Casimir Perpetual Motion Machine. Source Casimir Inc, Fair Use, Low Resolution Image to Identify the Subject.

“Casimir Effect” Perpetual Energy Machine Raises $12 Million Seed Capital

Essay by Eric Worrall

Claiming you’ve found a loophole in the laws of physics apparently gets you $12 million in capital.

PRESS RELEASE

Casimir Launches with $12M Oversubscribed SeedRound to Bring World’s First Quantum Energy ChipTo Market

Led by Scout Ventures, the Funding Will Accelerate Commercialization of Chips That Generate Persistent Power from Quantum Vacuum Fields 

May 12, 2026

Casimir, Inc., a quantum energy technology company founded by former NASA advanced propulsion researcher Dr. Harold “Sonny” White, today announced the close of a $12 million seed round led by Scout Ventures. The funding will commercialize the world’s first quantum vacuum energy source: semiconductor chips that harvest energy from quantum vacuum fields to produce continuous electrical power with no batteries, cords, or charging required. 

The oversubscribed round exceeded its original $8 million target, reflecting strong investor confidence in Casimir’s solution to one of energy technology’s longest-standing challenges, harnessing the Casimir effect. Scout Ventures is joined by Lavrock Ventures, Cottonwood Technology, Capital Factory, American Deep Tech, and Tim Draper of Draper Associates. The funding will accelerate chip performance optimization, targeting commercial availability of the company’s first-generation MicroSparc chip by 2028, positioning Casimir to disrupt the ultra-low-power electronics sector. 

Casimir’s MicroSparc chip measures just 5mm × 5mm and is designed to produce 1.5 volts at 25 microamps, performance comparable to a small rechargeable battery, but with no degradation and no replacement cycle. The company’s initial market targets ultra-low-power electronics, including tire pressure monitoring systems, embedded sensors, wearables, and other devices where battery replacement is costly or impractical, a market valued at nearly $10 billion today. 

Casimir’s technology is engineered to scale across the full power spectrum. Beyond its initial IoT applications, the company’s roadmap extends into consumer electronics and mobility platforms, including electric vehicles, and ultimately into larger-scale energy systems capable of powering homes and commercial infrastructure, a total addressable market exceeding $67 billion. As artificial intelligence drives unprecedented demand for persistent, low-latency computing, Casimir’s battery-free architecture offers new possibilities for always-on memory, edge devices, and autonomous systems at every scale. 

“Millions of devices will operate for years without a battery ever needing to be replaced or recharged because we have engineered a customized Casimir cavity into hardware capable of producing persistent electrical power,” said Dr. Harold “Sonny” White, Founder and CEO of Casimir. “I spent nearly two decades at NASA studying how we power humanity’s future. That work led me to the Casimir effect and the quantum vacuum, where new tools have allowed us to build on a century of scientific knowledge and bring abundant power to the world.” 

Casimir’s technology was incubated at the Limitless Space Institute (LSI), a nonprofit advancing interstellar travel founded by Dr. Kam Ghaffarian, the technology investor and serial entrepreneur behind X-energy, Intuitive Machines, Axiom Space, and Quantum Space. Dr. White serves as LSI’s Director of Advanced Research and Development, the role from which Casimir’s technology emerged. Dr. Ghaffarian continues to serve as an investor and board member of Casimir. 

“Casimir represents exactly the kind of breakthrough dual-use technology Scout Ventures was built to back,” said Brad Harrison, Founder and Managing Partner at Scout Ventures. “This is based on 100 years of science and we’re finally approaching a commercial product. Sonny’s ability to pull pieces from different domains of research and engineer them together into working hardware is remarkable. We’re proud to lead this round and support Casimir’s journey from applied science to deployed technology.” 

Casimir’s scientific foundation has been supported by multiple research and development efforts, including DARPA-funded nanofabrication research, university partnerships, and Dr. White’s peer-reviewed work on the dynamic quantum vacuum. On March 9, 2026, Dr. White published “Emergent Quantization from a Dynamic Vacuum” in Physical Review Research (DOI: 10.1103/l8y7-r3rm), providing the theoretical foundation for why engineered Casimir cavities produce usable electrical energy and marking the latest milestone in his nearly two decades of advanced propulsion research at NASA. 

Casimir is proudly American-made, actively engaged with commercial, university, and government partners for dual-use applications with direct implications for U.S. energy independence and national security. 

To learn more about Casimir, visit casimir.inc.

‍About Casimir 

Casimir is the world’s first quantum vacuum energy company, developing semiconductor chips designed to generate persistent power using the physics of the quantum vacuum, no batteries, cords, or charging required. Founded by Dr. Harold “Sonny” White, a former NASA advanced propulsion researcher, the company has engineered customized Casimir cavity structures into semiconductor hardware, technology built on nearly a century of quantum physics and validated by DARPA-funded nanofabrication and peer-reviewed research. Headquartered in Houston, Texas, and proudly built in America. www.casimir-inc.com 

‍About Scout Ventures 

Scout Ventures is an early-stage venture capital firm investing in dual-use technologies that advance U.S. national security and global stability. The firm focuses on artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, space infrastructure, cybersecurity, quantum technology, and advanced power, the critical technologies underlying how modern forces shoot, move, and communicate. Scout partners with founders from the military and intelligence community, leading national research laboratories, and top-tier research universities to back breakthrough companies at the seed stage. Scout’s mission: to invest in technology so capable, and deterrence so credible, that conflict becomes unthinkable. 

