Burnham’s ‘Climate Tsar’ Has Racked Up 250,000 Air Miles on Taxpayer-Funded Flights

From THE DAILY SCEPTIC

By Toby Young

Andy Burnham’s ‘climate tsar’ Rachel Kyte has racked up 250,000 air miles on taxpayer-funded flights – including business-class trips to Rio de Janeiro, Seoul and Barbados – at a cost of £107,000 in under two years. Conservative MP Greg Smith has demanded Burnham sack her and abolish the £130,000-a-year role entirely. The the Mail has the story:

Andy Burnham is under mounting pressure to sack his ‘climate tsar’ after she racked up more than enough ‘air miles’ to get to the Moon.

The the Mail can reveal Rachel Kyte has clocked up 250,000 miles worth of official flights in less than two years in the job – and that includes business-class trips to glamorous locations such as Rio de Janeiro, Seoul and Barbados.

On Saturday, the Prime Minister faced calls to cut the climate tsar’s air mileage or get rid of her.

Conservative MP Greg Smith told The the Mail: “Rachel Kyte’s jet-setting lifestyle is a slap in the face to taxpayers.

“The fact this so-called ‘climate tsar’ regularly does 10,000-mile round trips – often in business-class – to eco conferences is outrageous. If she had any shame she would resign. If not, Andy Burnham should sack her and abolish the role for good.”

Ms Kyte, a one-time fan of environmental group Extinction Rebellion, came under fire in June last year for running up 75,000 air miles since she became the UK’s Special Representative for Climate in September 2024.

However, fresh Freedom of Information requests show that she has now done 250,000 air miles in the job, enough to circumnavigate the globe ten times.

This has come at a total cost to the taxpayer of £107,000, a figure that does not include hotel bills.

She flew to Colombia for the ‘Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels’ conference in April – a 10,000-mile round trip branded “beyond a joke” by her critics.

This came immediately after a £10,000 business-class jaunt to Brazzaville in the Republic of Congo. This year alone, Ms Kyte has already spent more than £31,000 on over 20 flights, the majority in business class.

The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) considers these expenses “cost-effective” and “in the interests of taxpayers”. But according to climate-protection organisation myclimate.org, Ms Kyte would have burned 100 tons of CO2 on her flights – ten times the average person’s annual emissions.

It would take you 27 years to rack up the equivalent emissions driving a Range Rover.

The £130,000-a-year climate representative role was brought back by Labour after it was abolished by the Tories in 2023.

Ms Kyte, an academic, has previously spoken of air travel’s negative impact on the environment.

In a New Statesman interview in 2021, she admitted that “the carbon footprint wrapped up in my social and professional identity is a source of deep discomfort”.

Worth reading in full.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
49 Comments
Scarecrow Repair
August 23, 2026 10:17 pm

Be nice! Look at her, imagine trying to squeeze into an economy class seat for such long flights.

Scissor
Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
August 24, 2026 4:45 am

Possibly trans? Trans elephant?

Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
August 24, 2026 8:46 am

C’mon guys, by all means attack her hypocritical behaviour, but lay off the personal attacks, please

SxyxS
Reply to  Redge
August 24, 2026 9:47 am

You are right.
I’m also against whale shaming
and occupying 2 seats instead of 1 , she always reduces someones carbon footprint who couldn’t take the flight because of that.

Most people are not sensitive enough to understand that.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Redge
August 24, 2026 12:29 pm

I agree.

However, I wonder if the airlines institution fuel surcharges has gone into effect, yet.
This is in the context of here bemoaning her “carbon footprint.”

Neil Pryke
August 23, 2026 10:30 pm

The newly-appointed minister is like a kid being given the keys to the sweet-shop…

She will milk it while she can…

Corrupt…utterly corrupt…

SxyxS
Reply to  Neil Pryke
August 24, 2026 9:49 am

She looks like she was born in a sweet -shop …
and grew up there.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Neil Pryke
August 24, 2026 12:29 pm

I wonder how the machine gun analogy might fit in here.

August 23, 2026 11:21 pm

Who ate all the pies !!

SxyxS
Reply to  kommando828
August 24, 2026 9:51 am

She’s the reason Michael Moore lost so much weight.

