Essay by Eric Worrall
What a disaster that would be – not.
MARCH 4, 2026
Climate change pushes tropical insects to their heat limit
by Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg
edited by Gaby Clark, reviewed by Robert EganUp to half of the insects in the Amazon region could be exposed to life-threatening heat levels due to progressive, anthropogenic global warming. This is shown by a recent study by the universities of Würzburg and Bremen.
“Current evaluations of the heat tolerance of insects such as moths, flies, and beetles paint a differentiated—and at the same time alarming—picture,” explains study author Dr. Kim Holzmann, researcher at the Chair of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology of the Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg (JMU). According to the study, insects’ ability to tolerate high temperatures does not simply adapt to their respective environment. “While species at higher altitudes can increase their heat tolerance, at least in the short term, many lowland species largely lack this ability,” says Holzmann.
Threatening consequences for entire ecosystemsThe study, published in Nature, makes it clear that tropical insects have only a very limited ability to adapt to climate change. Dr. Marcell Peters, animal ecologist at the University of Bremen and study author, says, “Rising temperatures could have a massive impact on insect populations, especially in regions with the world’s highest biodiversity. Since insects fulfill central functions in ecosystems as pollinators, decomposers, and predators, there is a threat of far-reaching consequences for entire ecosystems.”
…
Read more: https://phys.org/news/2026-03-climate-tropical-insects-limit.html
The abstract of the study;
- Article
- Open access
- Published: 04 March 2026
Limited thermal tolerance in tropical insects and its genomic signature
Kim L. Holzmann, Thomas Schmitzer, Antonia Abels, Marko Čorkalo, Oliver Mitesser, Mareike Kortmann, Pedro Alonso-Alonso, Yenny Correa-Carmona, Andrea Pinos, Felipe Yon, Mabel Alvarado, Adrian Forsyth, Alejandro Lopera-Toro, Gunnar Brehm, Alexander Keller, Mark Otieno, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter & Marcell K. Peters
Nature (2026)Cite this article
- 3861 Accesses
- 170 Altmetric
- Metrics details
Abstract
Insects make up the majority of all animal species, with 70% occurring in the tropics1, yet the impacts of warming on tropical insects remain highly uncertain2. This stems from sparse, taxonomically biased data on thermal tolerance of tropical insects and an incomplete understanding of the underlying physiological mechanisms3. Here we compared environmental temperatures with field-measured upper and lower thermal tolerance limits of around 2,300 insect species along Afrotropical and Neotropical elevational gradients and identified genomic signatures of thermal tolerance across the insect tree of life. We show that thermal tolerances do not proportionally track environmental temperatures but approach an asymptote in tropical lowlands. Insects at high elevations utilize plasticity to cope with rising temperatures, whereas lowland species have limited plastic abilities. Heat tolerance showed strong differences among insect orders and families, reflected in the thermal stability of proteins, suggesting that variation in thermal tolerance is founded in the fundamental protein architecture. Up to 52% of future surface temperatures and 38% of air temperatures in the Amazonian lowlands can cause heat mortality in half of the studied community. Our data suggest a limited capacity of insects in the Earth’s most biodiverse regions to buffer future warming.
Read more: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10155-w
Frankly this study doesn’t pass the smell test.
Would some insect species suffer significant changes in distribution if conditions changed? Absolutely. 10s of thousands of insect species in intense competition with each other, even slight advantages matter. Any change which shifts the balance in favour of a different species causes changes in distribution and population.
Would such changes threaten critical insect activities such as pollination? Absolutely not. The Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, 5-8C hotter than today, was the age of monkeys. Our mostly fruit eating monkey ancestors thrived on the abundance of the hothouse PETM, and colonised much of the world. Since those monkey ancestors mostly ate fruit, there must have been an abundance of pollinators, even in the hottest parts of the hothouse PETM world.
Regardless of whether the author’s claim of plasticity limits applies to the species they studied, the abundance of insects and pollinators in past periods of extreme warmth unequivocally demonstrates there is no risk of a pollinator apocalypse, even if the species fulfilling that role changes with temperature.
