Miliband Expected to Block North Sea Oil Drilling

From THE DAILY SKEPTIC

Ed Miliband is expected to block fresh oil drilling in the North Sea despite growing pressure to resume production to combat the energy crisis sparked by the Iran war. The Telegraph has the story.

The Energy Secretary is understood to be resisting the development of Rosebank, the UK’s largest untapped oil field, estimated to contain up to 300 million barrels of oil.

He is against new drilling licences despite concerns over impending fuel shortages, surging oil prices and diminishing stocks.

Despite growing pressure from opponents and his own Cabinet, including Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, Miliband has also delayed a decision on a licence to drill at the Jackdaw gas field, which it is estimated could produce the equivalent of 6% of the UK’s future gas supply.

The move delays the decision until after the May local elections, which could trigger a Labour leadership battle where he has been mooted as a potential contender. On Friday, Miliband’s aides dismissed as “unfounded” suggestions that he was minded to approve Jackdaw.

Any block on North Sea drilling puts him at odds with not only Kemi Badenoch, who this week launched a “Get Britain Drilling” campaign, and Nigel Farage’s Reform, but also the SNP, whose leader, John Swinney, on Thursday reversed the nationalist party’s opposition to further oil and gas exploration in the North Sea.

Swinney said the Iran war had changed the “balance of the arguments”. Speaking at a Holyrood election hustings, the Scottish First Minister said “energy security” had to be taken into account when deciding whether developments such as Rosebank oilfields and the Jackdaw gas project were allowed to proceed.

Robert Jenrick, Reform’s Treasury spokesman, told the Telegraph: “Keir Starmer needs to grow a backbone, overrule Ed Miliband and open up both Jackdaw and Rosebank immediately. It is completely mad that we are choosing not to exploit our own resources in the middle of an energy crisis.”

There is also a growing split within Labour. Unions led by the GMB have been vocal in their calls for the Government to give the go-ahead to both fields.

The Chancellor has also indicated that she supported increased drilling in the North Sea, saying this week she would be “very happy” to support extraction at Rosebank and Jackdaw because of the positive effect on “jobs and tax revenue”.

Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, said he believed the licences should be approved. Asked whether he believed Mr Miliband, who is seen as hostile to fossil fuels, was doing a good job, Sarwar said: “Yes, but there’s work to do.”

He added: “We made a commitment before the election that we would honour licences that were granted. The licences then have come into question – we should honour those licences.”

Sir Keir Starmer has refused to comment on the Jackdaw scheme, citing the fact that it is a quasi-judicial decision for Miliband.

However, Downing Street is said to be acutely aware that public opinion on further drilling has been shifting as a result of the crisis in the Middle East.

Worth reading in full.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 9 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
29 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bill Toland
April 5, 2026 6:39 am

Ed Miliband would rather sacrifice the British economy than admit that he is wrong about anything. I think that he sincerely believes that beneficial global warming is dangerous despite all evidence to the contrary. It is impossible to win an argument with someone like him. He believes that he is right and therefore nothing can change his mind.

strativarius
Reply to  Bill Toland
April 5, 2026 9:04 am

His father had a real deep disdain for the people who took him in in 1940. That chip on the shoulder was passed down as you can see.

Sean Galbally
April 5, 2026 6:40 am

Why isn’t traitor, Red Ed Mini Brain arrested? He is more anti UK than Putin is!

strativarius
Reply to  Sean Galbally
April 5, 2026 9:06 am

According to Harvard, Yale, Princeton, MIT, Berkeley, Stanford, Brown, Columbia, Caltech, Cambridge, Oxford, Sorbonne ad nauseam, mad Ed is on the right side of history.

ResourceGuy
Reply to  strativarius
April 5, 2026 9:50 am

Airbrushed history perhaps

Eric Schollar
April 5, 2026 7:05 am

The image at the top of the story is comment enough. No point in vebalizing it,

DipChip
April 5, 2026 7:16 am

He is attempting to wait until all the oil field expertise at the operator level has left the field to pursue a means of survival.

DipChip
Reply to  DipChip
April 5, 2026 7:25 am

Soon in the not too distant future MillyBrain and Starver along witth all the bloody Englishmen will be in th same Fix, searching for a means of survival that have been taken by aliens..

Scissor
Reply to  DipChip
April 5, 2026 4:41 pm

If you like your mullah, you can keep your mullah.

Bruce Cobb
April 5, 2026 7:29 am

The “leave-it-in-the ground” idiocy only “works” if everyone else does the same thing, which of course, they won’t. Their ultimate goal then, is for everyone to live in energy poverty.

