Attorney General Hilgers Files Lawsuit Against First Street for Harming Nebraska Homeowners

Press release from Nebraska AG office.

Thursday, August 27, 2026

Today, Attorney General Mike Hilgers filed a lawsuit against climate risk company First Street for inaccurate and misleading property-specific loss predictions that have depressed Nebraska’s real estate market and made it difficult for Nebraskan homeowners to sell their homes.

First Street claims to offer “accurate and reliable” risk scores for loss events like flood and fire for every parcel of property in Nebraska. For many properties, however, First Street’s scores are neither accurate nor reliable, with serious consequences for Nebraskans. Specifically, the lawsuit alleges that: 

  • Many of First Street’s scores are based on inaccurate or incomplete information about the property being scored, including failing to account for certain flooding protection measures homeowners have invested in.
  • First Street also fails to disclose that its predictions, which it misleadingly presents as hard facts, may be very different from the federal government’s data or the predictions of other climate risk models.
  • First Street insulates its uncertain and flawed predictions by withholding its underlying data as proprietary and through an express policy of refusing to consider consumer disputes. This includes failing to provide homeowners with meaningful dispute resolution when the prediction is based on error.

Despite these problems, major real estate companies like Zillow direct consumers to First Street’s flawed predictions by linking them to real estate listings. As a result, many homeowners have had to accept reduced prices from buyers that have been spooked by First Street’s scores. Others have watched their homes sit on the market for longer than expected, and, in some cases, have been unable to sell their homes at all. 

“First Street is making a profit at the expense of the value of Nebraskans’ homes,” said Attorney General Hilgers. “First Street passes off misleading and often inaccurate climate speculation in a way that drives down home values and increases costs and frustrations for Nebraskans. The deceptive behavior has to stop.”  

Attorney General Hilgers is taking legal action to address these concerns. He wants the court to stop First Street’s unfair and dishonest business practices, make them pay fines, and return unlawfully earned profits. The lawsuit was filed in Dakota County District Court where many homeowners were negatively affected by First Street’s inaccurate climate scores.

The Nebraska Attorney General’s Office enforces consumer protection laws and advocates for Nebraska consumers. We work to ensure a fair, honest, and safe marketplace for residents of the State. 

Download Court Filing

First Street


Previous WUWT coverage of First Stree

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 7 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
25 Comments
August 27, 2026 6:50 pm

The Climate Change™ scam has institutionalised scamming and theft to be virtuous pursuits.

I justify my subsidised home solar and home battery along the same line of argument that justifies minimising tax. But the subsidy system is highly regressive form of theft in Australia where the poor get to pay some of their electricity bills to the less poor through both direct subsidy and indirect cost burdens on those who cannot afford a roof

Harry Durham
August 27, 2026 7:04 pm

Sure glad the climate nonsense got deleted from the the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. Imagine the damage it would have done in a case like this! Going to be interesting following it to see how First Street defends “calculating” how much risk a specific house faces due to “climate risk” when models are barely able to forecast a county, state or country’s future climate. Or how they can’t get it right when they do. Wonder if they’ll borrow WUWT’s “Failed Predictions” charts to prove how erroneous all those predictions have been?

Reply to  Harry Durham
August 28, 2026 7:31 am

models are barely able to forecast a county, state or country’s future climate. “

Barely able? The *climate* models don’t even attempt to go down to this granularity.

August 27, 2026 8:07 pm

of refusing to consider consumer disputes”

This is the really reprehensible part of the First St scam.

They could manipulate prices for their mates to obtain cheaper properties, and no-one can question their data…. seriously !!!

That is tantamount to FRAUD. !

2hotel9
Reply to  bnice2000
August 30, 2026 5:03 am

It is fraud.

Izaak Walton
August 27, 2026 8:07 pm

Presumably First Street have a first amendment right to publish inaccurate risk predictions. Nobody is being forced to pay any attention to them and so if anybody is at fault here it as the real estate listing companies like Zillow. There is nothing to stop another company publishing a different risk assessment and selling those assessments to Zillow, it is just capitalism in action. There can be as many risk assessments as people willing to make them. People do not have to believe any of them.

leefor
Reply to  Izaak Walton
August 27, 2026 9:05 pm

Ah buyer beware should apply to false advertising. Got it.

