Thousands of wind turbines and millions of solar panels generated a massive blackout
Paul Driessen
Updated Man of La Mancha lyrics could read: “To dream the impossible dream of clean, green, net-zero electricity, to fight the unbeatable foe of manmade climate cataclysms, we must run where the brave dare not go.”
Don Quixote saw windmills as malevolent and dangerous dragons. Spain’s governing classes view them from the Chinese perspective: benevolent and magical dragons.
They’ve erected over 22,000 gigantic windmills, to harness the wind and generate electricity. Portugal has nearly 3,000. Together, when conditions are perfect, they can generate almost 38 gigawatts.
Like Cervantes’ hero, the elites also want “to reach the unreachable star” – or at least capture the energy from one star: the sun. Spain and Portugal together also have 38 GW of photovoltaic solar panels.
However, the Iberian Peninsula neighbors have long ignored the dark sides of the forces they seek to commandeer.
Those wind turbines, solar panels and transmission lines sprawl across some 2,000,000 acres of Spanish and Portuguese vistas, habitats and croplands. That’s equal to Delaware and Rhode Island combined.
They kill eagles, bustards, vultures, and other raptors and birds. Building them requires mining, pollution and child labor on historically unprecedented scales. Solar panels are easily destroyed by storms.
Worst, they provide intermittent, weather-dependent electricity – necessitating expensive backup power and making the electrical grid unstable. Just how unstable was demonstrated recently, and dramatically.
On April 16, for the first time, for a few minutes, Spain generated 100% of its electricity with wind, solar and hydro power.
A fortnight later, on April 28, a prolonged blackout sent Iberia into chaos. Lights, televisions, refrigerators, cell phones and traffic lights went dark. Trains, subways and elevators trapped passengers. Airports canceled flights. Hospital backup power provided only basic and emergency services.
The outage even struck parts of France and Belgium. It was Europe’s biggest blackout ever. If France hadn’t shut off its connection to Spain’s cascading problems, all of Europe could have shut down.
Just a week later, another blackout hit Spain’s Canary Islands.
Power outages are nothing new. But the Spain-Portugal blackouts underscore fundamental problems with the supposedly “inevitable transition” from coal, oil, natural gas and nuclear electricity to wind, solar and battery power.
They show that the only inevitability will be more frequent and severe blackouts – because of our soaring reliance on electricity … political decisions to mothball or destroy reliable generating systems … and ideological commitments to “green” energy.
We’re effectively being told: You’ll have electricity when it’s available – not necessarily when you need it. In this modern technological era, that is absurd, outrageous, intolerable and dangerous.
One fundamental reality must override all other considerations: Modern industrialized societies require enormous quantities of steady, synchronous alternating current, 24/7 – at the precise frequency of 50 Hertz in Europe and 60 Hz in the United States. Without it, life shuts down, societies descend into chaos, and people die.
Frequencies outside 0.2 Hz above or below that frequency can trigger major emergencies. A mere ±0.5 Hz deviation can cause system-wide cascading blackouts.
In Spain’s case, with 80% of its power now coming from renewable sources, the country simply did not have enough reliable, dispatchable, instantly accessible power on hand to keep its grid from collapsing when a power generation glitch happened.
Rice University’s Baker Institute explained how a malfunction at two Spanish solar power plants triggered the widespread chaos.
“At approximately 12:30 pm local time in Spain – just minutes before the grid collapsed – renewable sources accounted for 78% of electricity generation in the Iberian system, with solar alone contributing nearly 60%. By contrast, conventional technologies, such as gas-fired and nuclear power plants, comprised only around 15% of the total generation mix….
“[Then] two consecutive generation loss events occurred in southwestern Spain, likely involving large solar installations…. Given the limited availability of conventional generation, these unexpected losses, combined with reduced support from neighboring systems – the instability triggered a disconnection from the French system – created a “perfect storm” for a massive power outage.
“In just five seconds, Spain lost approximately 15 GW of capacity, equivalent to 60% of its national electricity demand. The remaining generation was insufficient to meet demand, thus triggering a cascading failure across the entire grid. Various generating units were automatically disconnected to protect infrastructure, and nuclear plants were shut down in accordance with safety protocols.”
That’s all it took. In the blink of an eye, the Iberian Peninsula and beyond had a massive blackout.
Unless America’s Net Zero politicians and utility companies wake up to reality, multiple US states – and entire regions – face similar preventable (indeed virtually inevitable) disasters. The same nightmarish realities confront other countries worldwide.