‍Press Contact 

Luca Sesti 
Luca.Sesti@lcscomms.co

Read more: https://www.casimir.inc/press-releases/casimir-launches-with-12m-oversubscribed-seed-round-to-bring-worlds-first-quantum-energy-chip-to-market

The founder of Casimir Inc, Harold White, was also heavily involved in the EM Drive – a controversial reactionless space drive idea. A reactionless space drive would open the way to the stars, enabling velocities far above the most powerful proposed drives which could be achieved with existing technology, such as Project Orion. But my understanding is tests on the EM Drive to date have proved too disappointing for NASA to push forward with the idea.

Here is Sabine Hossenfelder’s take on this “breakthrough”.

The Casimir effect is real, and has been measured. Place two plates of uncharged metal really close together in a vacuum, and the plates will experience a force pushing them together. This force is created by the plates altering the quantum properties of the space between the two plates – between the two plates, some quantum states are forbidden, causing a difference between quantum fluctuations outside the plates vs the space between the plates – resulting in a slight pressure pushing the plates together.

But harvesting energy from this quantum effect is like trying to harvest energy from a magnet. You get one tiny burst of energy if you allow the plates to squash together, then nothing.

The authors claim they have found a workaround, where the quantum quiet of the Casimir effect reduces the possibility of electrons escaping from the middle of the device, resulting in a net flow of electricity.

From the about section;

Imagine a Pacific atoll. The ocean outside is full of chaotic wave energy, while the lagoon inside is calm. In the same way, the outer plates feel the full “wave energy” of the quantum vacuum. Every so often, an electron tunnels from the plates to the central pillars. Inside the gap, the calm lagoon fluctuations are weaker, so the electron is unlikely to return.

When the plates and pillars are connected through a circuit, electrons flow back to the plates, and the cycle repeats without stopping. By combining many of these cavities, Casimir can produce steady power at the levels needed for everyday electronics and far beyond.

Read more: https://www.casimir.inc/tech

I have my doubts. The power levels claimed – in the range of pico amps – could easily be instrument error, or leakage from the environment. A slight difference in temperature between different parts of the test device could produce currents on that scale.

Frankly I think the idea is absurd. Even if there is some kind of odd quantum effect detected, any movement of electrons across the “Quantum atoll” would produce a counter voltage which would repel further transfers of charge, if the movement of electricity was used to perform work – i.e. do anything useful. If such an effect is possible, a similar effect could be created with carefully placed magnetic fields – and how long have scientists tried and failed to extract free energy from magnets?

Obviously the lure, the possibility of such an extraordinary breakthrough, will always attract the hopeful. But let’s just say, given the 100% failure rate of past efforts, I’m not going to rush in to invest in this venture.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.9 18 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
113 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
atticman
May 18, 2026 10:07 am

There’s a lot of people going to get their fingers burned! FOMO strikes again…

Curious George
Reply to  atticman
May 18, 2026 12:50 pm

49% of U.S. voters vote for Democrats.

Marty
Reply to  Curious George
May 18, 2026 2:04 pm

Or as Trump calls them, “Dumbocrats.”

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Curious George
May 18, 2026 7:31 pm

Basically voting against Trump.

May 18, 2026 10:38 am

OK, sounds great. Best wishes on those commercialization plans.

On my end, I’m testing a lab-scale gravity wave reverberator that amplifies the Newton factor by several orders of magnitude in each element of a phased array of collimated projection chambers filled with magnetically aligned para-isotopic nitrogen molecules. We’ll soon be producing a net output of 1,000 nano-amps at the 1 V activation level, scalable by series connection to any voltage desired. As everyone knows, gravity is always on, so it’s only a matter of scale and political will against the pressure from the fossil fuel industry that stand in the way of this laboratory-proven method of providing reliable electricity for all mankind. Science!

🙂

That is all for now.

KevinM
Reply to  David Dibbell
May 18, 2026 10:49 am

For half a sentence I thought you weren’t kidding. You should submit that paragraph to the patent office.

Kevin Kilty
Reply to  KevinM
May 19, 2026 9:15 am

Don’t laugh. I know of a state-supported industry consulting group that has backed at least one perpetual motion machine of the first kind.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  David Dibbell
May 18, 2026 11:40 am

How do you maintain constant output for a cell phone at 10,000 ft?
Curious minds want to know. 😉

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
May 18, 2026 7:33 pm

Ask any 15 year old, if you can get them off their phones.

Reply to  David Dibbell
May 18, 2026 12:27 pm

If you “reverse the polarity” will you have an antigravity machine?
(Such an approach works in Sci-Fi.) 😎

atticman
Reply to  David Dibbell
May 18, 2026 1:08 pm

I think it’s probably got more chance of working than Casimir’s device.

MarkW
Reply to  David Dibbell
May 18, 2026 1:34 pm

If you are using gravity as your power source, will that end up making gravity weaker?
If so great, my wife says I need to lose a few pounds.

Randle Dewees
Reply to  David Dibbell
May 18, 2026 4:08 pm

So, a lemon with a couple of wires?

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  David Dibbell
May 18, 2026 7:32 pm

I’ve been working on the Interossiter. But that guy with the big forehead won’t return my calls.

