Miliband Lies In New York

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

What an embarrassment this man is for our great country!

It is really fantastic to be back here at NY Climate Week, I can honestly say to you, this is my second favourite Climate Week in the world, after London of course.  

No really, it is fantastic to be here, and look, I think the first thing I want to say is to sound a note of optimism, because despite challenging political times, it is set to be the case that in 2026 we’re going to see $2.2 trillion dollars in clean energy against $1.2 trillion in fossil fuels. 

I think that deserves a round of applause, ladies and gentlemen. 

I was here last year as the Energy Secretary. I’m now the Foreign Secretary of the United Kingdom, but I come here as passionate about the cause of New York Climate Week, the cause that we are all fighting for. 

And I want to make a simple argument to you today, which is that climate and nature loss represents an urgent national security issue and demands action equal to the scale of the challenge, and that it demands a shift in our thinking and a shift in who in government takes an interest and cares about these issues and puts them front and centre. 

And I think the history on this is instructive, like many people in this room, I’ve been at this some time for the better part of two decades. 

Because for many years when I was the Climate Change Secretary in 2008, climate change and the destruction of nature were treated as peripheral environmental issues. Yes, they were seen as important, but they were separate from the core business of economic growth, or indeed energy security.  

And over these last two decades, the penny has dropped about the opportunity that the energy transition offers in terms of the good jobs at good wages that so many people in our different countries want to see.  

And Russia’s invasion of Ukraine underlined the dependence that so many countries face on fossil fuel markets, the fossil fuel roller coaster, as we call it in the UK. And the situation with Iran, the Iran war has underlined that again. And I think people now see the energy security imperative, the energy independence imperative of clean energy. 

But having understood the jobs opportunity and the energy security imperative, my argument to you today is: we need to take the next step and recognize the national security imperative too.  

And I think you all know the picture, and it is gloomy, I warn you, but I’m just going to say some of it to you today because we need to be truth-telling about this. 

Over 150 million hectares burned globally in the first four months of 2026 alone. 

Record extreme heat causing widespread loss of life. 

Nepal’s devastating floods happening due to glacial collapse and the coming El Nino, as Prime Minister Albanese said, is already forecast to be the strongest in living memory.

This is why. These facts. What is happening in our world. Is why climate breakdown, in my view, must be an issue for foreign ministers and prime ministers, as well as energy and climate ministers. The security community, not just the activist community, the generals, not just the green campaigners. 

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/what-climate-security-means-now-foreign-secretary-at-new-york-climate-week

His three claims, which I have highlighted, are simply fake news:

1) Over 150 million hectares burned globally in the first four months of 2026 alone

His figure is not for four months, it is at WK 37. Worse still, there is nothing remotely unusual or catastrophic about the number he quotes.

In fact, this year is the lowest wildfire area since the start of records in 2012.

2) Record extreme heat causing widespread loss of life

There is absolutely no evidence or data supporting this claim, and the Government website gives no further detail.

3) Nepal’s devastating floods happening due to glacial collapse

The floods were triggered by a bedrock collapse, not a glacial collapse. They had nothing to do with climate change.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 20 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
52 Comments
Neil Pryke
September 23, 2026 2:08 am

Stop this “man” doing any more harm…

It might seem like a joke to some people, but to indulge him is to betray the memory
of people who got his parents out of the hands of the Nazis…

His parents, ultimately palpably ungrateful, foisted this educated twerp on the UK…

Stop him…

Gregory Woods
Reply to  Neil Pryke
September 23, 2026 3:10 am

Thanks for your BOLD statement,

Reply to  Neil Pryke
September 23, 2026 8:30 am

Stop this “man” doing any more harm…. to my eyes!

September 23, 2026 2:45 am

Speaking of lies:

TFK_bams09 and all the clones are GAAP & LoT frauds.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
September 23, 2026 8:32 am

I have to start downvoting you every time you abuse Generally Accepted Accounting Practices in a science post.

My wife and daughter are both CPAs.
My wife was formerly an professor of accunting.

John XB
September 23, 2026 3:10 am

Truth is alien to that creature.

