South African Plum dung beetle (Anachalcos convexus). By Charles J. Sharp - Own work, from Sharp Photography, sharpphotography, CC BY-SA 4.0, link

Claim: Climate Change is Killing all the Amazon Dung Beetles

Essay by Eric Worrall

That stink at the Belém Climate Conference was climate change, not overloaded toilets.

Dung beetles have a tough life. Climate change is making it worse

Doyle Rice
USA TODAY
Updated April 5, 2026, 7:27 p.m. ET

Not exactly the poster child for cute animals, dung beetles now join the list of species affected by human-caused climate change.

Indeed, the long tentacles of climate change now extend all the way into the dreary lives of dung beetles in the Amazon rainforest, a new study suggests.

“With ongoing climate change, rising temperatures may push dung beetles beyond their physiological limits,” said study lead author Kim Lea Holzmann of the University of Wurzburg in Germany, in an e-mail to USA TODAY.

“We studied the populations [of dung beetles] at altitudes of 250 to 3,500 metres above sea level,” said Holzmann, in a statement. “Unexpectedly, the number of dung beetle species fell rapidly between 250 and 500 metres above sea level.”

The reason for this: At an altitude of 500 metres, the temperatures are in a range that is ideal for the beetles, while the higher temperatures in the lowlands lead to heat stress.

Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2026/04/05/climate-change-dung-beetles/89434093007/

The abstract of the study;

RESEARCH ARTICLES| 25 MAR 2026

Temperature boosts and constrains dung beetle diversity along an Andean–Amazonian elevation gradient

Kim L. Holzmann Corresponding Author ; Pedro Alonso-AlonsoYenny Correa-CarmonaAndrea Pinos-LeonFelipe YonMabel AlvaradoAdrian ForsythFriederike GebertAlejandro Lopera-ToroAndreas KolterGunnar BrehmAlexander KellerIngolf Steffan-DewenterMarcell K. Peters

Abstract

In the light of a warming climate, understanding factors shaping tropical biodiversity becomes increasingly urgent. Temperature can enhance diversity by increasing diversification and ecological rates but may also restrict diversity when exceeding organisms’ thermal limits. Changes in diversity can subsequently influence community specialization patterns. We tested the influence of temperature, moisture and food availability on the diversity of dung beetles (Scarabaeinae), food specialization and the mechanism of thermal limits along an Andean–Amazonian gradient from 250 to 3500 metres above sea level (m.a.s.l.). Beetles were sampled with dung, carrion and fruit-baited pitfall traps to test specialization; mammal activity was recorded as a proxy for food availability. Diversity showed no significant relationship with mammal biomass but increased with higher temperatures to 500 m.a.s.l., with a sharp drop at lower elevations. Lowland diversity was restricted by upper thermal limits, with small or negative thermal safety margins. Resource specialization increased towards the lowlands, potentially a product of greater diversity. Our findings highlight temperature as a primary driver of diversity, with upper thermal limits acting as a key constraint in lowland areas. Our data suggest that additional warming of the Amazonian lowlands may have detrimental consequences for dung beetles and their ecosystem functions, even in intact rainforests.

Read more: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rspb/article/293/2067/20252792/481020/Temperature-boosts-and-constrains-dung-beetle

The study “tested” thermal range of dung beetles by stuffing them in plastic bottles and leaving them in the sun, to see if they survived. “… The experiment was done by exposing insects in individual plastic tubes (2 or 5 ml depending on body size) to increasing temperatures using a programmable thermoblock (Eppendorf Thermostat C, Hamburg, Germany) …

Study authors dismissed previous studies which suggested higher rainfall in alpine regions might be driving diversity – “… Water availability has also been identified as a potential factor determining diversity gradients in previous studies … While dung beetle reproductive success has been shown to increase under moist conditions …

In my opinion this study is an absurdity. Dung beetles modify their environment, if they’re too hot they dig a little deeper – not something they can do when stuck in a plastic tube. The researchers have no idea what killed the beetles in the tubes. More reliable moisture in my opinion is by far the most plausible explanation for why abundance is higher a few hundred meters above sea level.

There are other possible explanations for differences in species distribution at different altitudes. Dung beetles can be specialists, when cattle were introduced to Australia the local dung beetles couldn’t handle cattle dung, so different abundance of species at different altitudes might be driven by the abundance of species which produce the dung, and have nothing to do with any direct impact of environmental conditions on Dung Beetle survival.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 9 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
39 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Denis
April 8, 2026 10:24 am

Air temperature declines at a rate of about 0.65C for every 100 meters of altitude increase. The difference between 250 meters and 500 meters would thus be about 1.6C (~3F). Thus moving from 250 meters down would increase temperature by about 1.6C and moving up from 250 meters to 500 meters would decrease temperature by about 1.6C. Thats a range of 3.2C, far far more than global temperature has changed in the past 40 years. Also, dry season temperature of the Amazon has increased by about 3C in recent decades due to deforestation (https://phys.org/news/2026-02-amazon-deforestation-surface-temperature-3c.html). There seems to be some applicable information missing from this study.

