By Curtis Hill
There ought to be a name for what Anthony Fauci did to us. Benedict Arnold was a major general in the Continental Army but that’s not what he’s known for. His name has become synonymous with the word traitor, because of the treason he committed during our Revolutionary War. Dr. Fauci, whose name ignites a similar passion, deserves to be remembered for what he has done to us.
To “Fauci” or to be “Faucied” should become the single-word description of what happened to Americans under his watch, and a permanent alert against the same arrogant behavior if it ever reappears. To be Faucied is to have medical freedom stripped away by government decree, accurate information replaced by managed messaging, personal and parental choice overridden by bureaucratic command, and open debate treated as danger, all while being told it is for your own good. Faucism is the big-government-knows-best posture that treats free citizens as mindless sheep.
We first got Faucied with the masks, and the record is written in Fauci’s own voice. On March 8, 2020, he told CBS’ “60 Minutes” that “[t]here’s no reason to be walking around with a mask.” He added that a mask “might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is.” Weeks later, Fauci flipped. He was not only endorsing masks, but he eventually was promoting double masking, including cloth, with the confident claim that “if you have a physical covering with one layer, you put another layer on, it just makes common sense that it likely would be more effective.”
The man who once declared that attacks on him were attacks on science was not using science when he lied about masks. Treating the public like children who require managed messaging does not qualify as science. Fauci instructed that we did not need masks with the same scientific, medical authority he later used to try to sell double masking. And his explanation for his first story: He needed to tell us something so that we wouldn’t use up all the PPE supply. Or as he might suggest, he lied to us for our own good.
The same top-down posture extended to families. Prolonged school closures were advanced and defended despite clear evidence that children faced far lower risk of severe illness than adults. Parents who wanted their children in classrooms where learning, socialization, and mental health could be preserved were treated as obstacles rather than primary decision makers. That is not public health. It is substitution of bureaucratic preference and social manipulation for parental authority.
Americans were also denied the full range of information needed to combat COVID on their own terms. Discussion of early treatment options, natural immunity, and the limits of certain interventions was often discouraged or dismissed rather than openly debated. When the nation’s leading health official positions himself as the final arbiter, he leaves little room for the free exchange of ideas that free people and free markets require. Free enterprise depends on informed individuals making voluntary choices. A system that withholds or shapes information to produce compliance undermines that foundation.
None of these reasons means a successful criminal prosecution is realistic. As a former prosecutor, I would love to evaluate the evidence of all his actions with the goal of holding Fauci criminally accountable. But intent to kill or destroy the lives of millions remains difficult to prove under our evidentiary standards when decisions rest on evolving data, institutional pressures, and public messaging under crisis. Former President Biden’s broad preemptive pardon covering Fauci’s official conduct further complicates the federal criminal door. Any prosecutor must acknowledge the difficulty of producing a case. Being caught in demonstrable inconsistencies and overconfident claims is not the same as proof beyond a reasonable doubt of criminal specific criminal conduct.
But the potential absence of a criminal case doesn’t mean Fauci gets a free pass. The nation’s preeminent health official during a once-in-a-century crisis does not get to impose sweeping costs of disrupted childhoods, eroded trust, and constrained personal choices, and then retreat behind Fifth Amendment silence and a presidential shield. Ordinary Americans are living with the consequences of decisions made by Fauci – who is owed no continued deference.
Accountability does not always require a courtroom. Sometimes it requires only that we stop pretending we don’t see the truth. It requires that we restore the principle that free people, not unaccountable bureaucrats, retain the right to make their own medical decisions.
Yes, he gets his own word – a verb. Enshrining the term “to be Faucied” ensures his name remains the permanent cautionary symbol of the approach we must always remember – and never accept – in American health care.
This article was originally published by RealClearPolitics and made available via RealClearWire.
I agree with this post but more importantly there were lots of people in and out of government acting right along with Fauci. I want those knuckledraggers as much as Fauci.
Agreed. The politicians who took his advice and tried to turn their cities and states into Soviet gulags on steroids are the ones we should be mad at.
Such as Trump? Unless I am mistaken Trump was president in 2020 and responsible for the lockdowns and the vaccines.
Governors were responsible for lockdowns. So yes, you’re mistaken, as usual.
. . . and the NIH/FDA/NIAID and industry contractors were responsible for the development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-19, not the President.
“Such as Trump? Unless I am mistaken Trump was president in 2020 and responsible for the lockdowns and the vaccines.”
100% true. Fauci was merely an advisor, who, in my opinion, was trying to (like everyone else) work out the best path through a pandemic. Yes he goth things wrong a you would expect at a time of uncertainty.
But if there is blame to direct at someone, then it should lie fair and square at the feet of the person in charge. You know the guy who was telling us it would be gone by Easter…. and let’s use bleach. Oh and let’s not forget… let’s hit it with light.
Fauci “got things wrong”?! He was responsible for funding the illegal Gain of Function research in Wuhan which caused the pandemic.
