The data center energy threat is way overblown

From CFACT

By David Wojick

False fears of a flood of data centers is warping the electric power policy debate. Here are three little numbers that tell the story. Well, actually, it is two little real numbers and one huge fantasy number (which is the problem).

My first source is “North America Data Center Trends H2 2025” by the real estate tracker CBRE.

This quote provides the two little numbers, which are MW of data centers under construction:

“The total amount of new capacity under construction in primary markets declined for the first time since 2020. There were 5,994.4 MW under construction at the end of 2025, down from 6,350.1 MW in 2024. Many planned projects remain delayed due to ongoing permitting, zoning, and power procurement hurdles, underscoring the complexities of scaling infrastructure.”

So, there is only about 6,000 MW of new data centers in the construction pipeline for the entire U.S. That is a tiny number when it comes to the national grid. PJM alone peaks around 150,000 MW, Texas over 80,000, and so on. Combined American peak is over 750,000 MW.

Moreover, installed data center capacity is just around 17,000 MW. While adding 6,000 MW will be a big percentage increase, it will still be an extremely small amount. Note that this is not 6,000 MW a year, because it takes several years to build a data center.

For the huge fantasy number, we go to “Data Centers in the United States” by Clearview.

They have a nifty map showing all the existing and proposed data center clusters.

Here is the big number quote:

“As of April 2026, the U.S. has 602 operating data centers with 16,914 MW of capacity and 889 planned projects that would add 278,842 MW of additional capacity, according to Cleanview’s project tracker.”

Adding 280,000 MW of new power demand would certainly fry the grid, but this is just a fantasy number. These are not “planned projects,” just proposed or merely mentioned by some bigwig.

Unfortunately, it is variations of this fantasy number that are driving the data center panic. Many press articles read as though we are already being swamped with data centers, when the reality is new construction is barely noticeable. CBRE has a nice listing of the latest year-on-year additions for each region. Almost all are tiny.

Note, too, that the tiny amount of demand growth in existing data centers cannot possibly account for the regional surges in electric power prices. This is why there is no correlation between data center growth and power price increases.

It is helpful to see the long-standing parallel fantasy on the power generation side. The queue of applications for wind and solar projects to connect to the grid is over two million MW, when our total generating capacity is just over one million. Almost none of this proposed generating capacity is going to be built, and neither is the fantasy list of proposed data centers.

The data center threat is way overblown, if it exists at all. This supposed threat is just an unfortunate offshoot from the massive AI hype. Untold billions of investor dollars are flowing into the hot AI bubble, so there is tremendous incentive to develop AI data center proposals.

It is possible that over the next 10 to 20 years there will be significant growth in data center capacity. Some states, regions, and localities are already vying for this development. But it will be constrained by available power — in fact, it already is. New dispatchable generation would be good for restoring reliability, and if the data centers want to help pay for that, fine by me.

On the other hand, if the AI bubble bursts there might be relatively little growth. Investment capital can disappear very quickly.

But in no case is there a data center threat to the grid. Data centers are too small and growing too slowly to be a threat.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.7 3 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mleskovarsocalrrcom
April 18, 2026 10:17 am

Thank you for putting some sanity to the myth. The only real threat is to local energy supplies. If you build a data center where there’s little energy feed there’s a problem. But it’s local, recognizable, and can be planned for. Any new construction … industry, homes, businesses …. has the same problem.

1saveenergy
Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
April 18, 2026 10:38 am

The same goes for cooling water, another overblown ‘Threat to the environment/planet/mankind’ (take your pick).!!

DarrinB
Reply to  1saveenergy
April 18, 2026 11:51 am

AWS was just sued by local community for excessive nitrates in ground water showing up in their wells, nitrates cause health hazards. Nitrates are not used anywhere to treat water to my knowledge (worked in multiple industries with water treatment). Where do the nitrates come from? Farming. Who has deep pockets? Not farmers.

gyan1
April 18, 2026 10:51 am

It’s a moot point because Trump is permitting industry to generate their own power. Excess will be sold to the grid increasing capacity not reducing it.

