Europe’s Terminal Decline: The Philosopher Queens and Their Ruinous Rule

From Tilak’s Substack

These two “politicians” have brought Europe to ruin. The left one is doubly guilty because she brought the right one to power. Open borders plus deindustrialization for the climate. Historians will, in a few hundred years, after the new Muslim Middle Ages, puzzle over what drove European civilization to suicide (An X post by Chris Veber https://x.com/ChrisVeber1/status/1940673113550659636 )

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen faced two more challenges to her position in the European Parliament last week. She received support from just over half the members of the 720-seat European Parliament in both votes. Neither of the motions of no confidence had a chance of securing the two-thirds majority required to eject the President but still they served as the latest reminder of the increasingly fractured European Parliament and its growing populist factions.

Tilak’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The Patriots for Europe group, a conservative-populist faction which participated in the parliamentary motion, includes lawmakers from Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz party and the Rassemblement National (RN) party of Marine Le Pen in France. It criticised the EC’s climate, migration and economic policies. The conservative faction in European politics parallels President Trump’s characteristically blunt address to the United Nations. He had described Europe as “going to hell” through its twin obsessions with mass migration and green energy.

In the same week as the challenging votes in the European parliament, one of Germany’s foremost energy experts, Fritz Vahrenholt, stated that Germany is in the grips of an “energy madness”. The country in his view is headed towards a supply crisis as early as 2030. With every coal or nuclear power plant shut down, supply security is crumbling as the federal Government continues with its disastrous Energiewende experiment.

Ms von der Leyen, alas, is not alone in her suicidal empathy, a condition which scholar Gad Saad defines as “excessive compassion that undermines societal cohesion, values and security when it lacks limits”. The objects of such “excessive compassion” could be polar bears that refuse to go extinct despite the repeated claims of climate alarmists or the economic migrants from the Middle East, Africa and elsewhere that falsely claim refugee status in Europe.

From Merkel’s Folly to Ursula’s Creed

In Plato’s Republic, the ideal state was ruled by philosopher kings — enlightened guardians who alone could perceive truth hidden from ordinary folk. Two millennia later, Europe’s fate lies not with kings but with philosopher queens — women of unimpeachable confidence, certain of their own virtue and contemptuous of dissent. Angela Merkel, Ursula von der Leyen, Annalena Baerbock and Kaja Kallas together form a sisterhood of hubris that has guided the continent into its gravest crisis since 1945. Their vision — green utopia, open borders, perpetual warmongering — has produced instead economic decay, social fragmentation and geopolitical irrelevance.

Germany’s – and by extension, Western Europe’s – long descent began under Merkel’s dual obsessions: shutting down nuclear and coal power in favour of windmills and solar panels and opening the borders to mass migration from the Middle East and North Africa. Germany’s Energiewende (energy transition) promised a cleaner, safer future but delivered only intermittent electricity, astronomical energy prices and deindustrialisation. When Merkel welcomed over a million migrants in 2015, the ‘doctors and engineers’ she promised as an antidote to Western Europe’s low fertility rates failed to materialise. What Germany and the EU at large received was an influx of fighting-age, crime-prone males and their dependants, few employable, many hostile to assimilation and all eager clients of an already overstretched welfare state.

The social consequences were predictable: crime surges and parallel societies in the streets of Cologne and Berlin, as in many other cities of Europe ranging from Malmo in Sweden to Southport in England. The economic consequences were equally dire. As industry fled to the United States and Asia in search of affordable energy, Germany — once Europe’s workshop — now faces stagnation. Yet Merkel’s reward was canonisation by Brussels and the pliant media as the moral conscience of Europe.

In stepped Ursula von der Leyen, whose earlier career as Germany’s defence minister was a masterclass in incompetence. By 2018, the Bundeswehr possessed barely a handful of operational tanks and aircraft. What mattered, however, was not readiness but rectitude: gender quotas and diversity seminars counted for more than functioning tanks and helicopters. Her promotion to the presidency of the European Commission — unelected, unaccountable and serenely self-assured — was little surprise. In Brussels, failure is the ultimate credential.

Von der Leyen has since elevated the Energiewende to the continental scale. In her ‘State of the European Union‘ address delivered last month, she doubled down on the “green transformation” even as Europe’s industries collapse under electricity costs triple those in the United States. Germany’s deindustrialisation accelerates; Britain (under both Conservative and Labour governments) tethers itself to the EU’s climate and immigration policies and shutters steelworks, refineries and offshore oil and gas operations. Yet von der Leyen’s Orwellian sermonising continues, invoking economic competitiveness and energy security while throttling the very fossil fuels sector that would deliver economic growth and affordable energy. In effect, Europe has become a civilisation offering to sacrifice its productive capacity at the altar of Gaia.

Von der Leyen’s climate fundamentalism is matched only by her zeal for moral policing. Hungary’s Viktor Orbán is denounced as an “ally of Russia” for daring to continue importing affordable gas supplies and to reject mass immigration in defence of Christian traditions of family and nation. Slovakia’s Robert Fico earns similar scorn. Their refusal to embrace unvetted mass migration and the latest ‘woke’ gender dogmas while not supporting the EU’s escalating war rhetoric marks them as heretics to the European creed.

In remarks to the EU parliament delivered on Wednesday, a clearly exasperated Mr. Orbán said:

So unity [in the EU] does not mean that I as a Hungarian President should “shut up” always. … It is not written anywhere. I am here to represent the national interest of Hungary. And on that basis, I would like to make deals, agreements, compromises, whatever with the other country leaders who represent their own national interests. So I don’t represent the globalist elite here or the European bureaucrats. … I am standing firmly on the basis of national interest. … Hungary first, I suppose for you Germany first. That’s right. So lets sit down and understand what is good for Germans, what is [good] for the Hungarians. You are big, we are smaller. Let’s make a deal on how to cooperate. That’s European politics. Not to say that ‘you should follow the Unity, shut up’. That’s what you are saying. It’s impossible.

The globalist intolerance for national interests extends beyond rhetoric. Brussels seeks ever-greater control over national politics, nullifying elections in Romania and meddling in Moldova under the pretext of ‘Russian interference’, providing remarkable parallels to the Russian collusion hoax operation run by Presidents Obama and Biden to undermine President Trump during his first term in the US. The Commission now flirts with rules granting government access to private internet communications, effectively outlawing encrypted speech — the “right to whisper”, as one commentator called it. The self-anointed defenders of democracy have become its most efficient undertakers.

Meanwhile, von der Leyen lectures Beijing about state subsidies even as the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy remains the world’s largest distortionary scheme adversely affecting farmers everywhere. She admonishes China for trading with Russia while her own member states import record volumes of Russian LNG via intermediaries. In Moscow, the hypocrisy provokes derision; in Beijing, it elicits contempt. As the Wall Street Journal noted some time ago, the EU is long used to “punching well below its weight” in global affairs.