Keitho
Editor
Reply to  David Dibbell
May 19, 2026 3:48 am

Take my money now.

oeman50
Reply to  David Dibbell
May 19, 2026 4:37 am

About 10 years ago, I was asked to evaluate a technology that produced electricity by a process described in a paper. It went into a convoluted quantum-mechanical discussion I had difficulty unraveling. Then I realized it was transferring energy without a change in temperature, violating Carnot’s Law! So I realized that despite the techno-babel, it was a total load of BS. I gave it a thumbs down. Maybe the “Casimir effect” is the same thing, who cares? It’s still BS.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  oeman50
May 19, 2026 9:28 am

Physicists challenge a 200-year-old law of thermodynamics at the atomic scale
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/01/260121034140.htm

Except thermodynamics is macroscopic. Quantum effects not included.

oeman50
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
May 20, 2026 5:09 am

I see that from the article you linked, I was not aware of proposed a microscopic exemption. However, the device I was asked to evaluate was macroscopic, not a quantum motor.

It also leaves me at least one question. Even in a quantum motor, where does the energy come from?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  oeman50
May 20, 2026 9:59 am

My post was inspired by “convoluted quantum-mechanical discussion.”
Nothing more.

In a quantum motor where does the energy come from? According to the article it comes from vacuum, which I interpret to mean out of quantum foam..

JonasM
Reply to  David Dibbell
May 19, 2026 12:28 pm

For those who don’t get the original idea for this beautiful gobbledygook, see this:

“Turbo Encabulator” the Original

(Oops – I see someone posted this below. Oh well…)

Reply to  David Dibbell
May 19, 2026 4:42 pm

Thanks for all the replies.
I will call this the Gravity Excited Energy by Zero-Emission Reverberation effect. Retirees will surely supply a flood of funding.
🙂

KevinM
May 18, 2026 10:43 am

“Casimir’s MicroSparc chip measures just 5mm × 5mm and is designed to produce 1.5 volts at 25 microamps, performance comparable to a small rechargeable battery”

Electrical Engineer says “huh?”

“Small Button/Coin Cells (Lithium ML/LIR series): Operate at 3.0 volts. Because they are designed strictly for low-drain devices, they usually output a trickle of 0.01 W to 0.1 W

Theres a conversion there to be done between microamps and Watts, but if anyone does that math they’ll understand why I stopped reading.

KevinM
Reply to  KevinM
May 18, 2026 10:46 am

Well… maybe any two things can fit “comparable to“.
A brontosaurus is comparable to a chinchilla.
Not sure _why_ anyone would compare them, but they could – apparently it would get them $10M.

Reply to  KevinM
May 19, 2026 5:20 am

Nope, you have your numbers wrong. A typical button battery used in laptop of desktop computers also known as CMOS batteries is indeed 3V but with a current of 1 to 5 micro amps, is only a power of 7.5 micro watts if you use 2.5 micro amps as current. They have a capacity of 200 milli amp-hours which is why they last for 10 years in a computer. Furthermore, button batteries have a max continuous current of 1 to 5 millamps, thus their power is limited to 0.003 to 0.015 watts.

Finally IF this Casimir effect power source is real, generating 25 micro amps at 1V, then it would be more than comparable to existing button batteries used to keep CMOS chips alive in computers. (your CMOS button battery in your laptop or desktop is only delivering 7.5 microwatts and this quantum battery can deliver 25 microwatts purportedly.)

Reply to  KevinM
May 19, 2026 10:25 am

I did the math. 1.5V at 25 microamps = 0.0375 milliwatts. You would need a lot of these to match one of those button batteries.

Bruce Cobb
May 18, 2026 10:50 am

Then there’s the Cardiff Giant Effect. The banker Davd Hannum said, referring to customers of P.T. Barnum’s museum who were flocking to see his knock-off version of the Cardiff Giant – a carved, 10-foot tall gypsum statue, (meant to fool people into believing it was a real human) when David Hannum had the original: “There’s a sucker born every minute”.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
May 18, 2026 10:50 am

Investors in this are the same people that believe in AGW.

SxyxS
Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
May 18, 2026 11:35 am

If 0.01% of co2 can create a runaway effect
than a machine invented for this very purpose should be able to do the same perpetual trick easily.

And I’m pretty sure it’ll use significantly less fossil fuel as back up to deliver the promised results than renewables do.

May 18, 2026 10:51 am

 the plates will experience a force pushing them together …

Remember F=ma? A plate with mass m will accelerate with acceleration a if a force F is applied. If the plates don’t move, no work has been done. (Ignoring chemical energy generated by human sweating, and thinking “It doesn’t move”). In other words, the rate of change of motion is the force. (motion = mv, rate of motion change = ma)

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Johanus
May 18, 2026 11:42 am

Oh, now let’s not baffle the audience with technical competence. 😉

Rud Istvan
May 18, 2026 11:03 am

This is too funny.
Quantum vacuum energy was one of 6 energy ‘breakthroughs’ discussed in the “Details” chapter of my ebook “The Arts of Truth”. The others were EEstor, MEG, Blacklight Power, ECat, and Coherent. They are all in the details chapter because for each ‘breakthrough’ there is an unmentioned ‘detail’ meaning it doesn’t work. Eric has covered the QVE ‘detail’ well.