He wrote in his diary in January 2020 that the famous wet market was merely an amplifier and not the source of the virus
You really have no idea do you. His gain of function type testing happens all the time. It is how we learn about disease. It is not illegal. Go on google it. Learn something
Mr. Simon: The cat has no idea??!! You are the clueless one who agrees with false statement “100%”. You evidently refuse to inform yourself about Fauci mendacity, but we observe. Projection is your best look?
The trolls at this site are across-the-board leftie believers. Why? If climate change is true, then it follows Fauci never lied??!! What do you actually know about GoF research?
Gain of function research in the US was banned by Obama.
. . . and subsequently President Trump issued actions that effectively ban and restrict federal funding for gain-of-function (GoF) research. Trump initially signed an executive order on May 5, 2025, to halt funding for such, which was followed by a comprehensive government-wide policy released by the administration on July 28, 2026, the framework explicitly prohibiting any taxpayer-supported federal funding for dangerous gain-of-function research, both domestically and internationally.
Thanks was about to write that.
Stop talking shit,Mr Serial liar
This type of GOF was illegal in the USA.
Therefore Fauci circumvented the law like the CiA does when they do illegal stuff = using foreign institutions;
The CiA usually uses the Mi6 or other 5 eyes intelligence – Fauci used the labs in China and Ukraine (remember all the labs that suddenly popped up there after the Gershman – Nuland “revolution” in Ukraine, and Russias claims that those labs were working on bioweapons specifically designed to target slavic people ; after they occupied those labs and found documents).
Fauci funnelled US money and data via the CiA/Gates? front Echo Health.
And Iirc Wuhan was the only BSL 4 lab in China back then.
After the Virus broke out Faucis partners in crime, Dr Anderson and Dr Gerry exchanged mails concluding that the virus is artificial.
These guys know what a GOF virus is because they ran an Ebola lab in Kenema/Sierra Leone when the Virus broke out in 2014 there.
They officially shifted the outbreak location and patient zero a few miles across the border to Guinea to muddy the waters.
Another Bio Lab, another outbreak – again bats were blamed(no bats, nor other animals were found with the Ebola virus in Guinea in 2014 btw).
So Fauci gave those docs about 17 mio in fundings, and they got a change of heart and not only did a 180 and started now calling everyone conspiracy theorist who went along with their original story.
They even published a paper Fauci used to justify his actions before it was even Peer reviewed.
And just for your info – Fauci already killed huge numbers of gays via AZT?
And people who get flu vaccines get the flu more often than unvaccinated.
yes, people forget that Fauci engineered the withdrawals & shortages of the early effective drugs that the gay communities had discovered were providing suppression of their condition, so that he could “clear the way” in the market for his preferred product.
A disgusting excuse of a human being.
Fauci got cheap but effective generic treatments for AIDS and Covid-19 essentially banned, so that victims were forced to use expensive patent protected drugs which were less effective, and dangerous.
Fauci changed the definition of GOF research to attempt to convince people that the GOF research which he funded through ECO Health was not actually GOF. The fact that you fell for Fauci’s lies proves how easy it was to “Fauci” the poorly educated like you.
Good Lord, don’t be stupid. You really are. Now go find that pee per tape.
The golden shower sicko never fails to appear.
conversely, as the actual pee pee tape regularly fails to appear?
That’s probably because it is not real.
You and the FBI believe it is real 😉
How easily people delude themselves. Simon is appropriately ill-informed.
I wonder what he thinks about Fauci’s cruel beagle puppy experiments designed to see what happens when their heads are constrained within screened housings to allow sand fleas, ticks and other parasites to devore them alive. To further injury to these animals, their vocal cords were cut so as to prevent them from making noise from barking, howling and crying.
I doubt Simon would approve but I cannot be sure.
The ethical implications of such experimentation have been debated for a long time. Similar experiments were conducted on other beagles here in Utah regarding treatment for serious burns. As a result, the Intermountain Burn Center developed one of the best protocols for treating burn victims.
That being said, Fauci’s experiments seem needlessly cruel for questionable outcomes.
I suspect Simon would approve of anything as long as his team did them, and be aghast if the same were done by the other side.
Normally I am in favour of animal experimentation, but I believe Fauci’s treatment of beagles is ghastly and indefensible.
Well, I nether bothered with details either, but I do believe there is good evidence that
– masks filter droplets from the outgoing breath, so while certainly not perfect, they should somewhat help against spreading droplet based diseases when worn by infected people with symptoms.
– the vaccinations decreased death or serious symptoms in particular high-risk groups like elderly with asthma.
In that context it seems to make sense to try to reduce social contact for a limited time while ramping up the aid and protection for these groups.
I can also agree that some of the measures went on too strong/long wasting money and potentially even lives, while restricting freedoms without measurable benefit, which both are harmful and should have consequences for the advisers and deciders.
There is zero evidence that social masking and the MRNA jab were in any way effective. Masks have utility in clinical settings when rigorously utilized.