Ddwieland
Reply to  Denis
April 8, 2026 11:29 am

Such studies have gone from dubious to utterly ridiculous. All sorts of things may happen if something or other happens. Once respectable journals now publish garbage that adds nothing to our understanding of nature.

KevinM
Reply to  Ddwieland
April 8, 2026 12:11 pm

The science industrial complex has driven low hanging fruit to extinction.

Approximately 58,131 research doctorates were awarded by U.S. universities in 2024. I can’t think of 58 thousand unique ideas to explore (that someone else hasn’t thought of)(that someone else is willing to pay me for).

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  KevinM
April 8, 2026 3:46 pm

There have been CERN papers with over 1000 authors. That tells me that 990 of them at least were glorified tech monkeys whose work could have been performed by a high school dropout.

Reply to  Ddwieland
April 9, 2026 4:52 am

bingo!

SxyxS
April 8, 2026 10:28 am

They can observe when beetles are being killed by climate change(what else, as there are only dozens of other parameters, including effects related to traps = materials of traps, bugs starting to avoid them just as it already has been observed with cockroaches)
but not when eagles are being slaughtered by windmills?
Some animals are always a little bit more equal, I’d guess.

Another interesting thing is:
Why is there more diversity/specialisation/biomass in the lowlands if temperatures are so critical?
Shouldn’t we expect a migration (and increase) of the center of biomass uphill to compensate for the temperature increase?

jvcstone
April 8, 2026 10:55 am

about 10 years ago when I first introduced LH cattle to my little ranch, I wanted them to have the best, so I bought a couple of 200lb protein tubs at the local feed store. The particular tubs I bought were treated with insecticide to help keep the flies off of the cattle. Good deal, I thought. Wasn’t long before I noticed what had been a very active population of dung beetles being not so active anymore. That treated protein was passing through the cattle’s digestive system and being insects, the dung they were rolling was killing them off instead. Stopped using the treated protein tubs for a more “natural” brand with no insecticide, and am happy to report the dung beetles are once again doing their intended job. Old timer once told me that without those little bugs, we would all be knee deep in s**t

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Eric Worrall
April 10, 2026 5:40 am

when dung beetles arent around…WORMS are remember the Huge WA earthworms they killed when first ploughing land there , we also had similar in SA around OWEN as kids wed try n dig em out usually a Fail 😉

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  jvcstone
April 8, 2026 3:48 pm

What’s so special about left-handed cattle? Does it make it easier for right-handed butchers?

jvcstone
Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
April 8, 2026 4:33 pm

LH= Longhorns, and they are some pretty special cattle

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  jvcstone
April 8, 2026 7:07 pm

Yes, I figured that out, but I was hoping for a more interesting answer 🙂

another ian
Reply to  jvcstone
April 9, 2026 2:57 am

“Old timer once told me that without those little bugs, we would all be knee deep in s**t”

So there was a solution to that city problem before the internal combustion engine came to the rescue – if anyone had noticed

John Hultquist
April 8, 2026 11:11 am

 by stuffing them in plastic bottles and leaving them in the sun,
That is a crime in my book. Does PETA know?

April 8, 2026 11:15 am

Uh-oh, if it isn’t the penguins and the crocodiles, it’s the shit-eating bugs. Next thing you know, we’re all doomed!

Bruce Cobb
April 8, 2026 11:26 am

Have they tried testing them with the focused rays of a magnifying glass yet? If they burn, it’s climate change, and if not, then they are witches, and should be drowned.

April 8, 2026 11:40 am

A quick [Ctrl-F] Search for “dung” on John Brignell’s Warm List didn’t
turn up dung beetles but it did turn up “mammoth dung is melting”

As a the late great voice behind the EIB Golden Microphone used
to say: “You can’t make this stuff up”

So on edit I asked Googles AI:

Has melting mammoth dung been an issue as caused by climate change?

Yes, melting mammoth dung is a recognized environmental and scientific 
issue caused by climate change. As the Arctic permafrost thaws, organic 
matter that has been frozen for thousands of years—including ancient 
animal feces—is being exposed to the air. 

Smithsonian Magazine

The melting of this prehistoric dung presents several specific problems:
Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The most significant issue is that when mammoth 
dung thaws, dormant microbes “wake up” and begin decomposing the material. 
This process releases large amounts of carbon dioxide and methane, potent 
greenhouse gases that further accelerate global warming



Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Steve Case
April 8, 2026 12:07 pm

Smithsonian, I have a question or two:
How much frozen prehistoric dung is there?
How much CO2 per pound of dung?
If all the dung melted, how much would the atmospheric concentration of CO2 change?

