Brother Love the Earth’s Traveling Salvation Show

Exaggerations and lies persuade suckers to send billions to Climate Crisis, Inc. scammers

Paul Driessen

Former National Audubon Society COO Dan Beard once confessed, “What you get in your mailbox is a never-ending stream of shrill crisis-related material designed to evoke emotions so that you will sit down and write a check.”

Neil Diamond sang, “Pack up the babies and grab the old ladies, And everyone goes, ‘Cause everyone knows … ’bout Brother Love’s show. Hallelujah, brothers!”

Or to Brother Love the Earth’s Traveling Salvation Show, which will save your planet and soul if you mouth the right platitudes and donate to prevent the latest eco-crisis.

As anger grows over the follies of climate and energy policies, UN bureaucrats and eco-warriors are shifting attention to the plastics waste crisis, while still ranting about a fossil-fuel-driven climate crisis.

The Trump Administration is issuing leases and permits for drilling and mining, while erecting regulatory hurdles to massive wind and solar facilities sprawling across wildlife and scenic areas. Meanwhile, explosions in Middle East gas facilities, threats to Strait of Hormuz traffic and the Russia-Ukraine war have sent oil, gas and gasoline prices upward.

However, near-religious ideologies, indoctrination and fearmongering in our schools, and seemingly endless cash flowing to companies, universities and rabblerousers still mean climate and energy realism is unlikely in our lifetimes. Never has so much money drained taxpayer and ratepayer bank accounts, fueled politically connected colleges and corporations, or perpetuated absurd fears and ludicrous solutions that they helped generate and subsidies and mandates they helped enact.

I receive barrages of shrill crisis-related material and entreaties for my retirement money.

A recent Friends of the Earth (FoE) plea revived memories of foul-mouthed Marissa Tomei berating My Cousin Vinny’s Joe Pesci for even thinking about going deer hunting.

“A mama polar bear nurses her cubs in the safety of their den,” it began. “Then – THUMP! THUMP! THUMP! The walls vibrate. Bits of ice and snow fall from the ceiling. And finally, the den COLLAPSES – crushing mama and babies before they have time to react. Friend, this is the cost of oil drilling in the Arctic. As Trump enacts plans to open up fragile polar bear habitat in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, more innocent wildlife could soon face this gruesome fate.” [emphasis in originals]

“A polar bear family reaches the edge of the ice,” the next email wailed. “With no food in sight, they face a choice: swim or starve. Weak from hunger, the cubs aren’t prepared for a grueling swim. Sometimes, it takes DAYS to reach stable ice again. But mom has no choice – if they stay, they starve. She must risk losing her cubs to the current if they want a shot at survival.” Donate Now.

These pleas are offensive, intellectually degrading and founded on exaggerations, fables and lies. But as 2024 Sierra Club Changemaker of the Year Bruce Hamilton has admitted, “It’s what works. It’s what builds the Sierra Club.” And keeps funds flowing to countless Climate Crisis, Inc. corporations.

Reading these appeals, you would never guess that polar bears “are elite long-distance swimmers,” often traveling hundreds of miles at 6 mph in open ocean. One study followed a bear covering 426 miles in a single journey over nine straight days. Cubs can swim for several days.

Populations have soared from around 12,000 in the late 1960s, when they were over-hunted, to 32,000 in 2023. A few cub or adult deaths, though sad (and natural), will hardly hasten their extinction.

Polar bears are well adapted for life in Arctic climes. Their skin is actually jet-black, enabling them to absorb and retain heat from weak sunlight. Their fur is transparent and hollow, allowing sunlight to reach that dark skin and scatter the light, making them look white.

(My inquiry into “the bear’s greatest weakness” found that it is “their pass rush and defensive line.”)

FoE also asserts that “The Arctic is warming FOUR TIMES faster than the rest of the world.” The claim is meaningless and deliberately misleading. Arctic sea ice is highly variable over years and decades.

“We were astonished by the total absence of ice in the Barrow Strait,” British explorer Sir Francis McClintock wrote in 1860. “I was here at this time in 1854 – still frozen up – and doubts were entertained as to the possibility of escape.”

