Nonprofit Funded by Chinese Gov’t-Linked Entities Backs Blue State’s ‘Unconstitutional’ Climate Law

From THE DAILY CALLER

Daily Caller News Foundation

Audrey Streb
DCNF Energy Reporter

A nonprofit organization bankrolled by numerous Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-linked entities advocated for a New York law that authorizes the state to charge energy companies billions for their roles in climate change.

The Chinese-American Planning Council (CPC) is a New York nonprofit that has received over $1.4 million in taxpayer funds since 2022, in addition to significant funding from Chinese government-linked sources in recent years, as the Daily Caller News Foundation previously reported. The CPC supports New York’s climate superfund law, which would require energy companies to cough up $75 billion combined over time to fund green initiatives, in addition to a number of other bills and programs favored by Democrats, according to its website.

“The Chinese-American Planning Council (CPC) is not just another advocacy group, it’s a conduit for CCP-linked money and influence in the heart of our country. When you read ‘CPC,’ you should think ‘CCP,’” founder and CEO of State Armor Michael Lucci told the DCNF. “CPC has a long record of supporting malicious policies that run contrary to our interests. It should come as no surprise that the CPC supports New York’s massive climate slush fund, which would jack up energy costs while weakening America’s energy security.” (RELATED: New York Rolls Out ‘Shakedown’ Law Forcing Companies To Atone For Climate Change With Cash)

“This isn’t just bad policy — it’s Beijing’s playbook, operating through a range of front groups, proxies, and influence operations to undermine our sovereignty,” Lucci continued. “Every lawmaker who backs this scheme is playing into the hands of the CCP’s geopolitical strategy. If we’re serious about protecting national security and energy independence, we must treat CPC–backed initiatives as CCP-backed initiatives, which are always malicious influence operations against America.”

The CPC submitted written testimony for a January 2024 joint legislative public hearing on New York’s budget proposal advocating for the superfund law, and the group also characterized the bill’s failure to make it into the budget in April 2024 as a “shortcoming.”

Since 2018, the CPC has received up to $445,969 in donations from sources linked to the Chinese government, according to financial records previously reviewed by the DCNF. State-run corporations — including the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) and the Bank of China — have financially supported the CPC in recent years, records show.

The ICBC donated almost $20,000 to the nonprofit across 20182019 and 2023, according to the CPC’s annual reports, and the Beijing-based and state-owned Bank of China gave as much as $9,999 in 2020 and up to that same amount in 2024 to the CPC, the nonprofit’s annual reports show.

The CPC has accepted funds from multiple other organizations that have ties to the CCP, the DCNF previously reported.

House Republicans recently launched an investigation into the CPC after an undercover video surfaced allegedly showing CPC staff coaching illegal immigrants on how to avoid Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) apprehension. (RELATED: EXCLUSIVE: GOP Launches Investigation Into Taxpayer-Funded Group Allegedly Caught Teaching How To Avoid ICE)

Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul signed the climate bill in December 2024, enacting a law that will require energy companies to pay billions to the state over 25 years to atone for their supposed roles in causing climate change. The new law rests on shaky legal foundations and functions as a state revenue grab that, if fully implemented, is likely to increase consumer costs, energy and legal experts previously told the DCNF.

Hochul’s office says that the state will use the funds extracted from energy companies under the law to pay for projects that will enhance the state’s “resiliency to dangerous climate impacts.” Some of the projects to be funded by the law include upgrades to drainage systems, refashioning buildings to be more green and developing “green spaces” in urban environments, according to the law’s text.

Upon signing the bill, Hochul’s office proclaimed that the new superfund law will “[shift] the cost of climate adaptation from everyday New Yorkers to the fossil fuel companies most responsible for the pollution.” If the law is fully implemented, the financial burden on energy companies will ultimately lead to increased costs for the consumers, critics told the DCNF at the time of the bill’s enactment.

The Trump administration filed complaints against Vermont and New York over their “climate superfund laws” on May 1, following Trump’s April 8 executive order directing Attorney General Pam Bondi to “protect” domestic energy production from state laws that halt or hinder energy development. (RELATED: Trump Admin Sues To Block Blue States From Taking Fossil Fuel Companies To Court Over Climate Change)

The CPC has also backed other policies that hinder domestic energy production in addition to purportedly advising illegal migrants on how to defy immigration laws.

“There is an urgent need to invest in our community well-being and safety through building climate resilient infrastructures and systems,” the CPC’s website reads.

