Politico’s Climate Death Scare Debunked: Real Data Shows Europe Is Safer Than Ever

By Anthony Watts and H. Sterling Burnett

In an article in Politico, titled “EU has no plan for rising climate-related deaths, scientists warn,” writer Rory O’Neill warns that “Europe is increasingly grappling with illness and deaths from extreme weather and the arrival of tropical diseases but it has no plan to prevent and cope with rising climate-related health problems.” This is false. In fact, evidence from multiple sources suggests that climate and temperature related deaths globally — and in Europe — are in long-term decline, rather than increasing.

O’Neill continues:

Scientists fear mosquito-borne diseases dengue and chikungunya that were once confined to tropical regions could become endemic in Europe due to the northward spread of tiger mosquitos, which have made it as far as Brussels and 20 other towns in Belgium.

Meanwhile, heat-related deaths are projected to increase threefold by the end of the century, while deaths caused by extreme events including floods and wildfires are rising.

Perhaps the most glaring lie Politico tells is that deaths from extreme weather events are rising. The truth is just the opposite: climate-related deaths worldwide have declined by more than 98% since the 1920s and are approaching zero. (see Figure 1, below)

As shown by Dr. Bjørn Lomborg, and presented at Climate Realism, using long-term data from EM-DAT (The International Disaster Database), the annual number of people dying from weather-related disasters (which are often wrongly co-opted to be climate disasters) such as storms, floods, droughts, wildfires, and extreme temperatures has plummeted, despite moderate warming over the past century. Lomborg’s analysis exposes the inconvenient truth for climate alarmists: modern societies have become vastly more resilient thanks to technology, infrastructure, emergency response systems, and adaptive capacity.

As Lomborg rightly observes, “[t]he reason we don’t hear about this phenomenal achievement is because it doesn’t fit the narrative of climate alarmism.”

It would, in fact, be surprising if deaths from extreme weather events are rising in Europe, since neither wildfires nor floods are increasing in number or severity – two other assertions made by O’Neill that are simply flat out wrong. Data discussed in Climate at a Glance: Global Wildfires from three independent sources, including from NASA and the European Space Agency, show that globally wildfires have declined over the past few decades. (see Figure 2, below)

The figure above shows no wildfire increase in Europe, a fact confirmed at Climate Realism, here.

Concerning floods, the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has found no increase in flooding, and, recent European floods have not be historically unusual, as discussed at Climate Realism, herehere, and here.

Politico’s temperature death assertions are misdirection. O’Neill’s claims totally ignore the significant decline in deaths from cold temperatures, a figure that is far larger than the slight increase in deaths from heat. O’Neill cites projections that heat-related deaths in Europe could triple by 2100, based on worst-case model scenarios. But what the Politico article conveniently omits is the fact that cold-related deaths vastly outnumber heat-related deaths, and deaths from cold are on the decline.

A landmark study published in The Lancet analyzed mortality data from 13 countries, concluding that cold kills roughly 20 times more people than heat, as shown in Figure 3 below:

As a result, during the period of modest warming deaths tied to non-optimum temperatures have fallen dramatically, due to the significant decline in deaths due to cold temperatures. Warmer winters are saving far more lives than warmer summers are endangering. Yet this life-saving benefit of a modestly warmer climate is completely ignored in Politico’s climate polemic and are not accounted for in the models O’Neill cites.

As pointed out in another Climate Realism article, even within Europe, the bulk of excess mortality during winter comes from cold, not heat. In fact, energy poverty — driven largely by EU climate policies raising energy prices — leaves many elderly Europeans unable to adequately heat their homes, contributing to tens of thousands of avoidable deaths annually.

Politico attempts to whip up hysteria by claiming that dengue and chikungunya will soon become endemic in Europe due to climate change. The facts tell a very different story.

While the tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus) has spread into parts of southern Europe, the number of actual dengue cases remains minuscule. As Politico itself admits (buried mid-article), there were only 304 dengue cases in the EU in 2024 — barely higher than the 275 total cases from the previous 15 years combined.

This is not an epidemic; it is a statistical blip. As Watts Up With That covered here, the principal factors behind the spread of these diseases are not temperature but international travel, global shipping, urbanization, and human settlement patterns — factors which have nothing to do with CO₂ emissions.

Perhaps the most egregious assertion in the article is that “nearly 60 million people suffered from serious food insecurity in Europe in 2021, with 11.9 million of these cases attributable to climate change.” This claim was offered without any causal evidence, because no such evidence or data exists. Rather the claim is based on claims made in climate attribution studies — computer-based guesswork dressed up as empirical science.

Europe remains one of the most food-secure regions on Earth. As Climate Realism has documented dozens of times, crop yields have risen consistently across Europe and the globe, aided by technological advances and CO₂ fertilization — the scientifically validated phenomenon where increased atmospheric CO₂ boosts plant growth and water efficiency.

If anything, climate change has so far been a net benefit to European agriculture. Far from facing existential threats, farmers in Europe are producing record harvests.

The reason why the EU has no “master plan” to combat rising climate deaths is simple: there is no crisis that warranting such a plan. Real-world data shows modern Europe is safer than ever from weather-related threats.

The greatest current public health risk stemming from climate policy isn’t disease — it’s energy poverty. As covered in multiple WUWT posts, Europe’s premature abandonment of fossil fuels has created skyrocketing energy prices, forcing vulnerable populations to choose between heating and eating.

This — not dengue fever — is where actual lives are being lost due to climate zealotry.

As always, Politico’s piece leans heavily on speculative models forecasting dire outcomes by 2100. These models fail empirical validation tests. As Roy Spencer, Ph.D, has thoroughly demonstrated, climate models continue to “run hot,” consistently overshooting actual observed warming. Even The Lancet Planetary Health scenarios that Politico cites rely on extreme worst-case climate models, RCP 8.5, which climate scientists admit is unrealistic and shouldn’t be used to forecast future climate conditions or impacts.

