Wyoming needs eagle death numbers before it approves more wind projects

From CFACT

By David Wojick

The Wyoming wind power permitting authority has a formal hearing beginning on August 31, 2026, to consider the application from a major wind project. An approval decision on this project would be premature, because a crucial piece of environmental data, the projected eagle kills from the project, is still in progress.

Wyoming needs to decide how many eagles it is willing to kill.

The permitting authority is the Wyoming Industrial Siting Council. At issue is the proposed 650-megawatt Laramie Range Wind Project with hundreds of eagle-killing turbines. This is a very large project.

The Siting Council is supposed to carefully consider the environmental impacts of the project, but there is a glaring gap in their information. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) is supposed to predict the number of eagles killed by this project but has yet to do so. The Siting Council should wait for this crucial data.

Of particular concern are the golden eagles because Wyoming is central to their population. This population has reportedly declined by an incredible 30% since wind development began two decades ago. See my article, “Wyoming Golden Eagles should be listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.”

FWS normally estimates the golden eagle death rate for a wind project when that project applies for a permit to kill eagles under the Eagle Protection Act. In this case, Wyoming should ask FWS to do the calculations directly for them, not via the wind project developer. To the extent the developer’s eagle-related data is being used, it needs to be verified.

The FWS uses what is called a Collision Risk Model to predict golden eagle deaths from a proposed wind turbine array. The model output is a probability distribution, not a single death number. There is a probability for a given number of deaths.

For eagle-kill permitting purposes, the FWS uses the number of deaths with an 80% probability of occurring. The Siting Council might also want to consider numbers like the 50% and 30% death rates, which will be increasingly larger than the 80% rate. These lower-probability death rates are still serious likelihoods, calling for appropriate caution.

If the FWS will not provide these golden eagle death calculations, then Wyoming should develop them itself. The Siting Council must have the relevant eagle death data before it can make an informed decision on the huge Laramie Range Wind Project.

It is likely that the eagle-killing issue will come up at the Siting Council hearing where project opponents will testify.

The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality has provided the following information on viewing the hearing, which begins each day at 10:00 am Mountain Daylight Time:

“Persons wishing to observe day one of the permit hearing on August 31, 2026, may watch the hearing virtually via this information.

“Persons wishing to observe day two of the permit hearing on September 1, 2026, may watch the hearing virtually via this information.”

Wind turbines killing eagles cannot be ignored.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 14 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
J Boles
August 26, 2026 10:02 am
Ronald Stein
August 26, 2026 10:10 am

Killing any of those majestic Eagles, just to generate occasional electricity depending on favorable weather conditions is appalling.

Spending billions of dollars on weather dependent electricity generation by wind turbines and solar panels that CANNOT be dispatched on demand is a main cause of rising electricity rates, as wind turbines and solar panels have NOT eliminated any electricity generation by coal, natural gas, hydro, or nuclear.
 

oeman50
Reply to  Ronald Stein
August 27, 2026 4:56 am

The dead eagles have landed.

August 26, 2026 10:11 am

Story tip!
Never let a good tragedy go to waste. Nepal’s avalanches and floods are already being blamed on climate change. World Weather Attribution mentioned.

Why Nepal’s floods are so catastrophic:
Scientists blame a ‘complex chain of hazards’ for the devastating flash flooding
https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/article-16081739/Why-Nepal-floods-catastrophic-Scientists.html

Reply to  Cam_S
August 26, 2026 10:16 am

At the moment the BBC news says preliminary reports suggest an earthquake.

I guess they’ll soon revert to CC, though.

Ron Long
Reply to  Oldseadog
August 26, 2026 1:17 pm

The latest on the earthquake triggering mechanism is that the avalanche was started on its own, and the force of the avalanche caused an earthquake (seismic vibrations).

Reply to  Ron Long
August 26, 2026 1:56 pm

News.. First evah avalanche recorded in Nepal….. climate change…

2hotel9
Reply to  Oldseadog
August 27, 2026 4:06 am

They have already claimed CC causes earthquakes.

Harry Durham
August 26, 2026 10:45 am

Funny that is depends on who does the killing. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668d (1940, amended several times) states that “A violation of the Act can result in a fine of $100,000 ($200,000 for organizations), imprisonment for one year, or both, for a first offense. Penalties increase substantially for additional offenses, and a second violation of this Act is a felony.” There also are international treaties regulating treatment of protected and migratory birds.

Unless, of course, you’re one of the favored few who can break the law with impunity. Or have sufficient political clout to get the Secretary of the Interior to waive the penalties.

So, if you’re an individual who kills an eagle, you’re in trouble (except for identified groups, such as American Indian tribes for religious purposes). But if your windmill kills dozens or hundreds, well, it’s all in a “good” cause.

David Wojick
Reply to  Harry Durham
August 26, 2026 1:14 pm

Unfortunately it is not that simple. The Obama FWS cooked up a bogus offset system where every wind kill is supposedly offset by reducing power pole electrocution deaths which the wind project pays for, called compensatory mitigation. But they only fix about 350 poles per death when it should be more like 67,000 so no lives are saved much less the wind kills offset.
See my http://www.cfact.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Wojick-Eagle-Kill-Report-Final.pdf

Ron Long
Reply to  Harry Durham
August 26, 2026 1:48 pm

Good comment, Harry. It goes even further: if you pick up a feather from a dead eagle it results in a large fine and possibly jail time, unless you have indigenous status.

Harry Durham
Reply to  Ron Long
August 26, 2026 3:52 pm

Or wear a Laramie Range Wind Project jacket or vest.

strativarius
August 26, 2026 10:51 am

It’s disgusting and disgraceful.

Wyoming has to doublethink a number up. Roll the bones…

Sparta Nova 4
August 26, 2026 12:09 pm

I guess we now can calculate the cost of having eagle for Thanksgiving.
Cost of WTGs / number of eagles provided to the grocery store.
Except in NYC where they give the birds freely.

August 26, 2026 1:20 pm

comment image

John Pickens
August 26, 2026 2:49 pm

While they’re working to define the predicted eagle kill rate, perhaps they should ask for proof that these wind turbines actually produce any net energy. I’ve never seen a comprehensive analysis showing the net energy balance, cradle to grave, for a wind turbine system like this.

Bob
August 26, 2026 3:24 pm

I don’t know how many eagles are being killed now in Wyoming by turbines but is too many. Wyoming is already over the limit, time to start retiring current wind farms not build new ones.

2hotel9
August 27, 2026 4:05 am

That’s simple, they are willing to kill all of them for the right lies.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  2hotel9
August 27, 2026 12:25 pm

Sorry. Allow me to rephrase that.

“That’s simple, they are willing to kill all of them for the LEFT lies.”

What isn’t right is left.
We are so divided we have become binary.

Bruce Cobb
August 27, 2026 5:06 am

The moral depravity of “offsetting” is revolting. How can they sleep at night?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
August 27, 2026 12:30 pm

With their eyes closed, they cannot see the damage inflicted.

So the obvious answer to how can they sleep at night is… with their eyes closed.

August 27, 2026 7:01 am

I’m no hippie, but the bird and bat massacre is awful:

wind-power-will