Kaja Kallas – former prime minister of Estonia, newly anointed as the EU’s foreign-policy chief – brings ideological zeal to match Ursula’s sanctimony. She openly advocates the dismemberment of Russia, oblivious to the historical resonance of such fantasies. Annalena Baerbock, Germany’s former Green foreign minister and now President of the UN General Assembly, even declared that her commitment to Ukraine outweighed her duty to German voters — a statement revealing the mindset of Europe’s managerial class. Democratic accountability to constituents and their material needs is a nuisance when one possesses ‘noble intentions’.

Decline by Design

Europe’s malaise is not merely policy error; it is civilisational. For decades, the continent has elevated sentiment over reason, appearance over substance. The same impulse that replaces engineers with activists in energy ministries now promotes failed ministers to international office. Baerbock moves from Berlin to New York; Kallas becomes the face of EU diplomacy. Incompetence is no obstacle.

The economic cost of this virtue signalling is catastrophic. Europe’s electricity and gas prices remain among the highest in the world, crippling its manufacturing base. Automakers, fertiliser plants, aluminium smelters and chemical giants relocate to China, the Middle East and the United States where energy remains abundant and policy rational. Europe’s share of global industrial output shrinks yearly; its debt-laden welfare states consume ever more of the shrinking pie.

Source: UN and World Bank; projections from 2023 onwards based on Oxford Economics outlook

In geopolitics, the EU supported the US strategy of expanding NATO eastward following the collapse of the USSR and the reunification of Germany. This was against the advice of figures of America’s own analysts such as George Kennan — hailed as among the greatest US diplomats in the post-war era. As an astute Russia observer, he described NATO expansion as “the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-cold war era”.

John Mearsheimer – an international relations scholar of repute – observed in 2015 that Western policymakers led Ukraine “down the primrose path” to self-destruction. Now, as Ukraine heads to inexorable defeat, Europe faces the consequences of its own delusions. Yet the unhinged rhetoric in Brussels grows only shriller — contradictorily warning of imminent Russian invasions into East Europe and beyond while casting the Russian economy as simultaneously weak and about to collapse and President Putin facing regime change.

The male counterparts of Europe’s philosopher queens are no less absurd. Mark Rutte, NATO Secretary General, is famous for having referred to Donald Trump as “daddy” in an episode of cringing obsequiousness. Emmanuel Macron – who began his presidency comparing himself to the Roman king of gods Jupiter – now presides over a nation wracked by debt, riots, industrial unrest and a fourth prime minister in under two years. Friedrich Merz, the German Chancellor who is equally unpopular, issues belligerent warnings of war with Russia with a puny German army and a rapidly shrinking economy. Things are as bad if not worse across the English Channel as the UK’s Keir Starmer faces humiliation as the ‘least popular PM of all time’ since records began; the same ignominy holds for the country’s Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves. The European stage resembles an operetta – all pomp, no power.

Hubris, however, always meets its nemesis in reality. The laws of physics do not entertain Europe’s green fantasies. Wind and solar cannot power a continent; hydrogen remains an expensive chimera; carbon-capture projects collapse one after another. There are increasing signs of Brussels retreating on several fronts in its quest for green utopia.

It was only just over two weeks ago that von der Leyen boasted at the Global Renewables Summit in New York about the EU’s green agenda: “The momentum in Europe is real… with our Clean Industrial Deal we are helping industries innovate and adapt.” But last week, the EU’s Net Zero agenda suffered a major blow when the centre-Right political parties in the European Parliament agreed to roll back a range of green mandates and regulations on businesses.

According to Politico, there is an “emerging rightward rupture that is reshaping European policymaking”. The European People’s Party lead negotiator on climate issues declared that “It is very clear for all the political groups that the majorities have changed in the Parliament, and all the political groups have to adapt to the new reality”. The EU will now pare back sustainability reporting and supply chain due diligence obligations for businesses after pressure from industry and foreign investors. As Bloomberg reported, lawmakers voted to “drastically curtail” ESG directives once trumpeted as non-negotiable.

As the ideological façade cracks in Germany, the AfD surges in the polls despite Government attempts to outlaw it. In France, Marine Le Pen has been disqualified to hold office, yet her party gains ground. In Britain, the Reform Party has been surging in popularity and threatens the duopoly of Labour and the Conservatives. Across Europe, the populist Right articulates what the Establishment will not: that policy choices over energy security, mass immigration and escalating war efforts are bankrupting the continent both morally and financially.

Europe’s decline is not inevitable, but it is self-inflicted. A civilisation that once charted the seas, mapped the heavens and electrified the world now cannot keep its lights on without imported gas. It lectures Africa on solar panels while burning imported American wood pellets in place of coal. It decries nationalism while erecting bureaucratic fortresses devoted to globalism in Brussels.

Behind the rhetoric of progress lies an ancient impulse — the search for moral purity through sacrifice. The Aztecs tore out human hearts to appease the sun; modern Europe sacrifices its industries, borders and freedoms to sustain the illusion of environmental virtue. The climate cult functions as an ‘oligarchic strategy‘ — a mechanism through which elites amass power under the guise of planetary salvation. The victims are the working and middle classes who pay Europe’s highest energy bills and the future generations who inherit spiralling debts.

Von der Leyen recently urged multilateral development banks to focus on climate change rather than poverty despite US opposition — a statement that perfectly encapsulates the inversion of priorities. For Europe’s elites, the problem with the poor is not lack of opportunity but insufficient decarbonisation. Yet as empirical evidence shows, economic growth — not emissions cuts — remains the most reliable path to environmental improvement and human welfare.

The Coming Reckoning

The geopolitical humiliation of Europe is already manifest. The continent once balanced the world’s powers; it is now a mere appendage of American strategy. Its energy policy is dictated by Washington’s sanctions; its foreign policy by NATO’s dictates. Even as the BRICS bloc expands, embracing Gulf monarchies and Asian economic giants, Western Europe clings to a worldview in which moral posturing substitutes for realpolitik.

As President Trump ends US financing of the Ukraine war, Brussels faces an existential test. Without American financial support, the façade of unity will crumble. Energy shortages, fiscal crises and social unrest will expose the fragility of Europe’s post-Christian, post-industrial experiment.

Plato’s philosopher kings were to rule by reason; Europe’s philosopher queens rule by emotion. They conflate compassion with competence, signalling with substance. The result is a polity unfit for purpose — moralistic, militarily impotent, economically stagnant and socially fractured. One hopes that the physics and economics of energy, the arithmetic of national debt and the instincts of ordinary people will, in time, reassert themselves. If that were so, Europe may rediscover the virtues it once taught the world in its Age of Enlightenment.

