, 2026 9:17 am

Similar: “Scientists say…”

ResourceGuy
October 16, 2026 9:14 am

The next financial crisis will come from advocacy agendas distorting the economy and financial markets while high benefit costs break the system.

MarkW
Reply to  ResourceGuy
October 16, 2026 9:41 am

Collapsing the system is their goal. They are convinced that once the current system no longer exists, they will be able to replace it with socialism/communism with themselves in charge.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  ResourceGuy
October 16, 2026 10:19 am

Activists, not advocates. Nuance difference.

MarkW
October 16, 2026 9:36 am

The insurance companies are basing charges on actual payouts, not fanciful projections.
We can’t allow that to continue.

If any home becomes “uninsurable”, it will because of government fiat, not anything the “climate” is doing.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MarkW
October 16, 2026 10:20 am

But the government knows how best to spend your money. Proof? Just ask them.

Giving_Cat
Reply to  MarkW
October 16, 2026 10:24 am

> The insurance companies are basing charges on actual payouts, not fanciful projections.

The key word here being “base.” As in the minimum charge not what they are going to charge. Insurance companies are leading AI users. The goal being maximum profit.Oh, and do not doubt the use of AI by all of these companies is a form of collusion also leading to higher rates.

Edward Katz
October 16, 2026 2:34 pm

It seems as though the worst climate alarmists can be found among the British media who I maintain have been taking generous donations from a leftists government plus a number of green organizations to promote the sky-is-falling narrative. So such an article was to be expected eventually from one of these outlets.

October 17, 2026 12:55 am

“insurers are underpricing the risk “

Because that is what those darn insurers do. They keep undercharging their customers and turning huge losses as a consequence.

As a matter of fact insures are going bankru … oh wait

From Leo:
“Over the last 25 years, numerous insurance companies in the United States have gone bankrupt, often due to poor investments and financial crises, with notable cases including AIG and Conseco. The trend has shown that while bankruptcies are relatively rare, they tend to spike during economic downturns, reflecting broader financial instability.”