And as the book’s introduction explains, the book title is itself an illustration of its actual theme—the (several) arts of untruth. I used Harvard Yard’s famous John Harvard statute in front of University Hall as the introductory illustration. Its base reads “John Harvard, Founder, 1636.” It is known to Harvard undergrads as “the statue of three lies”. That isn’t John Harvard—sculptor French used a Harvard undergrad as his model in 1890. John Harvard wasn’t the college founder—Massachusetts Bay Colony was. And it was founded in 1634—1636 is when Reverend Harvard died and left his 700 volume library to the new college, for which in gratitude named itself after him.

David Spain
Reply to  Rud Istvan
May 18, 2026 12:01 pm

Rats! And here I was hoping to make ice with hydrinos that sinks to the bottom of the glass! Guess I’ll just have to settle for deuterium.

Rud Istvan
Reply to  David Spain
May 18, 2026 12:30 pm

Ah—Randy Mills Blacklight Power hydrinos!

MarkW
Reply to  David Spain
May 18, 2026 1:39 pm

It can work if you get enough collapsium.

JonasM
Reply to  MarkW
May 19, 2026 12:35 pm

Is that an isotope of unobtanium?

adaptune
May 18, 2026 11:05 am

Do the pushers of this idea claim that it sidesteps conservation of energy? If not, the chips must get cold as they put out energy, yes? But that would violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics (entropy must always increase). Has Dr. White addressed these issues?

Reply to  adaptune
May 18, 2026 3:37 pm

Entropy is the irreversible losses inevitably encountered when turning energy into work.
As the system becomes more efficient entropy decreases.
Observed in Rankine cycle heat kit diagrams and measured during steam turbine path performance tests.

Reply to  adaptune
May 18, 2026 3:38 pm

GHE violates LoT & no one seems to care.

Dave Burton
Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
May 19, 2026 11:02 am

Please stop, Nicholas. Just stop. 🙄

Reply to  Dave Burton
May 19, 2026 12:13 pm

GHE theory says without it Earth would become a 33 C colder -18 C ice ball.
That’s just flat wrong.
Can you defend GHE?

Stop me by ‘splaining how & why my 3 points are wrong

Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
May 20, 2026 12:06 pm

“Can you defend GHE?”

Well, FWIW, here’s what Google’s AI bot has to say when asked the question “How much colder is the average surface temperature of the Moon compared to the average surface temperature of Earth?”:

“The Moon’s global average surface temperature is roughly 27°C (48.6°F) colder than Earth’s.”

Hint for you: both the Moon and the Earth receive comparable amounts of solar radiation power flux (W/m^2) incoming from the Sun ,and both only have radiation to space as the means of losing energy. Each is otherwise considered to be a closed system in equilibrium, the major difference being the Earth has an atmosphere and the Moon does not.

QED.

Reply to  ToldYouSo
May 20, 2026 2:32 pm

Averages are for simpletons.
What matters is the range.
No GHE means no albedo and 278 K not 255.

Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
May 20, 2026 8:11 pm

“No GHE means no albedo and . . .”

And your basis for that statement is?

FYI, the large asteroid Vesta—having no atmosphere and therefore no GHE—has an albedo of about 0.42, some 40% higher than Earth’s average albedo of about 0.30.

The average surface temperature of Vesta ranges 145-150 K, depending on its distance from the Sun.

Now, you were saying something about “simpletons” . . .

Reply to  ToldYouSo
May 21, 2026 7:16 am

No GHE = no GHGs (all of them not just CO2) = no GHG water vapor = no clouds, ice, snow, 30% albedo & for that matter no water.

Temperature depends on distance from sun.
Where have I heard that before?

Reply to  ToldYouSo
May 20, 2026 2:36 pm

Surface is not the same as ToA.
So w/o atmos there is no major difference between Earth & Moon.

Reply to  ToldYouSo
May 20, 2026 2:55 pm

Who checks whether Google AI bot has been corrupted by liars and weasels??
BTW you evaded the 33 C/-18 C question.

Remove the Earth’s atmosphere or even just the GHGs and the Earth becomes much like the Moon, no water vapor or clouds, no ice or snow, no oceans, no vegetation, no 30% albedo becoming a barren rock ball, hot^3 (400 K) on the lit side, cold^3 (100 K) on the dark. At Earth’s distance from the Sun space is hot (394 K) not cold (5 K). 
That’s NOT what the RGHE theory says.

EVIDENCE:
RGHE theory says “288 K (15 C) w – 255 K (-18 C) w/o = a 33 C colder ice ball Earth.” 255 K assumes w/o case keeps 30% albedo, an assumption akin to criminal fraud. Nobody agrees 288 K is GMST plus it was 15 C in 1896. 288 K is a physical surface measurement. 255 K is a S-B equilibrium calculation at ToA. Apples and potatoes.
Nikolov “Airless Celestial Bodies” 
Kramm “Moon as test bed for Earth”
UCLA Diviner lunar mission data
JWST solar shield (391.7 K)
Sky Lab golden awning
ISS HVAC design for lit side of 250 F. (ISS web site)
Astronaut backpack life support w/ AC and cool water tubing underwear. (Space Discovery Center)

Diviner-slide
Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
May 20, 2026 8:13 pm

“At Earth’s distance from the Sun space is hot (394 K) not cold (5 K).”

