No, BBC, a Small Panamanian Island is Not Drowning Due to Climate Change

The BBC’s recent article “Climate change: The Panama community that fled its drowning island,” claims that the island of Cartí Sugdupu in Panama is being swallowed by rising sea levels due to climate change. This is false. The reality is that the island’s inhabitants are not being forced to relocate because of rising oceans, but due to overcrowding, poor infrastructure, and a lack of resources—issues that have nothing to do with climate change. Furthermore, real-world examples and peer-reviewed research contradict the idea that small islands are disappearing due to rising seas. Instead, many islands are growing, adapting, and naturally shifting over time. The BBC’s report is misleading at best, deliberately deceptive at worst.

Cartí Sugdupu is one of Panama’s San Blas Islands, home to the indigenous Guna people. The BBC’s article, painting a picture of climate-induced displacement, completely ignores the fact that the island is severely overcrowded, with more than 1,000 people packed into a tiny space of just 0.028 square miles. That’s a population density higher than New York City! The primary reason the residents are moving is not rising sea levels, but poor living conditions, lack of fresh water, and a shortage of space—issues that have been pressing for decades.

Instead of addressing these fundamental concerns, the BBC presents the relocation as a direct result of climate change, despite the absence of evidence that rising seas are responsible. The sea level around Panama has been rising at an average of about 1 to 3 mm per year, a rate consistent with natural post-Little Ice Age trends, a rate that has not increased during the recent period of climate change. As such, there is no indication of an impending climate catastrophe as described in Climate at a Glance. At this pace, it would take centuries before Cartí Sugdupu would face submersion.

Some new islands are even emerging. For example in the article San Blas Reborn: New Islands Emerge Amidst Climate Change Hysteria it has been reported:

Off the coast of Maoqui in the Dutch Cays, a new island is gradually taking shape. What started as a mere speck of land, approximately 5 meters by 8 meters, has grown over the past decade to a remarkable 40 meters by 80 meters.

The BBC article implies that small islands like Cartí Sugdupu are being swallowed by the ocean, yet fails to mention peer-reviewed research demonstrating that most islands are stable or even expanding. A 2018 study published in Nature Communications examined 101 Pacific and Indian Ocean islands and found that 88 percent were either stable or increasing in size (Kench, Ford, and Owen, 2018). The processes that shape islands—sediment accumulation, reef growth, and dynamic land movement—mean that atolls and low-lying islands are not passive victims of sea level rise.

Tuvalu is a perfect example. Despite years of claims that the country would disappear, its total land area has actually grown by 2.9 percent over four decades. Similar observations have been made for islands in Kiribati, the Maldives, and the Marshall Islands. If these islands are growing or maintaining their size despite sea level rise, why would Cartí Sugdupu be uniquely doomed? The BBC refuses to acknowledge this inconvenient reality.

The real reason for the relocation of Cartí Sugdupu’s residents has nothing to do with climate change. Instead, it comes down to basic infrastructure challenges:

  • Overpopulation – As seen in the head photograph, the island is overcrowded, with nowhere to expand. Unlike coral atolls that naturally grow, Cartí Sugdupu is an isolated, heavily inhabited island with no room for additional housing or development.
  • Lack of Freshwater and Sanitation – Many small islands struggle with freshwater availability. The BBC ignores this and instead attributes all hardships to climate change.
  • Economic and Government Decisions – Panama’s government is relocating the residents as part of a planned move, not an emergency evacuation due to rising waters.

The BBC’s reporting is a prime example of climate alarmism dressed up as journalism, with the organization pushing a narrative, while ignoring crucial facts. Rather than investigating the real reasons behind Cartí Sugdupu’s relocation—overpopulation, lack of infrastructure, and government decisions—the BBC misleadingly claims climate change is forcing its residents to relocate. It is the government that has made that decision, and not because the seas are rising at a historically unusual rate. The BBC ignores peer-reviewed research disproving its claim that islands are disappearing, fails to mention historical sea level trends, and omits crucial local factors that explain the island’s challenges. This isn’t objective reporting—it is activism disguised as news. The BBC’s audience deserves better, it deserves the truth.

Anthony Watts Thumbnail

Anthony Watts

Anthony Watts is a senior fellow for environment and climate at The Heartland Institute. Watts has been in the weather business both in front of, and behind the camera as an on-air television meteorologist since 1978, and currently does daily radio forecasts. He has created weather graphics presentation systems for television, specialized weather instrumentation, as well as co-authored peer-reviewed papers on climate issues. He operates the most viewed website in the world on climate, the award-winning website wattsupwiththat.com.