Green energy nuts gave up “Save the whales” for Wind Turbines. Now their mantra is “Save the mosquitoes”?
Quite the opposite..
https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.366
Right-handed Shark – Your provided link information is so very relevant to this article Abstract, and it should be prominently known by all; especially the authors of the above “study” abstract, and its readers. Wind Turbines are apparently killing flying insects in huge numbers. Down with Wind Turbines!
First chuckle of my day (-:
How about the HUGE number of insects killed by wind turbines,.
The blade edges can get coated in dead insects
Same on the leading edges of the wings on my 1958 Piper Tri-Pacer. At least it confirms I am going faster than the flying insects. But honestly, I can’t tell by the smashed remains whether I was overtaking them or hitting them head-on. 🙂
What’s the last thing to go through a bug’s mind as it smashed into a 1958 Tri-Pacer?
Its butt.
Could! That could happen somewhere in the landscape of the multiverse.
Word count in the linked paper:
could 6
may 1
might 2
would 3
They could (there’s that word again) find out for sure but they would need funding for their research.
Lots and lots of funding.
“tropical insects have only a very limited ability to adapt to climate change”
That’s nuts. Well, if a tropical ecosystem changes to a desert ecosystem very rapidly- it might be true. But a few degrees in temperature change will rapidly be adjusted to by bugs!
A few degrees? IPCC says:
Almost everywhere, daily minimum temperatures are projected
to increase faster than daily maximum temperatures, leading to
a decrease in diurnal temperature range. IPCC AR4 Chapter 10
Considering that the increase since 1850 is around a degree, it looks like the change
in tropics is less than a few.
And according to “mantra” it is the cold areas that would get warmer. (so will have more insects)
Tropical regions warm far less, if at all, because tropic oceans are self limited to around 32C by evaporative cycles.
Convection increases where water vapor is present keeping the tropics at the surface cooler limiting warming.
“While they promise them liberty, they themselves are slaves of corruption; for by whom a person is overcome, by him also he is brought into bondage.” 2 Peter 2:19
Ergo, the human race has no right to impact the environment.
More maybe and possibly from the warmistas. I wonder how much money was spent on this ‘research’ and how much was granted for it.
I think- could be wrong- but the biggest insects ever were during the Carboniferous? Real monsters and it was lot hotter.
And even nowadays the theory won’t work.
As result of the omnipresent moisture and water, and the resulting (options for )cooling ,
those insects have it way better in terms of heat survival(and reproduction) than those in dry hot regions, where even shadows are hard to find during the day.
But thanks god this expert seems to come from the lower IQ end of humanity.
Otherwise he’d have used this groundbreaking discovery for the real problems that may come along in such a scenario = the starvation of all animals that are higher ranked in the food chain and need insects for survival.
On a “positive” side: Less animals = less methane.
He should be happy about that and try to explain to us why all the warming extinction that is officially happenening does never result in lower methane output.
I thought the issue was worse at the poles with the highest temp increase and the equatorial had the least temp change. You can’t keep changing the predicted outcomes to keep your pet theory in play, I thought you had post normal science invented so your predictions all failing could be ignored.
True. The Amazon ecosystem is Cretaceous in origin. Equatorial areas are the least affected by global cooling or warming. The poles are a different story.
No mention of timing?
There is NO anthropogenic warming in jungles. … period. !!
The only measurable anthropogenic warming is in urban areas, and it is not because of CO2
First it was Arctic polar bears, until Susan Crockford pointed out they don’t depend on summer sea ice. Rather, about 75-80% of total annual caloric intake happens during the spring seal whelping season. Nobody ever said the Arctic wouldn’t have spring ice.
Then it was the heat sensitive North American alpine pika (whose thick furry coats for winter survival also mean they cannot survive summer temperatures above 25C). Until it was pointed out their range extends as far south as southern Nevada—the sneaky little guys simply burrow deep into the cool shade of their rocky high talus slopes during the heat of summer Nevada days.
