Xi Jinping: Official website of Ali Khamenei, Supreme leader of Iran, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Globe from NASA (Public Domain). Match: Dietmar Rabich / Wikimedia Commons / “Streichholz -- 2021 -- 6120” / CC BY-SA 4.0. Image modified.

Greens mistake Fake Chinese Economic Statistics for a Climate Triumph

Essay by Eric Worrall

China is reporting economic growth during a period of falling CO2 emissions – but this isn’t the first time China has promoted this falsehood.

‘It’s good news’: Scientists suspect history about to be made in China

By Nick O’Malley
JULY 13, 2024

For months, the reports came in and climate scientists and analysts pored over the data. Something unfamiliar was happening. It looked a little like good news. Perhaps even something of profound historical significance.

Ever since the industrial revolution began in the late 18th century, the amount of planetary warming greenhouse gases humans have been pumping into the atmosphere has grown inexorably, causing temperatures to climb dangerously over the past few decades.

In 2019, humans pumped 35 billion tonnes of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. That number fell by a staggering 6 per cent the following year as COVID crunched industrial production and shut economies. At the time, the fall prompted despair in some climate commentators. Is this what it would take to make a dent in emissions? If so, how could such an outcome ever be achieved in a functioning economy?

But it is data from the past few months that is intriguing analysts today. The world’s economy is growing. China’s economy is growing. Yet greenhouse gas emissions appear to have peaked.

Some time last year, or perhaps earlier this year, it appears China’s emissions, in particular, reached a high point. If China has peaked, there is good reason to believe global emissions peaked, too. It would mean that some time over the past few months, the stubborn nexus between economic growth and greenhouse gas pollution was snapped, and the 250-year surge in emissions ended.

Read more: https://amp.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/it-s-good-news-scientists-suspect-history-about-to-be-made-in-china-20240709-p5jsbi.html

How do we know these claims are likely based on fake statistics? Because this isn’t the first time it has happened.

From 2016

China’s post-coal growth

Ye QiNicholas SternTong WuJiaqi Lu & Fergus Green 

Nature Geoscience volume 9, pages 564–566 (2016) Cite this article

Slowing GDP growth, a structural shift away from heavy industry, and more proactive policies on air pollution and clean energy have caused China’s coal use to peak. It seems that economic growth has decoupled from growth in coal consumption.

Read more: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1462901118308803

Every few years, China promotes the myth of decoupling, to explain the divergence between their fake economic growth statistics and their CO2 emissions.

What actually happened since 2016? Chinese CO2 emissions soared, as soon as their economy recovered from their downturn, and genuine economic growth caught up with their fake growth statistics.

There is plenty of supporting evidence the true explanation for falling emissions in 2024 is that China is suffering a severe economic crisis – they have a debt to GDP ratio of 288% and a collapsing asset price bubble.

China’s Economic Slump Is Here to Stay

BY JAMES H. NOLT

MARCH 4, 2024 7:00 AM EST

James H. Nolt is adjunct associate professor of international relations at New York University and author of International Political Economy: The Business of War and Peace. He was founding dean of an international college in Nanjing, China, and for 23 years Senior Fellow at the World Policy Institute in New York.

China is in the midst of a profound economic crisis. Growth rates are flagging as an unsustainable mountain of debt piles up; China’s debt-to-GDP ratio reached a record 288% in 2023. But even that eye-popping figure does not capture the uncomfortable fact that much of it was borrowed to buy assets that no longer yield enough income to repay the debt. This is especially true in the housing sector, where sales have fallen by a third since the pre-pandemic peak, and new construction is down 60%. This is one of the worst housing crashes in the world over the last three decades.