Moreover, scientists say polar bears may have evolved from equally huge Alaskan brown bears but have been a distinct species since the mid-Pleistocene, some 600,000 years ago. They’ve lived and thrived amid an Ice Age that sent mile-high glaciers across much of North America, Europe and Asia, the Roman and Medieval Warm Periods, and the Little Ice Age.

To suggest they are now threatened by slight recent warming is ridiculous.

But the fearmongering continues. It’s what builds Friends of the Earth and other climate crisis mongers.

As to seismic and drilling work in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge causing polar bear dens to cave in and wipe out these cuddly white symbols of climate cataclysm – please!

ANWR is the size of South Carolina (19 million acres) and home to 800-900 polar bears. Fewer than 2,000 coastal plain acres (equal to one-twentieth of Washington, DC) would actually be disturbed by drilling, roads, buildings and other development work.

Most exploration and development work will be done during winter months, following extensive environmental reviews dating back several decades and still ongoing. Permits will consider where bears and other wildlife are hibernating, birthing babies, browsing, and battling voracious mosquitoes.

Five decades of oil production in nearby Prudhoe Bay oilfields demonstrates convincingly that oil and wildlife coexist quite well in these magnificent areas – even amid the retrieval and pipelining of 11 billion barrels of oil to date and an estimated 2 billion barrels of recoverable oil remaining. ANWR could hold 6 to 16 billion barrels of recoverable oil, which America and the world will need for decades to come.

After a few days grieving over polar bears, Brother Love the Earth’s Traveling Salvation Show shifted to a crusade against logging in America’s “magical” National Forests.

“Trump wants to send CHAINSAWS deep into our National Forests, turning these precious ecosystems into depressing fields of stumps – so Trump’s corporate buddies can profit,” their next Please-Send-Money email raged. “To make matters worse, he’s evading protections for endangered species.”  [emphasis in original].

These “nature lovers” would rather our forests continue to overgrow into billions of thin, dry matchstick trees on millions of acres – ready to erupt into roaring infernos ignited by lightning or arson. These conflagrations burn at 2200 degrees F (1200˚ C) – hot enough to melt aluminum (1220˚ F) and gold (1943˚ F)! They roast common and endangered wildlife, destroy forage and habitats, incinerate soil organisms and organic matter, ensure extensive erosion during future downpours and spring melts – and kill human fathers, mothers and children.  

But eco-fanatics scapegoat manmade climate change, instead of criminal forest mismanagement.

Don’t be another PT Barnum “sucker born every minute.” Keep your hard-earned money. Fight for Truth and Open Debate on energy, climate and environmental issues.

Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and author of books and articles on energy, climate change, economic development and human rights. 

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 14 votes
Article Rating
75 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
March 24, 2026 6:37 am

Nice AI image but the symbol on the pulpit instead
of a cross should have been a hammer & sickle.

Scissor
Reply to  Steve Case
March 24, 2026 6:57 am

Yes, perhaps green ones, at least on the outside.

Reply to  Scissor
March 24, 2026 7:30 am

Coulda shoulda woulda done this one:

comment image

Reply to  Steve Case
March 24, 2026 8:20 am

or a watermelon

Reply to  Steve Case
March 24, 2026 2:32 pm

Or maybe a green dollar sign.

Reply to  Gunga Din
March 27, 2026 8:24 am

Oh very good! first chuckle of my day.(-:

comment image

Reply to  Steve Case
March 25, 2026 6:28 am

Or Trump..

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  ballynally
March 25, 2026 11:21 am

The TDS is strong in this one, Obi-wan.

March 24, 2026 6:58 am

FoE also asserts that “The Arctic is warming FOUR TIMES faster than the rest of the world.” The claim is meaningless and deliberately misleading. Arctic sea ice is highly variable over years and decades.

The FoE claim is about Arctic temperatures, not sea ice extent. It is based on this peer reviewed 2022 paper in Nature, which found:

Here we show, by using several observational datasets which cover the Arctic region, that during the last 43 years the Arctic has been warming nearly four times faster than the globe, which is a higher ratio than generally reported in literature. 

Probably doesn’t beat a random anecdote from some unspecified date in 1860, though.

Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 24, 2026 7:06 am

Nature. Ha ha, good one.