Originally posted at ClimateREALISM

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
5 32 votes
Article Rating
49 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bryan A
February 13, 2025 6:04 am

Nice Island…which shanty is the Tree Museum?

Scissor
Reply to  Bryan A
February 13, 2025 6:50 am

It’s next to one of the few trees.

Bryan A
February 13, 2025 6:14 am

At least they’re trying their hardest to adapt to the Big Green Borg-thought
That last dark roofed building near the right side has 28 rather hastily placed Solar Panels on the roof. I wonder what they use those for?

Stan Brown
Reply to  Bryan A
February 13, 2025 8:30 am

To keep the rain out?

Bryan A
Reply to  Stan Brown
February 13, 2025 10:35 am

Aah covering holes in the roof, an excellent use for them

SCInotFI
February 13, 2025 6:15 am

BBC is a ‘fossil’ and provides an example of an ongoing extinction event – its own.

MarkW
Reply to  SCInotFI
February 13, 2025 7:55 am

The BBC is a perfect example of what happens when the government controls your funding.

rovingbroker
February 13, 2025 6:16 am

So … how do we stop the BBC (and others) from lying? True believers don’t read Watts Up With That?

0perator
Reply to  rovingbroker
February 13, 2025 7:21 am

Well they were getting millions from USAID and that money spigot is off along with a whole bunch of other propaganda the CIA was putting out.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  0perator
February 13, 2025 5:21 pm

USAID is only the US version there are lots of countries who have weird aid payments.

Reply to  rovingbroker
February 13, 2025 12:06 pm

The story of this island is also on youtube, lots of views.

February 13, 2025 6:35 am

story tip

State Dept. Plans $400 Million Purchase of Armored Tesla Cybertrucks
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/12/us/politics/trump-tesla-musk-cybertruck.html

WTF? I though Trump wants to get rid of all EVs.

Scissor
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 13, 2025 6:56 am

Tesla was removed from consideration but, yes, WTF. Apparently the decision to purchase was made under the previous admin.

‘The State Department was planning to buy $400 million worth of “Armored Tesla” later this year, according to its 2025 procurement forecast, a document outlining projections of anticipated contracts, which was published in December.”

MR166
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 13, 2025 6:56 am

Well to be more precise President Trump wants to just end subsidies and insure free choice.

Reply to  MR166
February 13, 2025 9:01 am

Yuh, but EVs for the military?

Tom Johnson
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 13, 2025 10:57 am

Of course. The plan is for perfect equilibrium. Half of them will be allocated to towing the diesel generators to charge them, and the other half to tow the diesel fuel tanks. This is the definition of “sustainability”.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 13, 2025 5:28 pm

You drive them into the enemy complex and set them on fire 🙂

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 14, 2025 4:25 am

ok im NOT into EV but…gotta hand it to this guy for testing em HARD Ive seen #2 and am about to watch #1 heres the link
its damn fun if nothing else. and I WAS amazed he didnt manage to ignite them

Reply to  ozspeaksup
February 15, 2025 1:50 am

Brutal

EmilyDaniels
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
February 17, 2025 6:15 pm

From what I understand, this was widely misreported. The Biden administration requested bids for EV armored vehicles for the State Department, and Tesla was the only responsive bid. This bid was accepted in December, and I think Trump is canceling the order

J Boles
February 13, 2025 7:19 am

Story tip – The Left Has Officially Lost the War on Gas Stoves – PJ Media

Excerpt –

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has formally concluded its review of gas-powered stovetops — a process that began during the Biden administration — and your gas stove isn’t going anywhere.
“In electing President Trump, the American people spoke loudly that the United States has no business telling American families how to cook their meals,” Consumer Product Safety Commission acting chairman Peter Feldman told the Washington Free Beacon.

MrGrimNasty
February 13, 2025 7:27 am

I posted about this on unthreaded, together with a link to some proper journalism.

https://sumauma.com/en/a-historia-de-uma-ilha-ameacada-pelo-mar-do-caribe/

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MrGrimNasty
February 13, 2025 12:49 pm

Touching. Very respectful.
The whole truth.

strativarius
February 13, 2025 9:05 am

The BBC – propaganda delivered in RP (received pronounciation)

Received Pronunciation (RP) is the British English accent regarded as the standardone, carrying the highest social prestige, since as late as the very early 20th century.[1][2] It has also been commonly referred to as the Queen’s English or King’s English.