A version of this article was first published in The Daily Sceptic (https://dailysceptic.org/2025/10/19/europes-terminal-decline-the-philosopher-queens-and-their-ruinous-rule/)

Dr Tilak K. Doshi is the Daily Sceptic‘s Energy Editor. He is an economist, a member of the CO2 Coalition and a former contributor to Forbes. Follow him on Substack and X.

4.7 29 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

109 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
strativarius
October 21, 2025 6:15 am

Since Labour came back to power we have been moving incrementally, bit by bit – against the spirit and meaning of the referendum result – closer to the EU across the board. And at whatever it costs as far as they are concerned, too.

As the ideological facade cracks in Germany, the AfD surges in the polls despite Government attempts to outlaw it. 

You could say…

As the ideological façade cracks in the UK, Reform UK surges in the polls despite Government attempts to brand them as racists and the enemy.

And that in the wake of the Charlie Kirk assassination followed by a covert reduction in Nigel Farage’s security provision.

Hoping? I certainly wouldn’t put it past them.

GeorgeInSanDiego
Reply to  strativarius
October 21, 2025 9:39 am

“If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.”

October 21, 2025 6:51 am

The problem for much of Europe is they have a lot of delusional leaders who don’t really understand the world they are living in.

I don’t think it is inevitable that Ukraine will lose the war.

NATO conventional forces could devastate the Russian military, if it came to that.

The Europeans have certainly caused themselves huge amounts of trouble with their Net Zero obsession and their unchecked immigration policies.

Delusional people do delusional things, and are voted into office by delusional voters.

Can Europe wake up fast enough to fix all this? Not with current “leadership”.

Imitating Trump would go a long way towards solving Europe’s problems. Trump sees the Big Picture. Europe should listen to Trump. He’s about the only sane voice around.

strativarius
Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 21, 2025 7:00 am

I don’t think it is inevitable that Ukraine will lose the war.

Is that based on the assumption of an unending supply of aid and armaments to keep what is effectively a war of attrition going? Ukraine has had over 300 billion Euros and counting, thus far. The UK economy is on life support and the government’s solution to that problem is the taxation defibrillator. Some very nasty shocks.

To me it was clear that the Biden administration had hoped harsh sanctions would do a lot of the heavy lifting, only they didn’t. In terms of manpower and resources I fail to see how Russia can lose what it has taken thus far. Few ever mention the post Soviet ethnic Russian problem. But then back in the day nobody saw the fall of the USSR coming.

https://soviethistory.msu.edu/1954-2/the-gift-of-crimea/the-gift-of-crimea-texts/transfer-of-crimea/

Reply to  strativarius
October 21, 2025 7:05 am

What you can or cannot see is incidental to the evolving situation in Russia.
Watch, and see.

strativarius
Reply to  Leo Smith
October 21, 2025 7:09 am

Well, Leo…

What you can or cannot see is incidental to the evolving situation in Russia.
Watch, and see.

Could you possibly be a little more vague?

Reply to  strativarius
October 21, 2025 10:20 am

Maybe Leo is talking about the unrest that seems to be stirring in various Russian areas. It seems some territories send more troops to the war front but the territories get no benefits from the effort, while other areas close to Moscow get benefits without having to supply as many troops. This breeds resentment and unrest.

Reply to  Leo Smith
October 21, 2025 8:04 am

One thing we’ll soon see is Ukraine destroying the Kerst bridge by slamming it with numerous flamingo missiles. That’s why they’re busy now destroying Russia’s anti air systems in Crimea. As Zelensky said years ago- this war is all about Crimea- where it started and where it will end.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 21, 2025 10:25 am

I saw a report where the Ukrainians used drones to destroy a bridge.

They sent in a number of drones which detonated against the concrete supports of the bridge, and this first attack blew the concrete away from the connecting metal infrastructure underneath, and then the next wave of drones hit the exposed metal supports and brought down the bridge.

The Ukrainians are very creative when it comes to their survival.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 21, 2025 4:09 pm

See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04ygR_H0sOA for video of the scale of drone production on both sides

Reply to  Leo Smith
October 21, 2025 3:33 pm

This article is mostly miseable rubbish and this utter BS doesn’t help…

“What Germany and the EU at large received was an influx of fighting-age, crime-prone males and their dependants, few employable, many hostile to assimilation”

FYI most of those foreigners are now working hard in Germany well assimilated and speaking German, just like the so called equally criminal Russian German minority that escaped from the USSR when it went down the toilet.

And YES Russia is going down the toilet yet again and YES it’s not fixable.

Btw some of us are admirers of Kallas and her Estonian way of telling it like it is!

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  pigs_in_space
October 22, 2025 7:01 am

I do not agree with what you have said, but I respect your right to say it.

Except the opening statement. Mature, adult conversation and debate is what is most critically needed in these time.

Scissor
Reply to  strativarius
October 21, 2025 7:20 am

Yes, and the average citizen on either side is not benefiting from all of the death and destruction. Russia is slowly grinding and rolling over new territory but is paying the higher cost in lives lost. All the corruption and money laundering is continuing unabated. Tears will continue to be shed.

War is certainly a racket full of insanity.

strativarius
Reply to  Scissor
October 21, 2025 7:24 am

Russians view the value of life differently to the west. Zhukov still has influence. Health and safety are a good example.

Reply to  strativarius
October 21, 2025 8:06 am

For centuries, Russia has considered itself “the third Rome”. It had eyes on Istanbul when the Ottoman Empire collapsed.

strativarius
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 21, 2025 8:14 am

Ankara is more concerned about the new Caliphate. And it coincidentally falls in line with Trump’s 20 point plan and that new economic area.

But you won’t hear about any of it in the msm, Why would you?

Reply to  strativarius
October 21, 2025 8:16 am

The MSM is mostly for people with an IQ of well under 100. 🙂

strativarius
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 21, 2025 8:20 am

And yet you know nothing of what’s going on. Smile about that.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 22, 2025 7:02 am

Um, more like 80. 🙂

The advocacy journalists are those with IQs under 100.

George Thompson
Reply to  Scissor
October 21, 2025 10:04 am
And $$$$ for the rich...including the Biden crime family
Reply to  strativarius
October 21, 2025 8:03 am

When Putin either dies or is overthrown- Russian troops will withdraw from Ukraine. It’s all about Putin who thinks he’s another Peter the Great. Anyone supporting Russia fails to recall what it was like when the Soviet Union was powerful.

strativarius
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 21, 2025 8:42 am

And Crimea?

Better start smiling, Joseph.

George Thompson
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 21, 2025 10:05 am

Unless….the crystal ball is foggy about the future here.

Reply to  strativarius
October 21, 2025 10:10 am

“Is that based on the assumption of an unending supply of aid and armaments to keep what is effectively a war of attrition going?”