As for the jab, it may have had some utility for those at high risk for the first variant of the virus. After that, it was unlikely to have much clinical value. The fact that they hastily vaccinated the control group, thus erasing any possibility of determining efficacy or safety, only serves as further evidence that the entire exercise was fraudulent.
Indeed, it was wise to protect the vulnerable to the extent possible, but just about everything that was demanded and done did more harm than good, and they knew that from early on.
Uhm, just checking if I understood your writing correctly.
Are you saying that
or
Gemini says:
“””Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, messenger RNA (mRNA) technology was deployed via Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines. These early shots delivered synthetic genetic code encased in protective lipid nanoparticles to instruct muscle cells to temporarily build a harmless coronavirus spike protein, sparking a targeted immune defense.”””
is that what you are talking about?
In both cases your claim that these measures would somehow only work in limited environments or only for high-risk population seems not in line with reality.
would you agree with this Gemini statement:
“”” The original strain of the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) arrived in the US on January 21, 2020, with community spread taking root by late February. Distinct mutant variants of concern (like Alpha and Delta) began appearing later, with the first official Alpha variant case detected on December 29, 2020.”””
To me it seems that both of the measures you mention were quite effective in the US during that critical first year.
Gemini seems unaware of the negative impacts of mRNA use in humans.
Viruses are very small compared to the droplets of spit that masks can trap. In order to stop viruses, the filtration system would need pressurized air to force it through. In other words, the masks that Fauci pushed us to wear were worthless.
Be specific. Which part did I get wrong?
Have you ever read the universally-acknowledged authority – Cochrane – on the COVID masking efficacy’s initial report?
Fauci was and remains a hack who was interested only in his own celebrity and personal gain. He lied about almost everything, from the virus origins to masking, social distancing, and mortality rates. He essentially experimented on the entire human population without consent, a vast violation of the Nuremberg Protocols. He is noted for defending gain-of-function by declaring that a few million deaths would be worth the knowledge gained. That puts him on par with Josef Mengele in terms of scientific integrity. He financed such experiments at a foreign lab noted for poor safety practices
Trump was perhaps overly optimistic and ignorant of science, but he did not intentionally mislead people with the full knowledge of his deceit as Fauci did.
Trump never said to use bleach. He suggested that some intervention similar in effect might be used and deferred to the experts in that regard. The “news” sources you apparently subscribe to twisted that as they do everything they report.
I could go on, but that pretty much satisfies the claim of ignorance on your part.
The guy in charge? You mean the guy who listened to the experts and their science and advice? The experts who ran the MSM? The experts who said that there were no alternatives for treatment? The experts who advised the lockdowns and school closings? The experts who put infected people into the nursing homes? And so on. Those experts?
What about the English statistician who claimed Covid was an exponential pandemic? The M. Mann of Covid-19.
Seriously??? Have you not heard/read of how IMPORTANT Fauci viewed his own position in directing the US response to the COVID-19 pandemic, based on entries in the dairies he kept during his government “service”?
For example: Fauci called himself an “international celebrity” and described his fame as “explosive and really unimaginable.”
—source: https://www.coloradopolitics.com/2026/07/28/faucis-private-covid-19-diaries-six-takeaways-on-fame-prize-money-and-the-lab-leak-debate/
So to be clear you think people who have a high opinion of themselves are not worth listening to? Well I can think of one president who thinks he is the greatest president who ever lived. And he doesn’t just write that in his private diary. He yells it to the world. You ill be leaving maga then?
Anyone who claims to be “the science” and demands that he should not be questioned is no scientist.
Anyone who deflects discussion by inserting a false equivalency is desperate to avoid the truth.
“But Trump!…” is the best you can do? Chuckle.
You clearly have a high opinion of yourself and you are not worth taking seriously.
Trump would never have shut things down if left to his own devices. He was opposed originally, but he got so much push-back that he let the governors do as they saw fit.
Indeed, Trump made the mistake of listening to Fauci to begin with, and championed the increasingly worthless injection, but some deference is justified in the early days of confusion and hope of a “cure”.
It was the Biden regime and the Democrat states who doubled down on it even after it became clear who was and was not at risk, and Trump never even suggested making the jab mandatory or a moral issue. And Trump certainly did not try to hide anything from Americans or to quash open discussion.
So yes, you are mistaken in drawing any kind of equivalency between the actions of the parties involved.
Trump, under Operation Warp Speed, is responsible for paying for the development of the mRNA vaccine, but that did not come with a government mandate to get jabbed.
Trump declared a national emergency, but it was California that dictated the first mandatory lockdown. There was no US mandatory lockdown. The lockdowns were all dictated by the stattes.
There was no national mandate to get jabbed. Most people here seem to have not had it.
10s of thousands of people lost their jobs because they refused the jabs. Thousands of career military were dismissed because of refusal. ‘There was no national mandate’ is a cowards evasion.
