False, Barron’s and Deutsche Welle, Climate Change Isn’t Endangering Mongolian Herding

From ClimateREALISM

By H. Sterling Burnett

Recently several domestic and foreign media outlets, such as Barron’s and Deutsche Welle (DW) posted articles claiming that climate change threatened the lifestyles and livelihoods of Mongolian herding communities, citing livestock losses caused by severe winters in recent years. This is false. Extended, cyclical periods of severe winter weather, called zud or dzud, typified by extremely cold temperatures and heavy snow or ice, have plagued Mongolian herders throughout history, and there is no evidence suggesting climate change has made these events more common or severe.

Livestock raising, herding in particular, is a traditional and critical vocation in Mongolia, accounting for a significant portion of Mongolia’s domestic agriculture industry and its agricultural exports, even today. Five animals are commonly herded across Mongolia’s steppes or grasslands: camels, cattle (including yaks), goats, horses, and sheep. These animals provide transportation, hides for clothing and shelter, milk, cheese, and meat.

The Barron’s article, “Climate Change Pushes Mongolian Herders To The Brink,” and DW’s similarly titled, “Climate change endangers Mongolian herders’ livelihoods,” claim high livestock losses in Mongolia this past winter and periodically in other winters over the past couple of decades are due to climate change.

“Traditional herders are struggling to get by on the Mongolian steppe,” writes DW. “The vast country is being hit particularly hard by climate change and extreme weather.”

Similarly Barron’s writes, “[a]cross Mongolia, more than seven million animals were killed, over a tenth of the country’s total,” blaming the loses on an extreme weather event resulting from climate change.

There are multiple false connections and misleading statements packed into those statements and the articles they come from.

Dzuds of different types have been common throughout Mongolia’s history, on occasion causing losses of up to 50 percent of the nation’s herded livestock. One study of Dzuds states:

Dzuds (the d is silent, z is long, and ud pronounced as the ud in udder) have affected Mongolia throughout history. These winter storms are a combination of deep cold, strong winds, heavy snow, and ice. Storms have been fierce enough to freeze entire herds overnight and the snow so deep that it causes flash floods in the spring when it melts.

The same study claims that dzuds have become more frequent in recent years. However, historical tracking of dzuds, before the advent of modern satellites, transnational news organizations, and even modern national government agencies monitoring and tracking such events, was sparse. As with hurricane and tornado tracking, dzuds likely occurred in the past more frequently than is now known because, while isolated herders were impacted, reporting and recording of the event and associated losses were absent. For instance, there were 15 dzuds recorded in the 1700s, yet it is unknown how many more might have occurred that went unreported/recorded. There was no official tracking of such things then, no temperature records, no snow records, no agencies, and fewer herders,and livestock, more isolated and sparsely spread over the steppes. There is no evidence, for example, that cold weather or heavy winter storms have become more common or chaotic over the past century, so no reason to believe that dzuds have become more common.

As explored in numerous previous Climate Realism articles data does not support the mainstream media’s constant barrage of stories asserting that climate change is making weather more extreme, climate change is not altering the polar vortex – making extreme cold spells more common, severe, and/or unpredictable. Nor is extreme cold or snow and ice storms more common or severe. In fact, as discussed in Climate at a Glance: Cold Spells, the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has stated that “it is ‘very likely’ there have been fewer very cold days and nights in recent decades, and the report’s authors further claim it is ‘virtually certain’ that there will be ‘decreases in cold extremes’ due to global warming.”

Although livestock losses in recent years have undoubtedly been devastating to some herders, the data show that herds have grown dramatically during the recent period of modest warming. Some losses are due to the fact that herd sizes have grown, but the grazing area has remained relatively stable, as a result, in some areas overgrazing has become a problem. Accordingly, when dzuds strike there are more animals in areas of less forage. Even then, livestock losses as a percentage of the total estimated herds have been greater in the past than at present.

Indeed, even as the Earth has slightly warmed and more dzuds have been reported, data from the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) show that livestock numbers have increased, not been decimated, amid climate change. FAO data show that from 1993 through 2023:

  • Mongolian camel stocks grew by more than 14 percent;
  • Mongolian cattle (including yak) numbers have increased by approximately 90 percent;
  • Mongolian goat herds expanded by nearly 340 percent;
  • Mongolian horse stocks grew by almost 95 percent;
  • and Mongolian sheep herds have increased by slightly more than 100 percent. (See the figure, below)

While some herders may have suffered nearly ruinous losses during recent dzud events, there is no measure by which it can be shown that recent climate change is threatening the herding culture or tradition across Mongolia.

Media outlets like Barron’s and DW should check the data and the historical context before asserting without proof that climate change is threatening Mongolian herders and the lifestyles and culture they have developed over the centuries, based on a few scientists unverified claims. Herding, like crop production, has always had to contend with the vagaries of weather. Mongolia’s herders have seen many periods of climate change and have been undeterred in their herding pursuit, thriving despite sometimes dangerous weather events, which can decimate herds in the short-term.