Now it is heat intolerant Amazon insects. So I did a bit of research on insect basics before this now widely echoed paper just appeared. Insects (or their eggs/larvae) generally survive at any temperature from something well below freezing to about 50C. Arctic mosquitoes prove the below freezing point. Swarms of summer desert locusts prove the peak temperature point. Current peak Amazon daytime temperatures are at most 35C, and Amazon insects thrive year round. It does not compute that the Amazon might warm by another 15C ever, let alone by 2050.
The warmunists never seem to learn how easy their catastrophe stuff is to refute using simple facts and common sense.
‘The warmunists never seem to learn how easy their catastrophe stuff is to refute using simple facts and common sense.’
Doesn’t matter. Simple facts and common sense are effectively non-existent in today’s academies. What’s abundant at these institutions is Marxism, although it’s adherents take great pains to hide it:
https://mises.org/mises-wire/disappearing-marxists
Auch du lieber, ist alles los? Niemals!
Holzmann, K.L., et al. Limited thermal tolerance in tropical insects and its genomic signature. Nature (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10155-w
The only difference between their figures and TV advertisements is that they are more stable. Buyer Beware! I would guess that the authors are tied to their desk machines.I know about some in other subjects not getting their feet wet.
Life’s too short given all the interesting things, otherwise might be tempted to waste my time trying to understand this. I would guess they don’t know about the shade from the tropical trees. I’ve never been there but was once taught that one theory for dark skin is in habitats where the sun has too much shade, therefore cooling the lower habitat. I have been in cold climates that have plenty of insects, even mosquitoes. I was in graduate school with a student from Canada who used to brag about their mosquitoes but he did have trouble with our subtropical local ones which depended more on rainfall.
Model based idiocy that is clueless about how convection works in the tropics. Water vapor limits the upper bound of warming potential keeping the tropics fairly steady. Dry areas and higher latitudes are the only places where significant warming can take place as a result.
Ignorance of the geologic record is the only way these fraudsters can maintain the con.
Killing up to half of the insects in the Amazon region could well be regarded as a major benefit for mankind and certainly for the local inhabitants of Amazonia. Most of those blighters are useless blood-sucking nuisances.
“Most of those blighters are useless blood-sucking nuisances.”
Didn’t know they had Democrats in the Amazon !
Not wrong there. Malarial mosquitoes at night, dengue mosquitoes during the day. Cannot escape the little devils…
Once again the key word is “could” , which along with “might”, “possibly”, “maybe” etc. are the favorites of the climate crisis crowd.
I’d say global warring could affect insect populations somehow. But somehow I’d be more worried by global pesticide use.
Ditto pesticide use. Bees and bats dying from pesticides. How many millions of vehicles are killing bugs on our windshields?
What a load of codswallop. Junk science.
Now, let’s bounce this off of a detailed study on how devastating the Last Glacial Maximum was to the global tropical and subtropical ecosystems.
Nature should reject all submitted papers based on computer models.
What a load of complete made-up garbage. If you want a stupid idea promulgated, ask an academic.
If anything can handle a bit of extra heat it’s an insect. In my area (temperate) you won’t even see a butterfly or a native bee until the temp is over 30C
If the past is any indication, all the warming will be at high latitudes at night in the winter season, so I don’t see the relevance for effect on tropical anything.
They will always tell you the same thing: “Yes, it was much hotter before, but it’s the speed of the change that matters!”
And you will barely have had time to mention that you can’t compare the quality of temperature measurements from the past 170 years with proxy reconstructions before they accuse you of being a denier funded by Big Oil.
Considering there are so many bugs in the Amazon that vast numbers of them have not yet been named, would they be missed? Meanwhile Cop-Out was an incursion in the forest which aimed at providing a sanitised environment for loads of effete individuals, while the cities nearby, deemed unsuitable for tender sensibilities, had raw sewage running through the streets. It’s all perception. The publicists registered a tiny win.
“Could”. So not credible, evidence-based research.