Mr.
September 23, 2026 3:25 am

He could just as well have repeated the original tactic for “The Cause” –
“even if the science is wrong, we have to ride this global warming scare. . . . “

Michael Corcoran
September 23, 2026 3:31 am

On Paul Homewoods final point…
While climate skeptics often focus their criticism on the WWA’s proprietary computer models (which mathematically calculate “how much more likely” an event became due to emissions), the physical mechanics linking warming to the Langtang Lirung collapse are treated as standard geophysics by independent experts.
Several prominent institutions and researchers have explicitly linked this specific disaster to long-term warming trends:
1. Independent Geoscientists

  • University of Graz (Austria): Geoscientist Jakob Steiner, who has monitored the Himalayan region since 2006 and was not involved in the WWA report, explicitly validated the findings. He noted that physical monitoring instruments at 5,000 metres show that high-altitude rock and ground no longer remain frozen year-round. He stated directly that ground sitting under ice for thousands of years is now being exposed and thawed, compromising its structural stability.

2. High Mountain Asia Specialists

  • The HiRISK Scientific Consortium: In their independent mechanical teardown of the disaster, this multi-nation team explicitly highlighted that the collapse was a cryospheric disaster. They noted that decades of atmospheric warming had been “quietly reshaping the thermal conditions locked inside the mountain,” directly mapping out how permafrost degradation and water infiltration preconditioned the rock face to fail.

3. Academic consensus on the wider “Himalayan Trend”
Glaciologists globally note that the Langtang Lirung collapse is not an isolated anomaly, but part of a well-documented physical trend across High Mountain Asia.

  • The World Meteorological Organization (WMO): In their broader reporting, the WMO noted that glaciers globally—and particularly in the Himalayas—have recorded continuous, accelerating mass loss. Independent satellite tracking shows Himalayan glaciers thinning by an average of 0.5 metres per year since 2000, meaning the “de-buttressing” (unloading of weight support) described earlier is an empirical fact backed by multi-decade space data.
Reply to  Michael Corcoran
September 23, 2026 3:42 am

“He stated directly that ground sitting under ice for thousands of years is now being exposed and thawed…”

Getting back to normal?

MarkW
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
September 23, 2026 8:54 am

Still colder than than the Medieval, Roman, Egyptian and Minoan warm periods and much colder than the Holocene Optimum.

Scissor
Reply to  Michael Corcoran
September 23, 2026 3:52 am

The horror, and the Grand Canyon is deeper now than at any time in recorded history!

Denis
Reply to  Scissor
September 23, 2026 6:20 am

Nature’s own China Syndrome?

Reply to  Scissor
September 23, 2026 10:05 am

My favorite place on the planet. Been to the bottom several times and not on the back of donkeys.

Denis
Reply to  Michael Corcoran
September 23, 2026 6:18 am

The exact same phenomena occurred in an Alaska fiord in August 2025 when a very large mountainside collapsed, bringing with it parts of a glacier atop, at the head of the fiord creating a wave originally about 1,600 ft tall as demonstrated by the trees stripped from the side of the fiord. Stripping continued for some distance seaward as the wave progressed. Had there been any boats or ships in the very picturesque fiord as there usually are during summer, hundreds or even thousands could have been killed. Nobody was because the collapse occurred at about 5:30 in the morning before any had arrived. There is no permafrost at the fiord location. It seems that Steiner, HiRISK and WMO are unaware of this incident. They may also be unaware that there are about 530,000 mountainside collapses in the world each year, some pebbles and some gigantic, leading to lower mountains and filled broad valleys the US Appalachians being a good example. The phenomena is caused by a a property of mass called gravity. They may be equally unaware that high mountain glaciers have been in decline since about 1750 to today. That’s a lot of unawareness.

Mr.
Reply to  Denis
September 23, 2026 8:24 am

Exactly.
Events of all kinds – natural and un-natural – can often be attributed to combinations of factors.

Such combinations causing the conditions triggering the sudden shift from “stability” to “instability”.

Example –
the autopsy found that while Count Dracula had indeed suffered a stake through his heart, it was actually the severing of his head that determined his fatality.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Denis
September 23, 2026 8:53 am

Earth is a “living” planet. It is geologically active in many different ways.

Reply to  Michael Corcoran
September 23, 2026 8:31 am

In your own words, please, not AI-generated bumpf

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Michael Corcoran
September 23, 2026 8:47 am

1.5 C (a questionable estimation) over 150 years certainly can reshape thermal conditions locked in rock. /s

Data recorded in the first 2 decades of the 19th century show temperatures more than 1.5 C higher than the 1850 bench mark and CO2 levels comparable to today.