That’s it . . . we’re done here.

Reply to  ToldYouSo
May 21, 2026 7:12 am

Plug your ears and stomp out of the room.

Reply to  adaptune
May 19, 2026 7:08 am

GHE & LoT

Solar based balance ISR ToA
(Luminosity, W / Average Orbital Radius Spherical Area, m^2)
1,368 W/m^2
(Divide discular cross section by 4 to average over spherical ToA)
1,368/4=342
(Deduct average 30% albedo.)
342*.7=240
(Deduct 80 atmospheric absorption.)
240-80=160 to surface.
160 arrives, no more than 160 can leave per LoT 1.
Leaving
17 sensible + 80 Latent + 1st 63 LWIR = 160 by remainder.
Balance is closed.

Imaginary, theoretical, calculation based balance S-B BB at 16 C 
396 W/m^2 upwelling 
396 is 54 more than 342 ISR & 1st violation of LoT 1
396 is 156 more than 240 net albedo & 2nd violation of LoT 1
396 is 236 more than 160 surface & 3rd violation of LoT 1.
396 cannot continue to ToA so 2nd 63 is copied from solar balance creating net 333 of “back” radiation which flows cool to warm wo work violating LoT 2.
396 = 63 + 333
Balances to zero.

396 is imaginary.
63 is imaginary.
333 is imaginary.
396/63/333 can be erased from graphic and solar balance is unaffected.

No GHE & no CAGW.

K-T-Handout
Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
May 19, 2026 8:33 am

Rather than waste my morning coffee break responding to Schroeder’s nonsense about broken laws of physics, thermodynamics, and greenhouse effect, I’m just gonna link previous responses…(for anyone who might be fooled into thinking Nicholas is correct).
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2026/05/17/open-thread-190/#comment-4196186

Reply to  DMacKenzie
May 19, 2026 11:34 am

Who is the fooler and who is the foolee?

Reply to  DMacKenzie
May 19, 2026 11:37 am

Seems previous responses are mostly all you still evading my points.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
May 19, 2026 8:57 am

No GHE correct.
No CAGW correct.
Flaws in your analysis have previously been addressed, but they do not alter the conclusions.
A shame you are still using the flat earth model graphic.
Upvoted to show support.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
May 19, 2026 11:34 am

No, they have not.
Stay on target.

Earth is cooler with the atmosphere/water vapor/30% albedo not warmer. 
Yes/No & why,
Ubiquitous GHE heat balance graphics don’t balance and violate GAAP & LoT. 
Yes/No & why.
Kinetic heat transfer processes of contiguous atmospheric molecules render surface BB impossible. 
Yes/No & why.

Shame it’s not a flat Earth model.
It’s Fourier’s ball evenly heated in bucket of cosmic poo which even Pierrhumbert says is no good.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
May 20, 2026 10:02 am

I have addressed all of those multiple times.
You do not have the attention span sufficient to assimlkate what was posted.

Not worth the powder repeating it all again.

Reply to  adaptune
May 20, 2026 11:48 am

Has Dr. White addressed these issues?”

No, no, no! He’s much too busy working on improving interstellar travel. Didn’t you read his short bio in the above article?

Pravda Pundit
May 18, 2026 11:08 am

If it sounds too good to be true, it is.

Tom Halla
May 18, 2026 11:30 am

It is May, not April 1.

Reply to  Tom Halla
May 19, 2026 1:17 pm

“Traffic.”

H/T to AHHnold

Sparta Nova 4
May 18, 2026 11:38 am

I had never heard of the Casimir Effect prior to this article.
It is a fascinating topic.

Can it be made to do what the researchers describe?
Unknown.

Is it perpetual motion?
Not based on the description of the physics.
Based on the description, it is harvesting energy from the quantum foam.

Can it be constructed at a useful scale?
Too soon to judge.

Are the claims optimistic?
To say the least.

Reply to  Eric Worrall
May 18, 2026 1:55 pm

What beset the cold fusion boys.

Rud Istvan
Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
May 18, 2026 3:09 pm

I wrote extensively about that in the same ‘Arts of Truth’ book. While at MOT, I sent the company’s best physicist to France to investigate after Pns and Fleischman left the US and set up a France lab funded by Toyota. He reported the ‘CF’ phenomenon was real, but not reliably reproducible.

Years later, we know it wasn’t ’cold fusion’. It is LENR. The reason it wasn’t reliably reproducible was the original experimental results depended on random lattice microfractures concentrating the necessary forces at ‘crack tips’ to enable proton electron capture—essentially what creates neutron stars, and also the inverse of radioactive beta decay.

The phenomenon has been reliably reproduced at 2x energy gain using high frequency AC forcing. But not at 4x. And at least 7x is needed for commercial energy production. So another interesting but ultimately practical dead end.

Dave Burton
Reply to  Rud Istvan
May 19, 2026 11:05 am

typo:
s/ ultimately practical / ultimately impractical /

Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
May 19, 2026 8:37 am

I can’t believe I’m giving Schroeder a thumbs up on this one !

Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
May 19, 2026 1:22 pm

we’re finally approaching a commercial product

First thing that popped into my mind when I read that was “It’s probably just 15 years away- just like cold fusion.” 🤣

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
May 20, 2026 10:05 am

“What beset the cold fusion boys.”