That’s not a national mandate. People who refused the jab made a decision that they didn’t want to have it and so had to weigh that against keeping their jobs. Personally I am fine with people being able to make that choice. If you don’t want the jab don’t have it, but there are consequences. I worked in a job that relied on people being healthy. I was fine to have vaccination a requirement for it. Some weren’t and so made a choice. Why should your beliefs and ignorance compromise my health? Simple really.
Not sure whether you know you’re lying. I got my COVID vaccine because getting vaccinated seemed unimportant to me relative to losing a good job. “Do it or get fired” is a mandate.
(… except for the rich)
But it is not a national mandate. It’s a mandate for your job.
While I’m not shy at throwing crap back at Trump,
this one can barely be blamed on him.
Trump 1 got attacked alk the time from all sides – and him not going along with certain standards would have resulted in being blamed for EVERY SINGLE covid death personally.
They already called him Hitler before that, but in this case he’d would have been called the worst genocidal maniac since Hitler.
Remember all the things they tried to get him back then – they even changed laws in New York to bypass the statutes of limitation to put him in front of the court.
Imagine if they’d the chance to charge him with the killing of 1 mio+ Americans.
Now that he has really started the killing and joined the endless tradition of genocidal US presidents as the Wall Street wants it
he gets a way better treatment by MSM, Big Tech and everyone else –
but back then he had literary no other choice than to go along.
Governors, not the POTUS, enforced lockdowns. We now know that Fauci spoke to governors to encourage them to lock down their states. Fauci stated in his journal that he was pleased that he convinced Newsom to lock down California.
The photo of Newsom sitting maskless with his elite friends at the Michelin starred French Laundry during his own lockdown proves that Newsom knew that Fauci was not telling him the truth about Covid-19. Newsom went along with Fauci’s dictatorial lies because he could exercise total control over California.
True, just as there were millions of ‘little Stalins’ during the purges and millions of ‘little Hitlers’ in Germany there were many ‘little Faucis’ during Covid in my ‘neck of the woods’ as I’m sure there were everywhere.
Those would be the lying, fact free, race baiting, divisive, science illiterate, fake news MSM and pretentious talking dick heads.
Science 😉
Fauci had a boss Francis Collins why hasn’t he been held accountable?
It’s not just Dr. Fauci. Remember Hydroxychloroquine? When President Trump brought that up at a press conference the news media pooh poohed it on the news that evening. The Navy hospital ship and the field hospital that New York ignored, The side effects of the so-called vaccine that was causing heart irregularities was swept under the rug. And then there’s:
Gain-of-function (GoF) research is a medical practice that genetically
alters an organism to enhance its biological functions, such as making
a pathogen more transmissible or virulent.
“Remember Hydroxychloroquine”
I do. The scam that sucked in so many gullible people and had them looking in the wrong place for cure.
You mean something that had proven efficacy overseas..
Unlike the “pseudo-vax”, which was never a cure, and did not stop disease transmission.
Really gullible people took multiple doses of the mRNA immune-destroying crap. !
No matter what you or I think about HCQ –
it was for sure not a scam.
Trump mentioned it once and all hell broke loose, it was demonized,outlawed.
Just like co2 it suddenly became Hitler overnight.
Same happened with Ivermectin.
A scam is an organized scheme using all kinds of dirty and psychological tricks ( like AGW , the Covid Vaccine, mandatory useless masks,mandatory low density energy devices – all the stuff you buy by the dozen)
not something mentioned in a speech with 0 benefits and only downsides for the “scammer”.
It didn’t work and snake oil salesman peddled it. That’s a scam.
Google “did hydroxychloroquine work for covid cases? Here I have done it for you…
No, hydroxychloroquine did not work as an effective treatment or preventative measure for COVID-19. [1]
While early 2020 laboratory tests on cell lines initially showed potential, massive subsequent clinical trials conducted globally found no meaningful health benefits
Findings from Clinical Trials
I rest my case.
Pfizer speaks.
Haha. Could have predicted that.
the drug had little to no impact on preventing COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, or death.
Yep, pretty much what the CEO of Pfizer admitted.
Garbage again. The vaccines were effective at saving lives. All the quality studies since prove that.
So did a number of other therapeutics products.
But they were all verboten by the Fauci cabal so that his invested mRNA products could have a captured market.
The vaccines were sold not ‘to save lives’ but to prevent infections, which they did not do.
It cost buttons, nobody was getting rich off of big Hydorxychloroquin, or Ivermectin.
Those large studies were conducted after the condemnation so those who were doing the condemning did not know it didn’t work. Since HCQ was widely used and carried no side effects there was no reason to outlaw its usage.
Oh and then there is the ivermectin nonsense. I googled that for you too. Guess what?