Many Western pundits and politicians view this crisis as a sign of the bankruptcy of China’s leadership and economic system. But it is more akin to the cyclical debt crises that have plagued capitalist countries throughout history. An apt comparison is Japan’s crisis of 1989, which ended decades of high growth and rising asset prices, fueled by a ballooning debt bubble. Japan’s Nikkei stock index peaked in late 1989 and fell almost 80% over the next 13 years. Real estate prices fell for two decades starting in 1991. Neither of these major asset classes has exceeded the pre-crisis price peak ever since. Japan transitioned from being the fastest growing major economy during 1954-73, typically growing over 10% per year, to the slowest, with growth averaging only 1.75% per year from 1981 to 2023. China may be facing similarly prolonged difficulties.

The bubble is already bursting. Chinese creditors have now scaled back new lending and raised interest rates, following government guidance announced as the “Three Red Lines.” As the most indebted Chinese bulls go bankrupt or panic sell to repay their loans, prices are falling further as their bear counterparts jump back in and buy assets at fire-sale discount prices. That will eventually put a floor on the price collapse but it is also redistributing wealth rapidly from debtors to creditors. Bears feast on the bulls during every crash.

Read more: https://time.com/6835935/china-debt-housing-bubble/

So the real question is, how could the scientists and public figures quoted by the Sydney Morning Herald be so easily fooled by China once again promoting their transparent emissions decoupling mistruth?

The last time China pulled this stunt was 2016, less than a decade ago. You would think scientists and public figures might bother to do a little research, before accepting Chinese economic growth claims as reliable, and echoing such a transparent communist falsehood.

5 17 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

38 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Scarecrow Repair
July 15, 2024 10:04 am

You would think scientists and public figures might bother to do a little research

Good Gravy No! They can’t see ahead any further than the next election, and backwards not at all.

Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
July 15, 2024 10:11 am

I don’t think they can see further ahead than the next COP.

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  Retired_Engineer_Jim
July 15, 2024 10:35 am

Yeah, you’re right, I was thinking too generally.

Reply to  Retired_Engineer_Jim
July 15, 2024 10:47 am

I believe they have already scoped out the best restaurants, hotels, and hookers.
First come, first served.

FJB

Tom Halla
July 15, 2024 10:23 am

Chinese economic statistics are as reliable as gas station sushi.

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  Tom Halla
July 15, 2024 10:39 am

Sushi?

A Jew and a Chinese are on a train, and the Jew slaps the Chinese.
“Hey! What was that for?!?”
“Pearl Harbor.”
“That was the Japanese, I’m Chinese!”
“Eh, what’s the difference.”
So the Chinese slaps the Jew.
“Hey! What was that for?”
“That’s for sinking the Titanic.”
“It was sunk by an iceberg!”
“Eh, what’s the difference, iceberg, Steinberg.”

strativarius
July 15, 2024 11:09 am

Greens mistake Fake Chinese Economic Statistics for a Climate Triumph

Shouldn’t that be:
“”Greens Spin Fake Chinese Economic Statistics for a Climate Triumph

Reply to  strativarius
July 15, 2024 12:03 pm

Yep. And the article does tell us why.

Covid.

If the Covid lockdowns or something as harsh is the only way to achieve CO2 emission reductions then the cure is worse than the disease. AGW scare is over.

So it cannot be. Something else must be.
There are green jobs on the line. Green politicians’, green journalists’ and green activists’ jobs on the line.

Reply to  MCourtney
July 16, 2024 5:39 am

But what the omit is the inconvenient fact that every non-productive “green” job created you lose three real (productive) jobs.

Reply to  strativarius
July 15, 2024 1:03 pm

To be completely descriptive, it should read: “Green Communists continue to support Asian Communists.”

mleskovarsocalrrcom
July 15, 2024 11:12 am

The question is when, not if, the China economic bubble will burst. Ghost cities anyone? Fields of electric vehicles for sale? Manufacturing plants no longer active?

John Hultquist
Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
July 15, 2024 11:54 am

The “Ghost cities ” took much cement, other materials, large machines, and a massive labor force. Emissions would have spiked. Those (odd to me) episodes ended a few years ago. Wikipedia has a page: “Under-occupied developments in China”, with a list of cities and a few photos.