Why are you deflecting?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Eric Worrall
May 19, 2026 8:58 am

True. Also stray EM energy. Unclear how they managed to construct a perfect EM shield.
Given that is one of the areas I work in, I would be pleased to be shown how to do it.

Rick C
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
May 19, 2026 9:48 am

You’d have a better chance of scaling the “perpetual motion” used to power the Atmos clock. While the actual source of power is obscure, it is real and doesn’t require breaking any laws.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Rick C
May 20, 2026 10:08 am

Or the “drinking bird.”

Both have scientific explanations.
Google AI has brief explanations.

son of mulder
May 18, 2026 11:44 am

Just checked with AI, it’s April 1st.

Bryan A
Reply to  son of mulder
May 18, 2026 12:00 pm

Remember the Steorn Orbo?

KevinM
Reply to  Bryan A
May 18, 2026 1:30 pm

“Steorn Ltd was a small, private technology development company based in Dublin, Ireland. In August 2006, it announced that it had developed a technology to provide “free, clean, and constant energy” via an apparent perpetual motion machine, something which is contrary to the law of conservation of energy, a fundamental principle of physics.”

Reply to  KevinM
May 18, 2026 1:53 pm

Much like “back” or “net” radiation.

Bryan A
May 18, 2026 11:57 am

And like the Steorn Orbo this too will prove itself a non entity.

May 18, 2026 12:24 pm

Same fizzics as GHE.

Reply to  Nicholas Schroeder
May 19, 2026 8:39 am

Alas Nicholas, a thumbs down on this one….

Kevin Kilty
Reply to  DMacKenzie
May 19, 2026 9:28 am

I’ll see your thumb and raise you one…

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  DMacKenzie
May 20, 2026 10:10 am

Nicholas does not appreciate that we agree with his conclusions but have identified details in his analysis that are incorrect.

He is reaching the point where a formal declaration of obsession could be valid.

May 18, 2026 1:10 pm

In the above there’s-a-sucker-born-every-minute article:
“The funding will accelerate chip performance optimization, targeting commercial availability of the company’s first-generation MicroSparc chip by 2028, positioning Casimir to disrupt the ultra-low-power electronics sector.”
and
“Casimir’s technology is engineered to scale across the full power spectrum.”

Is it only me that thinks the first order of business—before “accelerating chip performanc optimization” and before scaling “across the full power spectrum” (HAH!!!)—might be to produce a lab-version prototype proving there is net power output, even nano-watts, from this snake-oil “chip”, regardless of its claimed physical size.

BTW, 1.5 volts (dc) at 25 microamps would be a (steady-state?) power of about 38e-6 watt, so mention of any single “chip” being able to produce such “prodigious” output means that about 3 million such would be required to power just a single 100 W filament light bulb.

And, yeah, note to all investors: please check you conservation-of-energy-belief at the door before entering the investor forums headlined by Dr. Kam Ghaffarian, well-known for “advancing interstellar travel”. /sarc

KevinM
Reply to  ToldYouSo
May 18, 2026 1:36 pm

TYS has done the math mentioned above…
IF the chip is 5x5mm AND it harvests 38e-6 watt then why make it only 25 sq mm?

The world’s largest single integrated chip is the Cerebras WSE-3 (Wafer Scale Engine). Rather than dicing silicon wafers into hundreds of postage-stamp-sized processors, Cerebras builds a processor out of an entire, uncut 300mm silicon wafer

Sounds like a Russian company name but it’s a bunch of guys trying to make giant AI chips in Sunnyvale CA, USA.

MarkW
May 18, 2026 1:46 pm

Assuming these cells actually work as advertised, just how many of them are you going to have to create, side by side in order to create useable amounts of power.
Then after you get this large number of cells constructed and wired together, what happens if the dohickey you are using to keep the plates apart slips on just one of your cells, allowing to the two plates to come in contact. Which would create a short, thereby consuming all the power created by all of the cells in that array.
Fortunately even a thousand of these connected together would only produce a few milli-watts of power so we don’t have to worry about the array self immolating.

Ed Zuiderwijk
May 18, 2026 1:49 pm

Haha. Those providers of 12M have just lost their dosh. Should have paid more attention in the physics class when conservation of energy was discussed.

Ed Zuiderwijk
Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
May 18, 2026 1:59 pm

This appears to be the same guy that was developing a warp drive for NASA? Watched too many Startrek movies. I’d take him serious when he lives in a penthouse 45 up in a tower without elevators or staircases and moves about by saying ‘beam me up’.

Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
May 18, 2026 3:07 pm

The investors in Casimir would have done better to send their funds to the grieving widow of a Nigerian millionaire who promises to share his fortune locked in a Swiss account.

Dave Burton
Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
May 19, 2026 11:09 am

Upvoted, because I enjoy learning British slang. Google sez:

To “lose their dosh” is a British and Australian slang phrase that means to lose one’s money, typically in an investment, gamble, or failed business venture. [1, 2, 3]

TomInOregonCity
May 18, 2026 1:52 pm

There’s more energy to be found in harvesting nuclear decay from the pile of B.S. this company is shoveling.

