Miliband Lies In New York

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

What an embarrassment this man is for our great country!

It is really fantastic to be back here at NY Climate Week, I can honestly say to you, this is my second favourite Climate Week in the world, after London of course.  

No really, it is fantastic to be here, and look, I think the first thing I want to say is to sound a note of optimism, because despite challenging political times, it is set to be the case that in 2026 we’re going to see $2.2 trillion dollars in clean energy against $1.2 trillion in fossil fuels. 

I think that deserves a round of applause, ladies and gentlemen. 

I was here last year as the Energy Secretary. I’m now the Foreign Secretary of the United Kingdom, but I come here as passionate about the cause of New York Climate Week, the cause that we are all fighting for. 

And I want to make a simple argument to you today, which is that climate and nature loss represents an urgent national security issue and demands action equal to the scale of the challenge, and that it demands a shift in our thinking and a shift in who in government takes an interest and cares about these issues and puts them front and centre. 

And I think the history on this is instructive, like many people in this room, I’ve been at this some time for the better part of two decades. 

Because for many years when I was the Climate Change Secretary in 2008, climate change and the destruction of nature were treated as peripheral environmental issues. Yes, they were seen as important, but they were separate from the core business of economic growth, or indeed energy security.  

And over these last two decades, the penny has dropped about the opportunity that the energy transition offers in terms of the good jobs at good wages that so many people in our different countries want to see.  

And Russia’s invasion of Ukraine underlined the dependence that so many countries face on fossil fuel markets, the fossil fuel roller coaster, as we call it in the UK. And the situation with Iran, the Iran war has underlined that again. And I think people now see the energy security imperative, the energy independence imperative of clean energy. 

But having understood the jobs opportunity and the energy security imperative, my argument to you today is: we need to take the next step and recognize the national security imperative too.  

And I think you all know the picture, and it is gloomy, I warn you, but I’m just going to say some of it to you today because we need to be truth-telling about this. 

Over 150 million hectares burned globally in the first four months of 2026 alone. 

Record extreme heat causing widespread loss of life. 

Nepal’s devastating floods happening due to glacial collapse and the coming El Nino, as Prime Minister Albanese said, is already forecast to be the strongest in living memory.

This is why. These facts. What is happening in our world. Is why climate breakdown, in my view, must be an issue for foreign ministers and prime ministers, as well as energy and climate ministers. The security community, not just the activist community, the generals, not just the green campaigners. 

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/what-climate-security-means-now-foreign-secretary-at-new-york-climate-week

His three claims, which I have highlighted, are simply fake news:

1) Over 150 million hectares burned globally in the first four months of 2026 alone

His figure is not for four months, it is at WK 37. Worse still, there is nothing remotely unusual or catastrophic about the number he quotes.

In fact, this year is the lowest wildfire area since the start of records in 2012.

2) Record extreme heat causing widespread loss of life

There is absolutely no evidence or data supporting this claim, and the Government website gives no further detail.

3) Nepal’s devastating floods happening due to glacial collapse

The floods were triggered by a bedrock collapse, not a glacial collapse. They had nothing to do with climate change.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 6 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
18 Comments
Neil Pryke
September 23, 2026 2:08 am

Stop this “man” doing any more harm…

It might seem like a joke to some people, but to indulge him is to betray the memory
of people who got his parents out of the hands of the Nazis…

His parents, ultimately palpably ungrateful, foisted this educated twerp on the UK…

Stop him…

Gregory Woods
Reply to  Neil Pryke
September 23, 2026 3:10 am

Thanks for your BOLD statement,

September 23, 2026 2:45 am

Speaking of lies:

TFK_bams09 and all the clones are GAAP & LoT frauds.

John XB
September 23, 2026 3:10 am

Truth is alien to that creature.

Mr.
September 23, 2026 3:25 am

He could just as well have repeated the original tactic for “The Cause” –
“even if the science is wrong, we have to ride this global warming scare. . . . “

Michael Corcoran
September 23, 2026 3:31 am

On Paul Homewoods final point…
While climate skeptics often focus their criticism on the WWA’s proprietary computer models (which mathematically calculate “how much more likely” an event became due to emissions), the physical mechanics linking warming to the Langtang Lirung collapse are treated as standard geophysics by independent experts.
Several prominent institutions and researchers have explicitly linked this specific disaster to long-term warming trends:
1. Independent Geoscientists

  • University of Graz (Austria): Geoscientist Jakob Steiner, who has monitored the Himalayan region since 2006 and was not involved in the WWA report, explicitly validated the findings. He noted that physical monitoring instruments at 5,000 metres show that high-altitude rock and ground no longer remain frozen year-round. He stated directly that ground sitting under ice for thousands of years is now being exposed and thawed, compromising its structural stability.