No, ivermectin did not work to treat or prevent COVID-19 in humans. [1, 2]
While the drug initially showed promise in laboratory settings by blocking the virus in petri dishes, massive large-scale human clinical trials proven that it offers no meaningful clinical benefit. Major global health organizations explicitly advise against its use for coronavirus infections. [1, 2, 3]
Why People Thought It Worked
Laboratory Success: In early 2020, researchers found that high doses of ivermectin stopped the SARS-CoV-2 virus from replicating in cell cultures. [1, 2]The Dosage Catch: The concentration of the drug required to kill the virus in a petri dish was vastly higher than what can safely be achieved in the human body. To reach those levels internally, a human would have to take a lethal dose. [1]Early Flawed Studies: Initial small trials and anecdotal reports suggested positive effects. However, many of these early studies were later found to have severe statistical flaws, small sample sizes, or fraudulent data. [1]The Clinical Trial Evidence
Major, high-quality randomized controlled trials—such as the Together trial in Brazil and the Active 6 trial in the United States—tracked thousands of patients to see if the drug made a real-world difference. These gold-standard studies, alongside comprehensive global data analysis by panels like the Cochrane Reviews, confirmed that ivermectin fails to reduce: [1, 2, 3]
Hospital Admissions: Patients taking the drug were hospitalized at the same rates as those taking a placebo.Mortality Rates: The drug did not lower the risk of death from severe COVID-19.Symptom Severity: It did not stop the progression of mild COVID-19 into severe
Google speaks for Pfizer.
Don’t like being presented with facts huh? You will have no problem fitting in round here. Hint. If you find soft sand you don’t even need to dig to stick your head in.
Fauci knew the jab caused miscarriages and he pushed it on pregnant people anyway.
Another garbage statement. You guys just love swimming in this nonsense. So what does the science say?
Robust scientific evidence proves that COVID-19 vaccines do not cause miscarriages. Comprehensive data from global health organizations and large-scale peer-reviewed studies show that pregnant women who receive a COVID-19 vaccine face no higher risk of pregnancy loss than unvaccinated women.
Background Rates Match: Large-scale monitoring shows that the rate of miscarriage among vaccinated women remains entirely within the normal, expected background rate of 10% to 20% for all recognized pregnancies. [1, 2]
Yale School of Medicine Analysis: Researchers evaluating data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink found absolutely no correlation between pregnancy loss and the number of doses, type of vaccine, or timing of vaccination. [1]
Sweden Population Registry Study: A massive cohort study published in Communications Medicine confirmed no statistical differences in childbirth or miscarriage outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. [1]
Slightly Lower Risks Observed: Some tracking data, such as Boston University’s PRESTO study published by CIDRAP, actually noted marginally lower miscarriage rates among vaccinated women compared to unvaccinated peers
Did any of those studies publish data on only the affects during the first month of pregnacy?
Ivermectin has high efficacy in places where it was used in a sensible way..
Far more than the fake vaxxine
Garbage from you once again. Evidence please.
“Ivermectin has high efficacy in places where it was used in a sensible way..”
Actually for once you have said something that makes sense and is true. but you didn’t finish the sentence. Here I’ll help you.
“Ivermectin has high efficacy in places where it was used in a sensible way, specifically as an anti-parasite medication.”
Again all the studies were after the fact and nobody knew for absolute sure if it worked or not.
Absolute rubbish. Do you even check before writing this nonsense?
The TOGETHER Trial (Brazil): Published in the New England Journal of Medicine, this study tracked 1,358 high-risk COVID-19 outpatients. Half received a human-optimized dose of ivermectin for three days, and half received a placebo. The trial concluded that ivermectin did not reduce hospital admissions, emergency room visits, or clear viral loads any better than a sugar pill.
The ACTIV-6 Trial (United States): Funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and published in JAMA, this study tested nearly 1,600 symptomatic outpatients. Even when the dosage was increased to see if a stronger amount would trigger the laboratory effect, there was no meaningful clinical difference in recovery time or severe complications between the ivermectin and placebo groups. [1, 2]
The PRINCIPLE Trial (United Kingdom): Run by the University of Oxford, this massive trial studied over 2,000 participants taking ivermectin. The data, summarized by the Oxford University Primary Care Health Sciences division, concluded that ivermectin failed to provide any clinically significant improvements in hospital admissions or mortality rates. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Summary of Scientific Consensus
While ivermectin successfully disrupts viral pathways in a laboratory petri dish, it fails to function inside the human body at safe, legal dosages. Based on these definitive clinical outcomes, global regulatory authorities, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), strongly advise against using ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19
Funny this should be brought up today. I was this afternoon going through my photo file, and in it found a Branco cartoon captured in June 2021. It has Hillary watching TV with the set sitting on a trunk labelled ‘30,000 emails’, laughing at the screen, on which is a news item “Fauci emails expose lies, fraud, flip flops, and deceit”–to which Hillary says “Ha Ha–Idiot”. That was just over 5 years ago.
I have developed a saying that describes the follow-up on ‘lies, fraud, flip flops and deceit’ in government–‘Nothing …ever….happens.’ Let’s see if it gets violated this time.