Marty
May 18, 2026 3:03 pm

It seems strange that people would invest twelve million dollars in a vacuum energy device. You would think that people would use their common sense. But then you have to remember that people paid millions of dollars for an artwork that consisted of a banana duct taped to the wall. Or that the Art Institute of Chicago has a painting hanging on their wall that is nothing more than a canvas painted all black. Or that people would invest real money in imaginary virtual money that is backed by nothing at all. Or that governments would spend billions of dollars to fight global warming when there is no hard evidence that there even is any global warming. We live in strange times.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Marty
May 19, 2026 9:02 am

Or paintings by Hunter Biden?

May 18, 2026 3:33 pm

The press release sounds familiar . . .

Keitho
Editor
Reply to  Michael Standfast
May 19, 2026 4:12 am

What he said.

Michael S. Kelly
Reply to  Michael Standfast
May 19, 2026 4:45 am

My first thought as well.

Reply to  Michael S. Kelly
May 19, 2026 7:33 am

The actual engineering details were “dumbed down” for the audience.

Michael S. Kelly
Reply to  ToldYouSo
May 19, 2026 4:53 pm

That is such a classic video. It really was my very first thought, even as I watched Sabine’s video on my own feed earlier.

conrad ziefle
May 18, 2026 4:24 pm

I’m not saying that it isn”t so, but it flies in the face of everything humans have experienced before. If it actually does work, why not start with a bang? Power a car with it. Make one big enough to power the full electrical requirements of a house with it. Why the little things first? Is it because what you have actually is a battery and on a larger scale one would see it depleat quite rapidly?

Michael S. Kelly
Reply to  conrad ziefle
May 19, 2026 5:01 pm

The inventor also came up with the space propulsion system that ejects no mass. NASA tested it in ground vacuum chambers, with inconclusive results IIRC. I always thought that was dumb. I’ve worked on programs where we were trying to measure 70 pounds of thrust in vacuum, for pulsed attitude thrusters, and had an awful time getting the measurement accuracy to within useful limits. NASA was trying to detect milliNewtons. They have that $100 billion ISS in orbit. Why not send up one of those no mass propulsion systems on a Cargo Dragon, put it out through the experimental airlock, turn it on, and see if it accelerates? They would at least be able to detect it, though the claimed thrust to weight ratio actually renders that system useless for any practical purpose.

Reply to  Michael S. Kelly
May 19, 2026 8:53 pm

“Why not send up one of those no mass propulsion systems on a Cargo Dragon, put it out through the experimental airlock, turn it on, and see if it accelerates?”

Those familiar with the use of Dr. Harold “Sonny” White’s EM Drive are well aware that operating that unique system in the nearby presence of Earth’s gravitational field tensor runs the risk of trans-dimensional defarbcation of the helicon triplex coupler, which in turn would almost certainly lead to overload in the sub-tachyon, i-component-linked flexor and quantum-level disintegration of the space-time continuum to an outer radius of some 0.217 AU. Not something to be risked.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  ToldYouSo
May 20, 2026 10:13 am

What? A black hole?

Let me get a beer and some popcorn before you turn it on.
I’ve never seen a black hole (not that kind) before. 😉

Leon de Boer
May 18, 2026 6:35 pm

ROFL someone has been reading some very old military papers and recycling old ideas
https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/170031/

Page 25 🙂

A hypothetical example is the tunable Casimir device that was

reviewed in Section IV. The cycle of energy generation would consist of the collapse of

conducting plates with delivery of energy, followed by separation of plates switched to

insulating mode for which the attractive force is considerably weaker, only to be

switched back to conducting mode for the next cycle, and so forth. Provided the input

switching energy required per cycle is less than the output energy delivered per cycle, a

continuous generation of energy without a net change in matter configuration would

result. A second example would be a nonlinear oscillator that continuously, on a steady-

state basis, down-shifted high-frequency components of the vacuum ZPF spectrum to

lower frequencies for convenient collection and application, without a net change in its

own operation

Phillip Chalmers
May 18, 2026 7:28 pm

Psst! What will you give me for a bag of dilithium Casimir Kirk crystals I found in a crashed IFO in the desert of South Australia?
Satisfaction guaranteed or twice your money back.

Jeff Alberts
May 18, 2026 7:30 pm

I asked Grok what it thought of this:

Skeptical, with strong reasons to doubt it’s a breakthrough. The article on Watts Up With That (by Eric Worrall) is appropriately critical of Casimir Inc.’s claims. It highlights the $12M seed round for a device that supposedly harvests continuous electrical power from quantum vacuum fluctuations via the Casimir effect, without batteries or external input.

What the Company ClaimsCasimir Inc., founded by Dr. Harold “Sonny” White (ex-NASA, known for EM Drive work and warp drive concepts), says they’ve engineered static Casimir cavities into semiconductor chips (MicroSparc: ~5mm x 5mm targeting ~1.5V at 25μA or ~40μW initially).

  • They use fixed plates with central nano-pillars. Quantum fluctuations outside the cavity supposedly stimulate electrons to tunnel inward more easily than outward (a “quantum ratchet” or atoll analogy: rough ocean outside, calm lagoon inside).
  • This creates a net electron flow and usable current. Prototypes allegedly show outputs above noise floor; scaling to IoT sensors by ~2028, then EVs/homes later.
  • Backed by a recent paper (“Emergent Quantization from a Dynamic Vacuum”) and DARPA-related nanofab work. Investors include Scout Ventures, Tim Draper, etc.