I don’t think there is any guarantee that Putin can keep doing what he is doing. Ukraine has virtually fought him to a standstill and he is losing significant numbers of troops. I saw one report that said he lost 27,000 troops over the last month.

And Ukrainians seem to be getting very good at drone warfare and are keeping the Russians at bay.

So Putin is losing thousands of troops per week, his economy is bad and going to get much worse (India has agreed to stop buying Putin’s oil), and the Russian people and other Russian leaders are getting very restless and are not happy with what Putin has brought to them.

I think things look worse for Putin than they do for Ukraine. And that is before Western nations give Ukraine longer range weapons.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 21, 2025 11:41 am

Tom, maybe you can refresh my memory – when did Zelensky (or any other Ukrainian official, for that matter) raise any objections in our media pursuant to the Left’s idiotic attempt to impeach Trump over his inquiry into the Biden family’s dealings in Ukraine?

Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 21, 2025 6:13 pm

Lord knows where you get this nonsense from. I can only imagine from the mainstream media that’s fed you nonsense about our climate for decades now.

Even Ukrainian mappers documenting the conflict inch by inch since 2022 are lamenting the inevitable fall of Pokrovsk, the most significant and heavily defended logistics hub in Ukraine, within weeks, if not days. Konstantinovka, Kupyansk, Oleksiivka and others are facing similar fates.

The only challenges Putin faces is from the hardliners in his cabinet, who want him to go harder and faster. If Putin ever was forced out (unlikely as he was re-elected by 85% of the country) he would be replaced with one of those hardliners and things would get much worse for Ukraine.

India has refused all attempts to force it to stop buying Russian oil. Why should it not buy it? India has no beef with Russia, in fact it, along with Russia, is one of the founding members of BRICS, and it’s not beholden to America or the EU in any way.

Russia’s economy is booming, in part thanks to production for the Ukraine war, but more importantly, it has directed all its oil, timber, grain and many other commodities to the global south. It is constructing a new oil pipeline to China via Mongolia (from memory) which eliminates the need or desire to re-establish the Nordstream pipeline the west so unwisely destroyed. Western Europe has now lost any chance to get cheap, abundant, oil and gas from Russia forever.

Ukraine isn’t losing the war, it lost it in 2023. Russia doesn’t want land, it offered to hand back all the territory it seized in 2022 in a draft peace agreement with Ukraine in April 2022 in Istanbul. That was the peace deal Boris Johnson, the then PM of the UK, scuppered when he ordered Zelenskyy to tear up the agreement and fight with all the wonder weapons the west has now exhausted.

Where is the western propaganda about Javelin missiles, Chieftain, Abrams and Leopard tanks, Patriot missile batteries America was scouring NATO nations for? How about the handful of ageing F16’s given to Ukraine? Do we hear anything about stunning victories from any of them?

Russia was only ever interested in demilitarising Ukraine, in particular, ridding the country of the Banderites, descendants of Germany’s Waffen SS in WW2. Their tactics have followed almost identical tactics from when they took Mariupol, Bakhmut, Avdiivka etc. Partially surround a city and invite in as many Ukrainian assets as can be sent, then create a cauldron to kill, or force as many to surrender, as they can.

Trump has now refused to provide Zelenskyy with Tomahawk missiles. Little wonder as Russia is skilled at killing the newer, more powerful and more sophisticated British Storm Shadow, French Scalp and German Taurus missiles. Tomahawk’s would be sitting ducks.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but Ukraine is on life support.

Reply to  HotScot
October 21, 2025 8:16 pm

…. and you didn’t even bring Oreshniks into the discussion. The losing team doesn’t want the plebs to know about those.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 22, 2025 6:37 am

Setting the Stage for the Russian-Ukraine Conflict
According to Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland (who has Ukrainian parents), the US spent $5 billion from 1990 to 2014, to “turn Ukraine”.
.
US/UK neocons set the stage for the Russian-Ukrainian conflict with a US-financed Maidan color revolution/Coup d’Etat in Kiev in 2014. 
.
The illegal Coup d’Etat violently ousted a Democratically elected President, and caused 116 dead, plus 184 with gunshot wounds, plus 760 with bodily injury, all to take over Ukraine and use it as a proxy to “weaken, wreck, divide and then loot Russian resources, before China gets to them”.
.
Then, for eight years, 2014 to 2022,, Ukraine Armed Forces harassed the ethnic Russians in the Donbas area of East Ukraine with NATO-supplied training, mercenaries, missiles and artillery, and killed at least 14,000 ethnic Russians and seriously wounded many more, and did major property damage, all not reported in the Western media.
.
Those Russians had lived there for at least 300 years during the Czarist Russian Empire and the Soviet Union. 
.
Finally, after many Russian warnings, ignored by the West, because “Ukraine has the right to defend itself from invaders”, Russia had enough. In February 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine to stop the Donbas massacre. The Euro Russia haters jumped on the bandwagon.
.
NOTE: For “Joe and Hunter Biden, Inc,” the war was a nice smokescreen to cover his long-running grifting/grafting operations in Ukraine, Rumania, Kazakhstan, etc. 

Reply to  wilpost
October 22, 2025 7:04 am

Ukrainian, a War-Mongering Dependency of the West
Zelensky was told to reject Minsk 1 and 2 (a real good deal for Ukraine)
Zelensky was told to reject the already-initialed Istanbul 1 Agreement in April 2022 (also a real good deal for Ukraine)
.
Ukraine and especially the West (for face-saving reasons), desperately need a ceasefire, because the Ukraine armed forces face total destruction in a few months. 
Each day, Ukraine is losing about 1500 killed, missing and seriously wounded, due to the war; a demographic disaster.
.
The West does not give a damn about the killing of the Slav Russians and Slav Ukrainians, otherwise it would have stopped Kiev’s 8-y genocide of ethnic Russians in East Ukraine from 2014 to 2022.
After a few more years of fighting, the US/EU/UK aims to:
.
1) Sell more goods and services to the Ukraine market 
2) Have low-cost access to Ukraine mineral resources; oil, gas, rare earths, etc. 
3) Have low-cost access to Ukraine fertile lands; “breadbasket of Europe”, 
4) Have low-cost strategic access to the oil and gas of the Black Sea and Caspian Sea
5) Turn Crimea into: a) a major NATO base, b) cruise ship destination, c) a retirement/tourist Mecca, a la Monaco.
.
The US/EU/UK has been aiming to weaken Russia and take over its resources, as it almost succeeded from 1991 to 2000. Those resources, and the Northern Sea Passage, are at least 25 times more valuable than Ukraine’s resources. 

D Sandberg
Reply to  strativarius
October 22, 2025 12:37 am

Security & Naval Access:

Crimea provides Russia with warm-water port access to the Mediterranean via the Black Sea.

