Charles Rotter
In its steady promotion of fiscal frugality, the Trump administration has sent the entire content production staff of Climate.gov packing as their NOAA contract expired on May 31—effectively silencing the federal government’s flagship climate propaganda platform overnight. Rebecca Lindsey, Tom Di Liberto and the rest of the once–highly paid spin doctors who churned out daily “urgent” updates on melting ice sheets and CO₂ curves received form letters informing them that their “knowledge, skills, and abilities are no longer of use to NOAA,” a fitting epitaph for a site built on relentless hype.
For years, millions of casual web surfers landed on Climate.gov only to be lectured by animated carbon-cycle maps, sliding-scale temperature-anomaly widgets and color-coded doom gauges predicting imminent coastal calamity. All of that eye-candy is now frozen in digital amber—archived but never to be updated—so that future historians can gawp at government-sponsored hysteria in its unedited glory. No more breathless countdowns to climate Armageddon, no more click-bait pop-ups proclaiming every thunderstorm as “proof” of runaway warming. The propagandists have packed up their graph-generating scripts and left, leaving behind only static pages that serve as curious relics of alarmist marketing.
Critics have wailed about “critical climate data” being scrubbed, but their caterwauling stems from a basic misunderstanding: none of the raw measurements ever disappeared. The station records, satellite feeds, radar logs, ocean-buoy readings and even paleoclimate ice-core datasets remain untouched in the National Centers for Environmental Information archive, which manages over 60 petabytes of environmental data and continues to serve it up via Climate Data Online APIs, FTP servers and the NCEI Map Viewer. In other words, the data weren’t scrubbed—they were never meant to be buried; only the politically curated presentation was.
Let the narrative merchants keep insisting that “without Climate.gov the public will be left in the dark.” All that’s dark now is their empty echo chamber. Researchers already download the identical datasets through legacy servers and modern APIs, free from grant-dependent graphics and grant-writing obligations. The Trump administration didn’t “destroy climate data”—it defunded a taxpayer-subsidized panic-porn production line. And if that leaves the fear-mongers shrieking into the void, that’s just proof their only real product was panic.
This isn’t mere belt-tightening; it’s the death rattle of a climate industrial complex enmeshed in grant cycles, media conferences and self-congratulatory symposia. First came the mid-winter purge of greenhouse-gas inventory portals and adaptation-strategy playbooks, then the layoff of hundreds of modelers and communicators—including the entire team behind the National Climate Assessment. Now, the pièce de résistance: the mothballing of the flagship propaganda website itself.
What happens next is deliciously ironic. Journalists will scramble to cite “independent experts” instead of regurgitating White House press releases. Schoolchildren Googling “Climate.gov” will find nothing but stale content from before June 2025. Policymakers who once leaned on slick NOAA pop-ups to justify mandates on electric cars and green subsidies will have to defend their proposals on substance rather than spun narratives. The very architects of alarm will discover that once you cut off the megaphone, the tornado of fear winds down.
Those who moan about a “slippery slope of censorship” conveniently ignore that Climate.gov was never a neutral repository; it functioned as a de facto propaganda arm for unverified worst-case projections. Now that the faucet of federal hype has been shut off, civic discourse can finally shift back toward sober cost-benefit analysis and genuine uncertainty. Markets and local communities—far more responsive to observable risks than to speculative model output—will decide how best to adapt, unfettered by taxpayer-funded hype.
So raise a glass to the shuttering of Climate.gov. This isn’t just a budget cut but the vanquishing of one of the most lavishly promoted panic-mongering platforms in government history. For every ominous anomaly graph they spun, all that remains now is silence—and silence is the most honest response to alarmism that could never hold up under real scrutiny.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
My unexpectedly deceased just over a year ago significant other of 24 years disapproved of raising a glass of anything other than wine. My hoped for ‘new’ significant other disapproves, also. Since Patricia died over a year ago and Pat is newly only tentative since a few months, I am going to now raise a good glass of bourbon to the demise of Climate.gov. Prost.
Skeptics make slow climate progress. Faster now that 47 ‘has gone to war’. Still very slow, as 47 has also much more important (and less important but fixed) things also on his plate. Iran nucs, district court nationwide injunctions, NATO spending, trade barriers, China, BBB, WH flagpoles, soggy Rose Garden grass, …
Exactly how effective these alarmist sites were is debatable, but as citizens and taxpayers failed to see very much extraordinary about the weather but found that the propaganda they peddled inevitably led to new taxes, more restrictions and mandates and generally higher overall prices, they started detecting more than just a few things that were suspicious. Now that we’re seeing governments backing off on force-feeding the public their climate crisis narrative and closing down its purveyors, we’re getting further confirmation that it was and still is largely a scam.
Actually you could make a case that these sites had no effect. For four decades, the public has been saturated with climate alarmist propaganda. Peddled by the mainstream media and sustained by the stuff dished out by things like Climate.gov, it’s astonishing how little success they have had. The general public have not bought into the narrative one iota. Taken altogether, the message was incoherent noise. This whole thing started to fall apart, in my view, after the sea of promises about “the end of snow” or an “ice-free Arctic.”
Compounding this communications disaster, the proponents of this nonsense were unable, ever, to tell anyone what benefits terminating CO2 emissions would produce.
They’ve had mixed success at duping people old enough to remember the global cooling scare, but polls show that they’ve been very effective at indoctrinating the young and impressionable.
