Open Thread

A place for discussion

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
26 Comments
July 5, 2026 2:30 am

Please consider three concise points about the analysis of “climate” response to emissions of CO2, CH4, N2O, and other trace non-condensing IR-active gases.  

About models:
Not one of the pre-stabilized, time-step-iterated, parameter-tuned-to-hindcast climate models has ever had any diagnostic or prognostic authority concerning the influence of rising concentrations of CO2, CH4, and N2O on trends of any climate variable. This is because the step-wise computation of climate system response to incoming solar energy produces a rapid buildup of uncertainty far greater than the effect being investigated, for any emissions scenario. More here.

https://www.regulations.gov/comment/DOE-HQ-2025-0207-0371

About space-based observation:
The high-resolution images from GOES East for Band 16 confirm that two factors dominate the local and overall longwave emission to space: The formation and dissipation of clouds, and the time dependence of skin surface response to the daily pulse of solar heating under clear skies. Attribution of any portion of the reported land or ocean temperature trends to rising concentrations of CO2, CH4, and N2O is not justified, considering how the land + ocean + atmosphere system exhibits such strong characteristics of powered operation, self-regulation, and horizontal mass and energy transport. The impressive influence of the water cycle is implied in these images, especially in time-lapse presentation. More here. Stop the video to read the full text description.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgjw6ViRq9k

About atmospheric dynamics:
The computed incremental IR absorbing power from rising concentrations of CO2, CH4, N2O and other IR-active trace gases in the atmosphere is not capable of exerting a perceptible and physically persistent “warming” influence on the climate system. This is because dynamic energy conversion (in W/m^2) within the general circulation, operating throughout the depth of the troposphere, massively overwhelms the static IR “warming” tendency (also in W/m^2). Therefore an assumption that TOA longwave emission to space is suppressed as a result (i.e. the core concept of GHG “forcing”), cannot be justified based on the spectral IR absorption characteristics of these gases alone, nor by spectral emission profiles observed from space or from the ground.  More here, with background, references, plots, and a time-lapse video for visualizing the issue, based on the ERA5 hourly parameter “vertical integral of energy conversion.”

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1PDJP3F3rteoP99lR53YKp2fzuaza7Niz?usp=drive_link

That is all for now. Skeptics of climate alarm NEED NOT, and in my view OUGHT NOT, concede that *some* sensible heat gain down here is to be expected from what emissions of CO2 and the other IR-active non-condensing trace gases do in the atmosphere. No one knows that.

Thank you for your patient attention.

Reply to  David Dibbell
July 5, 2026 3:35 am

FYI: At the Mauna Loa Obs. in Hawaii, the concentrations of CO2 and CH4 in dry air are currently 432 ppmv an 1.93 ppmv, respectively. One cubic meter of this air has mass of 1,290 g and contains 0.85 g of CO2 and 1.93 mg of CH4. The small amounts of these greenhouse gases in the atmosphere cannot have any effect on air temperature, weather and climate.

The major processes for warming of the air are: heating of the earth’s surfaces by the absorption of sunlight, contact of air with the surfaces and warming of it by conduction, and by convection the warm air rises and heats up the atmosphere.

The main reason for the low concentrations of these gas in air is that they are absorbed by oceans and land surface waters.

Reply to  Harold Pierce
July 5, 2026 5:50 am

Thank you for your reply. There is a variable IR coupling of the skin surface of land and oceans to the lower atmosphere at the interface. This is not to be dismissed as a factor in the net energy transfer to the air.

Tom Johnson
Reply to  David Dibbell
July 5, 2026 4:56 am

Good points. A similar analogy might be that if you consider the erosion of the rock cliffs of Niagara Falls, the erosion might eventually work it’s way all across Lake Erie to Toledo Ohio. It’s like forecasting that flushing the toilets in the Niagara Falls visitors center is destroying Toledo and therefore requiring that all visitors to the falls must wear diapers instead of using the toilets.

Reply to  Tom Johnson
July 5, 2026 5:53 am

Thank you for your reply. I have family on Grand Island just upstream of Niagara Falls. Maybe I should tell them to moderate their water usage to “save Toledo.” 🙂

LT3
Reply to  David Dibbell
July 5, 2026 5:28 am

It is hard to tell if the social media posts from certain groups that are still pushing the CO2 / (CH4 is 1234.567 times stronger than CO2) narrative is driven by legitimate research anymore. But with the considerable reductions in SO2 emissions over the last two decades, and the indisputable physics behind Anthropogenic SO2 emission perturbing incoming sunlight, there is no research being done to compute how hot will this planet if all SO2 emissions are removed. The research that is out there explains the effects by statements such as “SO2 make clowd top shinny. at id wefwects sunlii”. Instead of the decades long emission of shipping fuels that were 3.5% Sulfur content were carried into the upper troposphere by convection, combined with water vapor and UV radiation to form Sulfuric Acid aerosols which are highly reflective. A 1% change of incoming across the Pacific Ocean dwarfs just about any forcing one could conjure up.

strativarius
July 5, 2026 2:33 am

The Stern gang – The gaslighting goes on. Nicholas Stern believes he is the expert’s expert nowadays…

Make Ed Miliband chancellor, ex-chief Treasury adviser tells Andy Burnham 

Nicholas Stern joins growing number backing Miliband, saying he has vision and experience to revive economy

He backed Miliband’s moratorium on additional drilling licences in the North Sea for oil and gas Guardian

The UK is heading in the opposite direction to plain common economic sense. Even Blair felt the need to speak up…

Blair warns Burnham: Don’t raise capital gains tax

Former PM’s think tank tells leader-in-waiting that targeting investors will damage economy Telegraph

Tax increases are the order of the day be it Starmer or Burnham in the chair.
And no word on being absolutely defenceless…

James Broughton
Reply to  strativarius
July 5, 2026 4:30 am

Burnham makes me uneasy, but I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt to see if he can actually get a grip on Whitehall.
But Ed Milliband scares me and must come nowhere near the country’s purse strings ……or the new Cabinet. One can only hope at this point.

strativarius
Reply to  James Broughton
July 5, 2026 4:44 am

I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt 

And there we part company. He has failed on two attempts at the Labour leadership. Against mad Ed Miliband and Jeremy Corbyn. His supposed triumphs in Manchester are in reality the product of his predecessors policies.

