Energy future: Made in China by coal

From CFACT

BY FRANK CLEMENTE AND FRED PALMER:

The stark reality: in China, 55% of power is produced by coal and the cost of household electricity is 8 cents per kWh. In the UK, coal’s percentage of electricity was 30% in 2010 but that has declined to less than 1%. Consequently, the cost of electricity for families has increased 250% — from 16 cents to over 40 cents per kWh — and is still on the rise. No wonder 37% of England’s families pay over 10% of their income on energy.

In the U.S., the closing of coal plants for political reasons has led to coal’s role declining from 45% in 2010 to just 15% today. Accordingly, the cost of electricity increased 70% to 19 cents per kWh and is projected to keep rising: “Retail electricity prices have increased faster than the rate of inflation since 2022, and we expect them to continue increasing” — U.S. Department of Energy. Moreover, after the closure of over 300 coal plants, reliability is at serious risk in the U.S.: “coal-fired generator retirements… have caused a sharp decline in anticipated resources … new generation is insufficient to make up for generator retirements and load growth.”  — North American Electricity Reliability Corporation (NERC)

Electricity is the sine qua non of modern society.  In 2000, the National Academy of Engineering identified electrification as the greatest engineering achievement of the 20th Century. Coal-based electricity brought the U.S. to the center of the world’s economic stage and China has followed that same pathway to modernity and societal progress. In 2000, coal produced about 990 Terawatt Hours (TWh) of electricity in China. By 2025, coal produced upwards of 6,000 TWh. This dramatic rise in coal power stimulated massive improvements in the quality of life of the population. In 2000, the Infant Mortality Rate in China was 30, it is now 5. Access to clean cooking fuels increased from 41% of the population to well over 90%. Availability of clean water grew from 45% of households to 99%. Life expectancy rose from 72 to 78, and the Food Production Index grew from 63 to over 112. No wonder the International Energy Agency (IEA) declared“Coal has underpinned China’s massive and unprecedented growth in output, fueling an economic miracle.”

The growth of the middle class in China is the largest the world has ever seen, increasing from 39 million people in 2000 to almost 1 billion today.  The middle class is the backbone of any society and coal-based electricity was the material foundation for this progress in China. In 2000, electricity use per capita was 993 kWh, it is now over 7,400 — far more than Germany. In essence, through the benefits of coal-based electricity, China, with over 1.4 billion people, became a modern nation in a little more than two decades. Since 2000, over 70% of humans lifted out of poverty were Chinese. Coal made the difference and propelled China to ever higher in the World’s socio-economic hierarchy.

China imports about 550 million metric tons of coal per year. These imports, along with its own substantial supply, have provided the energy to make China the world’s leading manufacturer and exporter. China produces over one billion tons of steel — 54% of global production, of which over 90% is produced using coal. China provides 52% of cement, 97% of which uses coal energy. China produces 80% of the world’s solar panels and coal provides at least 75% of the electricity for their manufacture. By 2030, China’s coal to gas capacity will grow from 9.4 billion cubic meters to 28 billion. The world’s policymakers need to be mindful of their dependence on China’s use of coal and the benefits that have spread across the globe.

And now China has built an electricity system for the next leap forward. The PRC is basing its electric supply on a foundation of coal — a fuel that has demonstrated abundance, availability, affordability and reliability. By 2030, China will have over 1,500 GW of coal-based electricity compared to the DOE projection of a mere 88 GW in the U.S. The idea that intermittent wind and solar will replace coal power in generation or manufacturing in China is wishful thinking indeed. Over 500 GW of coal capacity is already under development compared to an insignificant 4 GW in the U.S.

And these are not your grandfather’s coal plants. Rather, China is building advanced stations that produce significantly lower emissions. As Clare Richardson of the National Bureau of Asian Research pointed out: “China is rapidly deploying ultra-supercritical and supercritical coal technology, which can operate at higher temperatures and pressures to improve thermal efficiency.” The country has also pursued widespread adoption of flue gas desulfurization and selective catalytic reduction systems to cut sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions.