I’ve been examining some big “accidents” lately. Often a big failure, especially one that impacts the public or catches their attention, results in some sort of commission, or board of inquiry, or something similar. Just about as often the report resulting from this inquiry can become a CYA exercise. Chairman Rogers may have tried to do that with the Challenger inquiry, but several people helped Richard Feynman make certain it stayed true to its mandate to provide accountability.
Could a Commission of Inquiry be assembled to reveal the full story of COVID-19? Is COVID-19 such a big disaster that a CYA exercise is virtually guaranteed? We need accountability in order to not make the same mistakes twice. In fact, we need one to even determine what those mistakes were.
Never happen.
The term for politically agendized science has been Lysenkoism. It’s time to retire that term and update it to Faucism
The world was “Faucied” … we’re still waiting in Australia for their “science” to be uncovered.
When the “vaccines” became available, I did not like the lack of testing or the delivery method, so I did not get vaccinated. Wore the masks as little as possible and went about my business as normal. Never got COVID. My employer repeatedly threatened to fire me and I said, “okay”. After a couple years, they stopped. We were sent home 15 March, 2020 (beware the Ides) and never went back, working remotely from then on. So, the threats came via email. Apparently, HR does not know the concept of irony.
Yes, it was a very serious public health hazard but it was made much worse by bad advice, given knowingly by people whose job it was to protect us. Millions of people suffered severe economic hardship as a result, many thousands died unnecessarily. Andrew Cuomo should have been indicted on multiple counts of manslaughter.
“many thousands died unnecessarily”
Who are these thousands and what did they die of? The only people I know who died unnecessarily were the sad souls who bought the “don’t take the vaccine” nonsense and died sad horrific deaths.
Wrong….. most of the people who died were in Democrat state where the governors sent covid patients into old-people’s homes… and sadly those old people died sad horrific deaths.
Thats another bnasty2000 truth.i.e a lie….
By percentage and per capita rates, more people died of COVID-19 in Republican-leaning areas and states than in Democratic-leaning ones. Studies show this mortality gap widened significantly after COVID-19 vaccines became widely available. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Key Study Findings
Gee I wonder why that would be?
And how did these studies differentiate between dying ‘of COVID’ vs dying ‘with COVID’ when the data gatherers stopped differentiating early on. How about comparing death rates in nursing and assisted living facilities between NY and FLA?
Garbage again. Per capita Republican states had higher death rates. But you knew that. Things were pretty even till the vaccines were released at which time democrat death rates fell below that of the vaccine hesitant republican states. Fact….
Two persons in Bogota whom I know personally contracted Covid despite being fully vaccinated. One died and the other was in intensive care for months. I was vaccinated (Pfizer vaccine) and contracted the virus, though the symptoms were quite mild.
Not vaxxed.. I did catch Covid on a flight back from Tassie
.. nothing more than a slightly bad flu for a few days.. !
So no thousands. And your statement makes it sound like you thought the vaccine would stop you getting the virus. Is that what you believe?
If you take the MMR vaccine, what is likelihood of getting measles, mumps or rubella 😉
Biden promised the US that the vaccine was “safe and effective” and would keep you from getting Covid. It is on record.
Ah yes–that’s another cartoon from July 2021 that I have on file–
“And the question is whether or not we should be in a position where you, uh, um, are, why can’t the, the, the experts say we know that this virus is, in fact, uh, um, uh, it’s going to be, or excuse me, we, we know why all the drugs approved are not temporarily approved, but permanently approved, that’s underway, too, I expect that to occur quickly”–Joe Biden
There’s a ‘trust the science’ presidential directive if I ever saw one. Imagine what Kamala would have said!
I remember seeing similarly eloquent W Bush quotes turned into refrigerator magnets for sale in a the gift shop of a publicly subsidized museum in Massachusetts. The Biden quote will likely appear nowhere but here.
Forget Biden. It was Trump who developed the vaccine. Remember operation Warp Speed. Best thing he ever did.
And Trump said late in 2021 that if you get vaccinated you would be “protected.” Was he wrong? Nope, he was 100% right. You can still catch it, but your defence was boosted probably stopping serious illness or death… Love the Don.
That generally is the point of a vaccine, yes. A vaccine that doesn’t prevent transmission or infection gives that virus the opportunity mutate into a much more dangerous form. Look at Marek’s disease for a good example. Leaky vaccine allowed the virus to circulate for far longer than it would normally be able and removed selective pressures that it would normally face. This turned a fairly typical poultry virus into a highly virulent one that kills every non-vaccinated bird it infects.
We were told that the vaccine would prevent infection, which it clearly failed to do. I am unable to say if it diminished the symptoms I experienced.
BTW, a big thank you to paul courtney, ToldYouSo and others above for comprehensively exposing your lies in your reply to my first post.
Keep boosting Simon. Have at it.
Many thousands died in the UK because of delayed treatment for serious illness as the hospitals were in lockdown for everything except Covid and emergencies. That delay caused an increase in mortality long after.
