Protecting the Amazon rainforest is one of the main goals of COP30, with the location in the Brazilian city of Belém chosen to emphasise what is described as the crucial role that such forests play in global climate regulation, biodiversity and “carbon” storage. It is bad enough that 100,000 mature rainforest trees had to be cut down to build a ‘Highway of Shame’ to speed COP delegates around town this week and next. But a far greater scandal, which today the Daily Sceptic brings to wider public attention, is the illegal logging of balsa wood in the Ecuadorian rainforest to supply rocketing demand from mostly Chinese wind turbine manufacturers. Such is the need for the strong but extraordinarily lightweight wood, it is estimated that at least 50% of the world’s balsa demand is currently being supplied by illegal logging in virgin rainforest.
The wood’s unique qualities make it ideal as a core for the giant blades attached to wind turbines. Ecuador produces over 90% of balsa due to unique climatic conditions in this particular area of the Americas. Much of it was previously obtained from plantations, but a ‘balsa boom’ over the last five years has depleted these resources and shortages have been made good by plundering the rainforest. And plunder is hardly an exaggeration, with trees apparently being removed from some of the most protected areas of the Ecuadorian forest.
Last year, the Environmental Investigation Agency produced a damning report that found many producers blended plantation wood with illegally harvested wild balsa from Amazon forests, including the Yasuni Biosphere Reserve, home to uncontacted indigenous groups. Its key finding is reprinted below:
According to EIA’s investigation this skyrocketing demand has had a long lasting effect. It appears that since the 2019–2020 balsa boom, the entire balsa production sector continues to depend upon the logging of natural forests, with a blending of plantation vs natural forest that allegedly varies between10% and 70% depending on exporter. These mixing practices in Ecuador have global repercussions.
Curiously, this shocking report, that seriously undermines the ethical production chain of wind turbines, failed to get a mention in the mainstream media. The EIA is not a small unknown operation, rather it is a substantial well-funded NGO founded in 1984 in the UK, with offices in the US and Europe. The Net Zero fantasy requires the planet to be blanketed with wind turbines, and this obviously overrules any ecological concerns. Bats and birds can be killed in their millions, whales beached on shorelines and entire local ecosystems disrupted, but the political activists don’t seem to care. If anything is said, it is little more than justifying and accepting the ecological consequences for the greater Net Zero good. For instance, in the UK the Bat Conservation Trust states that “climate change” is a significant threat to bat populations. “We need renewable energy to help mitigate for climate change for the benefit of the bats, people and the wider environment,” it adds.
Until recently, balsa wood was a small market, its uses including model aircraft and surfboards. The balsa boom led by wind blade demand means the current market is estimated at an annual value of at least $200 million. The balsa tree (Ochroma pyramidale) is fast growing in the right tropical conditions. If it wasn’t for the enormous demand created by the wind industry, it could be harvested on plantations as a sustainable commodity. As it is, recent and continuing demand has exhausted many plantations and denuded areas of virgin rainforest. In a wild setting, balsa trees often fill in natural gaps. Harvesting them creates sudden clear spaces that disturb the complex webs of life that support thousands of animal and plant species. Although fast growing in rich soils, regeneration in the rainforest can be much slower due to poor quality ground and local erosion caused by canopy removal.
To this day, balsa wood has numerous advantages as a core wind blade material over possible plastic foam substitutes. It has superior strength and stiffness compared to foam materials, and this allows for thinner core layers in high load areas like a blade’s root. This helps overall weight to be reduced without any reduction in overall engineering integrity. Prices of balsa wood are generally considered competitive, not least it would seem because production of plantation timber is massively boosted by the illegal logging.
The EIA report is worth reading in full. Mainstream media might even consider reporting its findings. The EIA investigators toured many of the illegal logging sites and charged that most, if not all, exporters quickly turned to natural forests as a “convenient and immediate available replacement” when plantations were quickly depleted of older trees from around the turn of the decade. It was found that balsa was extracted from Ecuador’s Amazonian heartland, “much of it spanning some of the last intact forest landscapes in the country”. These were said to be unique protected areas and emblematic indigenous territories. Traders are said to have told EIA that the logging of balsa was taking place “from north to south across most of the Amazonian provinces of the country”.
The EIA recommended that wind blade manufactures and wind power developers suspend the use of balsa until Ecuadorian supply chains are traced and transparent. The answer to that, as Britain’s unhinged energy secretary Ed Miliband once sang, is blowing in the wind.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor. Follow him on X.
At Least Half the Balsa Wood in Wind Turbine Blades is Illegally Logged
By the same token x number of bats, birds, whales etc were killed by wind turbines.
The crucial thing to remember is these are necessary sacrifices to Gaia. Absolution guaranteed.
“Wind and solar are free!” — standard quote from one of the apologists.
Wind and solar are just as free as oil, coal and gas. More should be made of this fact.
“We have to destroy the environment in order to save the planet”.
It has been practiced with countries on a regional scale,
why shouldn’t it work with the environment on a global one?
Just suspend wind turbine production until all the issues with balsa wood, bats, raptors, whales, etc are settled? That is The Green Blob’s reaction to anything else they disapprove of.