Define large amounts.

Reply to  Steve Case
April 9, 2026 7:31 am

It would appear that Google’s AI has been trained using climate alarmist sources. M E Mann’s use of principle component analysis can be adapted to training AI.

Sparta Nova 4
April 8, 2026 12:02 pm

The “science” is nothing but a load of dung.

1saveenergy
April 8, 2026 12:38 pm

The boiling acid seas will rise & dissolve the dung & we’ll all drown in hot shit soup, what a way to go … but better than eating Muck Donalds (:-))

MarkW
April 8, 2026 1:35 pm

The difference in air temperature over a 250 meter vertical distance is only about two degrees C.

Are they really trying to claim that a 2 degree difference is sufficient to go from ideal climate to one that is on the verge of being unlivable?

MarkW
Reply to  MarkW
April 9, 2026 6:23 pm

Human’s live in regions that range from a few hundred feet below sea level to over 15,000 feet above.
A 250 meter range is nothing.

Phillip Chalmers
April 8, 2026 3:06 pm

The Amazon is not pristine unspoiled old growth forest.
It was inhabited for at least a thousand years by human beings practising what we would now call an agricultural variant based on planting and caring for and harvesting “food forests”.
It is just as unnatural as the biosphere of Australia, totally changed by at least a thousand years of repeated burning which obliterated vast numbers of species, animal and plant, into extinction.

Reply to  Phillip Chalmers
April 9, 2026 5:01 am

Just guessing- but I suspect those humans didn’t occupy the entire Amazon given its size. So, much of it probably is old growth. And, humans were there much longer than a thousand years- probably a few tens of thousands. Areas they did occupy are certainly very different as recent research has shown. The aborigines of Australia have been there, supposedly, for something like 70K years.

DipChip
April 8, 2026 3:31 pm

Did they check on the Availability of Dung and the life that provides it?

Reply to  Eric Worrall
April 9, 2026 5:02 am

didn’t dive into it 🙂

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
April 9, 2026 7:36 am

My mind is picturing well known climate zealots diving into a huge pile of dung. 😂🤣

Bob
April 8, 2026 4:03 pm

Can we say these people are full of sh*t?

Jeff Alberts
April 8, 2026 4:34 pm

 Kim Lea Holzmann of the University of Wurzburg in Germany

Hmm, I would have expected this kind of pig shit to come out of nearby Schweinfurt instead.

Jeff Miller
April 8, 2026 8:27 pm

I’m not a scientist. Finally, a piece of sh*t I can understand.

KevinM
April 8, 2026 8:37 pm

I’d hoped for good dung jokes when I came back tonight. Oh well.

Why did the toilet paper roll down the hill? To get to the bottom!
What do you call a magical poop? Poodini!
What do you call a fairy in the toilet? Stinkerbell!
What did the one toilet say to the other? “You look a bit flushed!”
Why did the toilet paper fail to cross the road? Because it got stuck in a crack.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  KevinM
April 9, 2026 6:55 am

That was quite the movement you had there.

cgh
April 8, 2026 9:42 pm

How do we know they are lying? Or just making up nonsense?

Easy. Their papers and articles are riddled with the words “may”, “could”, “might”, “suggests”. They made the blunder of claiming definitive, observable effects two decades ago with nonsense like An Inconvenient Truth, or disappearing polar bears or vanishing Arctic ice or shrinking Greenland ice caps. More recently, they hyperventillated about “boiling oceans”.

How do we know they are lying? Easy. Their lips are moving or absurdities are being written by their word processors.

Or they stumble in with handles such as ‘Nick Stokes’ or ‘MyUsername Reloaded’.

April 9, 2026 5:10 am

The ancient Egyptians made a dung beetle scarab. The attached is just an example- they had many others.

Egyptian-Scarab-Beetle-Egypt-Tours-Portal-1
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
April 9, 2026 5:11 am

Something nice to give to your honey? 🙂

2hotel9
April 9, 2026 6:35 am

So they killed a bunch of beetle in order to claim climate change is killing them. Talk about clownworld.

April 11, 2026 7:40 am

I suggest a new observational study in Denmark where cattle and dairy farmers are forces to use Bovaer, 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP), it inhibits a cow’s stomach enzyme that helps produce methane during digestion.

read: Angry dairy farmers stop feeding Bovaer
 https://agupdate.com/agriview/news/regional/article_597614f8-3945-4b59-ac28-9b374b444196.html

Nothing to worry about here, let us mess with nature and kill cows to save the planet. Last time I checked cow poop was good for the soil and enhances food crop production.

A dung beetle observational study could could determine how Bovaer affects them. Maybe the insects will not eat the Bovaer dung. Using their test tube method, they can determine the difference between dung beetle methane with and without treating the cows with Bovaer.
Maybe it will kill the beetles.

Will a government fund this type of study? Go figure!