Sadly there is some truth to what you say. But it is not universally viewed as a “wrong” decision, but rather an impossible ethical dilemma where there was no entirely right answer. Public health experts, ethicists, and official inquiry boards view the situation not as a simple mistake, but as a catastrophic trade-off forced by a system that was deeply unprepared for a pandemic. They were tough times. The UK lost 230000 people to covid.
Will Al Gore and Michael Mann be seen in the same light? There are many more players, just as there were with Fauci, but those two are/were “The Science” in the Climate Contention®.
The term ‘being gored’ has already been taken by bulls.
This is unfairly harsh.
Yes, Faucci changed his mind on masks. Perhaps he was lying at the beginning or perhaps he started lying later on, or perhaps he never lied either way and simply changed his mind at some point. In either case nobody ever died because of a mask mandate. Masks were an annoyance at worst.
Yes, the school closures were bothersome for many people, and yes children were less likely to die of Covid. But “less likely” is not the same as “no chance at all”, and if the government pushes a little too hard during a once-in-a-century pandemic that’s hardly cause for comparisons to Benedict Arnold.
Yes, there was pressure to shut down alternative points of view, and free speech is obviously important. But it’s not as if we descended into totalitarianism; I still saw plenty of alternative views widely shared online.
It’s worth noting that some of Faucci’s decisions saved lives. For instance, he promoted vaccines which saved many people, especially among the elderly.
Kindly explain why Sweden, which did not lock down and only vaccinated the elderly, fared at least as well as countries which did.
The US cured the flu. Everything was labeled Covid.
Including auto accidents and gunshot deaths.
Because Anders Tegnell the Swedish health minister resisted the media panic to lockdown. The evidence of infection rate and fatality rate were available by March and April 2020.
Tegnell was also an expert on controlling viruses having worked in Africa on ebola outbreaks.
He advised us Brits to not lockdown but we went with the media panic. People got arrested for sitting outside on park benches or going for country walks.
If Sweden’s policies were smarter than ours, it doesn’t automatically follow that Fauci is a criminal or a traitor.
And anyway, Sweden didn’t only vaccinate the elderly. As of October 2021 Sweden had already vaccinated 80% of its adult population. https://web.archive.org/web/20210818180535/https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/folkhalsorapportering-statistik/statistikdatabaser-och-visualisering/vaccinationsstatistik/statistik-for-vaccination-mot-covid-19/
Are you looking at the wreckage of a generation of schoolchildren and students whose education was effectively sidelined for years? Whose social development has been shown to be seriously damaged? Yes mate, bothersome. Good grief.
The data is mixed. For instance:
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20250605-the-pandemic-generation-how-covid-19-has-left-a-long-term-mark-on-children
Faucism seems a mispelling. Perhaps, Fascism?
TFN, Izaak and Simon. Bots. It matters not the subject, they take the opposing position, but with no reason or substance, only the intent to rankle. Don’t engage them.
I don’t think they’re bots. But they do certainly have metastasized TDS. It’s too late for them.
The term is Flame Warriors.
Basics: Inflate their ego by scoring “debating points” employing tactics that amount to sophistry.
The other day Simon posted a reply to me, and I responded with a change-the-channel *click*.
Got multiple downvotes.
Fauci’s crime was much more limited than what the post discussed. He funded gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute in violation of stated federal policy to not fund gain of function research. The Wuhan Lab used that funding to create the deadly virus. For that he should be breaking rocks in the hot sun.
What I am seeing being published from his personal journal, he also lied. Many times.
Let’s face it, schools were closed for the benefit of the staff, not the children.
Yes!!!
Over 80% of Covid-19 cases were among those under 65 years of age.
75% of Covid-19 deaths were among those over 65 years of age at only 15% of population.
30% of deaths occurred in elder care facilities.
This was from transparent CDC data before they turned it over to a third party pay wall.
Covid-19 was just a typical seasonal variation culling the herd of the too old, too sick, too crammed together in contagious, badly run (blue) Medicare/Medicaid cash cow elder care warehouses.
The Japanese have the highest percentage of +65 years old but way down WHO’s list for C-19 cases and deaths. What do they know/do the rest of the world does not??
Perhaps due to their habit of wearing masks?
https://web-japan.org/trends/11_culture/pop202008_mask-culture.html
It will probably take “history” more than the next 50 years to fully account for, and accurately report on, the extent that the US—indeed, the world’s—populations got “Faucied” by his advocacy of the incompletely-tested-for-safety mRNA-based vaccines for SARS-CoV-19.
The VAERS database for voluntarily reporting adverse reactions to vaccines (https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html ) documented the variety and significantly increased frequency of adverse reactions to this particular type of vaccine during its rollout administration, and subsequently there have been many reputable medical reports/papers documenting the increased prevalence of diseases such as “Long COVID”, myocarditis, and pneumonitis/ILD that are linked directly to mRNA-based vaccines administered during the COVID-19 pandemic.