It continues to argue for the passage of the Climate, Jobs, and Justice Package for the sake of “marginalized communities,” which includes the superfund law as well as the NY Home Energy Affordable Transition Act and the Just Energy Transition Act. The NY Home Energy Affordable Transition Act seeks to “[align] utility regulation with state climate justice and emission reduction targets” and the Just Energy Transition Act would “provide a blueprint to guide the replacement and redevelopment of New York State’s fossil fuel facilities and their sites by 2030,” according to the bill text.

The CPC supports efforts to “decarbonize New York and transition into renewable energy that will allow all New Yorkers to live in a safe and healthy environment,” the nonprofit’s website states. New York has historically supported green energy mandates that threaten the reliability of its power grid, several grid experts previously told the DCNF.

The nonprofit’s site goes on to list support for increasing taxes on corporations to fund left-leaning social programs, universal health care and shelling out $500 million in taxpayer funds on a program for illegal migrants.

The CPC, the Chinese Embassy, Hochul’s office, the ICBC and the Bank of China did not respond to the DCNF’s requests for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

5 10 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

22 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Halla
June 1, 2025 6:06 pm

Rather like Rosneft making contributions to green NGOs opposing nuclear and fracking.

Reply to  Tom Halla
June 1, 2025 6:45 pm

Tom
Bingo! China, like Russia, loves it when they get the West’s NGOs to hobble our economies.
They benefit economically & geopolitically — truly a win-win situation for them!

Also, let’s not forget that it is the oil/gas customers who burn the fuel; the O/G industry
uses ~ 25% [IIRC] of the energy they produce. So, if this nonsense lawsuit prevails, 75% of any “penalty” should be paid by the users.

Reply to  B Zipperer
June 2, 2025 4:36 am

I think 25% is high. That would suggest an EROI around 4, which is way too low. There are many ways of calculating the cost of supplying energy vs. its useful output, but typical oil and gas numbers are in the 10-40:1 range, I think.

But to your point, another option is for the O/G companies to withdraw their presumably “bad” products from New York, and let the public decide whether or not they prefer things like heat, electricity, fuel for transportation, etc… The question is, if an industry is targeted, can the industry act as one to respond? Would it be illegal for Exxon and Chevron and all the others jointly take the same position to stop providing gasoline anywhere in New York State? or would that be illegal? In a court case, can’t the defendants provide a joint defense? Why couldn’t the companies all propose to jointly stop supplying their product while the case proceeds? Would love to see the result…

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  BobM
June 2, 2025 7:53 am

If they get a court injunction prohibiting supplying the products, they are not liable for the consequences.

CD in Wisconsin
June 1, 2025 6:40 pm

“The CPC supports New York’s climate superfund law, which would require energy companies to cough up $75 billion combined over time to fund green initiatives, in addition to a number of other bills and programs favored by Democrats, according to its website.”

******************

Up to $75 billion for a problem that doesn’t exist. Begs the question of whether the Trump administration is going to fight it or not.

ResourceGuy
Reply to  CD in Wisconsin
June 1, 2025 7:50 pm

I guess that means the Chinese have completed their super refinery corridor and plan to take all the international oil plays.

Reply to  CD in Wisconsin
June 2, 2025 4:06 am

Energy companies in New York should raise their prices by $75 billion to make up for the loss.

ResourceGuy
June 1, 2025 7:39 pm

Hidden links again.

June 1, 2025 8:48 pm

Let’s face it: the US Democrat Party has become the lap dog of the CCP. Everything the Dems do or say is dictated by and in service to Maoism — not just Marxism but Shining Path Maoism. If you’re waiting for a Dem, any Dem, to reject or even criticize Red China, you’re in for a very long wait.

Reply to  OR For
June 2, 2025 4:23 am

Birds of a feather, flock together.

The Democrats want to install a Chicom-type government in the United States. A One-Party government that they control. They are very close to realizing their goal if Republicans do not play their cards right.

The radical Democrats who control Washington DC are an existential threat to the freedoms of all of us. Their intention is to destroy their political opponents and seize political power for themselves.

Any Republican who does not vote to move President Trump’s agenda forward, is selling our country out to Dictatorial Democrats. It’s as simple as that. No budgetary issue or any other issue is as important as implementing Trump’s agenda.

The implementation of Trump’s agenda will put the United States back on the fast track to economic properity where we can grow our way out of the budget deficit, and at the same time impress the American people with how Republicans can get things done and are good for American, which will result in more Republicans getting elected, which will result in a Republican Congress putting this nation back on track.

