Charles Rotter
The New York Times recently published a piece titled “Environmental Groups Face ‘Generational’ Setbacks Under Trump”, and the tone could not have been more funereal. For an industry of professional alarmists, one might say grief is their natural habitat. But this time the grief isn’t over melting glaciers or theoretical sea-level rise a century from now. No, this grief is personal. Their taxpayer subsidy empire is crumbling. Their grip on Washington is slipping. Their “apex” moment under Biden—when they believed the Inflation Reduction Act had permanently remade the American economy in their image—has dissolved like morning dew in a Texas August.
It’s almost poetic that the best way to understand the environmental lobby’s current condition is through Elisabeth Kübler-Ross’s famous “five stages of grief.” They are textbook cases—grieving not the Earth, but their own waning power.
Stage One: Denial
The Biden years were their champagne banquet. The Times describes how “hundreds of billions of dollars of federal investment in renewable energy, batteries and electric vehicles was beginning to flow”. Coal plants were being shuttered, oil and gas drilled under suspicion, and money sluiced from Washington to every group with a clever enough slogan about saving the planet. This was their utopia, written into federal law under the banner of the Inflation Reduction Act.
The denial set in on Election Night 2024. Surely the voters couldn’t have chosen coal over climate, prosperity over precaution, reality over rhetoric. But they did. And as Trump moved to revive coal, “the dirtiest fossil fuel,” while boosting oil and gas, the fantasy of permanent power began to crumble. Denial still lingers in some corners, where activists insist that Net Zero remains inevitable, just “delayed.” In truth, what they thought was an unstoppable train was nothing more than a gravy train, and the conductor just hopped off.
Stage Two: Anger
When denial fails, anger takes the wheel. And what better weapon for anger than a blizzard of lawsuits? Earthjustice, one of the environmental lobby’s most aggressive legal arms, has launched “96 legal actions against the Trump administration this year, including lawsuits as well as technical comments on proposed regulatory changes”. Nearly three times the volume of their first Trump-era flailing.
Greenpeace has taken anger to an art form, but karma has a sense of humor. Sued for defaming the Dakota Access Pipeline’s backers, it now faces “the prospect of nearly $670 million in damages if it loses on appeal”. This is the same group that has spent decades lecturing oil companies about morality, now brought low by the simple fact that slander has consequences.
When movements turn angry, they often turn inward too. The Sierra Club just fired its executive director, Ben Jealous, after a year of “tension between Mr. Jealous and local chapters, employees and the organization’s union”. That’s what happens when an organization bloated with donor cash discovers the faucet has been turned off—it eats itself alive.
Stage Three: Bargaining
Once rage exhausts itself, bargaining begins. Tom Steyer, billionaire climate crusader, has suddenly discovered that Americans aren’t fond of economic suicide. He now insists that climate policies must mean “lower electric bills” and “relief”. Translation: after decades of insisting the planet would burn if we didn’t pay more, activists now plead that green schemes will actually make life cheaper—if you’ll just let them try one more time.
The Natural Resources Defense Council, meanwhile, has decided that if Washington isn’t listening, it will “expand its advocacy at the state level and internationally”. Vermont is being drafted into suing fossil fuel companies for “climate damage.” Georgia and Ohio are suddenly “opportunities” for solar. And if the American voter still refuses to buy the message? Well, there’s always India and Africa. Bargaining often involves desperation. Here it means turning every new jurisdiction into another testing ground for failed schemes.
Stage Four: Depression
The Times couldn’t hide it: “The morale is destroyed,” confessed Ramon Cruz, former president of the Sierra Club. “This is a generational loss”. Greenpeace is slashing staff. Rewiring America fired nearly a third of its workforce. Even Bill Gates is pulling back his money, shutting down his D.C. lobbying shop because, as the article puts it, “his philanthropic dollars would be better spent elsewhere”.
When billionaires stop writing checks, when donors vanish, when directors are fired and activists laid off, depression is inevitable. You can almost picture the scene at Sierra Club headquarters: a circle of dispirited staffers clutching soy lattes, whispering about how unfair it all is. For decades, they were courted as the conscience of the nation. Now, they’re struggling for relevance while fighting Exxon in court.
Stage Five: Acceptance (Not Quite Yet)
The tragedy—at least from their point of view—is that acceptance hasn’t arrived. True acceptance would mean admitting the “climate crisis” is a political construct, not a physical reality. It would mean recognizing that models are unreliable, costs are staggering, and the public simply doesn’t want what they’re selling.