Reply to  R Taylor
March 24, 2026 7:10 am

It’s written by the Finnish Meteorological Institute. I realise that for many here that means it won’t carry quite the same gravitas as, say, NoTrickZone or some retired accountant running a ‘climate’ blog from his garden shed, but there you have it.

Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 24, 2026 7:26 am

So, a rise of .04℃/year instead of .01℃/year. Got it.

Reply to  Mumbles McGuirck
March 24, 2026 7:53 am

Actually, +0.073 C/year (+0.73 C per decade; +7.03 C per century).

You have to read the paper to see that (don’t worry, Paul Driessen obviously didn’t bother reading it either).

Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 24, 2026 8:26 am

Vast areas of the tundra are starting to grow trees and shrubs and that results in an increase in associated wildlife. I suppose that’s a horrible thing. /s

strativarius
Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 24, 2026 9:27 am

Actually, +0.073 C/year

Measured how?

Reply to  strativarius
March 25, 2026 4:56 pm

Another one who didn’t read the paper

J Boles
Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 24, 2026 11:29 am

Mr. Nail, how much FF do you use each month? (lots!)

Reply to  J Boles
March 25, 2026 4:57 pm

If I knew what “FF” was I’d tell you

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 24, 2026 1:24 pm

Actually, +0.073 C/year (+0.73 C per decade; +7.03 C per century).

Ah, yes, the iron-clad proof based on linear extrapolation. /s

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
March 25, 2026 4:58 pm

It’s all there in the paper linked to.

If you disagree with it you can write and publish a comment or refutation

Keep us advised of your progress

Mr.
Reply to  Mumbles McGuirck
March 24, 2026 7:56 am

I just knew there was something bad going on –
there was definitely a disturbance in The Force.

(not such a big disturbance that ordinary people would notice, mind you, but those of us who don’t really have a life notice these things 🙁

Reply to  Mumbles McGuirck
March 24, 2026 8:24 am

Now I’m really terrified. 🙂

Leon de Boer
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 24, 2026 4:44 pm

Hey I ordered my EV immediately, I mean anything to save the Arctic from warming. My other thought was if I set up a solar panel and inverter and ran an AC in cooling does that count as my contribution to cooling the planet 🙂

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Leon de Boer
March 25, 2026 7:45 am

Only if you reverse the flow so the cold air goes outside while you cook yourself inside.

Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 24, 2026 11:32 am

Contempt for No Tricks, retired accountants and garden sheds is unnecessary. They have no power to divert significant resources for political reward.

Reply to  R Taylor
March 25, 2026 4:59 pm

It’s not them I have contempt for. It’s the idiots they are profiting from.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 24, 2026 1:14 pm

Finnish Meteorological Institute

https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/green-office-environmental-system

Includes:

The Green Office environmental system
Dynamicum, the head office of the Finnish Meteorological Institute in the Kumpula district of Helsinki, is included in the Green Office programme run by WWF. By participating in this programme, offices can reduce their environmental burden, achieve cost savings and slow down climate change. In addition to conducting research into climate change, the Finnish Meteorological Institute wants to do its share in mitigating climate change.

Not a completely unbiased organization.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
March 25, 2026 5:01 pm

Then identify the flaws in their paper and submit a comment or refutation of it.

No one else has been able to do so.

Be the first.

Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 24, 2026 7:39 am

According to AI (programmed by wokies) polar bears “need” sea ice to hunt harp seals, because harp seals use the sea ice to whelp pups. In the absence of sea ice the seals whelp on the beach, and the bears don’t need to swim anywhere to eat them.

Sea ice is a giant dys-scientific mythological fooba wooba. It’s like tooth fairies on Venus — vacuous imaginary ennui. Nobody and nothing needs sea ice. Its alleged predicted shrinkage doesn’t matter.

Reply to  OR For
March 24, 2026 8:29 am

Nice! And, no doubt, many species of marine life will like an open arctic.

Reply to  OR For
March 24, 2026 10:50 am

…. plus, using it as a proxy for global temperatures is about as stupid as it gets.