Roger Collier
Reply to  strativarius
February 14, 2025 1:48 am

The BBC has discouraged RP since the last millennium.

strativarius
February 13, 2025 9:08 am

The BBC – propaganda delivered in RP (received pronunciation)

Received Pronunciation (RP) is the British English accent regarded as the standard one, carrying the highest social prestige, since as late as the very early 20th century. It has also been commonly referred to as the Queen’s English or King’s English. Etc

bobpjones
Reply to  strativarius
February 13, 2025 10:01 am

And that’s why the King, lives in a “hice”

Jim Turner
Reply to  bobpjones
February 14, 2025 3:23 am

Actually, he lives in a karstle, hices are for peasants.

bobpjones
Reply to  Jim Turner
February 14, 2025 3:49 am

😄

Dave Fair
February 13, 2025 9:14 am

Does any WUWT reader/contributor know of any complaint to the BBC for publishing obvious, fact- less propaganda?

bobpjones
Reply to  Dave Fair
February 14, 2025 3:51 am

Complaints have been submitted. But, as you’d expect, they either don’t respond, or try to gas light the complainant.

Dale Mullen
February 13, 2025 9:42 am

Wasn’t the BBC article referring to the small Island of Gardi Sugdub, rather than the island of Cartí Sugdupu? Are these one and the same?

MrGrimNasty
Reply to  Dale Mullen
February 13, 2025 9:52 am

Yes.

Editor
February 13, 2025 9:42 am

I wrote about this madness last year in my post “The 13th First Climate Refugees“. As Anthony says, it’s fake news.

w.

Bruce Cobb
February 13, 2025 9:47 am

Of course, it’s the Beeb. They have a reputation to live down to.

bobpjones
February 13, 2025 9:55 am

The BBC’s audience deserves better, it deserves the truth”

Not so, we deserve our money back for the last 25 years.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  bobpjones
February 13, 2025 5:44 pm

Unfortunately some of you voted for it. Until there is enough hurt and they might vote differently. Recent polls suggest UK may be at that point.

bobpjones
Reply to  Leon de Boer
February 14, 2025 12:10 am

Obviously you don’t understand the BBC. Nobody gets to vote for or against it. It has been a long standing law, going back to the first days of its creation.

Gregg Eshelman
Reply to  bobpjones
February 14, 2025 3:12 am

Uou folks in the UK should be demanding the end of the TV and radio license. Fully privatize the BBC and make them fund themselves with advertising like every other TV and radio network in the UK does.

bobpjones
Reply to  Gregg Eshelman
February 14, 2025 3:58 am

We’d very much like that to happen. A few years ago, the gov’t handed total control of licensing to the BBC, with the requirement, that they still permit the over 75s, to have a free license.

Within a year of gaining control they scrapped that concession.

They now, pursue non license viewers in the courts, obtaining a criminal conviction. Even to the point of prosecuting a disabled person who had learning disabilities, and was under the care of the council, who were responsible for managing her finances.

Alas, many politicians don’t want the license to be scrapped, as the BBC is essentially their ‘mouthpiece’, and promotes gov’t propaganda.

But dissent is growing. They’re losing about 500,000 viewers every year.

Mary Jones
February 13, 2025 10:07 am

…the island is severely overcrowded, with more than 1,000 people packed into a tiny space of just 0.028 square miles. That’s a population density higher than New York City! 

But only about 1/3 the population density of Monaco. Of course, Monaco is a rich country with good infrastructure, not a tropical island in the ocean. But it makes as much sense to compare Carti Sugdupu to Monaco as it does to New York City.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Mary Jones
February 13, 2025 12:23 pm

While your point is valid, most people in the US can associate with NYC than Monaco.

Westfieldmike
February 13, 2025 11:27 am

Giant gas field discovery could power Britain for a decadeA giant gas field has been discovered under Lincolnshire that could fuel the UK’s entire needs for a decade, reducing dependence on imports  and generating tens of thousands of jobs, an energy company has claimed.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/02/13/giant-gas-field-discovery-could-power-britain-for-decade/

Leon de Boer
Reply to  Westfieldmike
February 13, 2025 5:45 pm

Except I expect under current commitments you have to leave it in the ground.

Sparta Nova 4
February 13, 2025 11:28 am

And BBC received multimillion dollar funding from USAID.

DipChip
February 13, 2025 11:34 am

Perspective: .028 Sq miles is 18 acres and provides 780 sq ft or 72 sq meters per person for 1,000 population.

Reply to  DipChip
February 13, 2025 12:10 pm

wow, 780 sqft, that’s 2.5 times the size of our house, where do I sign up.

Bob
February 13, 2025 3:18 pm

Very nice Anthony. Let me help you out here, the BBC is lying, lying is not okay. Freedom of speech and a free press does not justify lying. They need to stop it. At some point the media needs to be held accountable for its abuses.

Gregg Eshelman
February 14, 2025 2:17 am

Good thing Trump stopped USAID funding going to the BBC. https://www.bbc.com/mediaaction/press-release/4-feb-25