The BBC’s recent article “Climate change: The Panama community that fled its drowning island,” claims that the island of Cartí Sugdupu in Panama is being swallowed by rising sea levels due to climate change. This is false. The reality is that the island’s inhabitants are not being forced to relocate because of rising oceans, but due to overcrowding, poor infrastructure, and a lack of resources—issues that have nothing to do with climate change. Furthermore, real-world examples and peer-reviewed research contradict the idea that small islands are disappearing due to rising seas. Instead, many islands are growing, adapting, and naturally shifting over time. The BBC’s report is misleading at best, deliberately deceptive at worst.
Cartí Sugdupu is one of Panama’s San Blas Islands, home to the indigenous Guna people. The BBC’s article, painting a picture of climate-induced displacement, completely ignores the fact that the island is severely overcrowded, with more than 1,000 people packed into a tiny space of just 0.028 square miles. That’s a population density higher than New York City! The primary reason the residents are moving is not rising sea levels, but poor living conditions, lack of fresh water, and a shortage of space—issues that have been pressing for decades.
Instead of addressing these fundamental concerns, the BBC presents the relocation as a direct result of climate change, despite the absence of evidence that rising seas are responsible. The sea level around Panama has been rising at an average of about 1 to 3 mm per year, a rate consistent with natural post-Little Ice Age trends, a rate that has not increased during the recent period of climate change. As such, there is no indication of an impending climate catastrophe as described in Climate at a Glance. At this pace, it would take centuries before Cartí Sugdupu would face submersion.
Some new islands are even emerging. For example in the article San Blas Reborn: New Islands Emerge Amidst Climate Change Hysteria it has been reported:
Off the coast of Maoqui in the Dutch Cays, a new island is gradually taking shape. What started as a mere speck of land, approximately 5 meters by 8 meters, has grown over the past decade to a remarkable 40 meters by 80 meters.
The BBC article implies that small islands like Cartí Sugdupu are being swallowed by the ocean, yet fails to mention peer-reviewed research demonstrating that most islands are stable or even expanding. A 2018 study published in Nature Communications examined 101 Pacific and Indian Ocean islands and found that 88 percent were either stable or increasing in size (Kench, Ford, and Owen, 2018). The processes that shape islands—sediment accumulation, reef growth, and dynamic land movement—mean that atolls and low-lying islands are not passive victims of sea level rise.
Tuvalu is a perfect example. Despite years of claims that the country would disappear, its total land area has actually grown by 2.9 percent over four decades. Similar observations have been made for islands in Kiribati, the Maldives, and the Marshall Islands. If these islands are growing or maintaining their size despite sea level rise, why would Cartí Sugdupu be uniquely doomed? The BBC refuses to acknowledge this inconvenient reality.
The real reason for the relocation of Cartí Sugdupu’s residents has nothing to do with climate change. Instead, it comes down to basic infrastructure challenges:
- Overpopulation – As seen in the head photograph, the island is overcrowded, with nowhere to expand. Unlike coral atolls that naturally grow, Cartí Sugdupu is an isolated, heavily inhabited island with no room for additional housing or development.
- Lack of Freshwater and Sanitation – Many small islands struggle with freshwater availability. The BBC ignores this and instead attributes all hardships to climate change.
- Economic and Government Decisions – Panama’s government is relocating the residents as part of a planned move, not an emergency evacuation due to rising waters.
The BBC’s reporting is a prime example of climate alarmism dressed up as journalism, with the organization pushing a narrative, while ignoring crucial facts. Rather than investigating the real reasons behind Cartí Sugdupu’s relocation—overpopulation, lack of infrastructure, and government decisions—the BBC misleadingly claims climate change is forcing its residents to relocate. It is the government that has made that decision, and not because the seas are rising at a historically unusual rate. The BBC ignores peer-reviewed research disproving its claim that islands are disappearing, fails to mention historical sea level trends, and omits crucial local factors that explain the island’s challenges. This isn’t objective reporting—it is activism disguised as news. The BBC’s audience deserves better, it deserves the truth.

Anthony Watts is a senior fellow for environment and climate at The Heartland Institute. Watts has been in the weather business both in front of, and behind the camera as an on-air television meteorologist since 1978, and currently does daily radio forecasts. He has created weather graphics presentation systems for television, specialized weather instrumentation, as well as co-authored peer-reviewed papers on climate issues. He operates the most viewed website in the world on climate, the award-winning website wattsupwiththat.com.
Originally posted at ClimateREALISM

Nice Island…which shanty is the Tree Museum?
It’s next to one of the few trees.
At least they’re trying their hardest to adapt to the Big Green Borg-thought
That last dark roofed building near the right side has 28 rather hastily placed Solar Panels on the roof. I wonder what they use those for?
To keep the rain out?
Aah covering holes in the roof, an excellent use for them
BBC is a ‘fossil’ and provides an example of an ongoing extinction event – its own.
The BBC is a perfect example of what happens when the government controls your funding.
So … how do we stop the BBC (and others) from lying? True believers don’t read Watts Up With That?
Well they were getting millions from USAID and that money spigot is off along with a whole bunch of other propaganda the CIA was putting out.
USAID is only the US version there are lots of countries who have weird aid payments.