Consider, for example, Pingshan Phase II in Anhui Province, a cutting-edge 1.35-GW ultra-supercritical coal-fired unit with a net efficiency of about 50% — making it the world’s most efficient coal-fired power plant and a continuing model for the ongoing wave of plants under construction not only in China but also India and the rest of the world. China is the architect of 21St Century coal power.

There is widespread recognition that progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) will determine a large part of a nation’s future. RAND Corporation projects countries will see their influence rise or fall depending on how they manage the development of AI. Scholars at the University of Miami School of Law concluded: “The global race for AI dominance is shaping the future of economies, governance, and national security.” Finally, this cogent comment from Arab News: “Artificial Intelligence is no longer just a technological breakthrough: it is quickly becoming a linchpin of global power.”

Thus, the race is on and now we consider the realities: The U.S. aspires to global dominance in AI. In July of last year, the White House published: Winning the Race: America’s AI Action Plan as well as three executive orders designed to promote and maintain leadership in AI. But China has the same aspiration. Through a series of Five-Year Plans, China has become a formidable technological competitor of the U.S. As The New York Times put itChina Is Spending Billions to Become an A.I. Superpower.

The competition between the U.S. and China is intense and China is steadily eroding the initial gap. In 2023, the Stanford AI Index reported the performance gap between U.S. and Chinese model benchmarks was about 25%. By 2026, that gap has narrowed to 3% and is closing further. Daniel Hook, CEO at Digital Science, found that China is now ahead in the development of large language models with an AI talent pool that dwarfs its rivals — 30,000 active AI researchers and a massive graduate student and postdoctoral population. China has filed at least 70% of all global AI related patents and leads on research article volume with 23 % of all global AI publications versus 13 % for the U.S. And the American talent pool is diminishing. The number of AI researchers moving to the U.S. has dropped 89% since 2017. The U.S. is ahead today, but the momentum belongs to China.

No country will meet its AI goals without reliable and affordable electricity. The U.S. is increasingly falling behind on both fronts. Consider the PJM Interconnection with 67 million customers in the East. Due to the closure of coal generating capacity, the reserve margin for the system will continue to fall from 23% in 2020 to a risky 14% in 2027. Incredibly, utilities in the PJM system are planning to retire over 11 more GW of coal. Hard to believe.

The U.S. has been closing coal plants willy-nilly for over a decade with nary a thought to the implications. Yet the consequences of higher rates and reduced reliability are real and meaningful to the competition between China and the U.S. — and will be even more so as India’s 1.5 billion coal-based population enters the AI picture — India’s electricity is 70% coal. “The difference in the cost of energy around the world is going to become really quite extreme,” Michael Brown, global investment strategist at Franklin Templeton, told CNBC. “If you’re making energy-intensive investments, then you’re going to go to where the cheapest energy is.”

In terms of rates, U.S. household power prices have risen nearly 25% in just four years. In 2025-26 a total of 47 states endured electricity price increases and dozens of additional rate increase requests are still pending. The American people are increasingly victims of an array of poor energy policy decisions at both the Federal and state level — and even utilities themselves have failed to think ahead, closing productive coal plants to get in on the government dole of “renewables” like expensive wind and solar. Families suffer, businesses suffer and the next generation of Americans will pay a heavy price with a diminishing role on the world’s economic stage.

Note: Coal is the Cornerstone seeks to give a voice to supporters of coal in its many dimensions and contributions. But we need help and ask like-minded individuals and companies to help support the effort at http://www.coaliscornerstone.com. Access to our previous articles is available on this site.

This article originally appeared at RealClear Energy

Fred Palmer Esq. has served as CEO of Western Fuels and Peabody Energy’s Senior Vice President for Government Affairs. He chaired the World Coal Association Board and was a member of the National Coal Council. He received the American Institute of Mining Award for “Distinguished Achievement in Coal Technology.” He also was awarded a Statement of Appreciation from the National Coal Council in 2015 with a plaque for “Guidance since 1990”

Frank Clemente PhD. specializes in the socio-economic impact of energy policy and is author of The Global Value of Coal published by the International Energy Agency (IEA) as well as numerous articles in energy journals and reports for the National Coal Council. Professor Clemente has served on the faculty at the University of Kentucky, the University of Wisconsin and Penn State. His work is presented independently from any University affiliation. 