H. Sterling Burnett

H. Sterling Burnett

H. Sterling Burnett, Ph.D., is the Director of the Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy and the managing editor of Environment & Climate News. In addition to directing The Heartland Institute’s Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy, Burnett puts Environment & Climate News together, is the editor of Heartland’s Climate Change Weekly email, and the host of the Environment & Climate News Podcast.

5 8 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
April 3, 2025 10:16 am

 These animals provide transportation, hides for clothing and shelter, milk, cheese, and meat.

___________________________________________________________________________

And they emit gobs of methane, and Trump’s USAID bans mean Mongolia won’t be able to afford feeding BOVAER® to their yak herds.

Tom Halla
April 3, 2025 10:16 am

Open range herding has generally been risky. What they are missing is any sense of history. As the herd numbers show, overall, the Mongolian herders have been “doing better” over an extended period, with occasional severe losses.
Theodore Roosevelt tried cattle ranching in the Dakotas in the 1880’s, and had significant losses in 18886-87, due to a severe snowstorm that is reminiscent of a dzud. TR had to make a living as a writer to compensate for his losses. There is, of course, still cattle ranching in the Dakotas.

Jeff Alberts
April 3, 2025 10:36 am

It’s essentially observation bias.

Scarecrow Repair
April 3, 2025 10:39 am

Interesting. Implies a lifespan of 9-10 years.

more than seven million animals were killed, over a tenth of the country’s total

Wikipedia lists various animals in their herds. What does it say about their lifespans?

Sheep: 10-12 years.
Goats: 15-18 years.
Cattle: 25-30 years, but slaughtered at 18 months (bulls) or 5 years (dairy cows).
Horses: 15-20 years.
Camels: 40-50 years.
Pigs: 20+ years, but I doubt slaughter waits that long.

Didn’t find anything specific on Mongolian breeds, but seeing as how these are not pets and live through some harsh winters, their lifespans are probably shorter. Especially if you raise them for meat, no one’s going to wait until they die natural deaths to slaughter them.

April 3, 2025 10:40 am

We are all doomed.
Everybody panic.
We are all going to freeze to death because of Global Warming.

Er ….

Or maybe not.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Oldseadog
April 3, 2025 11:57 am

The sky is falling.
Er …
Or maybe not.

April 3, 2025 11:34 am

I, for one, welcome my new yurt lifestyle once we have been cast back to the stone age by warmists.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Shoki
April 3, 2025 11:59 am

You unintentionally nailed it.
The Yurts shall inherit the earth.

The rest of us, the deplorables, shall have nothing and be happy as a yak.

MrGrimNasty
April 3, 2025 11:59 am

“After the collapse of the communist Mongolian People’s Republic in 1990, Mongolia abandoned the quota system that previously governed the number of animals permitted to graze on its lands. Since then, its grazing livestock population has jumped from 20 million to 61.5 million. Goats now account for more than half of all livestock, which has proven environmentally disastrous: Goats eat the roots and flowers needed to seed new grasses, so when a herd uproots a pasture, what grows back is sparser and often poisonous (inedible plants generally replace native grasses). Unmoored soil is swept up into dust storms, reaching as far south as Beijing and Hong Kong.

Consequently, an estimated 70 percent of Mongolia’s grazing lands are presently considered degraded. Herders are forced onto progressively smaller patches of land, further hastening soil erosion.”

Oh, the goats are for Cashmere mainly.

John Hultquist
Reply to  MrGrimNasty
April 3, 2025 7:44 pm

Thanks for the info. I was wondering why the increases and guessed one of the reasons was a growing demand from trade.
Seems there is a “tragedy of the commons” operating.

Sparta Nova 4
April 3, 2025 12:01 pm

Hmmm…. if it is freezing, then the animals should still be edible after the thaw.

I wonder how much CO2 will be emitted in the ensuing barbeque.

Bob
April 3, 2025 12:56 pm

Very nice Sterling. We must force the conversation away from climate change and force these false prophets to say what they really mean. They look stupid now but think how stupid they would look saying herds are freezing to death from catastrophic anthropogenic global warming.

Reply to  Bob
April 3, 2025 1:37 pm

Well, I wouldn’t mind one of the clapping seals who come on here explain how back radiation from anthropogenic carbon dioxide causes more severely cold winters in Mongolia. Just the abstract will do, no maths required.

Reply to  philincalifornia
April 4, 2025 1:06 pm

No maths possible. Such clapping seals are innumerate.

Intelligent Dasein
April 3, 2025 1:23 pm

Story Tip:

The March Global UAH data is out, for crying out quiet.

April 3, 2025 1:26 pm

The last time the Mongols ‘left the reservation’ so to speak coincided with cooling conditions beginning near the end of the Medieval Climate Optimum.

Rational Keith
April 4, 2025 6:04 am

Several years ago there was much publicity about the plight of Mongolian peasants because deep snow hampered ability of animals like horses to paw down to grass for food.

Responsible charitable people helped provide low cost ways to transport hay and shelter it, for winters.

Cold kills.

KevinM
April 4, 2025 8:34 am

Whew, headline scared me. I worried someone might be herding Mongolians. It’s cold out, and in the movies their shirts have no sleeves – it’s cold out there!