Africa’s Poorest Countries Need Energy, Not Empathy

By Vijay Jayaraj

The mainstream media and policy analysts have been slower than sloths in displaying an understanding of how the United States’ dismantling greenhouse gas limits for power plants is a profound turning point for global energy policy. Moreover, while Washington reclaims industrial common sense, the promise of energy reformation languishes in Africa, especially in nations that sit at or near the bottom of national income.

Begin with numbers published by the World Bank. In Mozambique, 81% of people live below the line of extreme poverty, $2.15 a day. In Burundi the figure stands at 74%, and in the Central African Republic close to 72%. Malawi sits alongside them with some of the highest poverty rates on the continent, and its economy entered 2026 with inflation nearly 30% and public debt approaching 91% of gross domestic product.

South Sudan posts the lowest score on the U.N.’s Human Development Index. In 2019, more than 97% of people in the Central African Republic, South Sudan, and Burundi cooked with smoky wood, charcoal, dung, and crop waste.

The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation found that household smoke kills Burundians at high rates, and women and girls spend four hours daily gathering fuel. In Egypt where cooking gas is widely used, such hardships are hardly known.

Energy Access and Poverty
One of the primary reasons for these levels of poverty is lack of access to energy, especially electricity. And some of the statistics could come from societies of dark pre-industrial eras.

The Central African Republic’s electricity network runs on the hydroelectric power of one waterway. The Boali complex on the Mbali River – three units totaling less than 39 megawatts – produces far less than a single modern coal-fired plant, which typically generates 1,000 megawatts or more. Of the country’s 5 million people, 4.3 million do not have electricity.

Burundi’s entire national grid produced less than 167 megawatts in 2025, even with a recent addition of nearly 50 megawatts. The national access to electricity sits below 12%. Burundi’s 14 million people depend on a system that is barely enough for a single American shopping mall.

South Sudan’s installed capacity reached roughly 214 megawatts by 2023, of which about half worked.

Why does so little firm power exist in places that need it most? Follow the finance. The World Bank stopped financing coal more than a decade ago. It then would end upstream oil and gas lending after 2019.

In September 2019, African Development Bank President Akinwumi Adesina told the U.N. Climate Action Summit that coal belonged to the past and his bank was getting out of it, a pledge the bank never formally wrote into policy but has applied in practice.

Vijaya Ramachandran of the Breakthrough Institute says blanket bans on financing hydrocarbon projects entrench poverty. Addressing climate change and ignoring poverty is “completely immoral,” she says. “The average Ethiopian consumes only 130 kilowatt-hours of electricity per year, about the amount the average person in the United States consumes in four days.”

Ms. Ramachandran is not a climate “skeptic” but rather an economist who knows what happens at a clinic that has insufficient electricity to refrigerate its drugs.

NJ Ayuk of the African Energy Chamber makes the engineering case. Ending energy poverty, he says, requires every available resource, with coal and oil among the assets that “each have a role to play.” Telling Africans to make do with wind and solar while wealthy countries restart their own coal plants is “not just unfair (and) unjust, it is dishonest,” he says.

African governments should demand that the African Development Bank and World Bank restore financing for fossil fuel plants and for the infrastructure to connect them to consumers. This is the bare minimum needed for the continent’s most desperate to escape poverty.

Originally published at PJ Media, September 30, 2026.

Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Fairfax, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India. He served as a research associate with the Changing Oceans Research Unit at University of British Columbia, Canada.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 3 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
Bill Toland
October 3, 2026 6:17 am

The hypocrisy of climate alarmists knows no bounds. They would rather poor African countries had no electricity at all rather than have an electricity grid powered by fossil fuels.

Tom Halla
Reply to  Bill Toland
October 3, 2026 6:40 am

It is also misanthropy in general

October 3, 2026 6:46 am

Nobody beside the US is restarting their coal plants and even there the massive amount of substidies will still not be enough to keep them running.

Solar and Wind are the fastest and cheapest way of electrification (see: Pakistan).

Hydrocarbons had 200 years time to make it happen – the only thing they brought is imperialism with giant power plant projects and corruption.

Bill Toland
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
October 3, 2026 7:02 am

Delusional drivel.

2hotel9
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
October 3, 2026 7:18 am

And more lies from the resident PLS. Stuck on stupid is all you got.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
October 3, 2026 7:29 am

Tell that drivel to the children left without a mother who died from cooking with dung. Better yet, why don’t you try cooking with dung in your home?

strativarius
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
October 3, 2026 7:43 am

imperialism with giant power plant projects and corruption.

Sounds very much like wind and solar. Prime farmland etc taken out of agricultural and useful production to farm renewables subsidies instead.

In a small island nation such an absurd idea is for the birds. And people with deep pockets to fill.

Petey Bird
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
October 3, 2026 10:26 am

Google;
“Pakistan is facing a severe electricity crisis marked by prolonged load shedding, surging tariffs, and a widening demand-supply gap.”
“High electricity costs and grid unreliability have driven a massive boom in solar net-metering across the country. While daytime solar generation lowers demand for traditional distribution companies (like LESCO) during daylight hours, it creates a sharp demand spike and system strain after sunset when solar output drops.”
Not very useful.