Rod Evans
August 23, 2026 11:37 pm

She may be described as an academic, but her BA in History and Politics followed by an MA in International Relations?….me neither, suggests more schemer/dreamer than academic.
Her accreditations are hardly appropriate for a role that is science based as she clearly has zero interests or study time in STEM subjects that would have enabled her to differentiate between fact and fiction in the energy provision world.
£139k/year ($175k) salary plus expenses pensions and all the other privileges that are attached to the ‘role’ she holds begins to explain why government costs are out of control and why energy prices are higher than in any other nation on earth here in the UK.
Perhaps Rachel could give us a brief report on her achievements and how those have in any way shape or form helped the UK economy or environment?
Over to you Rachel we look forward to hearing from you.

Reply to  Rod Evans
August 24, 2026 1:04 am

 BA in History and Politics followed by an MA in International Relations

Another one.

It is becoming unignorable.

CampsieFellow
Reply to  worsethanfailure
August 24, 2026 11:24 am

Perhaps everybody who puts comments on WUWT should supply their relevant qualifications so that we can judge the utility of their comments. I’ve only got a degree in International Politics so any comments I may make are presumably worthless.

George Thompson
Reply to  CampsieFellow
August 24, 2026 11:35 am

Probably true for as far as that goes, but a degree and mental training can be helpful, as well as any knowledge picked up on our journey-and everybody has an opinion-so who knows? So don’t be shy, speak your mind. Seriously. Keep reading-you’ll see what I mean.

Reply to  CampsieFellow
August 24, 2026 3:54 pm

I’ve only got a degree in International Politics

With that qualification, if you were to presume to start directing national energy policy your comments would indeed be utterly worthless. Even if—entirely by random dumb luck—you said something correct about energy policy, it would still be worthless because luck doesn’t last.

Meanwhile, there is no burden on any of us to present our credentials to point out errors. When he’s naked, you don’t need to be the emperor’s tailor to notice it.

Bill Toland
August 24, 2026 12:06 am

My favourite jab to climate alarmists is pointing out that they have a higher carbon footprint than me. I’m partially sighted so I don’t have a car. I have found that the more alarmist someone is, the higher their carbon footprint tends to be. The level of hypocrisy that most climate alarmists exhibit is off the scale.

Decaf
Reply to  Bill Toland
August 24, 2026 5:00 am

Isn’t that the case? And not just with carbon footprints.

Mr.
Reply to  Bill Toland
August 24, 2026 9:11 am

Well their main objective is to appear “virtuous”, so just as with Greta and DiCaprio, the more publicity they can create by sharing their constant travels for “causes”, the more travel they’ll book up.

Especially if taxpayers’ $$$$s are funding said “causes”.

Bob Heath
August 24, 2026 12:08 am

An overweight non-scientist talking about climate and carbon footprints!

decnine
Reply to  Bob Heath
August 24, 2026 12:22 am

Be fair. She has advanced talking credentials.

George Thompson
Reply to  decnine
August 24, 2026 1:02 pm

But can she sing? Remember, it ain’t over ’till the fat broad sings.

Ed Zuiderwijk
August 24, 2026 12:46 am

A source of deep discomfort. The cheek!

Augustine of Hippo, 4th century, epitomised this ‘discomfort’:

”Lord make me chaste, but not yet”.

George Thompson
Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
August 24, 2026 6:35 am

Nice. I feel a need to steal that line!

CampsieFellow
Reply to  George Thompson
August 24, 2026 11:27 am

Well, okay, but just remember that St Augustine uttered that statement shortly before becoming a Christian. Once he became a Christian he completely disavowed the statement.

George Thompson
Reply to  CampsieFellow
August 24, 2026 11:38 am

It’s still a good line even if nobody knows the full story.

atticman
August 24, 2026 1:21 am

But according to climate-protection organisation myclimate.org, Ms Kyte would have burned 100 tons of CO2 on her flights – ten times the average person’s annual emissions. [my bold]

The ignorance of climate worriers never ceases to amaze me. CO2 puts fires out: it does not burn!

Ed Zuiderwijk
Reply to  atticman
August 24, 2026 5:53 am

Magnesium burns in 100% CO2.

Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
August 24, 2026 2:26 pm

CO2 doesn’t have much effect on lithium fires either. ! EV-er

rtj1211
Reply to  atticman
August 24, 2026 7:46 am

And using leaky dams to recreate damp meadows in the upper reaches of rivers creates natural fire breaks. No-one knew that until the latest set of serious fires in the USA, but they noticed that is was a consequence of actions aimed more at restoring damaged hydrology.

Chris Hanley
August 24, 2026 1:22 am

Since the Climate Change Act in 2008 the UK standard of living as measured by the GDP per capita has been static after twenty years of steady growth and the UK central government debt as the percentage of GDP has risen from ~30% to 95%.

Rachel Kyte has clocked up 250,000 miles worth of official flights in less than two years in the job

What can other countries learn from this woman except for the sake of their economic and civil health don’t do what the UK is doing.

CampsieFellow
Reply to  Chris Hanley
August 24, 2026 11:29 am

I feel a need to repeat the frequently uttered truism that correlation is not evidence of causation.

Bruce Cobb
August 24, 2026 3:11 am

Remind me again what the purpose of having a “climate tsar” is. I keep forgetting.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
August 24, 2026 4:21 am

The purpose? It’s to reduce the number of people registered as unemployed down by 1.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
August 24, 2026 4:43 am

We had a climate tsar here in Wokeachusetts several years ago who got fired after admitting that we’re going to have to cover the state with solar panels and wind turbines to arrive at net zero nirvana.

rtj1211
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
August 24, 2026 7:47 am

It allows a woman, a black, a green nutter or some other form of ‘oppressed minority’ to get paid £100k+ in salary plus endless jollies all over the world.

Mac
August 24, 2026 3:40 am

I wonder whether she eats beef and other farm raised products on her flights or otherwise at home/cafes? Methane doncha know! Those farms would be more useful covered with solar panels or windmills(sarc).

Reply to  Mac
August 24, 2026 4:44 am

She didn’t get that beefy eating tofu and lettuce.

Petey Bird
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
August 24, 2026 7:46 am

Likely lots of sugar and grain. Livestock feed. Called processed food now.

August 24, 2026 7:15 am

From the last sentence in the above article:
“. . . she admitted that ‘the carbon footprint wrapped up in my social and professional identity is a source of deep discomfort’.”

My response: Oh, you poor, poor baby!

Mr.
Reply to  ToldYouSo
August 24, 2026 9:17 am

Certainly discomfort for whoever got allocated the seat next to her on the flights.

No wiggle-room, and suffocating in methane at the same time.
🙁

Petey Bird
August 24, 2026 7:43 am

She could have used a sailboat like Greta Thunderbird.
Ideally she could have built a raft of driftwood and used the skins of animals that died naturally to make a sail.

alacran
August 24, 2026 9:00 am

That’s typical of socialists; efficiency isn’t their strong suit—it’s endless talk designed to wear down their opponents.
And then there’s the main principle: “Everyone is equal, but we are more equal!”

David Gibbs
August 24, 2026 9:07 am

Thankyou to the commenters on this thread. I glanced at this when there were zero comments and was very dissappointed. Six hours later there are twenty five comments and they have hit the mark.

CampsieFellow
August 24, 2026 11:19 am

“a source of deep discomfort”.
You have to have pity for the poor lady and her discomfort. She’s so uncomfortable that she keeps on doing it.
As for being “cost-effective”, could the FCDO give us some evidence?

Jeff Alberts
August 24, 2026 12:24 pm

Performance art. Deeply disturbed people.

ResourceGuy
August 24, 2026 1:41 pm

Who gets the frequent flier points for more trips on top of this?

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  ResourceGuy
August 24, 2026 4:29 pm

They should go to marginalized people. Which at this point it time would be white males.

ResourceGuy
August 24, 2026 1:45 pm

If things don’t work out, she can always get a faculty position at UC Berkeley or Penn State or Yale.

Edward Katz
August 24, 2026 5:52 pm

She’s just another one of these climate con-artists who has figured out that the so-called climate crisis is just another way to milk government cash cows for one sort of free ride or another. Yet she’s no worse than the phonies who line up for the same to the COP conferences where from the outset they know they don’t have to accomplish anything. or show any positive results. Except if the governments had any resolve, they’d put an end to this wastage of tax dollars.