The story of this island is also on youtube, lots of views.
story tip
State Dept. Plans $400 Million Purchase of Armored Tesla Cybertrucks
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/12/us/politics/trump-tesla-musk-cybertruck.html
WTF? I though Trump wants to get rid of all EVs.
Tesla was removed from consideration but, yes, WTF. Apparently the decision to purchase was made under the previous admin.
‘The State Department was planning to buy $400 million worth of “Armored Tesla” later this year, according to its 2025 procurement forecast, a document outlining projections of anticipated contracts, which was published in December.”
Well to be more precise President Trump wants to just end subsidies and insure free choice.
Yuh, but EVs for the military?
Of course. The plan is for perfect equilibrium. Half of them will be allocated to towing the diesel generators to charge them, and the other half to tow the diesel fuel tanks. This is the definition of “sustainability”.
You drive them into the enemy complex and set them on fire 🙂
ok im NOT into EV but…gotta hand it to this guy for testing em HARD Ive seen #2 and am about to watch #1 heres the link
its damn fun if nothing else. and I WAS amazed he didnt manage to ignite them
Brutal
From what I understand, this was widely misreported. The Biden administration requested bids for EV armored vehicles for the State Department, and Tesla was the only responsive bid. This bid was accepted in December, and I think Trump is canceling the order
Story tip – The Left Has Officially Lost the War on Gas Stoves – PJ Media
Excerpt –
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has formally concluded its review of gas-powered stovetops — a process that began during the Biden administration — and your gas stove isn’t going anywhere.
“In electing President Trump, the American people spoke loudly that the United States has no business telling American families how to cook their meals,” Consumer Product Safety Commission acting chairman Peter Feldman told the Washington Free Beacon.
I posted about this on unthreaded, together with a link to some proper journalism.
https://sumauma.com/en/a-historia-de-uma-ilha-ameacada-pelo-mar-do-caribe/
Touching. Very respectful.
The whole truth.
The BBC – propaganda delivered in RP (received pronounciation)
Received Pronunciation (RP) is the British English accent regarded as the standardone, carrying the highest social prestige, since as late as the very early 20th century.[1][2] It has also been commonly referred to as the Queen’s English or King’s English.
The BBC has discouraged RP since the last millennium.
The BBC – propaganda delivered in RP (received pronunciation)
Received Pronunciation (RP) is the British English accent regarded as the standard one, carrying the highest social prestige, since as late as the very early 20th century. It has also been commonly referred to as the Queen’s English or King’s English. Etc
And that’s why the King, lives in a “hice”
Actually, he lives in a karstle, hices are for peasants.
😄
Does any WUWT reader/contributor know of any complaint to the BBC for publishing obvious, fact- less propaganda?
Complaints have been submitted. But, as you’d expect, they either don’t respond, or try to gas light the complainant.
Wasn’t the BBC article referring to the small Island of Gardi Sugdub, rather than the island of Cartí Sugdupu? Are these one and the same?
Yes.
I wrote about this madness last year in my post “The 13th First Climate Refugees“. As Anthony says, it’s fake news.
w.
Of course, it’s the Beeb. They have a reputation to live down to.
“The BBC’s audience deserves better, it deserves the truth”
Not so, we deserve our money back for the last 25 years.
Unfortunately some of you voted for it. Until there is enough hurt and they might vote differently. Recent polls suggest UK may be at that point.
Obviously you don’t understand the BBC. Nobody gets to vote for or against it. It has been a long standing law, going back to the first days of its creation.
Uou folks in the UK should be demanding the end of the TV and radio license. Fully privatize the BBC and make them fund themselves with advertising like every other TV and radio network in the UK does.
We’d very much like that to happen. A few years ago, the gov’t handed total control of licensing to the BBC, with the requirement, that they still permit the over 75s, to have a free license.
Within a year of gaining control they scrapped that concession.
They now, pursue non license viewers in the courts, obtaining a criminal conviction. Even to the point of prosecuting a disabled person who had learning disabilities, and was under the care of the council, who were responsible for managing her finances.
Alas, many politicians don’t want the license to be scrapped, as the BBC is essentially their ‘mouthpiece’, and promotes gov’t propaganda.
But dissent is growing. They’re losing about 500,000 viewers every year.
But only about 1/3 the population density of Monaco. Of course, Monaco is a rich country with good infrastructure, not a tropical island in the ocean. But it makes as much sense to compare Carti Sugdupu to Monaco as it does to New York City.
While your point is valid, most people in the US can associate with NYC than Monaco.
Giant gas field discovery could power Britain for a decadeA giant gas field has been discovered under Lincolnshire that could fuel the UK’s entire needs for a decade, reducing dependence on imports and generating tens of thousands of jobs, an energy company has claimed.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/02/13/giant-gas-field-discovery-could-power-britain-for-decade/
Except I expect under current commitments you have to leave it in the ground.
And BBC received multimillion dollar funding from USAID.
Perspective: .028 Sq miles is 18 acres and provides 780 sq ft or 72 sq meters per person for 1,000 population.
wow, 780 sqft, that’s 2.5 times the size of our house, where do I sign up.
Very nice Anthony. Let me help you out here, the BBC is lying, lying is not okay. Freedom of speech and a free press does not justify lying. They need to stop it. At some point the media needs to be held accountable for its abuses.
Good thing Trump stopped USAID funding going to the BBC. https://www.bbc.com/mediaaction/press-release/4-feb-25