Sheesh.

Whatever credibitility you may have gained with this post was totally lost by invoking WHO.

WHO is redefining the word “empirical”

September 23, 2026 3:39 am

“in 2026 we’re going to see $2.2 trillion dollars in clean energy against $1.2 trillion in fossil fuels”

I have no idea what he’s saying here.

Scissor
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
September 23, 2026 3:57 am

https://finance.yahoo.com/energy/articles/clean-energy-investment-hits-2-210000328.html

It means that clean energy costs are double for just one tenth of the output.

Reply to  Scissor
September 23, 2026 4:37 am

Yuh, he makes it sound like a good deal.

SwedeTex
Reply to  Scissor
September 23, 2026 7:06 am

It shows there is more money to be made in the climate grift

Steve Bunten
Reply to  Scissor
September 23, 2026 8:50 am

That is what I was thinking when I read his weird statement. It doesn’t mean what he thought it meant.

SxyxS
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
September 23, 2026 3:58 am

Sounds like Investment – either in infrastructure or propaganda.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  SxyxS
September 23, 2026 8:36 am

I pick door #2.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
September 23, 2026 10:45 am

Whatever he’s saying, it’s got nothing to do with climate, and everything to do with moving money out of your pocket and into someone else’s. Possibly his.

September 23, 2026 4:02 am

I live in Canada and fossil fuels keep 41 million people and their pets from freezing to death in winter. Last winter in the Yukon and the NWT air temperature plunged to -50° C, which broke the all time record for low temperatures.

He mentions clean energy and is unaware that it only produces electricity and that 80% of energy use in a modern economy is thermal energy. The heavy industries, heavy transportation systems and agriculture will always use large amounts of fossil fuels and this will never change. Net Zero by 2050 is not possible because there will be long cold rainy winters in the UK.

Are there any heavy industries left in the UK?

strativarius
September 23, 2026 4:28 am

Ed Miliband…

Bad Lie Mind

QED

September 23, 2026 5:13 am

Mary Robinson, who trained in law and was president of Ireland in the nineties, started promoting Climate Justice in 2012. Now it is Miliband’s turn promoting Climate Security. Notice how Climate Change and Climate Alarm has been marketed to the gullible public. This same Miliband is part of a government that cannot even offer UK citizens financial security through a balanced budget and promoting hard work, productivity and well paid jobs with lower taxes but it wants to offer Climate Security. It cannot secure its limited borders against people crossing the English Channel in flimsy boats but says it can secure the world against the vagaries of weather conditions and climate. These people despise God but deluded if they think they can play God. What Climate Sorcery are they going to come up with next?

Notice the failure to subject their climate claims to a rigorous examination. The Climate Prophets have made numeous alarming prophecies since 1988, none of which have been fulfilled. The mark of a false prophet is when his prophecies are repeatedly not being fufilled. Perhaps we should call this a Climate Con.

We need to follow the money, the huge investments demanded with certain people cashing in, let’s call it the Climate Profits. Better still we can call this a Climate Ponzi (Scheme). Various subsidized renewable schemes for wind and solar have made a small number of people rich but have failed. Taxpayers have been saddled with debt running into many billions. What of the failure of many EV manufacturers that received government subsidies? This was not the money out of the pockets of politicians and government officials but taxpayers. What of the costly retrofitting of houses with no thorough cost benefit analysis?

We need to keep on exposing the Climate Fraud.
We need to confront the mainstream media who push Climate Propaganda.
We do not need Climate Justice or Climate Security but Climate Honesty.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Michael in Dublin
September 23, 2026 8:38 am

Not “many billions” but rather “many trillions.”

Small bur significant nit.

Boff Doff
September 23, 2026 5:17 am

Mad Red Milibean cares not one jot or scintilla about climate or energy security. His sole objective, left to him by his equally mad Marxist father, is the destruction of capitalism. All other priorities are rescinded.

GeorgeInSanDiego
September 23, 2026 5:19 am

Make England Great Again

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  GeorgeInSanDiego
September 23, 2026 8:38 am

Hmmm….. megamaga?

Bruce Cobb
September 23, 2026 5:53 am

I’ve been at this some time for the better part of two decades. 
It seems that lying about climate for over decades makes one speak in word salad. He seems pretty proud of it though.