First, because federal, state and local governments have pressured or ordered utility companies to shut down coal, gas, nuclear and even hydro power plants that still have years or decades of operational life. Other utilities have done so voluntarily, to showcase their climate and green energy bona fides.
Second, because the same governments also provide subsidies, loan guarantees, tax breaks, rapid permitting, and exemptions from endangered species and other environmental rules – to incentivize utilities to build more and more wind, solar and battery installations, instead of traditional power plants.
Third, because those same entities demand and often subsidize a steady conversion to electricity from gasoline and natural gas. Vehicles, home and apartment building heating systems, stoves and ovens, water heaters, lawn mowers, leaf blowers and more must be powered by electricity – to save the planet from manmade climate change – even as electricity generation and reliability dwindle.
This shortsighted, ideological, virtue-signaling government intrusion into what should be market-driven, reality-based, reliable-electricity-focused decisions puts our grid, our society and our lives at risk.
Abundant, reliable, affordable electricity is the lifeblood of twenty-first century civilization. Modern industrialized societies simply cannot function, or even survive, if they are forced to rely on land-hungry, expensive, insufficient, intermittent electricity.
And yet, largely because of misplaced climate fears (about human-induced droughts and a “thirstier atmosphere,” for example), $9 trillion has been spent globally over the past decade on wind and solar power, electric vehicles, energy storage, electrified heating and power grid adjustments.
Congress, state governors and legislatures, the Trump Administration, our courts and utility companies need to act quickly and decisively to end this wasteful spending and fix our fragile electricity generating system and grid. The news media and academia must stop parroting “climate crisis” and “renewable energy” talking points, and start presenting the complexities and realities of these issues.
Paul Driessen is senior policy advisor for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and author of books and articles on energy, climate change, environmental protection and human rights.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Net Zero is the Great Leap Backwards.
Western European countries are still impoverishing themselves.
At least the USA has seen some sense.
Canada and Australia have still to realise they have been fibbed to by the climate hoax purveyors.
STORY TIP: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62d8k8edgxo
Spain’s government blames huge blackout on grid regulator and private firms
Yeah. And the horrific Stansted airport car park fire was caused by a diesel vehicle. Because we all know that diesel often spontaneously combusts and shoots out bright sheets of flame, don’t we?
The flames were also carmine- coloured, characteristic of lithium.
The stop-start battery for powering the starter motor….
Usually lead acid, because of cost and reliability.
No, not with the stop-start systems in vehicles that cut the engine every time you stop at the lights or a junction. They’re higher voltage (usually 48V) lithium.
…or was it a test of the Chinese “kill switches?
“Enquiring minds want to know.”
And so cannot be counted on when peak loads are encountered. If the continuous load is 50 gigawatts, but the fossil fuel generators only provide a maximum 45 gigawatts, no amount of “inertia” will get you out of trouble. You need 50 gigawatts of reliable continuous power.
It doesn’t matter if you have a nominal 500 gigawatts of wind power, it is completely useless unless the wind is blowing – not too slow, not too fast.
What a farce of wishful thinking!
Good, here’s a nitpick: “Various generating units were automatically disconnected to protect
infrastructurethemselves”Same thing – they are indeed part of local power generation infrastructure connected to external transmission infrastructure such as powerlines, switchyards, compensation units etc.
Substations also disconnected power lines that risked damage from overvoltage. That’s infrastructure. Indeed, those disconnections were really the point at which the system ripped apart. There was suddenly no surplus solar power being shipped North, and in the South the surplus was overwhelming.
The clean energy powerhouse…
Britain to rely on France to avoid blackouts this winter
Imported power from Europe will help backstop network on ‘tight days’
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/06/18/britain-to-rely-on-france-to-avoid-blackouts-this-winter/
We were short of power precisely because of low interconnector availability on Jan 8th. Why do they think it’s different this time?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/06/18/gas-free-britain-not-just-fantasy-downright-foolish/
LOL..
Currently South Australia again relying on GAS and DIESEL !!
So much for the “renewables” state ! 😉
NSW 81% COAL and GAS 18% hydro
Victoria 82% COAL and GAS 8% hydro
Queensland 89% COAL and GAS
HYDROCARBON FUELS RULE !!
Just keep telling yourself fickles are cheaper …fickles are cheaper…
A government owned retailer has just jacked up our electricity tariffs by 25 pct – because it can | RenewEconomy
Well they would be if the power retailers weren’t gouging of course as any climate changing Minister would know if things aren’t working out as hoped-
Power customers promised tougher rules on price gouging
Meanwhile Ms Wang has the answer for Oz power consumers-
I’ve seen the energy future and it’s in China, and Australia must ditch its distrust and collaborate | RenewEconomy
While Mguy is somewhat sceptical that’s in our best interests-
How China is DUPING the West by EXPLOITING the energy transition | MGUY Australia
I’m proposing “Nutty Z” as a good nickname for Net Zero.