KevinM
Reply to  John Hultquist
July 15, 2024 12:26 pm

Chinese ghost cities and empty 10-lane expressways sound so 2009.

KevinM
Reply to  mleskovarsocalrrcom
July 15, 2024 12:24 pm

i agree… but also I acknowledge commenting on the exact same subject 20 years ago when the cement was still wet.

Coeur de Lion
July 15, 2024 11:26 am

Look, chaps, examine the Keeling curve, especially the expanded version. Nothing has changed the idiosyncratic shapes, not even COVID nor Chinese manipulation nor even global CO2 increase, one does see an increased slope which is now straight. So what is happening? Natural CO2 dominates entirely . Human contribution negligible

LT3
July 15, 2024 11:54 am

China just needs to start building more carriers and printing money. It’s worked for the US.

KevinM
Reply to  LT3
July 15, 2024 12:34 pm

I don’t think today’s US could “get away with” the military things it did between WW2 and now. A lot of early 20th century good will has been spent.
Reading about the construction of the Panama Canal is super informative about attitudes from days gone by.

… point is, I think copying the US plan would show that the world has changed a little since 1960. May as well copy the Roman Empire.

July 15, 2024 11:54 am

One of my favorite YouTube channels.

China Uncensored
https://www.youtube.com/@ChinaUncensored/videos

Not much discussion of climate, but lots about the economy and politics of China.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
July 15, 2024 12:06 pm

Also check out Laowhy86 and SerpentZA on YouTube if you want to know what’s really happening in the Middle Kingdom.

KevinM
July 15, 2024 12:22 pm

“a staggering 6 per cent”
I wonder what word the author would use if the subject were US inflation rate?

Duane
July 15, 2024 12:31 pm

Economic data can always be argued, either whether the data are correct, or whether they are truly representative of what’s going on in a given national economy. Heck, we argue all the time over such data in the US despite having about the most transparent government on the planet. Opinions will always differ.

The key question here is what do the data say about China’s rate of growth in CO2 emissions.

Given the following from Google AI Overview:

China’s coal power construction in 2023 accounted for two-thirds of the global rise in operating coal power capacity, which climbed 2% to 2,130 GW. China’s 70.2 GW of new construction in 2023 was also 19 times more than the rest of the world’s 3.7 GW. As of July 2023, China had more coal-fired power stations than any other country or territory in the world, more than four times the number of India, which ranked second”

It seems unlikely that China is doing anything at all to curb CO2 emissions, given that they are the world’s largest developer of new coal fired generators.

Fudging economics, but fudging coal fired generator capacity growth … not so much.

July 15, 2024 12:47 pm

There have been plenty of reports of China building new coal fired electricity generating plants hand over fist as fast as can be managed during recent years and the current year, as well as increasing coal consumption with its CO2 production – to power those new facilities one would imagine. How can that possibly result in decreased CO2 emissions? Surely everyone here doesn’t have as bad a memory as they are harping about economists and journalists having.

Reply to  MyUsername
July 15, 2024 5:43 pm

carbonbriefs are designed to hold complete BS.

Wind and solar are tiny afterthoughts in China’s energy supplies.

And they have has hydro for a long time.

Furthermore. Wind and Solar are FAR from being clean energy.

They produce a whole load of TOXIC chemical during manufacture, and end up in landfill or as toxic waste at the end of their short but erratic and ineffective lives.

China-Energy-consumption
oeman50
Reply to  MyUsername
July 16, 2024 4:11 am

Interesting, NOT. The total amount of CO2 emitted to the atmosphere is not dependent on the share of coal-fired power in China. It is related to the total amount of CO2 produced in China, which has been increasing. But let’s not forget the increase in CO2 emissions in the world has yet been to increase the PPM of CO2 in the atmosphere.

Dave Andrews
Reply to  MyUsername
July 16, 2024 6:12 am

IEA ‘World Energy Investment 2024’

“China is by far the largest coal producer and consumer globally and also the main market for coal exports”

“Estimate its coal investment in 2024 will be c. USD 100bn ( over 60% of the global total) in 2024.”