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 3 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
40 Comments
Gregory Woods
September 9, 2026 6:20 am

No doubt: Between AI and GW we are all doomed!

Beta Blocker
Reply to  Gregory Woods
September 9, 2026 8:59 am

Seventy years ago, in the Broadway musical West Side Story, the Jets came to a similar conclusion in their fight with the Sharks for control of their New York City territory.

September 9, 2026 6:24 am

“In the UK, coal’s percentage of electricity was 30% in 2010 but that has declined to less than 1%.”

No doubt the UK government is proud of itself- having heroically helped save the planet regardless of the suffering of its people- er, uh, it’s non wealthy classes! /s

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
September 9, 2026 7:44 am

“The stark reality: in China, 55% of power is produced by coal and the cost of household electricity is 8 cents per kWh.”

The UK has become a hopeless basket case.

NEW MINE-MOUTH COAL ELECTRICITY LESS COSTLY, AVAILABLE NOW, NOT PIE IN THE SKY, LIKE EXPENSIVE FUSION AND SMALL MODULAR NUCLEAR 
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/coal-electricity-less-costly-available-now-not-pie-in-the-sky
 
Wind/Solar electricity is at least 3 times more expensive than coal electricity; a main reason Europe is castrating itself.
US utilities are forced to buy offshore wind electricity for about 15 cents/kWh.
That price would have been 30 cents/kWh, if no 50% subsidies.

Hidden Costs: These are the A-to-Z costs (windmill to land fill) almost all folks are kept ignorant about. 
At a future 25-30% W/S annual penetration on the grid, based on UK and German experience: 
– Onshore grid expansion/reinforcement to connect far-flung W/S systems, about 2 c/kWh
– A fleet of traditional power plants to quickly counteract W/S variable output, on a less than minute-by-minute basis, 24/7/365, which means more Btu/kWh, more CO2/kWh, more cost of about 2 c/kWh
– A fleet of traditional power plants to provide electricity during 1) low-wind periods, 2) high-wind periods, when rotors are locked in place, and 3) low solar periods during mornings, evenings, at night, snow/ice on panels, which means more Btu/kWh, more CO2/kWh, more cost of about 2 c/kWh
– Pay W/S system Owners for electricity they could have produced, if no curtailment, about 1 c/kWh
– Importing electricity at high prices, when W/S output is low, 1 c/kWh
– Exporting electricity at low prices, when W/S output is high, 1 c/kWh
– Disassembly on land and at sea, reprocessing and storing at hazardous waste sites, about 2 c/kWh
Total: 2 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 2 = 11 c/kWh
.
Offshore wind full cost of electricity FCOE = 30 c/kWh + 11 c/kWh = 41 c/kWh, no subsidies
Offshore wind full cost of electricity FCOE = 15 c/kWh + 11 c/kWh = 26 c/kWh, with equivalent of 50% subsidies
This compares with 7 c/kWh + 3 c/kWh = 10 c/kWh from existing gas, coal, nuclear, large reservoir hydro plants.
Some values increase due to inflation and as more W/S systems are added to the grid.
.
Such expensive W/S electricity would have made the US even less competitive in world markets.
Any US tariffs on the European/Chinese supply of W/S systems would greatly increase their turnkey capital costs/MW and their electricity costs/ kWh.
.
Here is an example of the lifetime cost of a coal plant

Coal gets very little direct subsidies in the US.
The key is running steadily at 90% output for 50 years, on average, i.e., base loaded.
.
Assume mine-mouth coal plant in Wyoming; 1800 MW; turnkey-cost $10 billion; life 50 y; Capacity factor 0.9; no direct subsidies; Wyoming coal, low-sulfur, no CO2 scrubbers needed; efficiency 0.4
Annual production = 1,800,000 kW x 8,766 h/y x 0.9 = 14,200,920,000 kWh
Coal heat value = 2000 lb/US ton x 8600 Btu/lb = 17,200,000 Btu/US ton
Year 1 coal cost = 14,200,920,000 kWh/y x (3412 Btu/kWh/0.4)/17,200,000 Btu/US ton x $15/US ton = $105,639,983/y
Year 1 O&M and other costs = 3 c/kWh. See Note.
 