Just suspend wind turbine production. You didn’t need the rest.
Is there a single thing within this movement that isn’t fake or hasn’t been corrupted?
” We’ll know that our disinformation program is complete when everything the american public believes is false ”
William Casey, CiA director(before historical revision),
author of kidnapping and assassination for contras manual
Crips, I was just explaining to my wife (I was helping with a minor wood project) about how balsa wood is grown and harvested on plantations. Is there nothing Net Zero can’t ruin?
Really? Environistas doing criminal shyte? Color me shocked, not.
That is the thing about all this GREEN stuff, it when I look closely it is always fake, hollow, empty, counterproductive to the claims made, and goes against good sense. Leftists are always wrong.
Google News Search on “balsa wind turbine blades” Turns up only 42 total hits by year as follows:
2014 4 2020 2
2015 0 2021 3
2016 0 2022 10
2017 2 2023 8
2018 0 2024 7
2019 2 2025 4
A cruise through the list does turn up the fact that some of the wood comes from
Amazon rain forests. But, how ever you cut it, it’s not on the News media’s radar.
Inquiring minds want to know if a company planting balsa trees gets climate credits that it can sell?
Wind turbines and their “farms” . . . cleverly marketed as the “environmentally conscious” alternative energy source. Well, not really if one considers:
— blades being filled with illegally harvested balsa wood
— blades being filled with plastic foam derived solely from petroleum
— the massive amounts of concrete (with release of CO2 from preparation of its cement) used to support the largest wind turbines
— the known propensity for large wind turbines (at least those that are operating, hah!) slicing up birds and bats in flight, including “protected” species of raptors, such as bald eagles
— the scientifically-documented fact that acoustic and ground-transmitted noise from operating, large wind turbines tend to drive wildlife and humans away from the vicinity of such emplacements.
I have often commented that wind and solar are highly environmentally destructive over every period of their short intermittent and erratic life. Far more than coal or gas.
This balsa issue is further evidence.
You left out tons of copper.
You also left out oil as lubricant.
You also left out massive quantities of rare earth minerals/metals.
You left out landfills.
The problems that you identified are endemic to fossil-fuel power plants as well. I did not want to appear as sensationalistic as the renewable, green, Net Zero folks are in attacking non-renewables.
You, in turn, left out:
— miles of transmission lines to connect a power plant the nearest grid
— costs of maintenance of/repair to equipment
— decommissioning costs
— NIMBY politics
— required environmental impact statements,
just to mention of few more.
I would be curious to know whether a wind turban, over it’s life, saves more carbon than would be sequestered by the balsa tree(s) cut down to manufacture the turban blades.
Wind turbines don’t “save” any “carbon”. More BTU’s of fossil fuel are used to mine, smelt, manufacture, erect, operate, and dispose of wind turbines than those turbines produce in their functional lifetimes. They are a net loss of fossil fuels. If no wind turbines were built, but instead the electricity was created by fossil fuels, less fossil fuels would be needed. Do the math. They don’t pencil out.
So there is no need to use the “OMG they’re raping the virgin forest!” hysterical argument. That’s a rabbit hole.
Thanks, guess I should have been more specific. I understand that they are a net loss in fossil fuels. However, the ‘climate change’ believers do think that each wind turbine saves a certain amount of CO2. I was just wondering whether providing the balsa for the blades negated those savings independent of what ever was generated by their manufacture. It looks to me like using balsa for the blades could possibly double the negative effect of a wind turbine on the environment.
I just took a look at hobby/craft balsa wood availability. I have a Guillow 1 pound (2/3 board feet) assortment box I purchased from Hobby Lobby around 2013 for $9.99. Right now, it’s available from a couple sellers on Amazon for $13.99.
40 percent increase is almost exactly the inflation from 2013 to percent. If normal sources of balsa were depleted/scare, I’d think the price of balsa products would be abnormally high. I’m thinking this story is a bit overwrought. Whatever might have happened in the short term probably was a typical 3rd world opportunity for locals to pick up some cash while plantations adjusted to the demand (yes, by clearing more rain forest!).
I’ve no doubt using balsa for blade cores is simply the cheapest acceptable solution for this application. I can’t think, outside of surfboards, of any large composite dynamic structures using it. I know you can buy off-the-shelf (Dragon Skin etc) carbon face sheet balsa core panels, so there must be some applications.
It looks like you totally missed the major point of the above article being that at least half the balsa wood in wind turbine blades is ILLEGALLY LOGGED in Amazonian rainforests. In fact, this was stated in the above article’s title.
Moreover, the above article did not discuss the specific price-per-pound of balsa wood, nor how it has changed over X number of years.
Now, about being overwrought . . .
I wish it were so!
Guillows models (from plans and instructions written in the 1930’s) with the only improvement being SOME are now laser instead of die cut, are in the 60 to 90 dollar range! Believe me, I know!
Someone really really knows how to milk a cash cow!
There are time elements in the supply chain. Perhaps the cost impact is about to hit.
