ABC: Green China is Building Lots of Backup Coal Plants Because they Need Reliable Energy

Essay by Eric Worrall

“… The government’s response [to energy shortages] was to signal that it wanted more coal plants …”

Why China is building so many coal plants despite its solar and wind boom

China has significantly increased its coal power capacity, reviving concerns about its climate-changing carbon emissions

ByKEN MORITSUGU Associated Press
February 3, 2026, 5:42 PM

Overall, China brought 78 gigawatts of new coal power capacity online, a sharp uptick from previous years, …

China added 315 gigawatts of solar capacity and 119 gigawatts of wind in 2025 …

The massive growth in wind and solar begs the question: Why is China still building coal power plants and, by most analyses, way more than it actually needs? 

The answer is complicated.

China is at an earlier development stage than the United States or Europe, so it needs more energy to keep growing. If more of the nation’s 1.4 billion people climb into the middle class, more will be able to afford air conditioners and washing machines.

Power shortages in parts of China in 2021 and 2022 reinforced longstanding concerns about energy security. Some factories temporarily halted production and one city imposed rolling blackouts.

The government’s response was to signal that it wanted more coal plants, leading to a surge in applications and permits for their construction.

Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/china-building-coal-plants-despite-solar-wind-boom-129805102

I’m so confused. I thought renewables were cheaper than coal. And China is the king of building cheap batteries. So why would China need 78 gigawatts of coal to back up 315 + 119 = 434GW of renewables?

Could it be that renewables + backup is not a viable solution to a nation’s energy needs, even when the people implementing that solution as the global leaders of manufacturing green energy components?

Of course Western apologists and Chinese propagandists insist that China has special needs, that the coal is just temporary. If China abandons renewables all green hope is lost, so they’ll tie themselves in knots trying to excuse China’s skyrocketing carbon emissions.

But nobody builds a new coal plant which they intent to shut down in the near future, those coal plants will still be humming long after all of China’s wind turbines and solar panels are dust.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
20 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ronald Stein
February 4, 2026 10:06 am

For affordable electricity, there are 460 coal plants under construction. Another 500 have been permitted or are about to be, with an additional 260 new plants expected to be announced. The vast majority of all this activity is in China and India.

February 4, 2026 10:07 am

Google AI says:

How many nuclear power plants does China have?
As of early 2026, mainland China has 59 nuclear power reactors in commercial operation. 
China currently has the world’s fastest-growing nuclear energy program, with more reactors under construction than any other nation. 

John Hultquist
February 4, 2026 10:11 am

The top image is unfair to Unicorns. Most of us are fond of the creatures.
Maybe you can produce a stylized image of Al Gore or someone else on the “Climate Hall of Shame”.
As to why all the wind and solar: Perhaps they are sopping up excess production that keeps thousands of people employed (housed, fed, off the streets, not protesting). In the future the next generation can likewise be satisfied by dismantling all the W&S. 

Bryan A
Reply to  John Hultquist
February 4, 2026 10:33 am

Al Gore with a single horn growing from his forehead
Or two small ones from each temple?

Richard Mott
Reply to  Bryan A
February 4, 2026 11:12 am

Not necessary. Just lengthen his nose by a Pinocchio-appropriate amount and you’ll have the same effect.

John Hultquist
February 4, 2026 10:11 am

The top image is unfair to Unicorns. Most of us are fond of the creatures.
Maybe you can produce a stylized image of Al Gore or someone else on the “Climate Hall of Shame”.
As to why all the wind and solar: Perhaps they are sopping up excess production that keeps thousands of people employed (housed, fed, off the streets, not protesting). In the future the next generation can likewise be satisfied by dismantling all the W&S. 

Bob Armstrong
February 4, 2026 10:14 am

The turbines won’t be dust .
They will be massive rebar concrete blocks buried across vast landscapes .

KevinM
Reply to  Bob Armstrong
February 4, 2026 10:52 am

Old cold war era soviet concrete mega-military monuments are fun artifacts.
Likewise abandoned olympic games infrastructure like concrete bobsled tube supports.
Someday, glossy photos of abandoned wind turbine platforms surrounded by cows grazing in grassy fields will make an excellent coffee table book.

Forgot USA auto factories in Detroit. Photos of the abandoned Chrysler plant are amazing.

Reply to  KevinM
February 4, 2026 11:07 am

After the US loses the EV race you will be able to admire far more abandoned car factories.

Land around wind turbines is already used for other things like livestock.

There is also Agrivoltaics

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
February 4, 2026 11:13 am

There are EV races?

Ok.

Mr.
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
February 4, 2026 11:24 am

Land around wind turbines is already used for other things like livestock.

and also burial grounds for raptors and other birds that got sliced & diced by the windmills blades.

What an impressive legacy 🙁

mleskovarsocalrrcom
February 4, 2026 10:16 am

“China is at an earlier development stage than the United States or Europe…” Yes, it’s because the West embraced industrialization, technology, Capitalism, and Democracy. The narrative that they need to “catch up” when their technology and industrialization equals or surpasses any country in the world puts the ‘developing’ nation meme to rest. China’s idea of ‘catching up’ is to limit everyone else’s growth.

Bryan A
February 4, 2026 10:19 am

Given Solar and Winds dismal capacity factors, especially in Winter it’s far too likely that the new Coal capacity brought online is to firm Actual Projected Generation from Wind and Solar.
315 GW nameplate for solar might produce 50 GW during the Summer months but likely not more than 20GW in the winter and Zero after 4pm.
119GW of wind might produce an average of 48GW when wind is optimal but will produce nothing if nature choses NOT to deliver the “Free Fuel”.
And neither will produce anything useful on still winter nights.
So on paper it looks like wind and solar have massive increases in Nameplate Capacity but when capacity factors are taken into account they aren’t providing more Energy than the New Coal assets.
And they’ll need replacement several times over the lifespan of the Coal Generation Plants.

KevinM
Reply to  Bryan A
February 4, 2026 10:56 am

“The Ship of Theseus is a philosophical paradox exploring whether an object that has had all its components replaced remains fundamentally the same.”

February 4, 2026 10:22 am

How much more electricity was generated from coal compared to 2024?

Bryan A
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
February 4, 2026 10:35 am

How much more “reliable energy” did coal generate than those “Massive” nameplate quantities of Wind and Solar???

Virtually All as Wind and Solar aren’t “Reliable” energy sources.!!

Mr.
February 4, 2026 10:27 am

The reality is that China is mainly interested / engaged with the lucrative manufacturing and exporting of wind & solar plant to willing buyers in Western countries.

Not so committed to installing & using these contraptions themselves.
That’s for we stupid net-zero Gweilo.

Every marketer knows you have to demonstrate to prospects your unfettered belief that your product is the best thing since sliced bread, so you pretend to use it yourself at every opportunity.

Remember the cheesy tv ads that used to start with -” 9 out of 10 doctors use and recommend [insert cigarette brand]”

Reliable, economic, abundant coal is what those clever, long-term thinkers in China have determined to be the most appropriate fuel for their needs in their current 5-year plan.

(and I’m sure they can get nuclear power plants sited, built and commissioned inside 5 years if they need to. They don’t shackle themselves with endless site studies & approvals processes like we do)

Bruce Cobb
February 4, 2026 10:44 am

Wait, no it couldn’t be. No way that China is simply gaslighting the western world about energy in order to give themselves an advantage. Because that would be wrong.

John the Econ
February 4, 2026 10:57 am

It’s a mystery.

Sparta Nova 4
February 4, 2026 11:11 am

CO2 is not carbon.