Year 1 revenue, 14,200,920,000 kWh x $0.082kWh = $1,164,475,440/y
Payments to bank, $5 billion at 6% for 50 y; amortized at $317.2 million/y x 50 y = $15.86 billion
Owner investment, $5 billion at minimum of minimum of 10% for 50 y
Standard inflation of coal, electricity, O&M at 3.0 %/y
Year 1 electricity price $0.082kWh
Project cashflow for 50 years
Assume 20-y MACRS depreciation, if applicable
Assume no up-front tax credits; assume loan interest deduction from taxable income
.
Per google AI, the Owner’s initial cash-on-cash yield starts at 6.31% in Year 1. Because the bank debt stays entirely static while operating profits increase via inflation, the cash yield crosses the 10.00% mark by Year 11 ($533.24 Million) and hits 47.52% by Year 50. This shifts the entire 50-year weighted return profile to a 10.77% exact IRR.

NOTE:
Fixed O&M (labor, maintenance, insurance, taxes, land lease)
Variable O&M (water, chemicals, lubricants, waste disposal)
Fixed + Variable, newer plants 2 c/kWh, older plants up to 4 c/kWh
.
Traditional Nuclear has similar economics; life 60 to 80 y; CF 0.9 in the US.
.
For perspective, China used 2204.62/2000 x 4300 = 4740 million US ton in 2024.
China and Germany have multiple ultra-super-critical, USC, coal plants with efficiencies of 45% (LHV), 42% (HHV)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/ultrasupercritical-plant

Mr.
Reply to  wilpost
September 9, 2026 8:43 am

“a main reason Europe is castrating itself”

You’re presuming there were any balls left anywhere in Europe to remove.

Reply to  Mr.
September 9, 2026 9:56 am

May be I was underestimating the trans surgeries.

September 9, 2026 6:27 am

When China finally rules the world, it’ll teach its children how the West absurdly committed suicide.

September 9, 2026 6:29 am

The U.S. has been closing coal plants willy-nilly for over a decade with nary a thought to the implications
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Yeah and after a short search:

The United States has recorded 41 permanent nuclear reactor shutdowns as of February 2026.
And there were 220 nuclear reactors permanently shutdown worldwide. 

There are 19 nuclear power sites currently being permanently decommissioned. as noted by Smart Growth America. [An interesting name if ever there was one. AND an interesting read]

When I bring up the closure of fossil and nuke power plants,
I’m accused of being a conspiracy crackpot.

SxyxS
Reply to  Steve Case
September 9, 2026 8:02 am

As a conspiracy crackpot I can tell you that it has become impossible these days to go against any big narrative and not be conspiracy crackpot
as having the mindset of an average 90ies moderate makes you
a looney.

And It’s also painful for crazy guys like me as the tattoo scenario repeats itself again.
What once used to be the domain of a tiny number of outcasts is now so mainstream that we need to find some new things to express our village idiot status.

But – the sooner you accept to be a conspiracy crackpot,Hitler,racist, bigot, Nazi.homophob the better.
You’ll no longer waste time with trying to justify yourself and can therefore focus on the relevant stuff.
Especially when you realise that the CiA weaponized this once meaningless term at the end of the 60ies when more and more people started questioning the official Vietnam War and JFKirk assassination narrative.

J Boles
September 9, 2026 6:31 am

I still do not know what A.I. does! Just make fake pictures and movies?

Reply to  J Boles
September 9, 2026 6:38 am

Did you ever read Orwell’s 1984 ?

strativarius
Reply to  Steve Case
September 9, 2026 6:58 am

One also has to read Lewis Carroll…

“When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’

Reply to  strativarius
September 9, 2026 8:17 am

I love AI. I’ve named my ChatGPT after Hal from the movie. I’ve made hundreds of images- mostly just for fun. Speaking of Lewis Carroll….