Consider the 2019-2020 balsa boom. Without yearly data, one cannot conclude the price impact of that. Perhaps the initial illegal harvesting/logging countered whatever price fluctuation the boom caused.
It is also possible the vast increase in logging offset any price fluctuation the demand caused.
But it is likely if this continues, you will see it in your future buys.
Saving the planet isn’t easy.
Ed Miliband blasted for 12,000-mile round trip twice in two weeks for eco summit
Energy Secretary accused of being “beyond parody” for making the double trip to Cop30
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/2132480/ed-miliband-flights-cop30#
Well, some COP30 attendees may find it just too difficult to stay away from the “services” offered by certain females in Belém, including those bused-in specifically for this festive event.
Summiting? . . . most definitely!
Just sayin’ . . .
Applause for you and clap a plenty for those attendees that seek to “party.”
“the “services” offered by certain females”
Not just ‘certain females’; I imagine that all bizarre tastes are catered for at a price !!!
Yes, indeed. Brazil is well-known for having XXX in its population.
So far beyond parody that it stops being funny
In the beginning of fiberglass boatbuilding, they used solid laminates – but these structures are flexible and not well insulated (sound & heat). So “cored” structures appeared, first for decks (where stiffness is very beneficial) then eventually for hulls. A cored structure is generally two thinner layers of laminate surrounding a core of structural stiffener.
At first, balsa was used – inexpensive, very lightweight and strong in compression (what a cored structure needs) . The negatives of using balsa became apparent, however: any water intrusion into the core caused balsa to first absorb the water, then rot & disintegrate. Today, hulls are generally cored with foams, as are many (but not all) decks. Foam is a bit heavier, but does not suffer the failings of balsa.
Windmill blades would seem to require the same stiffness enhancement as boat hulls, hence a cored structure – but it strikes me that water intrusion in a windmill blade would be a potentially VERY BAD thing, not only because it weakens the structure, but the weight would seriously unbalance the blades. Is the weight advantage balsa really worth the difference?
Hmmm … if the cores of defunct turbine blades were recycled into these, https://www.guillow.com/product-category/flying-toys/balsa-airplanes-motorplanes/ ,
would the toy planes be illegal? 😎
Self-styled “environmental activists”… seem to always act AGAINST the environment.
Why is that ?
It’s all, all been a scam from the start. Oh there are many passionate “true believers” to give the movement sincere front men and women, but the “crisis” has been manufactured to bilk the taxpayers of many $billions of dollars to line opportunists’ pockets.
Hopefully it’s beginning to unravel as more people open their eyes. Even if it is getting warmer – which is not really proven – that would be a good thing. CO2 is not the temperature control knob for the planet and more is beneficial not harmful. So-called fossil fuels have helped Mankind develop a civilization where even the poor can live better than kings of old. Let’s hope the scam dies a well-deserved death and its adherents are scorned by everyone with a functioning brain!
At different times Russia was invaded. It’s primary defense was “scorched earth” meaning anything of value or use by the invader was burned or destroyed.
Russia won, but it took a long time for those areas to be restored to previous levels of prosperity.
Net Zero is frightening similar to scorched earth in this context. If it ends today, how many decades will be needed to restore the environment?
What irritates me most about this article is the “protection” of “uncontacted” tribes. If these uncontacted tribes were to understand what modern medicine is, reading and writing, modern construction, vaccinations (real ones not the pretend ones), farming, air conditioning, electricity, clean water and waste disposal… How many would vote to stay in their primitive uncontacted state?
How is it that some human rights lawyer has not taken up their case and sued the government for denying them entry into modern civilization?
And porn! We’re denying them access to porn!
Porn & sexual exploitation seem to be a staple diet in all ‘civilisations’, just read your history books.
I don’t think anyone here at WUWT is surprised by this news. Wind and solar can only exist via lies and cheating. It’s just one more lie and cheat to add to the already massive list. Fire up all fossil fuel and nuclear generators, build new fossil fuel and nuclear generators, remove all wind and solar from the grid.
We have come to expect that sort of behaviour from the Greenies as they ‘save the World’.
story tip
Hypocritical UK Energy Guru Ed Miliband Jets to COP30 – Twice
https://redstate.com/wardclark/2025/11/11/hypocritical-uk-energy-guru-ed-miliband-jets-to-cop30-twice-n2196088
If the future of the planet is at stake, something or maybe somebody has to be sacrificed, so what are a few balsa trees more or less? Besides, cutting them gives these climate alarmists a chance to reemphasize what a collection of phonies they really are.
So THAT’S why the stick and tissue model airplanes I bought as a youth for 50 cents to 3 dollars now cost 40 to 90 dollars.
(and I’m stupid enough to pay that price. )
Seems perhaps that balsa will be more of a constraining resource than copper.
Save paradise! Put up a solar farm…
or in this case,
Save paradise! Put up a turbine farm…
With apologies to Joni Mitchell.
So will Trump’s OBBB July 2025 that defunds say, 90% of future US wind turbine projects, save the balsa trees in the Ecuador & Peru rainforests?
(The EIA Report is from 2024 and refers to Biden’s 2022 IRA [aka Inflation Induction Act] )