Izaak Walton
Reply to  leefor
August 27, 2026 9:20 pm

But it isn’t advertising. One suspects that they have good enough lawyers and fine print that they will just claim that they are expressing an opinion which is protected by the first amendment. And if their opinions are wrong nobody will pay for access to them and they will go out of business.

Reply to  Izaak Walton
August 27, 2026 10:52 pm

Your free market so called Democratic government lies to you, the ipcc lies to you, your doctor and the whole medical system lies to you, a lot of 401k funds is invested in the highly speculative AI market.

leefor
Reply to  Izaak Walton
August 28, 2026 12:29 am

So they don’t advertise their “expertise”. Strange that.

Reply to  Izaak Walton
August 28, 2026 3:31 am

As so aptly noted elsewhere, free speech and other constitutional protections are not absolute. You can’t yell FIRE! in a crowded theater and claim free speech protection. Likewise, yelling “Flood and Fire prone!” from a business enterprise without adequate facts is pushing the free speech protection too far. Its what government is supposed to monitor and question.

Izaak Walton
Reply to  Jim Gorman
August 28, 2026 5:03 pm

The government seems willing to let people claim that vaccines are harmful while kids are dying from measles so why do you think they would worry about people saying that rivers might flood more often in the future than in the past.

Reply to  Izaak Walton
August 28, 2026 3:37 am

So having good lawyers makes fraud and deception ok. Got it…

Izaak Walton
Reply to  Phil R
August 28, 2026 4:38 pm

No. But having good lawyers makes it legal. Which is a very different thing. Do you really think FirstStreet did not have lawyers look at the possibility of being sued before that started opérating? And if they didn’t then you can bet that their investors did — nobody is going to invest millions into a company that might get sued for dévaluting house prices unless they are sure that their business case is watertight.

And exactly who is being defrauded here? FirstStreet has a contract with Zillow and not with home-owners. Similarly home owners have contracts with their real estate agents. So there is no way that FirstStreet is defrauding home-owners since they are not doing business with them.

Denis
Reply to  Izaak Walton
August 28, 2026 4:08 am

Fraud is still a crime. If a land surveyor started to measure land inaccurately, saying a 1 acre lot is really a 1/2 acre or 1 1/2 acre, would that surveyor not be liable to the consequences of the error?

Reply to  Denis
August 28, 2026 8:17 am

But surveyors are registered with the state (here in the US) and are subject to numerous rules.

Reply to  Izaak Walton
August 28, 2026 3:35 am

Typical leftard. You wouldn’t understand Capitalism if it walked up to you and kicked you in the shin.

Reply to  Izaak Walton
August 29, 2026 12:11 am

Presumably First Street have a first amendment right to publish inaccurate risk predictions.

Good to know, that must be how “climate scientists”, the IPCC, “journalists,” and the rest of the extreme left have got away with it for so long.

2hotel9
Reply to  Izaak Walton
August 30, 2026 5:04 am

1A does not protect criminals doing criminal sh*t.

August 27, 2026 9:31 pm

The Governmnet stepping in to try to influence markets by suppressing information. These right wing zealots hate free markets

Reply to  Eric Flesch
August 27, 2026 11:12 pm

Except that is exactly the opposite of what is happening.

The AG is trying to make sure people have access to the data that is affecting their selling price.

He is trying stop the misinformation and deception from a decidedly far-left company.

Reply to  Eric Flesch
August 28, 2026 5:56 am

Exposing disinformation is what the Attorney General is doing.

August 27, 2026 10:47 pm

Well it is a capitalist system, what’s the problem. Let the buyer or seller beware.

State Street, Black Rock etc, view all assets as theirs, they just haven’t taken them yet.

Reply to  Ozonebust
August 27, 2026 11:14 pm

So you agree that the buyer and selling ought to have access to all information pertaining to a property sale, so they can verify it.

That is what should happen in a free and fair market….. and isn’t happening now.

ResourceGuy
August 28, 2026 4:00 pm

Hopefully this will be a model for other state AGs to follow, at least in the states that care about homeowners.