From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
By Paul Homewood
h/t Ian Magness
From the Telegraph:
The £33m aid project was designed to help poor Ugandan farmers deal with the impact of climate change.
But the reality saw their crops and homes destroyed in an “inhuman” project that left them “on the brink of starvation”.
Local government officials, who were guarded by armed security forces, razed crops, trees and homes as they claimed to be re-wilding wetland in a project run by the Green Climate Fund (GCF), which has received £2.6bn in UK taxpayers’ money.
It is one of a number of controversial projects uncovered in a seven-month investigation by The Telegraph into how the Government is spending £11.6bn in International Climate Finance (ICF).
Full story here.
Meanwhile Ugandan farmers seem to be doing pretty well “despite” climate change.
It is the green lobby they should be more worried about!
https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#compare
Is there no atrocity to perverse to visit upon the nameless masses in the name of the great green god?
Miliband says no
Things like that have been happening for decades – now they are just hiding it behind the green color.
The CiA has killed more than 200000 people in Guatemala with its proxy regimes
for the sake of the UFC.
Officially it was and is sold as a civil war while in reality farming land forcefully changed ownership.
Got any evidence, or is that just what the party has told you to believe?
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), an estimated 73 million induced abortions occur worldwide each year
In the US there are 65.97M women between 15 and 44. Per the WHO the US abortion rate is 11.2/1000 which means the US has 738,864 abortions yearly.
The UK is lower a 300,000 yearly but their Women 15 – 44 is only 21M so their overall rate is slightly higher.
WWI killed 22 million
WWII killed Over 70 million
Abortion kills 73 million yearly
For all the supposed atrocities blamed on the CIA, nothing takes more lives than Abortion
Web sources claim USA abortions are at just over One Million per year.
Web sources are apparently as varied as Kits in Kaboodle. My web source was searched 5 minutes prior to posting.
It’s not a drill, roll out the smoke and mirrors!
Ahem. Don’t worry, soon these particular slogans will be replaced with something else, and it will be cool again. Also, look — a butterfly!
It’s impossible to even try to make this stuff up.
It is actually quite logical.
Some years ago wikileaks revealed documents from a private intel company (iirc Stratfor) about Lybia.
The documents said that Lybias population is way above the natural carrying capacity as result of the great water project and that those numbers need to be brought down to natural levels..
And that’s exactly what happened when Obama brought peace,freedom and democracy (the green method nowadays makes it so much easier as we can see)
he completely bombed the waterproject Lybia had invested tens of billions of dollars in out of existence.
Obama, once again the heavy hand from the past. That POS caused more trouble and problems than any one man should be allowed. And he’s still at it.
Obama famously asserted Caucasians “did not build that” when we did. He destroyed as much of what we built as he could, but remains rich and a ridiculous reprobate.
“natural carrying capacity” – There’s the word “natural” again, right in a spot where no one will wonder what it means. I imagine a songwriter struggling to figure “what can I put here that takes up three syllables?”
In this case “natural carrying capacity” usually means, how many people could the land support without any enhancements by man.
In other words, how many hunter gatherer humans should the land support.
Agriculture and animal husbandry is man imposing his will on the land and is therefore evil and must be opposed.
If that’s the case, I’m more interested in the UN-natural carrying capacity. ie how many people could the land support with as many enhancements by man as man can figure out? A naisuhtlam number?
I’ve posted this link to a spreadsheet by “Optimum Trust” AKA Population Matters many times.
Note: the link is to archive.org and opens the spreadsheet directly. I haven’t checked if it still works, but have a copy on my PC.
It shows where the worlds population must be culled in line with a countries natural carrying capacity.
There is no limit to the evil the Climate Crusaders will commit in the name of “saving the planet:.
“We had to destroy the village to save it”…where have we heard that before?
The earliest reference I’ve come across:
“In order to win the city, it was necessary to demolish it”
Conquistador Juan Rodriguez de Escobar, talking about the destruction of the Aztec capital city, 1521. (Weird History 101, John Richard Stephens, 2nd ed., 2006, page 64.)
Harsh
But progressively harsh.
Not in my name.
Looks like true Klimate disaster to me.
You clearly have to pick a side.
Ugandan Villages Destroyed To Fight Climate Change
how the Government is spending £11.6bn in International Climate Finance
No question about it, greenism is fundamentally anti-human at its core. They can and do real damage to people, turn a blind eye to what’s inconvenient and impose their policies just the same. At the same time they crow about the pure evil of the fossil fuel companies and their money.
“Exxon funded thinktanks to spread climate denial in Latin America, documents reveal”. – The Guardian
Needless to say, the Guardian hasn’t had a story on the ‘climate success’ of Uganda this year. One wonders why…
«Against Monsanto» is always a good heuristic. If not always the safest. Monsanto was pushing its tentacles into the place for a dozen years or so. Where do you think they are in this?
And yet most of the said greenies live in cities and survive only because others grow food, build dams for water and provide energy and housing. If we need to reduce “carrying capacity”, let’s start with the climate hypocrites, the greenies themselves. We could have a test.
Let’s say we check out their dwellings. If it isn’t a cave, fail!
If they own a car, even an electric one, fail! Because the electric cars create a lot of emissions while being built and with the generators increasingly being used to charge the battery stations.
Clothing not made of natural fibers eg cotton, linen, silk or wool. Fail!
Any plastics in their houses. Fail! etc. Move them to a nice desert region where they can live out their fantasies and we can ignore them.
True to form, the response of Klimate mouthpieces such as the NYT to this story will be;
Crickets.
Headline implies poor Ugandan farmers were done wrong.
Chart implies that the overall category Ugandan farmers are doing great.
Therefore, some program has supposedly helped non-poor Ugandan farmers at the expense of poor Ugandan farmers. I’d kind of like to hear what the non-poor Ugandan farmers have to say about it. Maybe they’re too busy farming to take interviews? Maybe someone in Ugandan congress should propose a program to retrain the poor Ugandan farmers to be computer programmers? Can AI farm in Uganda? It’s callous, these are people who have to eat, but where are all those crops in the chart going if Ugandans aren’t eating them? And what on earth is the unit of the chart Y-axis? Internal dollars? I’d expected bushels of wheat or similar.
Isn’t this entirely predictable? Just search for “Uganda” and “Monsanto”. Obviously, their crops are not the ones being destroyed, only unmodified crops are. As always. The farms owned by Monsanto are properly blessed and don’t enrage ManBearPig, or something.
More worthless crappy government.
Congo Christians across the border not so much