Media outlets such as Carbon Brief and The Guardian recently ran articles claiming that climate change is making tropical cyclones worse shortly after cyclone Chido caused destruction and tragic loss of life in Mayotte and Mozambique this past December. This is false. Tropical cyclones are not worsening. Data show no increase in the severity or number of hurricanes and typhoons. In fact, recent research suggests that there has actually been a modest decrease in cyclone frequency and power over the past 30 years.
The Carbon Brief post, “Chido hits; Coal’s new peak; Africa’s energy transition,” citing the Associated Press, claimed that Chido was the “most intense storm to hit Mayotte in 90 years,” and that “[s]cientists have long suggested that climate change is making cyclones worse in the region, but a lack of weather data has hindered more conclusive claims.”
The Guardian’s coverage in the article “Hundreds feared dead as Cyclone Chido devastates French island of Mayotte,” rightly focused examined tragedy of the disaster that occurred there, but the paper could not help itself, claiming in the very last paragraph that tropical cyclones are “getting worse because of the climate emergency,” and “cause large humanitarian crises in poor countries in southern Africa, which contribute a tiny amount to global heating, underlining their call for more help from rich nations to deal with the impacts of climate change.”
The Guardian’s point that African nations need more help because of wealthier nations’ alleged larger contributions to “global heating” is silly, because one imagines that aid would be needed and requested by poor countries when natural disasters occur regardless of climate change. They require help because they are underdeveloped, and they are underdeveloped for a variety of reasons, among them poor institutions, limited property rights, and political corruption, none having to do with climate change.

Beyond that logical error, publicly available data show that tropical storms are not getting more frequent or extreme. Climate Realism has covered that fact many times looking at the historical tropical cyclone storm data compiled and provided by meteorologist Dr. Ryan Maue. The lack of trend is particularly evident when looking at global Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE) – a measure of storm windspeeds over time that gives a value for storm energy. (See graph above) Climate at a Glance: Hurricanes and Climate at a Glance: Global Tropical Cyclones also present real-world data showing no increase in the frequency and severity of such storms.
Emerging research discussed by Chris Morrison in a Daily Sceptic article also shows, contrary to the claims made by Carbon Brief and The Guardian, that cyclones have not been intensifying. Research recently published in the journal Nature that shows there has been “no increase in the destructive power of cyclones – the generic term for typhoons and hurricanes – in any ocean basin over the last 30 years.”
Morrison explains the researchers developed a “Power Dissipation Index,” (PDI) which is similar to ACE except that it includes the intensity of the storm as well as duration and frequency. That metric showed the South Indian basin, where Chido formed, has seen a decline in PDI over the past 30 years. This suggests that the modest warming of the past hundred-plus years has had limited if any impact on cyclone formation and severity. (See graphic below)

A number of factors besides water temperatures factor into whether cyclones form, how powerful they are, and their duration. This is part of the explanation for why there were more typhoons (hurricanes in the Asian Pacific region and Indian Ocean) in 2024 than there were in 2023, despite 2023 ocean temperatures having been much higher, as Climate Realism discussed in the post “Global Warming is Not Making Record Typhoons, South China Morning Post.”
Multiple lines of evidence indicate that tropical cyclones are not getting worse due to the modest warming of the past hundred plus years, regardless of the reason for the warming. Carbon Brief and The Guardian misinform and do their readers a disservice when they leap to attribute individual storms to climate change, especially when evidence to the contrary is so readily available to the public and journalists.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
When talking about Grauniad articles, every sentence should contain the words “claims”, “climate change”, and “false” (but not necessarily in that order).
I really want to hear what the Pakistani groomers think since their feelings carry so much weight.
They say…
Sex abuse gangs view white girls as ‘worthless’ and ‘trash’
ie unislamic. Not so well known is Hindu girls were also fair game
Hindu Council UK demands national public enquiry into grooming gangs across UK https://www.wionews.com/world/hindu-council-uk-demands-national-public-enquiry-into-grooming-gangs-across-uk-8601436#
Go Elon
Don’t forget “climate breakdown”, “supercharging extreme weather”, “levels of heat never experienced by modern humans” and make sure they are all in the first paragraph!
Good writeup!
“Multiple lines of evidence indicate that tropical cyclones are not getting worse due to the modest warming of the past hundred plus years, regardless of the reason for the warming.”
Would Carbon Brief and The Guardian be saying anything about “climate change” if it were known to be of natural origin? Not likely. So we should keep repeating the reminder that no one “knows” that the reported warming has anything to do with human emissions of CO2 from the developed nations.
I linked to this Michael Mischenko Maniac lecture in a previous thread. If you go to the 46.29 point, Michael addresses climate models.
Michael Mishchenko Maniac Lecture, January 26, 2015
Climate models are just not fit for purpose, but we have know this forever. This is why Freedman Dyson never accepted that they added anything of value other than employment opportunities for a lot of not-very-good scientists.
There is nothing that climate change is not making worse. 97% of writers worldwide feel obliged to keep harping this idea, even if their subject is knitting:
“How is climate change rapidly affecting the supply of yarn?!?”
I am so sick of seeing this in everything.
This “climate change made worse, will make it worse, it is worse than we thought, etc.” has degenerated in such self-parody that it resembles Onion news. Nevertheless, it is still very effective. The vast majority mindlessly accepts the Narrative they have grown up with.
Indeed.
There used to be a website, I don’t remember the name and lost track of quite awhile ago, that used to keep a list with links to all of the negative things that were linked to climate change. It was so long ago that it might have even been global warming then. The site closed but was still searchable, at least for a while. even back then I think they had listed over 800 ridiculous things that had been linked to global warming/climate change.
Chicken Little and the Boy Who Cried Wolf had nothing on Climate Change.
“I am so sick of seeing this in everything.”
Yet we read here every day. I’m kind of sad that it’s waning after a few good decades.
Carbon brief…. black underpants.
I saw reference to burned bodies in LA as “carbonized.” Sadly, to add insult to injury, they too are easily misgendered.
Angela Rayner creates a climate of her own
At least one Cabinet minister is finding creative ways of using the ingenuity of civil servants.
https://order-order.com/2025/01/10/rayner-caught-using-civil-servants-to-help-move-house/
All hail the new feudalism.
It’s a big planet. Probably every day there is somewhere a severe weather event- red meat for the climate alarmists yet it proves nothing.
This big planet has more than one climate system….
Yet somehow the global average delta-T is able to describe them all with a single number.
That’s globalism.
Based on quote “[s]cientists have long suggested that climate change is making cyclones worse in the region, but a lack of weather data has hindered more conclusive claims.”… the writer detected nonsense and struggled to find words.
Very nice Linnea.
In the early days, they were content to tweak old climate records, nowadays they have moved on to plain old lies repeated ad nauseum.
It doesn’t matter how many times they are corrected, they just keep repeating the same old climate change lies over and over again.