The land corridor through Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia regions ensures uninterrupted logistical and military access to Crimea. Russia had this access since 1783 when Cathrine the Great secured it from the Ottoman Empire. Ukraine usurped this access in 1992 immediately after the USSR collapsed in December 1991..
.
The 2022 invasion aimed, in part, to re-secure this corridor permanently.

 Historical trauma, especially from WWII and earlier Western invasions, deeply informs Russia’s security.  The Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR issued a decree transferring administrative control of Crimea to the Ukrainian SSR.

The transfer was framed as a gesture efficiency, given Crimea’s of “friendship” and economicgeographic proximity to Ukraine.

Importantly, this was not a transfer of sovereignty, because both republics were part of the USSR, and sovereignty resided in Moscow, not in the individual republics.

Russia’s strategic interest in Crimea is valid and widely acknowledged.  Russia had millions of their citizens murdered by an invasion from the West in the very recent <100 years. Blaming Russia for their legitimate security concerns is on the wrong side of historical events.

Ukraine needs to end martial law, amend the constitutional prohibition on land transfer for about 1/10th of their land mass along the Ukraine/Russia border or we may see a serious escalation in armed conflict shortly after October 2025.

  • Ukraine’s constitutional prohibition on territorial concessions is a major barrier to negotiated peace.
Reply to  D Sandberg
October 22, 2025 2:32 am

It’s also interesting that whilst the deal over Crimea was done behind the Iron Curtain, with no international permissions sought, suddenly it’s the international community’s problem.

Reply to  D Sandberg
October 22, 2025 5:56 am

The people in Crimea and the four East Ukraine provinces voted by over 90% to rejoin Russia.
The Russia Duma approved their rejoin request.
No one was forced.
Nothing was annexed.
All was done according to UN rules, which upholds the self-determination of people.

The UN and Western countries were OK with it when Muslim Kosovo declared independence, after it had been part of Serbia for about 1000 years.

The Kosovo Muslims are impoverished ethnic Albanians who infiltrated Kosovo since 1945, and then multiplied like rabbits, displacing Serbs, who had lived there for 1000 years.

Reply to  wilpost
October 22, 2025 6:21 am

Ukraine had a population of over 52 million in 1990, a year before the end of the Soviet Union. In 2025, Kiev can claim political control over a population of about 20 million, of which 10.6 million are old retirees on a meager government pension. Each day, Ukraine is losing about 1500 dead, missing, and seriously wounded, due to the war. A demographic calamity

Reply to  wilpost
October 22, 2025 6:25 am

Neocons, etc., Want to Continue the Profitable Fight
The US does not need Ukraine to be anybody’s problem, despite the insane yearnings of the various neocons, the weapons manufacturers, and the reckless globalists of the EU, who are eager to make Ukraine everyone’s problem.

Hence, Trump’s dilemma: how to dissociate from this losing proposition and come out looking like a winner, saving Europe from becoming a smoldering ashtray, staunching the flow of US taxpayers’ money and US-made weapons into this black hole.

William Howard
Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 21, 2025 7:56 am

can’t wait to see all the egg on the faces of these philosophers when they find out what all readers of WUWT know – that CO2 had no impact whatsoever on the climate and they have wasted trillions of dollars and ruined their economies and countries solving a nonexistent problem

Reply to  William Howard
October 21, 2025 10:47 am

They all know that already. They are in on the scam of the Century.

Reply to  Graemethecat
October 22, 2025 6:03 am

Finally, we have someone in the White House who knows how to get “the word” out. CO2 is an essential, life giving gas that produces green plants.

CO2 IS AN ABSOLUTELY VITAL FOR GROWING FLORA AND FAUNA; NET ZERO IS A SUICIDE PACT
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/co2-is-an-absolutely-vital-gas-ingredient-for-growing-flora-and
.
The IPCC, etc., has dubbed CO2 as having magical global warming power, based on its own “science”
The IPCC, etc., claims, CO2 acts as Climate Control Knob, that eventually will cause runaway Climate Change, if we continue using fossil fuels.
The IPCC, etc., denies the Little Ice Age, uses fraudulent computer temperature projections.
.
Governments proclaimed: Go Wind and Solar, Go ENERGIEWENDE, go Net zero by 2050, etc., and provided oodles of subsidies, and rules and regulations, and mandates, and prohibitions to make it happen.
.
Net-zero by 2050 to-reduce CO2 is a super-expensive suicide pact, to: 

1) increase command/control by governments, and 
2) enable the moneyed elites to become more powerful and richer, at the expense of all others, by using the foghorn of the government-subsidized/controlled Corporate Media to spread scare-mongering slogans and brainwash people, already for at least 40 years; extremely biased CNN, MSNBC, NPR, PBS, NBC ABC, CBS come to mind.
.
CO2, just 0.042% in the atmosphere, is a weak absorber of a small fraction of the absorbable, low-energy IR photons.
CO2 has near-zero influence on world surface temperatures.
CO2 is a life-giving molecule. Greater CO2 ppm in atmosphere is an absolutely essential ingredient for: 
1) increased green flora, which increases fauna all over the world, and 
2) increased crop yields to better feed 8 billion people.

Reply to  William Howard
October 21, 2025 3:50 pm

Actually they wasted it NOT solving the nonexistent “problem.” Despite the trillions squandered, fossil fuel use AND”emissions” of the Satanic Gas continue to INCREASE.

Not that it has any measurable effect on the Earth’s climate.

Reply to  AGW is Not Science
October 21, 2025 8:20 pm

It has had a measurable effect on their bank balances and that’s all they care about. The category of people who can’t get real jobs extends all the way up to the top.

Biden, Starmer, Macron – and if they can stop me saying it, it will prove that it’s not true. In your dreams ….bags.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 21, 2025 8:01 am

“I don’t think it is inevitable that Ukraine will lose the war.”

You’re right. Hardly anyone that really pays attention to that war would believe such a foolish statement that Ukraine might lose.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 21, 2025 6:14 pm

You’re not paying enough attention.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 22, 2025 7:09 am

Either side can lose. It is war. Who knows what impactful factor will occur in the future that will tip the balance.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
October 22, 2025 7:29 am

Tomahawk missiles.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 22, 2025 8:52 am

Some British missiles have been used to attack refineries in Russia. Putin let it be known that some Russian missiles might make their way to Britain with 12 minutes warning. Assuming this is a calculated sabre-rattling would be a mistake.