Reply to  gyan1
April 18, 2026 11:10 am

They already had ‘permission’

Scarecrow Repair
April 18, 2026 11:00 am

“As of April 2026, the U.S. has 602 operating data centers with 16,914 MW of capacity and 889 planned projects that would add 278,842 MW of additional capacity, according to Cleanview’s project tracker.”

The first discrepancy I noticed is that the planned 889 is close to the existing 602, only 50% higher, while the planned 278,842 is far higher than the existing 16,914 — closer to 20 times as high at first guess, but actually only 16.5 times as high. Far more than the 1.5 times by count.

The existing data centers come to 28 MW per data center. The planned data centers come to 313 MW per data center, 11 times as much per data center. That doesn’t pass my smell test. It implies that AI data centers are 11 times as big as old fuddy duddy data centers.

Erik Magnuson
Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
April 18, 2026 11:40 am

From what I’ve read about the increasing power per rack for data centers, the 11X power requirement for new data centers is not much of an exaggeration.

April 18, 2026 11:14 am

Test regular text …. bold on … bold off … Italics on … Italics off

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  _Jim
April 18, 2026 11:25 am

It’s everywhere — stories, comments. Well, not every everywhere, “Post Comment” isn’t bold and a few others.

April 18, 2026 11:17 am

This simplistic narrative ignores the substantial problem of the concentration in data center growth. For example in my northern Virginia county the world’s largest data center campus is being considered by the courts for approval. In addition , data centers are proliferating in other areas of our county. The local utility (the largest electric cooperative in the US) projects their load will continue to increase and by 2035, increase their total demand 10 fold. This is one hell of a challenge. In addition, water demand for data center cooling in the Potomac basin is projected to risk severe water shortages by 2030. So, no you cannot use macro level data for the US to dismiss a real problem for local communities in our region .

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  Warren Beeton
April 18, 2026 11:26 am

“10 fold” in 9 years? Sets off my BS detector. Someone’s scare-mongering.

Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
April 18, 2026 11:32 am

The utility is NOVEC. give them a call and ask them. Until you do, you have no argument

DarrinB
April 18, 2026 11:42 am

“Note that this is not 6,000 MW a year, because it takes several years to build a data center.”

Absolutely wrong. I started with a DC less then 1.5 years ago. At only one campus when I began the first building was just starting to accept racks and the second buildings shell was up. Today the 4th building is now accepting racks and the 5th building shell is up (final build on that campus). Just around the corner they are prepping ground at yet another campus right now. This is going on all over the geographic area I live in. An entire campus worth of buildings takes 2 years not 2 years per building.

April 18, 2026 11:45 am

I think the article is misleading. The issue is local energy use and allocation, not overall grid power use.
Simply because on a local level real choices need to be made between supply and demand as well as the grid structure.
And this is what is going on right NOW.
Combine that with increased electrification of just about everything and it is pretty clear..

Rud Istvan
April 18, 2026 12:18 pm

The data center ‘projections’ are a result of the AI hype, which strongly reminds me of the ‘dot com’ bubble that burst around 2000 and took down hyped companies like Sun Microsystems, whose then advertising was “we put the dot in .com”. The Sun wreckage was sold to Oracle for a pittance.

And to the extent AI does experience strong growth, there are at least four technical innovations on the horizon that will significantly lessen electricity demand.

  1. Most energy is consumed in AI model ‘training’, not use. MIT just announced a major training breakthru. Used to be, a model was fully trained and then ‘downsized’ by ‘pruning’ for use. What they have now shown (in the real world, not to mention a nifty mathematical proof from control theory) is that the pruning for the most common AI architectures can be done after the first 10% of training, cutting the training energy demand by a factor of about 10 at a performance cost of essentially zero from the current approach to train fully then prune for use.
  2. China has shown that ‘distillation’ can cut the training costs of derivative (some would say illegal copycat) models by 100 fold, from several months to several days.
  3. Several companies, including Microsoft as well as startups, are developing specialized AI chip architectures—unlike Nvidia’s general GPU originally developed for video gaming— that significantly lower the time and cost of training.
  4. TSMC says it will have ~1 nanometer fab available by about 2028 that will significantly reduce further chip level power and cooling requirements. Nvidia’s best stuff is currently 4nm, while typical is 7nm (why the US is fretting Nvidia exports to China). One driver is Apples M series portable electronic processors. The other is AI chips.