Instead, activists grasp at straws, insisting that if they just “coordinate more deliberately”, or file one more lawsuit, or expand to one more foreign country, victory is still within reach. It’s the addict’s delusion: one more hit of donor cash, one more round of litigation, and the glory days will return.
But deep down, they know. They know that Trump’s reversal of Biden’s subsidies was not some random accident. It was democracy in action. Voters had seen enough of higher costs, unreliable power grids, and endless hectoring from self-anointed prophets of doom. The public made its choice.
And so the grieving continues. Not for the planet, but for lost prestige, lost funding, and lost illusions. The Times calls it “generational setbacks.” A sober observer might call it reality catching up.
The real five stages of the climate lobby’s grief may look like this:
- Denial that the taxpayer gravy train has derailed.
- Anger in the form of lawsuits, both filed and lost.
- Bargaining with voters who prefer affordable electricity to utopian promises.
- Depression as billionaires close their wallets and staff receive pink slips.
- And someday, perhaps, Acceptance—that there was never a “climate crisis” to begin with.
Until then, the movement staggers on. Lawsuits in one hand, slogans in the other, forever trying to convince a weary public that the sky is falling. The irony is rich: for once, it isn’t the sky that’s collapsing. It’s their own house of cards.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Oh noooo another secretive right wing lobby group pestering politicians-
‘Dump it, or we’ll dump you’: secretive consultancy group sends Liberal MPs barrage of emails over net zero policy
Whatever is the world coming to?
Liberals lost my support when they had Turnbull, Morrison etc
They were weak non-conservative followers of leftist policies… losers, in other words.
Local National candidate is still “sensible”, but the Nationals really need to get their act together and destroy the Net-Zero agenda.
One Nation is the only party seriously fighting the idiotic Net-Zero nonsense.
Great post, CR ! 🙂
In my books, their grief is well and truly deserved….may they suffer big time. 🙂
It is good grief 🙂
Guess where the journey to climate grief started:
Australia has not yet reached Stage 1. In fact, dead opposite. The only reason the transition is going slower than anticipated is that there is not enough money being thrown at it. Almost impossible to convince farmers that having transmission lines across their property is a blessing.
USA slipped off the rails in Trump’s first term and has never really gained much momentum under Biden. Trump has stopped the train and moved to a completely different track toward energy supremacy. Although China’s 5bn tonne of coal annually will take some beating.
Is it true that Xi Jinping is in hospital and Wang Yang now in charge?
Shown in the chart (See below) is a plot of average annual temperature at Adelaide from 1857 to 1999. In 1857, the concentration in air was ca. 280 ppmv (0.55 g CO2/cu. m.) and by 1999 it had increased to ca. 370 ppmv (0.73 g CO2/cu. m.), but there was no corresponding increase in surface air temperature. Instead there was a cooling. This chart falsifies the claim by the IPCC that CO2 cause global warming and climate change. Note how little CO2 there is in the air. There is too little CO2 in the air to effect the weather and climate.
The chart was taken from the late John-Daly’s website:
“Still Waiting For Greenhouse” available at http://www.john-daly.com. From the home page, page down to the end and click on the selection “Station Temperature Data. On the “World Map”, click on a region or country to access temperature data from over 200 weather stations located around the world.
If you click on “Australia”, there is displayed a list of weather stations. Click on a station entry and there is displayed the temperature chart for the station. Click on the back arrow to return to the list of the stations. Clicking on the back arrow will display the “World Map”. There are 21 entries for Australia two of which display sea level data. The charts show no warming up to 2002. However, the chart for Brisbane shows a slight cooling.
How can this temperature data be used to shut down the government climate plan? Not easily since the data is 20 years out of data.
I’m overdosing on schadenfreude. Nelson Muntz “Haw Haw” turned up to 11. It’s wonderful. I’ve been waiting 20 years for this moment. I didn’t know if it would ever arrive. Thank you, Donald Trump. And thank you Anthony, Charles, et al. You guys kept the faith and never gave an inch. Mega congrats!
Amen!
Speaking of schadenfreude….and you want some battery power with that sir?
‘Deeply sinister’: Volkswagen to charge monthly fee to unlock full power of customers’ EVs
some environmental groups to shift their focus away from federal policy. Manish Bapna, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, said his group was redoubling its efforts in state and federal courts and expanding its advocacy at the state level and internationally.
Translation: They are looking for other people’s money in other places.
I voted for this.