In summary, Politico’s piece is not journalism — it’s an extended press release for climate activists and unelected NGO bureaucrats, which regurgitates flawed model projections, cherry-picks isolated data points, and conveniently ignores real world data to the contrary that shows climate-related mortality has drastically declined during the recent period of modest warming and that adaptive capacity has never been higher.

If it wants to tout itself as a journalistic endeavor, Politico should spend less time amplifying NGO talking points and more time seeking out the truth which is easily discovered through an examination of existing, actual, data.

heartland leaf

Heartland Institute

The Heartland Institute is one of the world’s leading free-market think tanks. It is a national nonprofit research and education organization based in Arlington Heights, Illinois. Its mission is to discover, develop, and promote free-market solutions to social and economic problems.

Originally posted at ClimateREALISM

5 16 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

17 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Halla
June 18, 2025 6:09 pm

Most of the crop failures in Europe in my memory have been due to late frosts, not excessive heat. Most of Europe has a tolerable climate only due to favorable
ocean currents.

KevinM
June 18, 2025 7:09 pm

Saw a bit on Oregon KATU local news tonight: Experts say for every degree temperature rise US crop yield will be halved. No logic or explanation or alternative view. Wow. Sure.

John Hultquist
Reply to  KevinM
June 18, 2025 11:36 pm

Halved! Really? tell me someone mis-spoke.

KevinM
Reply to  John Hultquist
June 19, 2025 10:41 am

Nope. The news reader seemed earnest, which is their primary job. No critical thinking applied at all.

Jeff Alberts
June 18, 2025 9:16 pm

What is a “climate related death”? I mean, if you were living in an unhealthy climate, wouldn’t you leave? Ohhh, they mean weather-related.

June 18, 2025 10:16 pm

Any rise in mosquitoes in the UK has nothing to do with a warming planet. Tiger mosquitoes and the diseases they carry are being imported on cargo ships and by tourists. Mosquitoes aren’t strong enough to fly across the English Channel. 

Malaria (known in the Middle Ages as “ague”) was endemic in parts of the UK until the 19th century, so both the MWP and the LIA.

We still have native mosquitoes in the UK, including one species that remains active throughout the winter. The last known locally acquired malaria case in the UK was in 1957.

June 19, 2025 3:31 am

“…. could become endemic in Europe due to the northward spread of tiger mosquitos ILLEGAL ALIENS…”

June 19, 2025 3:54 am

From the article: “despite moderate warming over the past century.”

Just to be clear, there has been warming and cooling over the past century and the warming of today is no warmer than it was in the Early Twentieth Century or the 1880’s which were equally warm.

I heard Janice Dean “the Weather Machine” say this morning that there was a high pressure system headed for New York which may set new high temperature records. She said the heat records in the 1880’s may be broken this coming week.

It was just as warm in the recent past as it is today. A suggestion that today is unique and warmer than usual is not correct. It is no warmer today than in the past according to the written, historic temperature records from around the world, and according to NOAA who put out a study in 1987 saying it is no warmer today than in the past.

Bogus Hockey Stick global temperature profiles have confused the issue of temperature. As they were meant to do.

observa
Reply to  Tom Abbott
June 19, 2025 5:11 am

Beware the insane freeze-
Insane freeze strikes Australia’s east coast and it’s about to get colder: Here’s why
Bet you didn’t know about that weather classification.

observa
Reply to  Tom Abbott
June 19, 2025 5:46 am

Oh no I didn’t know about the dreaded heat dome and corn sweat engulfing yo’all-
Millions brace for powerful ‘heat dome’ set to engulf much of America
We’re all doomed!

KevinM
Reply to  Tom Abbott
June 19, 2025 2:44 pm

She said the heat records in the 1880’s may be broken this coming week.
What caused it to be so warm in 1880?

Dick Burk
June 19, 2025 5:33 am

there were only 304 dengue cases in the EU in 2024 — barely higher than the 275 total cases from the previous 15 years combined.” 304 in 2024. 275/15=28.3 per year. Seems like a little more than a ‘blip’ to me.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Dick Burk
June 19, 2025 6:52 am

Do you think the cause is “climate change”, or mass immigration?

Steve Oregon
June 19, 2025 12:09 pm

It’s interesting to see how easy it is to have Gemini AI come up with in response to articles. I plugged in this one and got a lot of the alarmist’s “evidence” in rebuttal. Leading to this:
Overall Summary:
Your critique of the Politico article highlights several valid points, particularly regarding the historical decline in overall weather-related mortality due to societal resilience, the current statistical dominance of cold-related deaths over heat-related deaths, and the role of factors beyond climate change in disease spread (like travel). There’s also a legitimate debate about the over-reliance on RCP 8.5 in some impact studies.
However, your argument often frames these points as if they completely negate the concerns raised by Politico and the scientific community. The article’s focus is on future and rising threats from climate change – namely, escalating heat-related mortality, the potential for endemic vector-borne diseases due to vector range expansion, and the increasing frequency/intensity of specific extreme weather events in Europe. While societies are more resilient, these projected changes present new and intensifying challenges that, according to many experts, do warrant proactive planning. The scientific discussion is nuanced, encompassing both historical successes in adaptation and future risks requiring further action.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Steve Oregon
June 20, 2025 6:25 am

In other words, you are right and being right does not matter. The Borg will assimilate you.

Reply to  Steve Oregon
June 21, 2025 8:23 am

More proof that AI is not capable of critical thinking, it just scans the Internet and cannot assimilate.

Bob
June 19, 2025 9:03 pm

Good work, keep these liar’s feet to the fire.