A recent post by CBS News, titled “Top 10 deadliest hurricanes in U.S. history,” presents a factual discussion of the 10 deadliest hurricanes that made landfall in the United States. Refreshingly, CBS did not attempt to attribute the deadly hurricanes to climate change.
The post begins by quoting the Colorado State University Tropical Meteorology Project prediction that this season would be “well above average” for major hurricanes making landfall in the United States and Caribbean. While some media outlets, including CBS in other posts (covered by Climate Realism here), do try to cram a human-caused climate change narrative into stories covering this hurricane season, this one does not. Instead, it merely lists the top ten storms with the highest death tolls, and the post itself actually serves to undermine climate alarmist claims about the “unprecedented” nature of recent storms.
Of the ten storms listed:
- 4 happened before the year 1900;
- The Great Galveston hurricane of 1900 killed the most people of all at up to 12,000 people;
- Only Katrina (1,200 dead in Louisiana, 2005) and Maria (2,975 dead in Puerto Rico, 2017) occurred within the last three decades.
It is an open question, however, whether Maria should actually make the list since the death toll from the hurricane itself was 64. The 2,975 number comes from an counterfactual attribution study, the kind Climate Realism has critiqued previously here and here, for example, in which the authors looked at historical death patterns in and around the time of the hurricane, and attributed any excess deaths to the hurricane – an “estimate how many people would have died had Hurricane Maria not hit the island.” Had attribution studies been conducted for each and every hurricane on the list, it is likely their death tolls would have been much higher as well.
Helene has a current death toll of 238, according to the report, but that number is likely to climb as more wreckage is combed through and missing persons are identified. At the time of writing, no death statistics are available for Milton.
There is no clear pattern to this data, for two major reasons.
First is that there is no pattern of increasingly severe storms. The available hurricane and tropical cyclone data simply do not show that hurricanes are getting more intense, severe or frequent over time. Climate Realism has covered the data, sometimes at the state-specific level, dozens of times. Even the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) agrees, stating in their 2021 AR6 Working Group report that identifying past trends in tropical storm metrics is a “challenge.”
Since the beginning of more accurate data collection in the 1970s, there is no trend whatsoever for global tropical cyclone frequency, or global accumulated cyclone energy (ACE). (See figures below)


Despite a much larger population in the Hurricane bullseye zone on the coasts now than in the past, most of top ten deadliest hurricanes occurred in the more distant past. Why? Because of improved early warning systems resulting in evacuations and infrastructure in the United States having been hardened against severe weather due stronger building standards and technology. Also, many deaths due to exposure to the elements have been prevented by modern generators and the speed with which emergency personnel can get into communities and power is restored. These improvements would not have been possible without fossil fuels and their byproducts, which climate alarmists seek to eliminate.
Every deadly storm is a tragedy, and it is just as much of a mistake to downplay the danger and damage from tropical cyclones as it is to hype them up and try to connect them to climate change. In this instance, CBS gave a simple, factual account detailing the somber history of severe hurricane landfalls in the United States and its territories. Bravo, CBS. See if you can follow this up by sticking the facts about severe weather in the future.
Wow! I’m certainly surprised. CBS news precedes some favorite TV Game shows so it’s on in our house. I generally leave the room when it’s on. So yeah, I’m surprised.
And thanks for the LINK which I have bookmarked (-:
The death numbers are not comparable.
in 1900 and before, it took days to get warnings out to the few people in affected areas
In 2024, it takes seconds to get warnings to a vastly larger number of people, almost all of them manage to evacuate and avoid death.
Destruction of property is another measure of hurricane power.
In 1900 and before, there was vastly less property exposed than in 2024
A better measure is how much $property damage, and how long will it take to repair, and should it be repaired in the same places, to likely be damaged again?
Insurance data could be a valuable resource.
The deadliest.hurricanes occurred prior to our ability to outrun them. Before we could travel 200 miles at a go then stop 5 minutes to refuel and go another 200 miles. Repeat as necessary to get away. Though they have been increasing likely from increased idiocy inserted into society from the idiocricy
I did exactly that when Frederick hit Melbourne back in the late 70s.
“A better measure is how much $property damage”
Inflation.
Population growth.