That has a nice sound, but I still like “Nut Zero”.
Everywhere needs their core power provided by large spinning machines, not interconnected small spinning machines and solar. If you want to live off-grid or on a small scale grid with solar or a wind turbine, that is your choice, but a large/national grid that seeks to rely on these small rotating devices and solar will remain problematic, as the current back-up systems of battery or pumped storage will just not cut it for long.
Too bad so sad-
High energy costs trigger closure of major UK wind turbine supplier
The irony is hilarious!
The official report is out from the Spanish government. 182 pages, which I’m reading. They are blaming insufficient reactive power and voltage control due to too few units dispatched with the capability and some allegedly underperforming in providing those services (but perhaps that is difficult if you are only running part load). It was a record low of dispatch of inertia providing generation which also has voltage control and reactive power capability.
The oscillations in frequency resulted in “corrective” actions that in the end amplified the problems: more grid links were opened, and exports to France were reduced. Overvoltages multiplied.
One power station that was initially scheduled to run gave notice the evening before that it needed to stay off for maintenance. REE didn’t schedule a replacement until it started seeing the oscillations in frequency, but a 90 minute start time meant it was not going to come on line until an hour after the apagon.
Of course, the corollary of too little dispatchable power was that there was too much renewable power, but the report avoids drawing attention to that – or to the consequence of reduced inertia in speeding up the grid collapse.
I’ll add more comment later after I have read through.
https://www.lamoncloa.gob.es/consejodeministros/resumenes/Documents/2025/Informe-no-confidencial-Comite-de-analisis-28A.pdf
What is next? It does not seem that they are eager to abandon the AC distribution grid. That would be the next step backwards.
From The Telegraph:
Renewable energy to blame for Spain’s blackouts
The journalist should read more closely. That happened, but at a different time.
In fact, the blame for market fluctuation is for the 24th April, with negative prices flipping to positive ones leading to more generation. On the 22nd and 28th, there was actually a reduction in planned renewables output which happened in the third minute – i.e. 12:03
I wonder how many backup diesel generators actually started.
Many years ago a graduate student who was also a neonatal ICU nurse came in to do her testing, looking like something the cat dragged in. A “normal” winter power failure had occurred during the night and the Children’s hospital generator failed to start – it had been tested earlier the same week. The ward had 5 babies on respirators and 6 nurses. 5 manually ventelated them while the last looked after the whole ward. It took >2h to get emergency power on. They did not lose a baby!
Does anyone remember the 2003 northeast blackout in the US?
Does anyone remember the 1965 northeast blackout?
How about the 2003 or 1977?
Or the NYC blackouts in 2003 or 2008?
Stuff happens. I get that.
Perfection is unobtanium.
But given that stuff happens, why are we inviting it?
How many times must it happen, how many people must die, before we acknowledge that reliability is key?
The Iberian count was 11 in mild spring conditions.
They were lucky in that regard. It could have been much worse.
How about being stranded in an elevator for 29 hours. No light, heat, food, water, or bathroom. One of those blackouts lasted 29 hours.
One of those blackouts happened because a tree took out an Ohio interconnector and the problem was augmented by a “computer bug;” Stuff happens.
I usually don’t comment but sometimes the Information is so confusing I have to ask. Why doesn’t a network branch shut down before taking out the whole grid? If my table saw pulls too much power the circuit breaker flips off. Seem mostly like a grid design problem. So, I am not a power grid engineer.
When your circuit braker trips it does not induce a transient that causes other circuit breakers to trip.
The problems started with overvoltage in the South, where there was a large excess of power being exported North. They got a whole bunch worse when the transmission lines North tripped out because of the overvoltage. Suddenly there was a massive excess of power in the South with nowhere to go – so all the solar farms tripped out – and in the North there was a massive shortfall with nothing to replace it, so grid frequency fell sharply, tripping all generation offline despite load disconnections as frequency fell.
In fact, they first tried to sort out the problems in the South by opening additional grid links to try to diffuse the power more evenly, but this caused much bigger problems. They also tried cutting exports to France to reduce the demand for power flow Northwards on an overloaded grid. That just led to bigger overvoltage in the South, and the trips started.
Thank you. Yeah when the concept involves more than a water pressure analogy it gets pretty complicated. That extra power can’t just sit in the grid and apparently pretty hard to unload or store it.