IMHO, Fauci not only looks the part, but deserves to be put alongside “Angel of Death” Josef Mengele in the history of “medical experimentation” for his malfeasance-of-office, including his indirect funding of GoF research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China through the cutout organization EcoHealth Alliance, despite a 2014 USA government moratorium on funding for such research.
And President Biden KNEW . . . the perhaps-not-so-obvious reason for his preemptive, unconditional pardon to Fauci in the final hours before Biden left office!
Well, Biden may not have known but whoever’s hand was operating the autopen did.
Did Fauci see dementia in Biden early on?
Let’s hear the tapes from the Fauci meetings with Biden. I mean the full tapes.
Those tapes have been “vaccinated” against truth.
More on Fauci in the Daily Sceptic.
https://dailysceptic.org/2026/08/10/why-did-fauci-exaggerate-the-threat-from-covid-19/
Mostly on the exaggerated threat after data from the Diamond Princess ship showed how mild it was in reality.
Thanks for this brief over view in the above post.
The last vaccine I accepted was in 1960, at 7 years old. I am now 73, fit and healthy. Never been on any medication. Still walking briskly up mountains.
Most people in the western world are so well trained to do what they are told, and what to believe and think, by governments, universities and religions. They are intellectually numb.
The comments to this post are slim pickings of the real story. Bob had the most to say.
The biggest obstacle most people face is coming to terms with the fact that they have been lied to by the people that have the most influence on them.
Good health
Dear Curtis Hill
You say that there is not enough evidence to prosecute.
That is not true, you like most other folks have not looked deep enough.
The covid virus was first patented in 1964. Give Dr David Martin a call.
They knew exactly what they were doing.
“The biggest obstacle most people face is coming to terms with the fact that they have been lied to by the people that have the most influence on them.”
No. It’s that their bodies won’t last forever. They will “wear out”. They will become more susceptible to a germs, virus, etc. that their younger body would have shrugged off or not noticed was developing. (Arthritis usually takes a long time to develop.)
I’m 72. I never had the MMRV vaccine. I had the real things. As a child, I did have the smallpox and polio vaccines. Never had smallpox. Never had polio.
But I do have a picture of me at about 18 months old feeding a polio victim with others in iron lungs looking at us and smiling in the background. That was before I got the vaccine. (I was in the hospital for tubercular meningitis. (I think they would bring me into that ward as sort of a “comfort dog” before they existed.)
How many people do you know that have had smallpox or polio since those vaccines came out?
Some vaccines save lives. Some are a waste of time for some who don’t have a weakened immune system (like the elderly).
I wouldn’t paint all vaccines with such a broad brush.
Gunga
The Covid vaccine destroyed the Immune system.
I believe the POTUS is currently recommending to reduce the 70 odd vaccine variants down to a total of 11 for young people. Excellent start.
Peoples immune system reduction at age is more about life style, booze, poor food choices and not focusing on nutrients etc etc, lack of physical stress on the body. Its either growing or its dying.
I went on a Seven 7 day Adventist healthy eating course a few years ago. There was one guy about my age on 33 different pharma medications. At the end of the 12 week course he was down to 16, six months later down to zero – none. Said he has never been healthier.
Check this out – virus’s. Listen carefully to what she says. They have never identified one virus out of the body.
https://youtu.be/ipwUpcY2UgY?si=EtoX8e_LltlI9J8b
FALSE. COMPLETELY FALSE.
Viruses are regularly identified “outside of a human or other animal body” by tests such as NAAT/PCR and antigen tests, using cells obtained by throat swab or blood draw.
Moreover, there are current techniques and means to culture viruses outside of a whole living organism . . . see https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-microbiology/chapter/isolation-culture-and-identification-of-viruses/
And finally there is this simple, historical fact:
The very first virus ever discovered in history was a plant pathogen—the Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV), identified in the late 19th century. Thousands of distinct plant viruses are now known to science, affecting crops, wild species, and ornamental plants. FYI, in taxonomy, plants and animals are distinctly different Kingdoms.
What is the British equivalent? Borissed, Whittied, Vallanced, Hancocked, Gilberted, Morganed?
I think the British are also familiar with the word “f*cked”.
They claimed it was safe for pregnant women. The miscarriage rate was 82% for pregnant women who got the jab. I can’t believe anyone still defends this crime against humanity.
Not true!
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10152171/
“Prolonged school closures were advanced and defended despite clear evidence that children faced far lower risk of severe illness than adults. Parents who wanted their children in classrooms where learning, socialization, and mental health could be preserved were treated as obstacles rather than primary decision makers. That is not public health. It is substitution of bureaucratic preference and social manipulation for parental authority.”
Of course this ignores the fact that the teachers of those students did not have a far lower risk of severe illness. Also those children at school exposed to the very poor health practices of their fellow students were more likely to catch it and then pass it on to their parents and grandparents who were more likely to get a severe illness.