933f6186-48e1-43cb-bdde-6366aaa3930f
Reply to  Steve Case
September 9, 2026 8:23 am

Please elaborate.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
September 9, 2026 10:10 am

You would have to ask those who think I’m a conspiracy crackpot.

comment image

Reply to  Steve Case
September 9, 2026 10:10 am

Orwell did not foresee AI and its benefits.

His concern was the central command to implement state socialism and communism.

The political and bureaucratic implementers are the true evil doers

Reply to  J Boles
September 9, 2026 7:09 am

Don’t forget scamming people and porn.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 9, 2026 8:21 am

Most or all American AI won’t make porn. Must be Chinese AI. Scamming? Probably some of that in AI too- not just in AI but everywhere in our civilization. So, you want to end AI or just apply mountains of regulations that won’t work, will be expensive, and it’ll slow down and even kill much of it. No doubt the climatistas are planning such a move.

Mr.
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
September 9, 2026 8:54 am

I tried to get GPT to sharpen & colorize up an old photo of my aunt as a child at the beach, to include in her life-story powerpoint deck to be shown at her wake.

GPT refused my request on the basis of suspected nefarious motives, and I had to provide evidence that I was who I said I was, and my purpose was legitimate.

So much for using AI as a porn factory, hey?

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
September 9, 2026 10:12 am

So I guess Grok is now chinese.

Bryan A
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 9, 2026 11:00 am

Chinese Grok
comment image

Reply to  Bryan A
September 9, 2026 11:39 am

Austrian weapons, nice!

comment image

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 9, 2026 1:16 pm

Well, I didn’t know that since the topic doesn’t get any attention from me. But I’m surprised if Grok does porn. If it does, I don’t see a problem with it. Just another product seeking a market. Sooooo… you follow closely the porn industry? 🙂

Reply to  J Boles
September 9, 2026 7:44 am

AI means Artificial Insemination.

Mr.
Reply to  Oldseadog
September 9, 2026 9:00 am

I’m using the Pro version of Perplexity to compile complicated (for me) financing scenarios models of property management projects.

I call it “APPLIED Intelligence”.

It’s been a godsend for this work, but I fear I might now be performing myself out of a job 🙁

Reply to  Oldseadog
September 9, 2026 10:12 am

Indoctrination?

Reply to  J Boles
September 9, 2026 8:23 am

It can do advanced math- recently an AI solved a math problem a century old. It can do a zillion things and I’m only scratching the surface. Look on YouTube and you’ll see what it can do.

SxyxS
Reply to  J Boles
September 9, 2026 8:24 am

A.I. can be great for total surveillance that was started as Total Information Awareness(now Palantir) – that’s why the Oracle founder threatened that Americans should be careful with what they post on the Internet.
To Tokenize everything and track any kind of CBDC deal in realtiime and ban everyone from trading who does not follow narratives.

Next Level AI may be able to code and improve itself.
To come up with High End Sleeper Stuxnet codes that can infiltrate foreign countries nuclear power plants,military installations and take over/ down those systems without leaving a trace.
To create custom made viruses targeting specific ethnicities as those Ukrainians(according to Russian sources after taking them over ) were trying to make in their US – Biolabs.

No more need for wars or wasting hundreds of millions of dollars on buying foreign politicians and military leaders or billions for activists/ terrorists.
Having unrestricted access to the digital control grid of a region way easier to force people into submissionthan bribing and blackmailing politicians who will become obsolete once the all seeing A.I. of sauron is in control.

Mr.
Reply to  SxyxS
September 9, 2026 9:05 am

Much of those nefarious activities you describe have been happening for a while now.
Without describing the digital toolsets as “A.I.”