Coach Springer
October 3, 2026 6:53 am

Put the UN and/or greens in charge and they will get neither energy nor empathy more of the same.

Neil Pryke
October 3, 2026 7:08 am

I have issues with the free and easy use of “empathy”…

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Neil Pryke
October 3, 2026 7:27 am

You also have issues with your own narcissism.

2hotel9
October 3, 2026 7:17 am

The peoples of Africa have been drowned in liberal, white “empathy”, or as it is more correctly called “suicidal empathy” because it damages white liberals as much as it damages those it is forced upon. The damage is done, so many of the countries in Africa are in a flat spin that the further heaping on of “empathy” from white liberals is massively exacerbating. When a structure is on fire stop pouring gasoline on it.

People in Africa have to drive out the NGOs and church based “aid” groups forcibly and DO NOT LET THEM RETURN. And that includes the Chinese.

Reply to  2hotel9
October 3, 2026 7:23 am

Neocolonialism doesn’t work with empathy – it works with megaprojects and debt.
Aid programs are used as a form of soft power. It’s funny how americans cheer for the disbanding of US Aid as it only will hurt them in the long run.

2hotel9
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
October 3, 2026 7:26 am

Wow, even more stuck on stupid.

strativarius
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
October 3, 2026 7:46 am

americans cheer for the disbanding of US Aid as it only will hurt them in the long run.

How did [USAID] giving money to people like David Miliband (salary >$1 million) help Americans? Now that he no longer gets a cent how has that harmed Americans???

Jeff Alberts
October 3, 2026 7:29 am

First and foremost, African nations need effective leaders, instead of the kleptocrats they always seem to be saddled with. Only then can they lift themselves out of poverty.

October 3, 2026 7:32 am

Here is a record of what President Obama was putting across to young African leaders in 2013:

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/06/29/remarks-president-obama-young-african-leaders-initiative-town-hall

“Ultimately, if you think about all the youth that everybody has mentioned here in Africa, if everybody is raising living standards to the point where everybody has got a car and everybody has got air conditioning, and everybody has got a big house, well, the planet will boil over — unless we find new ways of producing energy.”

No. There was never a physically plausible mechanism for emissions of CO2 to exert a harmful warming influence on “the planet.” Granting that the “boil over” exaggeration was not meant seriously, it nevertheless signaled a delusional claim that a non-hydrocarbon future was just around the corner if the world would only listen.

Now the U.S. has begun to correct the course, but huge political risks remain. The “climate” movement will not give up easily.

Thank you for listening.

John Hultquist
Reply to  David Dibbell
October 3, 2026 8:01 am

“In 2013, President Obama demonstrated the Soccket, an electricity-generating soccer ball, …”
Now that I reflect on his presidency, this was likely his best idea.

strativarius
October 3, 2026 7:35 am

the promise of energy reformation languishes in Africa – and in the North West European nation that once ruled large parts of it.

Africa must follow, pied piper fashion, the UK’s [post-colonial] selfless act of achieving net zero ; for the planet’s sake. The planet? We need new ’eminent’ scientists.

Hundreds of thousands are expected to die, millions to go hungry. This is not just about weather patterns, but about injustice

Some warnings are so grave that it is almost impossible to fully comprehend them. The descriptions of a super-sized, “Godzilla-level” El Niño already heating our planet would sound hyperbolic were they not issuing from eminent scientists. 
…
The UK foreign secretary’s warning to other countries at the UN on Wednesday that El Niño and the climate and nature crises threaten their national security and defence was welcome. – The Guardian

All the UK can give Africa is wads of cash, £1.5 billion in 2025/26. With strings attached.

John Hultquist
October 3, 2026 7:55 am

“One of the primary reasons for these levels of poverty is lack of access to energy, especially electricity. …. ”
And —
“Why does so little firm power exist in places that need it most? Follow the finance.”

In September, 1882, the Edison Illuminating Company began operating on Pearl Street in lower Manhattan. In the years that followed, towns across North America lit-up as though by the rising sun. Nearly 150 years later much of the world struggles with this phenomenon because of “finance”. My comprehension of this isn’t working. I guess I’ve missed a significant point. 

Dave Andrews
Reply to  John Hultquist
October 3, 2026 8:41 am

For decades western environmental and other NGOs, often with the tacit support of Governments and International Development Institutions, broadly opposed large scale energy and resource development – dams, mines, oil and gas etc across the developing world.

Instead they prioritised things like transparency, civil society engagement, market liberalisation and climate change and withdrew from nearly all large scale infrastructure, energy development and other resource related projects.

China and Russia took advantage of this in many developing countries in Africa and elsewhere.

October 3, 2026 9:13 am

A picture paints a thousand words. In this case, two pictures.

OWID-Per-Capita-CO2-and-Life-Expectancy
Reply to  sskinner
October 3, 2026 9:17 am

The US having emissions like the developed world but not the life expectancy to show for it 😛