Voting against Trump’s agenda will undo all of this. So wake up you dozen short-sighted Republicans and vote with Trump and the American people. This may be our last chance to save our Republic. Pass Trump’s Big, Beautiful Bill and get this nation moving. If you have a petty interest, put it in another bill. There’s always tomorrow, as long as the radical Democrats don’t have control. Don’t give it to them. Your petty issues or your dislike of Trump is not a good enough reason to vote against Trump’s/America’s agenda.

Republicans should not vote with Radical Democrats. It’s an existential threat to our freedoms. Republicans who cannot see this, should not be in political office as they pose a danger to all of us.

Michael Flynn
June 1, 2025 9:25 pm

I’m not surprised that the The Chinese-American Planning Council (CPC) receives money from the Chinese and Americans.

Seems logical.

I guess NGO’s get funds from people who support them, just like political parties. Maybe the American taxpayers shouldn’t have been the majority funder of the CPC.

Seems silly.

OweninGA
June 2, 2025 2:52 am

There are only two correct responses for energy companies: the best is they should completely withdraw from those markets. A state that is completely dependent on those energy companies for survival really shouldn’t be accusing the energy companies of causing harm.

The other choice is a NY surcharge on all fuels sold in the state. Make the price prohibitive for the consumers and clearly label it as payment for this fund. Pain is the only source of education for these people.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  OweninGA
June 2, 2025 7:56 am

Third choice supporting the first. Get a court ordered injunction prohibiting sales of the products in those states. The injunctions absolve the energy companies of the consequences.

Someone
Reply to  OweninGA
June 3, 2025 8:56 am

I would not mind gas stations putting up billboards next to gas prices that would break down how the gas cost is partitioned: cost of oil, cost of refinery, delivery, various taxes. It would also be instructive to compare this with some benchmark, like national average. They could also make transparent their profit margin.

June 2, 2025 4:04 am

From the article: ““CPC has a long record of supporting malicious policies that run contrary to our interests. It should come as no surprise that the CPC supports New York’s massive climate slush fund, which would jack up energy costs while weakening America’s energy security.”

No, it should not come as a surprise that the Communist Chinese are trying to undermine the United States.The Chicoms are on the attack in every way possible. They mean to destroy the United States.

Trump is going to throw a monkey wrench into the Chicom plans. He is zeroing in on the problem by putting the spotlight on about 300,000 Chinese students who are attending schools in the United States, including the daughter of China’s leader, Xi. Trump might end up revoking her visa! 🙂

oeman50
June 2, 2025 4:08 am

And is New York planning to add China to the demand for money since it emits more CO2 than any other country? Hmmm…..

June 2, 2025 4:14 am

Harvard Has Trained So Many Chinese Communist Officials, They Call It Their ‘Party School’
https://www.wsj.com/world/china/china-communist-party-harvard-f855112b?st=L6TxMV&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

2hotel9
June 2, 2025 4:49 am

Funded by Chinese Communist Party? Then they are foreign agents, did the list themselves as such with FARA? And since their actions are intended to damage US they should be listed as terrorist groups and targeted accordingly.

ResourceGuy
June 2, 2025 6:01 am

It makes you wonder just how many hidden funding linkages exist in American msm too.

Dave Andrews
June 2, 2025 7:18 am

Here in the UK the former head of MI6 recently warned that Ed Miliband’s “crazy” net zero plans put the UK at risks because of their reliance on Chinese technology.

A government spokesman said “we would never let anything get in the way of our national security”. So that’s alright then 🙂

Meanwhile Wind Europe says wind turbines “are packed with electronics and sensors which gather a wealth of operational data. This makes wind turbines potential targets for cyber attack”

Chinese wind turbines probably have a few extra sensors and other technology embedded just like their solar panels.

John Hultquist
June 2, 2025 7:42 am

the new superfund law will “[shift] the cost of climate adaptation from everyday New Yorkers
Gov. Kathy Hochul and those in her office are, supposedly, well educated. When the government of Washington State implemented a law to shift the cost of CO2 production to big companies, gasoline prices rose an estimated 50¢ per gallon. Most things “everyday” Washingtonians purchase have also increased in price. The Governor and her colleagues are willfully ignorant and likely skipped basic economics during their school years. 

observa
June 2, 2025 3:12 pm

They want the West to starve on emotion-
This farmer proves why Net Zero is impossible – Topher Project Ep 088
No amount of rational arithmetic can overcome the emotional appeal of net zero and the stinkers in residence would only get it with a dose of Pol Pottyism being frogmarched off to the fields with hoes and scythes.