His first big idea – given the state of the nation, defence and the economy etc – is to duplicate No 10 (expenses, staff etc) in the North (Manchester). Then it’s on to increasing taxation from the dead to creating a real North South divide.

Burnham has declared war on the South. Your homes and savings are no longer safe
London and the South East already vastly subsidise the rest of the country. The answer is to liberate the North, not seize southern wealth Telegraph

I wrote him off a long time ago. And he is, apparently, better than the entire 400 plus Labour MPs who are already in the House. That certainly beats the Tories.

And don’t forget our Andy rang around 26 constituencies trying to persuade the sitting MP to stand down. He got lucky on no 27 in Makerfield. 

Scissor
Reply to  strativarius
July 5, 2026 4:43 am

Tax increases are fine but only if they help support more migrants.

strativarius
Reply to  Scissor
July 5, 2026 4:49 am

You are a Liberal Democrat and I claim the Tenner…

Scissor
Reply to  strativarius
July 5, 2026 5:08 am

I really love Britain, so its slow suicide is painful to watch. I’ll take two fivers as long as they are plastic.

strativarius
Reply to  Scissor
July 5, 2026 5:26 am

Then you are not a Lib Dem… In Oxfordshire they went to the High Court to get English CSG flags banned during the World Cup

Unauthorised flags – High Court injunction granted on 23 June 2026

Their sister council in West Berkshire is giving newbuild properties to Afghans and Ukrainians who leapfrog over the thousands who have been on the waiting list for social housing for years. We have military veterans sleeping on the streets. They never get a thought.

Scissor
Reply to  strativarius
July 5, 2026 5:56 am

Good luck to you.

Reply to  strativarius
July 5, 2026 4:50 am

“Nicholas Stern joins growing number backing Miliband, saying he has vision and experience to revive economy”

This has to be one of the greatest lying-by-omission quotes I’ve ever seen. Nurtured by decades of BBC- and Guardian-thinking at the Satanic level, to which only the London elites can aspire. If our football team was at this level, we’d be hammering Mexico 10-0 tonight in Mexico City.

So what is the full no-omissions, reality quote, one might ask ?

Nicholas Stern joins growing number backing Miliband, saying he has vision and experience to revive economy, which is how he knows exactly how to continue to destroy the UK economy”.

Congratulations Old Nick, you are the GOAT:

Screen-Shot-2026-07-05-at-4.49.10-AM
strativarius
Reply to  philincalifornia
July 5, 2026 4:58 am

That growing number…

a growing number of senior academics and officials 

Right thinking academics and quangos/civil service. The very antithesis of democracy and the very essence of the technocracy.

Ed Zuiderwijk
Reply to  philincalifornia
July 5, 2026 5:55 am

Anybody who thinks Miliband has ‘vision’ is himself as blind as a Covid bat.

Reply to  philincalifornia
July 5, 2026 6:00 am

Miliband has vision!

Stern just demonstrated his own lack of vision. Thinking Miliband has vision is about as divorced from reality as one can get.

The UK is in Big Trouble. It is being led by Leftwing fools and imbeciles, who think they have it all figured out. They don’t, they just think they do.

Stupidity must be a contagious disease.

Ed Zuiderwijk
Reply to  strativarius
July 5, 2026 5:54 am

Burnham thinks he was the Mayor of Manchester in his previous life, but in fact he was the Sheriff of Nottingham.

Scissor
July 5, 2026 5:00 am

Paul Pelosi is doing his part to get vehicles off the road. It seems he mounted a hit and run on a parked Tesla in Yountville making it inoperable and then he drove off before his own car conked out.

https://www.kcra.com/article/nancy-pelosi-husband-paul-charge-napa-county-hit-and-run/71823395

Reply to  Scissor
July 5, 2026 5:16 am

His Karma met its Dharma … tragically —
— ’twas another Story-in-5-Words.
In the sequel, implicate his Mater-Ma.
(Why do all these bad things keep happening to Queen Nancy-P.?]
In the prequel, his head met a hammer.

Reply to  Whetten Robert L
July 5, 2026 5:43 am

Yes, and the guy who mysteriously got into his house with the hammer is now doing 30 years without parole in a maximum security prison. When he gets Epsteined, you can say you read it here first.

Derg
Reply to  Scissor
July 5, 2026 5:31 am

Well Nancy will have to use her extraordinary investing skills to help with his defense.

Reply to  Scissor
July 5, 2026 6:03 am

Maybe it’s time to take the car keys away from this guy.

He can afford a driver. Nancy made a lot of money while in Congress.

Scissor
July 5, 2026 5:27 am

Celebration

Reply to  Scissor
July 5, 2026 6:06 am

Trump can definitely put on a good party!