Reply to  OR For
March 25, 2026 5:03 pm

Like I said, the FoE quote was about temperatures, not sea ice extent (or polar bears)

John Hultquist
Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 24, 2026 7:56 am

Note the specified date of this report. [20th November, 1817]
“It will without doubt have come to your Lordship’s knowledge that a considerable change of climate, inexplicable at present to us, must have taken place in the Circumpolar Regions, by which the severity of the cold that has for centuries past enclosed the seas in the high northern latitudes in an impenetrable barrier of ice has been during the last two years, greatly abated.
(This) affords ample proof that new sources of warmth have been opened and give us leave to hope that the Arctic Seas may at this time be more accessible than they have been for centuries past, and that discoveries may now be made in them not only interesting to the advancement of science but also to the future intercourse of mankind and the commerce of distant nations.”
President of the Royal Society, London, to the Admiralty, 20th November, 1817 
from John Daly’s blog:

Reply to  John Hultquist
March 25, 2026 5:06 pm

This, again, is anecdotal evidence pertaining to Arctic sea ice extent hundreds of years ago.

The claim made by FoE in the above article is based on a 2022 study of observational Arctic temperatures.

Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 24, 2026 8:22 am

Numerous stories are published about almost every place on the planet warming faster than any other place. Even if the coldest places on the planet are warming trivially, only an idiot would see that as a negative.

Denis
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 24, 2026 9:47 am

Every place is Lake Wobegon.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 24, 2026 2:59 pm

My little spot on the globe, Columbus Ohio, set a record daily high for March 22 at 88*F.
Yet my front porch temperature that day peaked at 85*F.
My front porch gauge isn’t reported to the NWS but it works.
I wonder what site reached 88*F?

Reply to  Gunga Din
March 25, 2026 2:55 am

Yuh, probably next to the airport or in the Walmart parking lot. 🙂

Junkgirl
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 25, 2026 5:51 am

Or the recording sites that don’t actually exist and never have.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Junkgirl
March 25, 2026 7:47 am

Sorry, but Ohio is not in the UK. 😉

Tim L
Reply to  Gunga Din
March 25, 2026 6:36 am

Might be worth reporting what the high temperature was on March 23rd. We saw a >30 degF temperature drop between the two days here in Dayton a little to your west, yet we survive.

Reply to  Tim L
March 25, 2026 8:53 am

Similar drop where I live. Lots of wind.

Reply to  Tim L
March 25, 2026 10:08 am

The high on March 23rd here was 44*F.
(Odd. Looking at the record today for March 22nd, they now say it was 86*F.)

Junkgirl
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 25, 2026 5:49 am

Kind of like the game I played during Covid. Plug any number you like, low or high, plus the words Covid deaths into Google and you would find a Covid post of a story relating that same number of deaths exactly, somewhere. Maybe that would be fun with planet warming statistics.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 25, 2026 5:12 pm

Who said it was a negative?

I just pointed out that the FoE quote referenced in the above article was based on a peer-reviewed scientific paper and on observational evidence.

It concerns Arctic temperature observations, not sea ice extent, as the author of the above article tries to imply.

Maybe Arctic amplification of global warming is the best thing since bread came sliced; maybe not.

But it’s happening.

Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 24, 2026 10:05 am

The authors deliberately start in 1979 because “satellite era” gives better Arctic coverage. They openly admit pre-1979 data have large uncertainties.

This is the classic short-period trick in climate papers.

When they extend the analysis back to 1950-2021 (their own Fig. 4), the observed Arctic amplification drops. The 43-year window captures a specific phase of strong sea-ice loss + internal variability (e.g., positive Arctic Oscillation/NAO phases, Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation influences).

This is what’s known as selecting the slice that give the scariest number while downplaying that longer records align better with models.

The paper itself notes the discrepancy shrinks over longer periods but buries it:

Nevertheless, we also found that the discrepancy in AA between climate models and observations is smaller when calculated over longer periods, such as 1950–2021

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Redge
March 24, 2026 1:28 pm

Also:

Our results indicate that the recent four-fold Arctic warming ratio is either an extremely unlikely event, or the climate models systematically tend to underestimate the amplification.

In other words, they do not know what is going on and can only offer conjectures.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Redge
March 25, 2026 7:49 am

If you look at the graph, starting in 1980 would have resulted in a significantly different trend line.