John Hultquist
Reply to  J Boles
September 9, 2026 8:55 am

 Augmented information is a better phrase. What can it do? Lots that would take you many hours or weeks, if you could do it at all.
Use this search term and consider how else you might find this information;
follicular lymphoma

Reply to  J Boles
September 9, 2026 10:04 am

I used Google AI to do financial analysis that would have taken me all day with a spreadsheet.

I get a better answer in just a few seconds, plus I can easily explore what ifs.

Of course, you have to know how to ask the questions.

That is knowledge only experienced professionals have.

strativarius
September 9, 2026 6:31 am

the next leap forward

Is difficult to imagine given the number of people that have been purged as a result of Xi’s increasing paranoia.

Nonetheless, the Chinese have the British over a net zero barrel.

Reply to  strativarius
September 9, 2026 8:26 am

China always plays the long game.

spetzer86
September 9, 2026 6:50 am

Barak promised us “skyrocketing energy prices” if he got elected. One promise he really delivered on.

September 9, 2026 7:04 am

“And these are not your grandfather’s coal plants.”
“The country has also pursued widespread adoption of flue gas desulfurization and selective catalytic reduction systems to cut sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions.”
“Consider, for example, Pingshan Phase II in Anhui Province, a cutting-edge 1.35-GW ultra-supercritical coal-fired unit with a net efficiency of about 50% — making it the world’s most efficient coal-fired power plant and a continuing model for the ongoing wave of plants under construction not only in China but also India and the rest of the world.”

China and India, each with plenty of highly capable scientists and engineers driving the progress quoted above, know perfectly well that there is no good physical reason to have ever supposed that the CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants have anything to do with ANY trend of climate variables.

This is why I keep posting about dynamic energy conversion within the general circulation, which massively overwhelms the computed “warming” tendency from incremental CO2. It is absurd to suppose that China and India don’t know this. The current administration in the U.S. needs to push harder to directly refute the claims of harm from emissions of the so-called GHGs.

The key point in one image.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1knv0YdUyIgyR9Mwk3jGJwccIGHv38J33/view?usp=drive_link

And more here with references and a full explanation.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1PDJP3F3rteoP99lR53YKp2fzuaza7Niz?usp=drive_link

Thank you for your patient attention to this matter.

Reply to  David Dibbell
September 9, 2026 8:29 am

“making it the world’s most efficient coal-fired power plant”

Smart of China— they know much of the climate alarmist world will get down on them for rising carbon emissions so they can at least claim the new coal plants are super efficient. Kudos for them for having that come back.

Reply to  David Dibbell
September 9, 2026 10:20 am

Dave,
Amen to that.

CO2 is a wonderful gas with sunshine, water and fertilizer from the soil whole forests are created

50% for USC is a little too high for a coal plant with a bag filter air cleaning system.

44% is more likely

Germany and the U.S. also have USC plants

Reply to  wilpost
September 9, 2026 12:47 pm

Thank you.
“50% for USC is a little too high…”
I thought so too.

September 9, 2026 9:46 am

… under construction … also [in] India and [thenceforth in] the rest of the world

Bharat (India) et al.’s *A.U.F.-B.A.U.* is destined to rock our world:
— *Automated Universal Fabrication — Business-As-Usual*
— When the Minerals-extraction, & the Power-Plant Construction & the downstream Fabrication-Industry, are all Universally assembled by Automation (robotics), then nothing can stop [us] from quintupling (5X) the production, over the next ~ five (5) decades.
Hydrology – Excavation – Processing – Drip-Irrigation
Better to use all that incoming ‘heat’ (solar, geotherm, +) for our works & to de-glaciate the globe.
The standard G.A.T. -measure can increase by +5 C (+9 F) by 2,100 A.D. … it’s not that hard to see.
Yes, one can do this [wir schaffen das, jawohl!];
Yes, [we] can! —
Si, se puede!
It’s not about [us], or the U.S.
Our grandchildren our counting on it;
… it’s the least that we can do, for them.

September 9, 2026 12:59 pm

Capitalist controlled Free market, versus Central government controlled free market.
The first is always price gauging and purchasing competitors, the second is the cheapest for society.
Facts are facts.
Let the scorn begin.