CO2 and Temperature | Climate Chronicles

.
CO2 Coalition

This short video from the CO2 Coalition walks through the geological record, ice-core data, and basic physics to examine the relationship. Over hundreds of millions of years, CO2 and temperature have often moved independently or even in opposite directions. In ice cores covering the last several glacial cycles, temperature typically rises first; CO2 follows hundreds of years later. That sequence is the opposite of the cause-and-effect story commonly presented.

The video also covers why additional CO2 produces diminishing warming (saturation of the relevant infrared bands) and why water vapor and clouds dominate Earth’s greenhouse effect. CO2 remains essential plant food that has contributed to global greening and higher crop yields.

The CO2 Coalition presents data and analysis that challenge the claim of a CO2-controlled climate crisis.

Learn more and read the supporting papers at co2coalition.org.

#CO2 #Temperature #ClimateChronicles #ClimateScience #CO2Coalition

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
September 22, 2026 10:33 pm

CO2 warm forcing at the 430 ppm doesn’t do much of anything as most of it occurred in the first 60-80 ppm.

It is time to get on with life celebration that the planet is loving all the increase in atmospheric CO2 in the air as the greening Earth is well in evidence.

Reply to  Sunsettommy
September 22, 2026 10:45 pm

Talk about uneducated…

Mario Barbafiera
Reply to  Eldrosion
September 22, 2026 11:18 pm

Don’t be so hard on your self….

Greg Goodman
Reply to  Eldrosion
September 23, 2026 12:48 am

Talk about uneducated…

OK, let’s do that.
Uneducated is someone who comes a scientific discussion and makes some presumably critical comment without critising anything at all; without making any counter point; without saying anything we can either verify or falsify to see whether they actually know isht about anything.

Talk about uneducated.

Anthony Banton
Reply to  Sunsettommy
September 23, 2026 12:22 am

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/6375/2024/

We present a direct measurement of the impact of increased atmospheric CO2 on the spectra of the Earth’s longwave radiation obtained from space. The goal of this study is to experimentally confirm that the direct effects of CO2 increase on the Earth’s outgoing longwave spectra follow theoretical estimates, by developing a methodology that allows for a direct and more precise comparison between theory and observations. In this methodology, a search is performed to find selected ensembles of observed atmospheric vertical profiles of temperature and water vapor that are as close as possible to each other in terms of their values. By analyzing the spectral radiances measured from space by the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS), corresponding to the selected ensembles of profiles, the effects of increased CO2 on the spectra can be isolated from the temperature and water vapor effects. The results illustrate the impact of the increase in CO2 on the longwave spectra and compare well with theoretical estimates. As far as the authors are aware, this is the first time that the spectral signature of the increase in CO2 (isolated from temperature and water vapor changes) has been directly observed from space.

Dave Burton
September 22, 2026 10:41 pm

Folks, I want to apologize for the mistakes in this video. I thought we were going to hold it, to address them, but there was obviously some miscommunication.

The Chemist
Reply to  Dave Burton
September 22, 2026 11:31 pm

What mistakes?

Greg Goodman
Reply to  Dave Burton
September 23, 2026 12:50 am

Talk about uneducated

Greg Goodman
September 23, 2026 1:03 am

The should have mentioned geological proxies studies which show a 200-800 year time LAG between rising temps and rising CO2 in the swings between glaciation and interglacial periods like the present.

Reversed causation is a hard idea to sell.

They should have highlit the early 20th c. warming which was just as rapid as the late 20th c. warming but before the post 1960 economic development that the IPCC says is the cause of the warming. The is NO consistent correlation, what is why all the alarmist focus exclusively on one period the data where reducing all the available DAILY data to two straight lines shows both are positive. That is not what “correlation” means , it is a contrived result.

They should have mentioned the “canary in the coal mine” of global warming: Arctic sea ice.

We never hear about it any more , and for good reason: the last two years’ minimum ice extent were 10% GREATER than in 2007 when as the hysterical claims of “immentent ice-free summers” began.

The last two years’ minimum ice extent were 35% GREATER than in 2012, the recorded lowest extent in the 45y record.

35% RECOVERY !! Why did they hide such good news ?!

comment image

More detail here:
https://climategrog.wordpress.com/chartic-2007-2026/