We need to be careful, Anger doesn’t always strike inwards, sometimes it strikes outwards towards all those imaginary villians who have stood between them and the perfect world that they sought to force the rest of us into. Willing or not.
To help them thru their grieving —
Give them something else to think about.
Something better to work on.
(Not a new idea; older than the 5 Stages.
The Expulsive Power of a New Affection.*)
It’s not too much to expect that they can become Gardeners — Horticulturists, Arborists.
Instead of worrying about invisible greenhouses, high in the sky —
Build real greenhouses, and witness the effects of carbon fertilization in action.
E. F. Schumacher, perhaps quoting Gandhi, advised the ecology-minded readers of his day:
Plant a Tree, and nourish it to maturity.
———
Please … NO! I can’t imagine the new horrible schemes they can come up with to curtail my freedoms and rob my wallet.
Stage 5 requires the climate activists to admit they were wrong. Leftists never admit they are wrong, about anything. So instead stage 5 will be climate activists dropping climate change altogether and moving on to their “crisis issue.”
Gretta
I think a better guide is the account of failed prophecies in ‘When Prophecy Fails’, by Festinger et al.. The failure of a prophecy, in this case of the end of the world, goes in different stages from the Kubler Ross model.
First you have a reasonably modest set of beliefs, with the great event there but not at any specific date, and without any definite prophecies. At this point the movement is well under the control of the leadership.
In the next stage, membership grows, enthusiasts in the membership start to gain more influence, the belief set becomes more radical, and the leadership largely welcomes this because it looks like success, particularly the growth in membership and the media attention.
Next, the enthusiasts become more powerful in the movement and more extreme in their prophecies, and the leadership starts to get uneasy. Because they are starting to see the danger of the prophecies being falsified.
In the last but one stage, the enthusiasts sell their worldly goods and retreat to a high mountain to await the Apocalypse, which is now forecast for next Tuesday at midnight, based on scripture and numerology. And it doesn’t happen, of course.
The final stage will surprise bystanders. The faith of the enthusiasts is strengthened (this is called Cognitive Dissonance), and they become very hostile to skeptics. Personal attacks and vilification increase.
In the very last stage, which takes quite some time, the belief fades away, people drift out of the movement. Years later they say to each other ‘did we really believe all that stuff?’ Yes, you did, but its all over now.
I think its a better pattern for the likely course of global warming and ‘renewable’ hysteria.
Those b*stards have been trying to kill forestry to save the planet. Of course they all live nice, large wood homes.
The NRDC, Sierra Club, Tom Steyer, Gates and all the rest of the billionaires and cash rich NGOs should quit the griping, lobbying and suing and invest their own resources in building the new green renewable infrastructure they think will save the planet. Since they claim wind and solar are cheaper and more profitable than traditional sources they should have no trouble making a profit on such ventures. However, they must not be given any public money or be allowed to ignore property rights or environmental protection regulations including harassment of marine mammals and killing birds and bats.
As for being green and renewable, nothing meets those requirements more than the practice of forestry- producing goods and services forever when done right. But the climatistas want to end it. They’re such morons.
“You can almost picture the scene at Sierra Club headquarters: a circle of dispirited staffers clutching soy lattes, whispering about how unfair it all is.”
But they’ll always have the war against forestry to give them meaning. They hate all tree cutting.
“They know that Trump’s reversal of Biden’s subsidies was not some random accident. It was democracy in action.”
Right, but of course the alarmists say that Trump’s energy policies prove he’s a dictator! If he was a dictator, they’d all be in prison breaking rocks all day.
#6 They may now have to get a real job!
“Oh, the horror”.
(Apocalypse Now)
I always like to tell my state burros to get a real job and they do react in horror.
But, who employ them??
Those loudly protesting (protecting) the changing perception of the people are the closest to the grift, and their livelihoods are entirely dependent on it. This mode of operation is running though all aspects of folks lives. Another parallel grift, the operation of which is eloquently explained is presented in an interview about the homeless issue that can only be solved by wasting more and more valuable resources into the grift machine.
The climate lobby deserves all the grief they are experiencing. Let’s see if we can cause them some more.
Even before Trump took office, these alarmists had to consider only two facts to realize their battle against the climate was lost once and for all. The first was that since 1990 global carbon emissions had risen 60%, and the second was that over the last 25 years, China’s coal consumption had increased by almost 350%. So why would they expect any other developing nation to make any big cutbacks to their energy mixes? Better still, why would they expect consumers/taxpayers anywhere to accept higher prices and more laws, restrictions and mandates to keep fighting for an obviously hopeless cause?