Population density on coasts.
I was thinking the same thing: media loves to use the dollar amount of damages as some kind of equivalence to more intense storms. So much BS.
Lets not forget (though it didn’t strike the US) the great hurricane of 1782. It decimated the Caribbean islands killing more than 24,000 and scouring some islands completely devoid of all life.
Very nice.
The Galveston hurricane of 1900 should have an asterisk next to it whenever mentioned. The story is complex, but well worth understanding the role played by the waterfront streetcar and railroad tracks. All the wreckage, including houses, piled up six streets inland from the beach and, interestingly, saved much of the business district from total destruction.
I have NEVER seen a mention in any MSM outlet of the 1970 Bhola Cyclone (Bangladesh) that killed 300,000 – 500,000 people since the narrative of “CAGW make hurricanes worse” was adopted.
If normal people knew about that one, the death tolls (while tragic) of recent hurricanes would seem absolutely trivial in comparison.
Like the 12/26/2004 Tsunami in Banda Ache, tidal surge has a way of decimating low lying islands and coastal tidal zones when the oceans rise up
Or how people are so freaked out about Fukushima, but barely mention of the huge death toll from the tsunami, albeit nowhere close to Banda Ache.
Definitely the sea claimed more lives in Japan than the Fukushima nuclear incident
Didnt Bangladesh build raised concrete storm shelters within walking distance along the coast as a result? A low cost alternative to trying to change sea levels.
Most of my friends and acquaintances all simply repeat that, yes of course hurricanes and storms are getting worse, and if I try to suggest otherwise the conversation tends to just stop. It’s as if they simply don’t want to believe that the media is misinforming them, or simply lying. I find it rather depressing.
Hurricanes reports are getting worse.
Chicken Little had the right idea. /sarc
Speaking of which, my grandchildren had never heard of Chicken Little. I don’t think youngsters get taught the basics of life anymore. I find that depressing.
What is striking is the tremendous and random variability in the tropical cyclone activity from year to year, or from one short period of several years to the preceding or following similar period. Of course everyone is subject to recency bias, and the news media take full advantage of that human foible … so that whenever the data from one or just a handful of years show an increase in storms, they hype the hell out of that … but when the data from the following handful of years shows a return to mean, it’s just crickets from the media.
If it bleeds, it leads. The forever motto of the news media industry.
Even Market investors state about their portfolios…
Prior performance is not indicative of future trends
I like to call it Climate Science DuJour
Article says:”…landfall in the United States and Caribbean…”.
How is anything outside Puerto Rico and US Virgin Island our worry in counting hurricanes? How far out will we be willing to extend the count area?
As far as necessary to maintain the narrative.
It’s not about the truth, it’s about how many people your lies can dupe.
Life has been like that since time immemorial.
Politicians don’t learn to tell the truth because they don’t win power telling the truth. They learn to lie convincingly because that is what gets you into office.
It’s increasingly the same with ‘senior scientists’, ‘top docs’ and ‘rich CEOs and bankers’.
Learn to lie, learn what lies work and what lies don’t.
That’s what 12th grade classes should focus on in true education systems.
Moving water is the great killer in most storms. Either you control the water or move to higher ground. Personal transport can thus be a lifesaver.
So let’s all jump into EVs.
Has anyone heard from Tom in Florida lately? If he didn’t go through some of the worst of Milton, he could see it from there.
“the Deadliest” anything will have occurred earlier in medical history.
It could be that CBS and some of the other mainstream media outlets are getting more flak from viewers about their inaccuracies concerning the origins and results of violent storms. People are tired of being blamed for their lifestyles–e.g. fossil fuel use—being responsible for every damaging weather event and suspect it’s the funding from all the green organizations and governments seeking to institute higher taxes and more restrictions on consumers that’s responsible for the tiresome climate alarmist hype.
“Refreshingly, CBS did not attempt to attribute the deadly hurricanes to climate change.”
What happens to climate realism (TM) if it becomes mainstream?
“I never believed the Earth was flat!”
“You said…”
“Nuh uh!”
“The Great Galveston hurricane of 1900 killed the most people of all at up to 12,000 people.”
I wonder if that figure includes the roughly 500 looters shot and killed by US Army troops.