The Casimir effect itself is real: uncharged parallel plates in vacuum attract due to restricted virtual photon modes between them (lower vacuum energy density inside). It’s been measured.

Why It’s Highly DubiousStandard physics says you can’t extract net, continuous, usable energy from the vacuum this way without violating conservation laws or the second law of thermodynamics. Here’s the core issue:

  • In a classic Casimir setup, plates are pulled together, doing work once—but then they’re stuck. Resetting costs at least as much energy (often more due to losses). It’s like a spring that discharges once.
  • White’s “static” version with tunneling/ratchet aims to create asymmetry for ongoing flow. But any net charge separation or current would build an opposing electric field that quickly balances the tunneling probabilities, halting net flow (or requiring energy input to maintain). It’s analogous to failed “free energy from magnets” schemes.

Sabine Hossenfelder (and many physicists) calls this out directly: the Casimir effect doesn’t provide a free energy source. Claims of perpetual power run into the same problems as other zero-point energy extraction ideas, which have a 100% failure record when scrutinized.

Low power levels (picoamps to microamps) are easily explained by measurement artifacts, thermal gradients, leakage, or environmental pickup—especially in early nanofab prototypes. Independent, reproducible verification under controlled conditions is missing so far. The company’s own site and announcements hype scaling to kilowatts/megawatts, but that’s even harder to square with physics.

White’s EM Drive history adds context: promising anomalous thrust that didn’t hold up under better tests. This has similar “breakthrough propulsion/energy” vibes.

The Investment Angle and Broader ContextRaising $12M (oversubscribed) on hype isn’t shocking in deep tech/quantum spaces—investors chase moonshots, and “quantum vacuum energy” sounds futuristic. Dual-use (sensors + defense) and ties to credible names (DARPA heritage, universities) help. But FOMO + over-optimism explains it more than validated science. History is littered with perpetual motion machines that attracted capital before fizzling.

If it works as claimed, it would be revolutionary (violating or bending known limits in a usable way). Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Right now, we have press releases, analogies, low-power prototypes, and one theoretical paper—not rigorous, peer-reviewed demos of net energy gain exceeding inputs/losses over long periods.

Bottom line: Treat this as speculative at best, likely impossible under standard quantum field theory. Watch for real independent tests and replication. Until then, it’s prudent to stay skeptical—like the WUWT piece does. Exciting quantum tech (e.g., better sensors or materials) might emerge from the research, but “unlimited power from the vacuum” is almost certainly not on the menu.

Editor
May 18, 2026 11:11 pm

My take?

If it were real, they would have shown it.

Their materials do not yet provide peer‑reviewed experimental data demonstrating continuous net electrical output from their devices under controlled conditions, with full energy accounting, nor do they show independent third‑party replication.

Their website and the coverage by tech‑news outlets mostly repeat the same claimed specs (1.5 V, 25 μA for a 5 mm chip) and their “quantum vacuum” narrative.

But there are no published articles in mainstream physics journals detailing the device architecture, measurement methods, error bars, or tests of whether the observed output exceeds any plausible spurious sources or stored energy.

That absence, combined with the extraordinary nature of the claim, screams “BOGUS” to me.

w.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
May 19, 2026 9:07 am

They have done several fabrications attempting to optimize parameters.

Hmm….

Maybe the next one will work?

Simon Derricutt
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
May 20, 2026 5:09 am

Willis – it depends on whether the tunnelling rate for an electron over a specific distance is lower within the gap than outside it. If the tunnelling-rate is lower inside the gap, then it will work. Reason here is that the tunnelling-distance will be the same going from outside to inside and inside to outside, but if the rates are different then you need more electrons to achieve the same actual number per second in each direction and thus reach equilibrium. The collector inside the gap thus gets more electrons and a negative potential (which also affects the relative rates, reducing the rate of tunnelling in and increasing the rate of tunnelling out), and if you put a wire between inside and outside the gap then current will flow.

Increase the tunnelling base-rate by making the gap smaller, maybe use a different aspect ratio for the gap, and you get more power delivered, but those improvements need better equipment to make so you’d need to spend the money on a more-competent fab.

The explanation given as to why it works could well be wrong. However, if either the energy level withing the gap is smaller or time runs slower in the gap (and I’ve seen both speculations in theory) then the thing works. Somewhat hard to make and rather expensive for the power delivered, but for IoT devices running at micropower might work out cheaper than needing to change batteries where the device is either hard to get to or there are loads of them. Thus there’s a valid market, possibly, that will buy the devices because they work out cheaper and don’t need a power transmitter to make them work.

At the power levels currently claimed (picowatt level) experimental error is a bit hard to disprove. Once they scale up, though, it will be obvious if they’ve cocked-up because the power output won’t scale. Thermoelectric offsets will stay the same, electrosmog pickup won’t increase much.

Still, seems that the tunnelling-rate is reduced by the gap experimentally, though I can’t recall where I read that (a long time back). Doesn’t really matter why, just that that’s true experimentally, and if so then the device ought to work. I’d expect it to be temperature-dependent, too, as the basic electron energy depends on temperature so as the temperature rises the tunnelling rate across a set gap will too. Either way, though, it’s not creating energy, just using the energy that’s already around either thermal or quantum fluctuations.

Anyway, probably not bogus, might not work well enough in practice to meet the specs.