Reply to  DMacKenzie
October 22, 2025 8:56 am

It is merely sabre-rattling. Putin isn’t going to start WWIII because he wants to live- and, ironically, may of the children of the Russian oligarchs live in nice European locations, especially London. Since the first weapons were offered to Ukraine, Russia propagandists have been threatening WWIII. Russia must be stopped from this invasion of Ukraine- and thrown out- teach it a lesson- there will not be a USSR V2.0. I think the West learned the lesson that after Germany lost in WWI it tried a comeback- when it could have been prevented by standing up to it. The West could say to Putin- “if you stop hitting Ukraine with missiles then the West will not give any long range missiles to Ukraine”. Seems like a deal! The Deal Maker Trump should have thought of that. 🙂

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 22, 2025 12:23 pm

We have heard too many proclamations of “game changer.”
The F-16s? The Abrams tanks?

Trump currently is hedging on Tomahawks.
There is a limited supply of those. Once gone, the resupply will be as reliable as electricity from SV during the night.

I am not taking a position on this. Warfare is evolving hourly/daily in that conflict.

We do not know if Russia air defense can take out a wave of Tomahawks. Maybe, maybe not.

Maybe an asteroid will take out Moscow?

Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 21, 2025 9:48 am

“NATO conventional forces could devastate the Russian military, if it came to that.”

It’s the last 5 words of that sentence that are problematic Tom. How many body bags arriving home in the UK and France etc., would it take for the respective governments to collapse completely. It’s not going to happen.

I just read (again) “The Gardener” by Rudyard Kipling. That is one sobering short story.

EDIT: PS I do agree with the rest of your post.

Reply to  philincalifornia
October 21, 2025 10:43 am

I think NATO weaponry would end a conventional war with Russia quickly and the body bags would not pile up so high.

Russia would have man power after such a NATO attack, but they wouldn’t have any equipment to fight with because NATO would have destroyed it all in the initial attack.

It reminds me of when the “Nervous Nellies” were afraid of an attack from the Mad Mullahs of Iran, but the truth of the matter was that the Arab nations in the region had more than enough firepower to neutralize Iran’s military, and we got a real life demonstration of this “Paper Tiger Iran” when Israel decided to attack Iran directly and promptly knocked it out to the point that Israeli aircraft could fly anywhere they wanted to over Iran.

If you can’t prevent your enemy from flying over the top of you, then you are going to lose the war.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 21, 2025 2:10 pm

Well, unlike Zelenskyy, I don’t profess to be a brilliant military strategist, so I’ll tell you where you are getting it wrong by using the big picture facts. First, currently and that’s an important word – currently – you need to modify your post to change NATO to NATO minus the USA. We’re out – fact. Second, Putin has said repeatedly that any attack by NATO (now NATO minus the USA) will be an attack by the individual countries. I realize that the leaders of the NATO minus the USA countries are a bunch of fkn idiots, but I don’t expect them to be calling his bluff any time soon. Third, Russia is not Iran, and lastly, as Putin has said, missiles will not change the course of the ground war (which you can see on Military Summary on YouTube on a daily basis, at the field by field level). So, unless Captain Mainwaring Starmer and his Dad’s Army of BBC people willing to die for the elitist {….bag} are prepared to be the boots on the ground and the occupants of the body bags, I think it’s safe to say that NATO minus the USA looks like the clown show that they are from the Russian military perspective.

Also, don’t forget that he has also been steadfast in stating that he will not have NATO on his doorstep. I have no reason, from what’s happening, to disbelieve him.

Reply to  philincalifornia
October 21, 2025 6:26 pm

Almost completely correct, other than NATO is now ‘buying’ arms from America to ‘sell’ to Ukraine.

That is, what arms America can now spare, as it’s scratching around for weaponry itself.

Like Britain and France centuries ago, Biden made the mistake of thinking Ukraine, with the support of the collective west, could sweep across Ukraine and march into Russia unopposed.

A costly blunder as it will now cost Europe it’s most prized possession, the European Union. When Ukraine falls, so does the EU.

MarkW
Reply to  philincalifornia
October 21, 2025 7:17 pm

Hes got NATO on his doorstep and has had it there since Poland joined NATO.
Thanks to his saber rattling Finland and most of the Baltic countries have also joined NATO.

Claims that he had to attack in order to keep NATO from his border has never been more than propaganda.

Reply to  MarkW
October 21, 2025 8:28 pm

I don’t know how “he had to attack in order to keep NATO from his border” was propaganda. He said it, then he did it. He had tanks lined up on the border from 2014 to 2022. He was saying don’t do it, but the warmongers in Washington, including the grifters, the senile and the cocaine addicts didn’t listen …. and here we are now.

Reply to  MarkW
October 22, 2025 2:22 am

Latvia, Lithuania and Belarus are between Poland and Russia. The border of Ukraine and Russia is within a 4 minute flight time of a missile to Moscow.

Only 2 nations have joined NATO since the conflict began, Finland and Sweden. Finland is a threat to no one, and Sweden doesn’t share a border with Russia.

If Ukraine joining NATO is propaganda, why does Zelenskyy keep demanding NATO membership?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 22, 2025 7:16 am

Your assumption that NATO would have destroyed all of the Russian military equipment in the initial attack is an assumption.

It really depends on timing and other circumstances what the outcome of the initial attack becomes. I assume (not assumption) your statement is based on Russia initiating war. It Russia initiates they will have the first step advantage and NATO will be forced to react. It also depends on the state of military readiness of the NATO forces. The time needed for US forces to deploy will give Russia another initial advantage of first step.

I do not see a quick resolution. Many thought the Ukraine “special military operation” would last a week. And here we are.

I respectfully disagree with your opinions on many points. An analysis of alternatives will give better insights into the possibilities and probabilities, which unfortunately we cannot do due to a gross lack of military intelligence.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
October 22, 2025 12:24 pm

Typo: (note assumption)

Reply to  Tom Abbott
October 22, 2025 5:29 am

Russia would reduce Europe to ashes in just a few hours, if NATO were to invade Russia.
The US would not respond, because both Russia and the US would be reduced to ashes, which would leave China and India as the sole survivors.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  wilpost
October 22, 2025 12:25 pm

I disagree. Nothing is certain.

bobclose
October 21, 2025 7:03 am

Thanks for this article, it is a brilliant summary of Europe’s current state of self-induced decline towards global irrelevance, brought on by hubris, socialist sentiment and ignorance of scientific and engineering reality. The EU’s delusional climate and energy policies have predictably caused it’s industrial and economic decline, despite all its virtue signaling to the contrary, it’s very sad really!

October 21, 2025 7:03 am

Anyone who thinks Ukraine is losing the war isn’t someone whose other ‘facts’ are worth paying attention to.

Reply to  Leo Smith
October 21, 2025 7:32 am

There’s a number of reasons to mistrust this tilak doshi guy, which I won’t enumerate, as they’re obvious to anyone paying attention.

I will instead point out that articles like his are explicit demoralisation propaganda. They assume that failure and collapse is inevitable and are designed to discourage any form of resistance. The people who write them do not want us to fight back; they want us to believe that there is no hope, so that we will continue to consume their doomerism uncritically.