Reply to  Redge
March 25, 2026 5:32 pm

The authors deliberately start in 1979 because “satellite era” gives better Arctic coverage. They openly admit pre-1979 data have large uncertainties.

This is the classic short-period trick in climate papers.

You are at liberty to refute or comment on the merits of the paper by submitting a rebuttal, etc…

But that is not the point I am making; which is simply that the author of the above article conflates Arctic air temperatures with Arctic sea ice extent.

He references a claim made by FoE that is (correctly) based on a peer-reviewed study published in a reputable journal and submitted by a reputable organisation then twists it completely out of context. The study was about surface air temperatures, not sea ice extent.

The paper itself notes the discrepancy shrinks over longer periods but buries it:

They ‘buried it’ so deeply that you were able to find it immediately, from a free-to-read, publicly available website, and quote it.

It’s not ‘buried’ if you look for it. Apparently the author of this article didn’t find time to do that. A common trait among self-proclaimed ‘skeptics’.

MiloCrabtree
Reply to  TheFinalNail
March 24, 2026 6:58 pm

Get lost, stinking troll.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MiloCrabtree
March 25, 2026 11:25 am

While he is a troll, stinking or otherwise, he has as much right to post here as anyone else. We honor freedom of speech.

I will defend to the death his Constitutional right to prove himself an idiot.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
March 25, 2026 5:36 pm

I’m a ‘troll’ and an ‘idiot’ for pointing out facts.

Says more about you folks than it says about me.

Doug S
March 24, 2026 7:25 am

I think the point of this post is spot on. If people “believe” that donating their money to any group or organization will alter Earth’s climate, it is an act of religious devotion.

oeman50
Reply to  Doug S
March 25, 2026 5:21 am

When I saw “FoE,” I immediately thought of Foes of Earth.

J Boles
March 24, 2026 7:32 am

To counter Climate Crisis, Inc. reminds me of the Beatles song –

You say you want a revolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
You tell me that it’s evolution
Well, you know
We all wanna change the world
When you talk about destruction
Don’t you know that you can count me out, in?
Don’t you know it’s gonna be alright?
You say you got a real solution
Well, you know
We’d all love to see the plan
You ask me for a contribution
Well, you know
We all doing what we can
If you want money for people with minds that hate
All I can tell is, brother, you have to wait
Don’t you know it’s gonna be alright? (Oh, shoo-be-do-wop)
You say you’ll change the constitution
Well, you know
We’d all love to change your head (ah, shoo-be-do-wop)
You tell me it’s the institution
Well, you know
You better free your mind instead (ah, shoo-be-do-wop)
If you go carrying pictures of chairman Mao
You ain’t gonna make it with anyone anyhow
Don’t you know it’s gonna be alright? (Oh, shoo-be-do-wop)

starzmom
March 24, 2026 7:40 am

I especially like the suggestions that it is all Trump’s fault, whatever “it” is. I bet Trump has never used a chainsaw in his life.

John Hultquist
March 24, 2026 7:51 am

“… incinerate soil organisms and organic matter, ensure extensive erosion …”
As a volunteer, I’ve helped re-vegetate such an area with native plants and seeds.
And, “send CHAINSAWS deep into. . . is so last century. Most trees are cut and limbed by large machines. Although in my woodlot, I use an electric chainsaw.

Reply to  John Hultquist
March 24, 2026 8:36 am

I love my electric saw. Perfect for my acre behind the house. No more going nuts trying to start in the spring because I failed to drain the gas in November so it got gummed up. No more noise- I don’t even wear ear protection with it- it’s so quite. And by not using gas, I’m helping to save the planet. 🙂

March 24, 2026 8:01 am

“Marissa Tomei berating My Cousin Vinny’s Joe Pesci for even thinking about going deer hunting”

Hilarious film. 🙂

March 24, 2026 8:06 am

“As Trump enacts plans to open up fragile polar bear habitat in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, more innocent wildlife could soon face this gruesome fate.”

Isn’t the arctic millions of square miles? The impact will be close to zero.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 24, 2026 1:29 pm

Key word: “could.”

