Reality Check: Maldives Have Actually Grown In Size or Remained Stable Over Recent Decades

From the NoTricksZone

By P Gosselin

An article in the German TKP science site titled “Die Malediven sinken nicht” (The Maldives are not sinking) challenges the common mythical narrative that the Maldives are destined to disappear due to rising sea levels caused by climate change.

Image taken by the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) onboard NASA’s Terra satellite. Source: ASTER gallery. Courtesy of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry/Japan Space Systems and the U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team

But as we have often reported here at NoTricksZone, most islands have in fact grown in size over the recent decades.

Contrary to the “sinking” narrative, the TKP article cites scientific observations (including satellite data) showing that many islands in the Maldives have actually grown in size or remained stable over recent decades rather than disappearing, This contradicts everything we’ve been told by the climate alarmists.

The TKP article explains that coral atolls are dynamic systems that can “grow” with rising sea levels as coral debris and sediment accumulate on the islands, a natural process that allows them to adapt to changing water levels.

AuthorThomas Oysmüller argues that the image of the sinking Maldives is frequently used by politicians and activists as a symbol of climate catastrophe to justify specific policies, despite hard empirical evidence showing the islands are more resilient than portrayed.

The article points out that the Maldivian government continues to invest heavily in permanent infrastructure, such as new airports and luxury resorts, obvious evidence that even the local authorities do not expect the islands to be uninhabitable in the near future.

The article notes that sea levels have fluctuated throughout history and that the current changes are within a range that the islands have successfully navigated in the past through natural geological processes.

In summary, the Maldives are not currently being “swallowed” by the sea and that the alarmist predictions often seen in the media are not supported by the physical growth and geological behavior of the islands.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 17 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
24 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Halla
April 18, 2026 6:16 am

It is just Charles Darwin’s model of
atoll creation. As long as coral growth keeps up, the islands should grow with rising sea levels.

Ron Long
Reply to  Tom Halla
April 18, 2026 12:33 pm

Amazing that Charles Darwin, sailing on HMS Beagle, from 1831 to 1836, was a better observer and scientific analyst than CAGW idiots.

MarkW
Reply to  Ron Long
April 18, 2026 2:23 pm

Darwin was trying to discover the truth.
The CAGW idiots already know what the truth it and are seeking to make the world fit their version of the truth.

Sean2828
Reply to  Tom Halla
April 20, 2026 3:17 am

According to Peter Ridd, when the water is warmer, you get the best corals. I suspect when you get the best corals, you deposit more Ca and Mg carbonate which essentially sequesters CO2 faster.

Scissor
April 18, 2026 6:17 am

I could never live on an island surrounded by water. It’s just a matter of time before it capsizes.

1966goathead
Reply to  Scissor
April 18, 2026 6:46 am

I believe a US congressman has said that.

Reply to  1966goathead
April 18, 2026 6:51 am

and he said it in all seriousness

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
April 18, 2026 5:35 pm

Oh, I’m pretty sure he was being facetious. Kind of like GW Bush remembering Pearl Harbor on September 7th. Bush wanted the press coverage and so did Hank Johnson. Any coverage is better than no coverage. Apparently politics works that way. We all remember Hank because of it. By the way AOC isn’t stupid. She knows exactly what she’s doing.

Reply to  Steve Case
April 18, 2026 5:59 pm

On, I actually think Hank Johnson really is that stupid. !

leefor
Reply to  bnice2000
April 18, 2026 7:40 pm

And as for the Occasional Cortex?

Richard Rude
Reply to  Steve Case
April 18, 2026 9:32 pm

Any proof to back up what you say.

Reply to  Steve Case
April 19, 2026 1:16 pm

I’ve watched the exchange on Youtube a number of times, and I am convinced Hank Johnson was entirely sincere.

1saveenergy
Reply to  1966goathead
April 18, 2026 6:54 am

The claim that Guam could capsize due to overpopulation was made by U.S. Representative Hank Johnson during a 2010 hearing.

MarkW
Reply to  1saveenergy
April 18, 2026 2:29 pm

A few gems from Hank:

“We need a constitutional amendment to allow the legislature to control the so called free speech rights of corporations.”

“The benefits and $174,000 per year salary that we get, we earn. It’s not elaborate, it’s just a bunch of poppycock that a lot of people have spread around trying to get us to hate our own government and our government representatives.” ~ Hank Johnson

At a recent congressional hearing, he declared that grieving parents of children killed by illegal immigrants was just a stunt organized by MAGA Republicans.

During a previous administration:
As Americans, we have the right to decide who lives within our borders, and we can’t let unscrupulous employers to undercut honest business owners by exploiting cheap labor.



DipChip
Reply to  1966goathead
April 18, 2026 10:12 am

The physics and science education of the common Congress Person

Phillip Chalmers
Reply to  DipChip
April 18, 2026 2:00 pm

Why complain? How are US Congress people chosen?
Some people vote sometimes for some reason every so often.

MarkW
Reply to  Phillip Chalmers
April 18, 2026 2:38 pm

The problem is that there are more people who vote for a living then there are people who work for a living.
Those who rely on government checks to pay the bills should not be allowed to vote.

Reply to  Scissor
April 18, 2026 3:10 pm

When I was a child, I used to look at the world map and think that, at the end of the day, continents were just very, very, very large islands, also floating on the ocean. There are surely plenty of geological facts that disprove this naive view, but I still find it amusing (and I remember with nostalgia the globe lamp that used to sit on my bedside table almost two decades ago now.)

Reply to  Charles Armand
April 18, 2026 6:07 pm

People often don’t realise that Australia is actually two main islands and many, many smaller ones.

Bit of research, says 8,222 small islands

Graeme4
Reply to  Charles Armand
April 18, 2026 6:36 pm

Not exactly floating, but Australia continues to move in a north-easterly direction, albeit very, very slowly.

Reply to  Graeme4
April 18, 2026 7:54 pm

I wonder why someone gave you a red thumb.. ?

Your statement is absolutely correct..

1saveenergy
Reply to  Graeme4
April 19, 2026 12:44 am

So when it bumps into China, you can save on the coal shipping costs (:-))

Bob
April 18, 2026 5:19 pm

More good news.

Editor
April 19, 2026 9:37 am

I’d like to note here that as far as I know, I was the first modern observer to call BS on the “sinking atolls” nonsense in my 2004 study (PDF file), which over the years has received 30 citations in the journals.

Six years later, I turned this study into a WUWT article entitled Floating Islands.

My best to all,

w.