Petey Bird
September 23, 2026 7:43 am

Milliband has achieved CLIMATE SECURITY. He is stating it clearly.
I told you the government controls the weather.
The droughts and fires are turned on by the government climate control office deliberately.

/s.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Petey Bird
September 23, 2026 8:39 am

A shame they do not have an emergency cutoff button.

Sparta Nova 4
September 23, 2026 8:30 am

There are 3 kinds or lies: lies, damn lies and, statistics.
— Generally attributed to Mark Twain, but with possible origin attributed to Benjamin Disraeli.

Miliband makes Goebbels proud.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
September 23, 2026 2:29 pm

You sure? I think even Goebbels would be thinking what a fkn idiot this cretin is.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  philincalifornia
September 24, 2026 9:21 am

You have a point.

Dave Andrews
September 23, 2026 8:55 am

Just because Ed has moved from Energy Sec to Foreign Sec doesn’t mean he is no longer Mad Ed!

1saveenergy
September 23, 2026 9:41 am

[“What an embarrassment this man is for our great country!“]
I think you mean …

‘What an embarrassment this man is for our former great country !!‘

Pulled down by 5th columnists like Milliband.

September 23, 2026 1:47 pm

What a fkn weirdo this guy is. I grew up in W. Yorkshire in the Harold Wilson years, so I’ve been following this now anachronistic party for 50+ years. With their support of of 27,000 deaths a month of Ukrainians, can they please rename the party the more accurate “Psychopaths who can’t get real jobs anymore Party”.

Edward Katz
September 23, 2026 1:48 pm

Brits like Miliband either consciously or subconsciously work hand in glove with alarmist organizations like the Guardian, the BBC and any of other multitudes of outfits like them. Except when the facts are really examined their claims collapse like the proverbial houses of cards. So it’s best to take their rantings with a heaping tablespoon of salt.

ethical voter
September 23, 2026 1:57 pm

The idiot talks about the destruction of nature without noticing the destruction of forests for wood pellets and space for bird choppers. Also green fields for solar panels, sea, and landscapes blighted with bird choppers.

The man is a complete idiot. How he arrived at his present position is the most important question. He is a shame on democracy and a greater shame to all who elevated him.

Reply to  ethical voter
September 23, 2026 3:06 pm

Drax makes wood pellets from a variety of sources in the southern US. No good trees are cut down for the making of wood pellets. Slash from forestry operation can be used for making wood pellets. Wood waste from furniture manufacture is used for making the pellets. The main reason Drax is in the wood pellet business is generous government subsidies.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Harold Pierce
September 24, 2026 9:23 am

Yes. The wood pellets was a bit off center, but the point is the environmental destruction of nature.

September 23, 2026 3:22 pm

No tectonics…no Himalayas…no disaster. Tectonic activity is the absolute, foundational driver of disaster risk in the Himalayan region. While surface events—such as monsoonal flash floods, glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs), and massive landslides—are frequently blamed for local destruction, tectonic force is the root cause that creates the topography, fractures the bedrock, and forms the cascades that make these disasters possible. No, it’s not CO2. It has been happening in all climates: hot, cold, medium for many millions of years. Without active continental collision, the Himalayas would lack the extreme topography, shattered geology, and massive potential energy that transform weather and hydrological flows into high-magnitude disasters. Weather provides the seasonal variation, but tectonics establishes the baseline hazard architecture.

leefor
Reply to  idbodbi
September 23, 2026 9:55 pm

That’s heresy, speaking science. I’m shocked. :0

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  leefor
September 24, 2026 9:23 am

Me too.
HOW DARE HE!

🙂

Bob
September 23, 2026 4:08 pm

“…it is set to be the case that in 2026 we’re going to see $2.2 trillion dollars in clean energy against $1.2 trillion in fossil fuels.”

Two point two trillion dollars spent on clean energy yet we are on the verge of energy shortages. Doesn’t look to me like that money was well spent. If that two point two trillion were spent on fossil fuel and nuclear I am convinced we would be well on our way to energy security for all.

This guy is a disgrace.

observa
September 24, 2026 2:40 am

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine underlined the dependence that so many countries face on fossil fuel markets, the fossil fuel roller coaster, as we call it in the UK.

Beware of Russian collusion Ed-
UK prime minister blames Russia for rise of far-right | Watch
Now where have we heard that before?

Melvyn Dackombe
September 24, 2026 4:19 am

That manic stare again.