2. High Mountain Asia Specialists

  • The HiRISK Scientific Consortium: In their independent mechanical teardown of the disaster, this multi-nation team explicitly highlighted that the collapse was a cryospheric disaster. They noted that decades of atmospheric warming had been “quietly reshaping the thermal conditions locked inside the mountain,” directly mapping out how permafrost degradation and water infiltration preconditioned the rock face to fail.

3. Academic consensus on the wider “Himalayan Trend”
Glaciologists globally note that the Langtang Lirung collapse is not an isolated anomaly, but part of a well-documented physical trend across High Mountain Asia.

  • The World Meteorological Organization (WMO): In their broader reporting, the WMO noted that glaciers globally—and particularly in the Himalayas—have recorded continuous, accelerating mass loss. Independent satellite tracking shows Himalayan glaciers thinning by an average of 0.5 metres per year since 2000, meaning the “de-buttressing” (unloading of weight support) described earlier is an empirical fact backed by multi-decade space data.
Reply to  Michael Corcoran
September 23, 2026 3:42 am

“He stated directly that ground sitting under ice for thousands of years is now being exposed and thawed…”

Getting back to normal?

Scissor
Reply to  Michael Corcoran
September 23, 2026 3:52 am

The horror, and the Grand Canyon is deeper now than at any time in recorded history!

September 23, 2026 3:39 am

in 2026 we’re going to see $2.2 trillion dollars in clean energy against $1.2 trillion in fossil fuels”

I have no idea what he’s saying here.

Scissor
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
September 23, 2026 3:57 am

https://finance.yahoo.com/energy/articles/clean-energy-investment-hits-2-210000328.html

It means that clean energy costs are double for just one tenth of the output.

Reply to  Scissor
September 23, 2026 4:37 am

Yuh, he makes it sound like a good deal.

SxyxS
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
September 23, 2026 3:58 am

Sounds like Investment – either in infrastructure or propaganda.

September 23, 2026 4:02 am

I live in Canada and fossil fuels keep 41 million people and their pets from freezing to death in winter. Last winter in the Yukon and the NWT air temperature plunged to -50° C, which broke the all time record for low temperatures.

He mentions clean energy and is unaware that it only produces electricity and that 80% of energy use in a modern economy is thermal energy. The heavy industries, heavy transportation systems and agriculture will always use large amounts of fossil fuels and this will never change. Net Zero by 2050 is not possible because there will be long cold rainy winters in the UK.

Are there any heavy industries left in the UK?

strativarius
September 23, 2026 4:28 am

Ed Miliband…

Bad Lie Mind

QED

September 23, 2026 5:13 am

Mary Robinson, who trained in law and was president of Ireland in the nineties, started promoting Climate Justice in 2012. Now it is Miliband’s turn promoting Climate Security. Notice how Climate Change and Climate Alarm has been marketed to the gullible public. This same Miliband is part of a government that cannot even offer UK citizens financial security through a balanced budget and promoting hard work, productivity and well paid jobs with lower taxes but it wants to offer Climate Security. It cannot secure its limited borders against people crossing the English Channel in flimsy boats but says it can secure the world against the vagaries of weather conditions and climate. These people despise God but deluded if they think they can play God. What Climate Sorcery are they going to come up with next?

Notice the failure to subject their climate claims to a rigorous examination. The Climate Prophets have made numeous alarming prophecies since 1988, none of which have been fulfilled. The mark of a false prophet is when his prophecies are repeatedly not being fufilled. Perhaps we should call this a Climate Con.

We need to follow the money, the huge investments demanded with certain people cashing in, let’s call it the Climate Profits. Better still we can call this a Climate Ponzi (Scheme). Various subsidized renewable schemes for wind and solar have made a small number of people rich but have failed. Taxpayers have been saddled with debt running into many billions. What of the failure of many EV manufacturers that received government subsidies? This was not the money out of the pockets of politicians and government officials but taxpayers. What of the costly retrofitting of houses with no thorough cost benefit analysis?

We need to keep on exposing the Climate Fraud.
We need to confront the mainstream media who push Climate Propaganda.
We do not need Climate Justice or Climate Security but Climate Honesty.

Boff Doff
September 23, 2026 5:17 am

Mad Red Milibean cares not one jot or scintilla about climate or energy security. His sole objective, left to him by his equally mad Marxist father, is the destruction of capitalism. All other priorities are rescinded.

GeorgeInSanDiego
September 23, 2026 5:19 am

Make England Great Again

Bruce Cobb
September 23, 2026 5:53 am

I’ve been at this some time for the better part of two decades. 
It seems that lying about climate for over decades makes one speak in word salad. He seems pretty proud of it though.