April 5, 2026 8:32 am

Off topic, but I’m having fun with ChatGPT.

Trump
strativarius
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
April 5, 2026 9:07 am

I guess it keeps you off the streets.

Reply to  strativarius
April 5, 2026 1:07 pm

I suspect some of the annoying folks here have graduated from TDS University.

strativarius
April 5, 2026 8:58 am

And lo, it came to pass on Conisborough Viaduct, Gaia came down unto Friar Miliband and handed him two sets of stone tablets inscribed with the Ten Commandments for Sustainabilty.
Gaia said unto Miliband, “Chisel out two stone tablets like the first ones, and I will write on them the words that were on the first tablets, which you broke.” 

Here is one of them…

comment image

ResourceGuy
Reply to  strativarius
April 5, 2026 9:56 am

Maybe church-state separation is a good thing when the church is actually a green Mordor influencer. Where is the holy water…. flown in from Iceland or Greenland (with good marketing)?

Ed Zuiderwijk
Reply to  strativarius
April 5, 2026 10:29 am

The Mel Brooks version with 15 commandments was much better.

strativarius
Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
April 5, 2026 12:46 pm

That was fiction…

ResourceGuy
April 5, 2026 9:48 am

At least it’s predictable madness, much like deadender behavior.

April 5, 2026 10:08 am

Milliband, the oxymoron.

Reply to  whsmith@wustl.edu
April 5, 2026 2:50 pm

no.. just a moron.

Beta Blocker
April 5, 2026 11:14 am

What was it, six refineries closed down in the UK in the last twenty years? Where will the North Sea oil be refined even if it is being extracted?

1saveenergy
Reply to  Beta Blocker
April 5, 2026 11:45 am

Probably Antwerp or Rotterdam.

Following closures at the Grangemouth and Lindsey refineries in 2025, only four operational refineries remain in the UK.

Thanks to morubund Milliband, the UK is up shit creek without a paddle … & the boat is leaking (:-((

ResourceGuy
April 5, 2026 1:38 pm

The US got rid of John Kerry services with the election that cleaned house. But the UK is stuck with Ed and the gang for the ride to nowhere in netzero dogma land. Good luck

Bob
April 5, 2026 1:53 pm

Only government can be this stupid. Any nation refusing to develop its own resources should not be allowed to import those same resources.

1saveenergy
Reply to  Bob
April 5, 2026 2:22 pm

And the ‘Glorious Leaders’ should be forced to only use what they advocate for us plebs.

April 5, 2026 5:09 pm

Ed Milibrain…..

GiraffeOnKhat
April 6, 2026 2:20 am

I’ve commented until I am blue in the face on the Telegraph that Jackdaw doesn’t need a licence to drill. It is 99% complete, all the wells were drilled over the last three years, the platform, jacket are in place, the pipeline to Shearwater in and tested.

There is a very small amount of topside completion work to be done, but it is essentially just waiting on a licence to open up the taps.

Yet all of Westminster and Whitehall media-politico class keep referring to drilling. Their complete ignorance of the entire Energy engineering process is a large part of why we are where we are, and vast offshore wind farms are considered green. Don’t even get me started on carbon capture.

sherro01
April 6, 2026 12:48 pm

If the drilling for hydrocarbons was given the go-ahead, what is the perceived downside?
Apart from consequences for political careers, the UK might end up using a little more hydrocarbon in the next decade. If it was forced, by political policies, to use less hydrocarbon, the outcome would be widespread poverty.
If politics allows North Sea hydrocarbon expansion now, the UK can reasonably predict better outcomes such as more jobs, lower inflation, lower cost of living and a less tense society. What is wrong with having more fun?
Really, how can voters get so conned by politicians that they continue to vote for outcomes that are predictably bad? Geoff S

Reply to  sherro01
April 7, 2026 4:00 pm

If the drilling for hydrocarbons was given the go-ahead, what is the perceived downside?

From the article

The Energy Secretary is understood to be resisting the development of Rosebank, the UK’s largest untapped oil field, estimated to contain up to 300 million barrels of oil.

And according to the Worldometer the UK uses 1.4M barrels per day so the “largest untapped oil field” accounts for a bit over half a year’s worth of oil for the UK. But of course it cant be produced that fast so its actually a few percent of the needed production over a few decades.

And its expensive oil to extract.

So from a perception point of view? Once the UK resorts to recovering this oil, and it probably will one day, then its an acknowledgement that oil is coming to an end and the downside will be our energy options will be depleting.