March 24, 2026 8:13 am

But mom has no choice – if they stay, they starve.”

Calling it “mom” is a stretch. Sure, it’s the mother- but mom? How about calling its other parent, “daddy”.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 25, 2026 7:51 am

Calling it “mom” follows naming storms. Personification allows for generating more emotional responses, stifling critical thinking in the process.

March 24, 2026 8:19 am

““Trump wants to send CHAINSAWS hard working men deep into our National Forests, turning these precious ecosystems into depressing fields of stumps more ecologically diverse forest stands– so Trump’s corporate buddies can profit people can have wood for homes, furniture and paper …”

Fixed it. 🙂

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
March 25, 2026 7:53 am

Um, erm, hard working men and women into our National Forests.

Now that is the modern spin. In the past such a neutral use of the word “men” would be equivalent to humans, people, etc. Context defines language genders not ideology.

strativarius
March 24, 2026 8:46 am

I’m always reminded of the snake oil salesman in the film “Little Big Man”. A man who gradually lost body parts to unsatisfied customers.

In the very one sided argument for AGW etc “scientists say“, a blatant appeal to authority, passes for evidence. They know, you don’t, so shut up. You are not a climate sceantist…

Search term: Scientists say

Heatwave scorching US west ‘virtually impossible’ without climate crisis, say scientists. Link

Evidence?

“To quantify the impact of global warming on the week’s extreme temperatures, the researchers analyzed weather and forecast data, and also used climate model simulations to compare how heat events have changed in today’s climate.”

Essentially, they made it up.

Scientists say government must prepare for unlikely but ‘plausible’ 4C rise in temperature and a 2-metre rise in sea levelsLink

Believe me, it goes on and on. Personally speaking, a 4C increase would be most welcome.

Dave Andrews
March 24, 2026 10:03 am

Re polar bears and swimming I have a book ‘World of the Polar Bear’ by Fred Bruemmer published in 1989. Loads of stunning photographs.

On page118 he notes

“And a bear tagged in 1967 on Spitsbergen was shot a year later in southwest Greenland, more than 2000 miles away”

Spitsbergen, of course, is now known as Svalbard

Sparta Nova 4
March 24, 2026 1:09 pm

Another green influencer chasing greenbacks.

Edward Katz
March 24, 2026 2:31 pm

Only suckers fall for the climate alarmism sales pitch. Realists notice that when it comes to weather and climate, all they see is the usual annual fluctuations and little that can’t be handled without the usual adjustments. Nor are they willing to be conned into making major lifestyle changes, accepting new taxes and being pressured into buying overpriced , supposedly environmentally-friendly products. They just continue living realistically without falling for sales pitches that benefit only the peddlers of them.

KlimaSkeptic
March 24, 2026 6:20 pm

Isn’t it strange, how these wackos never complain about the massive destruction of pristine nature caused by these, mostly useless, windmills and solar farms.

Doug S
Reply to  KlimaSkeptic
March 25, 2026 5:28 am

“Thou shalt not bear false witness against the oracles of our faith.” Doug 3.25

Bruce Cobb
March 25, 2026 3:11 am

“Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest.”
Former Chief Climate Liar, Stephen Schneider.
Translation: It’s OK to lie, as long as you are doing it to “save the planet”.

March 25, 2026 6:28 am

I can see the man in the picture replaced by Trump. “save America”(maga). I AM America. Boots on the ground in Iran, fight the evildoers followed by the military draft and civil unrest, followed by emergency legislation followed by…a third term as President.
You think this is an fancy scheme dreamt up by an idiot? Or might there be something to it?
Trump managed to trap himself just like the US did in Vietnam.
And NO, you guys lost. It wasnt the Congress that tied you down. You still hold on to that lie because in your book the US can NEVER lose. You are brought up that way. To not see the bleeding obvious.
Climate Alarmist Agenda..same ffin trajectory. Always double down.
You..are..the..same.
I will take the negative votes as a badge of honour.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  ballynally
March 25, 2026 8:13 am

“You think this is an fancy scheme dreamt up by an idiot?”

Absolutely.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  ballynally
March 25, 2026 11:26 am

The TDS is strong in this one, Obi-wan.