When you consider how prima facie absurd the central premise of the climate scare is, the large number of people who believe it really is proof of the effectiveness of the Big Lie.
NCA4 (circa 2018) estimated that global average temperatures have risen 1.14 ±0.13°C since the late Little Ice Age (late 1800s). Just think how tiny that is:
That’s a total warming which is similar to the hysteresis (“dead band”) in most home thermostats. Your indoor temperatures go up and down that much, all day long, and you probably don’t even notice it. Such a small temperature change is even less consequential outdoors (except when near 0°C).
It’s about the temperature change you get from a latitude change of 70 miles, or an elevation change of 600 feet. In the American Midwest, farmers can adjust for that much warming by advancing their planting dates one week.
The central premise of the climate scare is that that tiny change constitutes a “crisis” or “emergency,” or even “the Apocalypse.” That’s downright silly. But, thanks to relentless climate industry propaganda, a great many people nevertheless believe it.
Some even think that a degree or two of warming could “melt Antarctica,” where temperatures average more than 40° below zero. We live in deeply unscientific times.
Well, WUWT claims, “The world’s most viewed site on global warming and climate change” so more people came here to learn than climate.gov? Apparently lots of lurkers.
“leaving behind only static pages that serve as curious relics of alarmist marketing”
Not the only excellent sentence, but my fave.
I shall definitely raise a glass or two of an excellent Alsace white this evening.
The caterwauling over this successful demolition is reminiscent of the caterwauling that goes on over the Iran nuke facilities demolition.
Which the latter, I suggest, is just tacit admission that the mad mullahs WERE in fact developing thermo nuclear devices all along, in flagrant disdain and ignoring of the piss-weak “agreements” that Obama / Biden and the IAEA got conned into.
The case with the feds is that RIFing the whole operation is more practical than any attempt at reform/
I think reform is impossible, look away and the ideology driven slither back in.
Yes, they’ll be back in three years. Google “What are some universities where I can major (or minor) in sustainability or environmental justice?” Quite a list.
Have the mills that grind out the alarmists stopped cranking them out? If the current administration can bring back traditional STEM degrees, they will have done some serious good. Going after DEI and antisemitism is just a start.
On a related note, I see this message at the top of the NSIDC “Charctic” interactive web page for sea ice extent –
“The Department of Defense (DoD) will stop processing and delivering the Special Sensor Microwave Imager/Sounder (SSMIS) data no later than 30 June 2025. The SSMIS data are used as input for this NSIDC-produced data set, which will therefore stop processing no later than 30 June 2025.”
A possible case of malicious compliance, either at DoD or NSIDC/NASA? There was/is no obvious reason to change anything about the processing of the satellite data already being collected. And were the DoD inputs primary or supplemental? It is not clear to me why DoD sounder data would have ever been the primary sensor inputs. We’ll see what happens.
The graphics with which CtM heads his articles are always appropriate.
Frank, CTM told me over lunch here some months ago that it is almost all AI generated now. Relieved the potential copyright attack problem. CtM is amazing.
Not quite correct, but a very large percentage. This image was made on a standard meme generator site, but it was aspect ratio fixed to include AI generated expansion.
Selection or creation of images often takes more time than preparing the article itself.
Very nice Charles, well said.
Go to the site and click on the news section. It is still loaded with ongoing, one-sided climate news.
Forrest:
Climate.gov redirects to NOAA.gov, but you are correct. The info still slants towards alarmism..
Examples: $1 billion disaters, scary amount of tonnage of Antarctic ice melting etc.
Looks like Howard Lutnick, the Director of the Dept. of Commerce (which oversees NOAA) who was
sworn-in Feb 2025, has some work to do!
Simple suggestion for Mr. Lutnick: redirect all climate.gov queries to
https://climaterealism.com/ or https://climateataglance.com/
or redirect here 🙂
Perhaps this will free up some time so NASA/RSS can resume reporting the measured increase in water vapor. Their last report was for the data through 2023. The engineering/science analysis available at http://globalclimatedrivers2.blogspot.com shows that measured water vapor increase (about 1.4 % per decade) can account for all of planet warming attributable to humanity. This WV increase is more than twice that caused by planet warming. https://watervaporandwarming.blogspot.com The graph is Fig 7.2 there.
I am sure that is a factor, but there is no single factor driving the weather or the resulting climate calcuation.
This, combined with natural factors of ocean oscillations and the time-integral of sunspot numbers (as a proxy) account for about 93 % of the average global temperature change since 1895. The analysis is at Sect 17-19 of the analysis made available at http://globalclimatedrivers2.blogspot.com
Just past 10:PM as I read this good news, and local
fireworks are going off in preparation for the July 4th holiday.
Good riddance! Rebecca Lindsey & Tom DiLiberto not only squandered public funds to produce and promote unscientific propaganda on behalf of the climate industry, they also illegally censored those who would correct their errors, in deliberate violation of federal law, as I related here:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/06/11/when-the-narrative-dies-climate-gov-and-the-quiet-collapse-of-climate-alarmism/#comment-4082480
Good start, now take the DOGE chainsaw to all other .gov sites.
Climate.gov was in the same category as PBS and NPR except the taxpayers paying for it was more direct.
Goodbye and thanks for all the fish.
Too bad so sad-
‘Every day is a trainwreck’: Scientists lash out at Trump’s newest sabotage