Reply to  Archer
October 21, 2025 2:14 pm

This is primarily a “climate” website, so ad hominems go over like a lead balloon here. If you have something(s) to say about what’s written, say them.

strativarius
Reply to  Leo Smith
October 21, 2025 7:42 am

You have obviously picked a side. The only skin I have in it is the aid we send. And we are tired of it.

You appear to be highly selective about ‘your’ facts. There isn’t much one can do about that.

Reply to  strativarius
October 21, 2025 8:11 am

Pay now or pay later with a revived Soviet Union.

strativarius
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 21, 2025 8:17 am

Don’t be daft.

You are funny. Is it an act?

MarkW
Reply to  strativarius
October 21, 2025 9:16 am

Putin has been wanting to recreate the Soviet Union since his first days in office.

Reply to  MarkW
October 21, 2025 6:34 pm

Why would you imagine that? He was a child of the Cold War and watched Russia shrug off the misery of the period for the prosperity it enjoys now.

How could Russia possibly seize all the nations between it and the Brandenburg Gate?

Bearing in mind that Eastern European nations the USSR occupied since WW2 were handed to it by the allies. It didn’t need to, nor could it have fought for them.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  HotScot
October 22, 2025 12:27 pm
  1. Putin has said so.
  2. It does not have to be in a single battler or attack or war.
  3. Putin was a high level KGB.
George Thompson
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 21, 2025 10:09 am

We’re gonna pay regardless-the dice are cast; we just can’t see them.

SxyxS
Reply to  Leo Smith
October 21, 2025 8:02 am

I’m 100% sure that Ukraine is totally losing the war.

1) I knew it from day 1, as Ukraine taking on Russia is like Mexico taking on USA.
Obvious for everyone who is not a total moron.

2) Ukraine is totally corrupt, and while Russia has experienced a continues economic growth and kicked out the magnificent 7 oligarchs(that’s how they called themselves )Ukraine has been continuesly raped by its oligarchs during the same period.
Combined with Russias massive natural ressources and the fact that almost all Ukrainian ressources are in the occupied east, Ukraine is at a total disadvantage.

3) Russias losses are so low that even BBC Russia in collaboration with pro western Mediazona could not come up with more than 57000 victims as of Jan 25.
Even after climate style adjustments – they simply doubled the numbers after the use of new Algorithms their numbers are a fraction of Ukraines.
Former Trump advisor Col. MacGregor claims that Russian weekly losses are now on average in the single digits

4) Russia produces the same weapons as the west with 80-90% less costs.
They have 3* higher population and 10* higher GDP than Ukraine..

5) Someone who was lied to about the Iraq Wars,the Lybia War,the Syria WarI,Vietnam War etc. etc. must be a special piece of shit to believe in anything official Ukraine.
Especially when they do not believe the official narrative about the climate but still believe in war propaganda that uses the same inflammatory,manipulative strategies as those wars.

Have a nice day sir.

MarkW
Reply to  SxyxS
October 21, 2025 9:17 am

In your view, there are no oligarchs or corruption in Russia?
Is your hatred of western capitalists that complete?

Reply to  MarkW
October 21, 2025 11:17 am

I think your ‘argument’ needs work. There are a lot of people in the West who hate ‘capitalism’, many of whom now hate Russia for allowing the USSR to implode.

MarkW
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
October 21, 2025 1:59 pm

Sxyx has been quite consistent in blaming everything bad that has happened in the past 150 years or so on New York bankers.

Reply to  Frank from NoVA
October 21, 2025 2:20 pm

I think it also needs work because it’s a total change of subject. It’s a fkn war. Each country does what it can to win and SxyxS’s comment already included the oligarch situation (as far as we can see it).

Reply to  MarkW
October 22, 2025 9:25 am

There are about 25 oligarchs in Russia, but in 2000, a young-looking Putin, just elected President, forced them to sign a statement, saying they could keep their wealth, but they must follow government orders. No more “free-lancing”.

One of very richest in the meeting had not signed the statement.
Putin noticed his missing name, called him to his desk and made him sign the statement in front of all the others.

Reply to  Leo Smith
October 21, 2025 8:10 am

I agree. There are dozens of YouTube channels dedicated to analyzing the war. Anyone only reading the mainstream media has no clue about the war. Many of the producers of those channels are on site- in Ukraine and they watch Russia’s media so they see both sides- and I don’t mean Russia’s propaganda channels but its social media where the Russia troops often say just how bad it is for them. The Western media has no clue.

MarkW
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 21, 2025 9:18 am

The Western media is, for the most part, still mourning the loss of the Soviet Union and would love to see international communism restored.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MarkW
October 22, 2025 7:23 am

Only so we would have a moral enemy to oppose.

Rod Evans
October 21, 2025 7:44 am

What a brilliant overview, many thanks It is at least reassuring to know I am not the only one critical of the globalists anti energy policy and its fixation on CO2.
The next election can not come soon enough. We have got to get these one world imbeciles out of office.

October 21, 2025 7:53 am

“Now, as Ukraine heads to inexorable defeat…”

bullshit!

strativarius
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 21, 2025 7:58 am

And if all the western aid stopped tomorrow… it wouldn’t be anything of the sort. It would be the reality.

Reply to  strativarius
October 21, 2025 8:14 am

And just what does that prove, other than a big bully can dominate a weaker nation if it gets no help. Good thing the USA helped the UK in the both world wars or you’d only speak German today.

strativarius
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 21, 2025 8:18 am

And if all the western aid stopped tomorrow… it wouldn’t be anything of the sort. It would be the reality.

And just what does that prove”

That you are wrong QED

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 22, 2025 2:46 am

The USSR and China helped the UK and the USA during WW2.

WW2 casualties:

China (Allies) – 20 million. Russia (Allies) – 13.9 million.

UK (Allies) – 450,000. America (Allies) – 420,000.

Reply to  HotScot
October 22, 2025 9:33 am

URLs please

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
October 22, 2025 9:31 am

Hitler would not have tolerated any float-ins, walk-ins, fly-ins in the former UK.
They likely would be exported to a concentration camp for re-education through hard labor; arbeit macht frei.

KevinM
October 21, 2025 8:35 am

“As President Trump ends US financing of the Ukraine war”
Made my morning nicer.
Ultimately whether to shoot each other is a personal choice for the people with the guns, but I’m happy not to be raising kids that pay interest on the cost of the bullets.

October 21, 2025 9:15 am

The bits about Merkel and von der Leyen pathological empathy towards mass immigration and wind and solar power are well known.

The rest is armchair geopolitical strategy bombast from someone who knows less-the-zero about the history of Europe, Putin’s motivation, and why Ukraine is fighting for it’s existence.



gyan1
Reply to  Michael Standfast
October 21, 2025 11:25 am

“The rest is armchair geopolitical strategy bombast from someone who knows less-the-zero about the history of Europe, Putin’s motivation, and why Ukraine is fighting for it’s existence.”

Russia is an obstacle for globalists desire for one world government. That is why they are demonized as an enemy. War mongers knew that the Medvedev Doctrine was Russia’s official foreign policy and that if they started killing Russian speakers in eastern Ukraine they could profit from the invasion which would certainly happen to protect those people. The coup that brought Zelenskyy to power was a setup corrupt Biden supported for the benefit of weapons manufacturers.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  gyan1
October 22, 2025 7:27 am

The One World Order is a project of the Muslim Brotherhood.
I used to believe it China and/or Russia.
I am entitled to my beliefs, even if they prove wrong.
If they prove wrong, I will admit I was wrong and pursue something else.

Reply to  gyan1
October 22, 2025 8:22 am

Thank you for stepping up and proving my point.

The bit about Eastern Ukraine is pure standard Russian agitprop a continuation of the method of Soviet-Russan agitprop used to justify the invasion and occupation of the Baltics and Eastern Europe.

The Putin fanboys of the ‘Merkin Right are, to use a phrase attributed to Lenin, “Useful idiots” who know less-than-zero about the history of the region.

The belief that Ukrainians would be willing to fight and die for years against anything other than an existential threat can only be classified as delusional.

gyan1
Reply to  Michael Standfast
October 24, 2025 11:14 am

“Useful idiots” who know less-than-zero about the history of the region.

The Medvedev Doctrine is official Russian foreign policy. The NAZI coup in Ukraine that brought Zelenskyy to power is a matter of historical fact.

“The belief that Ukrainians would be willing to fight and die for years against anything other than an existential threat can only be classified as delusional.”

Delusional is believing cannon fodder have a choice in the matter. All wars are sold on false flag false narratives that the manufactured enemy is an existential threat. Delusion is not knowing wars are about profit and power and are rigged to maximize that.

Donald Beal
October 21, 2025 10:46 am

Plato’s philosopher kings were to rule by reason; Europe’s philosopher queens rule by emotion. They conflate compassion with competence, signalling with substance.

I like Tilak’s summary in the article. But it’s not just the females. Macron, Mer, and Starmer guide their countries into economic degeneration guided by an emotional commitment to intermittent and insufficient but -all hail- Renewable energy. Plus they destroy social stability by mass import of culturally incompatible migrants.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Donald Beal
October 22, 2025 7:31 am

There is more than an iota of misogyny in the article.
I agree. It is not so much sex driven as he leads the reader to believe.
It is primarily emotional appeal for public opinion persuasion than critical thinking.

Much of it amounts to the sex equivalent of racial profiling.
That is, taking a few examples and generalizing to create a universal concept.

gyan1
October 21, 2025 11:02 am

The subjugation of Europe by globalist oligarchs was entirely predictable when the EU was first proposed. Why I vocally opposed it at the time. The pathetic sheep allowing their lives to be micromanaged by unelected petty ideologues disgusts me.

Sane people need to get control of the education system there and make Ann Rand and The Road To Serfdom by Friedrich A. Hayek required reading in middle school.

The EU needs to end and nation states reclaim their sovereignty. The fiction that authoritarian globalist control would improve people’s lives have been clearly invalidated. Censorship in the EU is no different than China. That is because oligarchs like the CCP’s model of totalitarian control of information and markets. Without Trump America would have been subjugated also. Idiotic leftists are still goose stepping to putting themselves in chains.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  gyan1
October 22, 2025 7:33 am

My concept of the EU when first proposed either was totally off-base or proven wrong.
I envisions the EU to create a common currency and remove trade barriers, taxes, and tariffs for the members. Kinda-sorta like NAFTA was supposed to be (but wasn’t).

mleskovarsocalrrcom
October 21, 2025 1:17 pm

The EU is nothing more than a test case for One World Government led by the UN. The downfalls of society (immigration) and economy (AGW) are the tools Marxists use to collapse countries so they can march in and be saviors. It doesn’t take long for those ‘saved’ to understand what and how the takeover happened that led to their subjugation.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
October 22, 2025 7:34 am

I am beginning to suspect it is not Marxists but rather the Muslim Brotherhood.
Watching and learning as we go, I could be wrong, I could be right.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
October 22, 2025 8:19 am

IMHO the Marxists are using Islam/religion to further divide the people. All religion will be demonized once the OWG is in power. Also, Islam is too divided (Sunni/Shia) to allow one or the other faction to come into that much power. It’s been a long march for the Marxists and they’ve been at it world wide since the Russian revolution.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
October 22, 2025 12:31 pm

Points I initially considered. Watching, my viewpoint is altering.

heme212
October 21, 2025 1:27 pm

spinster blight

Bob
October 21, 2025 4:17 pm

Europe’s biggest problem is the European Union. If individual nations feel the need to belong to something join an organization that doesn’t rob you blind and feel they have the right to boss you around. Stop giving them money and leave all of their organizations that pile more laws, regulations and obligation on top of the ones you are saddled with in each individual country. I am impressed that someone had the courage to challenge female leadership. There have been good leaders female and male, there have been bad leaders female and male. All bad leaders should forcefully be called out. There doesn’t seem to be any resistance to calling out males, think Trump. I don’t see the same eagerness when it comes to females.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Bob
October 22, 2025 7:35 am

Are you talking about the EU or the UN?
Seems your description fits both.

Bob
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
October 22, 2025 4:03 pm

I have equal respect for both organizations i.e. no respect but I was talking about the EU.

Quilter52
October 21, 2025 4:50 pm

These two women are the best argument ever against women in power. They have no backbone, just ideology and not much intellect. I really wonder if either would be in their positions without DEI supporting them. Margaret Thatcher on the hand shoved DEI into the drain and just succeeded on merit. We will continue to get second rate governments, while ever anything that is used to prevent merit appointments remains in place and we will all be poorer and less safe despite their “compassion”. As a woman (adult human female!) they are an embarrassment to me.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Quilter52
October 22, 2025 7:36 am

It is not an argument against women in power.
It is an argument against identity politics and a substantial argument for merit.

Sparta Nova 4
October 22, 2025 6:56 am

We are now in the age of unlightenment.
And the lights will go off.
And the pitchforks and torches will appear.
We live in interesting times (as defined by the old Chinese curse).

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
October 22, 2025 9:42 am

Spain set a new record in the EU, about 70 million with no electricity, all due to woke idiocy

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  wilpost
October 22, 2025 12:31 pm

A point on which we agree.

October 22, 2025 4:17 pm

The link from the article is well worth reading [ how elites use the climate issue to stay in power; from a German perspective].
https://www.eugyppius.com/p/climatism-as-an-oligarchic-strategy