July 15, 2024 1:02 pm

The CCP’s economic statistics are always lies, but it is possible for economies to grow as CO2 emissions decline. Carbon dioxide emissions in the U.S. declined after about 2005 mostly because old coal power plants were replaced by natural gas ones which emit much less CO2, and the economy kept growing. The climastrologists like to credit wind and solar, but they are a small fraction of the power production, and always will be until large scale power storage becomes economically competitive, if ever.

Reply to  stinkerp
July 16, 2024 7:09 am

Not only do wind and solar have no effect on emissions relative to substituting gas fired power plants for coal fired power plants, but gas plants are also needed to provide the backup power to the worse-than-useless wind and solar.

Bob
July 15, 2024 2:26 pm

Where do you get reliable economic information about countries like China. A guy would be appalling ignorant to believe what the Chinese themselves say.

July 15, 2024 2:31 pm

Why would the Western green alarmists believe China’s fake GDP growth statistic? Because fake climate statistics and other bogus statistics is the Crisis Climate Industrial Complex stock and trade. Don’t like the “Dreaded Psuse” in temperatures for a couple of decades? jigger the thermometer readings to erase the pause. Temperature increase since 1950 (before which, impact of CO2 was negligible) is too small for your liking? Move the goalposts back a century and bankroll the 0.6°C degrees of natural recovery since the end of the LIA. The apples to apples calc of the cost of generation renewable power a bit too astronomical for you, Use the Fake LCOE formula that sheds off 75% of the true cost directly incurred to accommodate adding in renewable power generators…..

KevinM
July 15, 2024 4:00 pm

Does/Will “Weekly average CO2 at Mauna Loa” reflect this purported “period of falling CO2 emissions“?

KevinM
Reply to  KevinM
July 15, 2024 4:01 pm

“For months”? How old is the data series? How old is the Earth?

July 15, 2024 4:45 pm

they have a debt to GDP ratio of 288% and a collapsing asset price bubble.

China is approaching the demographic middle age where savings begin to outstrip borrowing within the population. That means the government needs to spend more to take up the slack otherwise the economy collapses. Net savings is usually reached when the median age of the population reaches around 38yo.
https://www.worlddata.info/average-age.php
Most of Europe has past middle age. Japan median age is 49yo so well past middle age. Japan’s population is also in decline. Their government debt to GDP has levelled out around 260%. The last person living in Japan will be very wealthy. Japan owns a lot of productive assets around the globe.

USA and Australia keep importing people so they stay around middle age and population is borrowing enough to keep the money supply positive.

sherro01
July 15, 2024 9:36 pm

Eric,
While you make your point, it is a shame that you have to note that rubbery figures were involved. When you use rubbery figures too much in articles like this, readers might begin to think you approve of the rubbery method.
No criticism, just sharing your frustrations that arise from recent trends to set aside hard accounting principles in favour of obfuscation. Surely someone somewhere has a more rigorous set of Chinese national accounts. Geoff S

DStayer
July 15, 2024 10:22 pm

They are fooled because these “Scientists” and “Public figures” first desire, over all others, is the realization of a global socialist state modeled on Communist China, and where they are part of the ruling elite!

July 16, 2024 5:36 am

When you’re pushing a political agenda, anything that APPEARS to support you argument will be accepted uncritically, even when it is mostly male bovine feces.

You know, like “climate science.”

SteveZ56
July 16, 2024 1:17 pm

A reduction in CO2 emissions in China is probably pure Communist propaganda. Aren’t there satellites over China that can measure their real CO2 emissions?

The current international agreements (Paris accord, etc.) don’t ask China to reduce their CO2 emissions until 2035, so they can do what they please until then. After that, they can still do as they please because who is going to stop a nation of 1.4 billion people armed with nuclear weapons from emitting CO2?

Of course, the propaganda that China has reduced their CO2 emissions is aimed at western democracies, to give them a false sense of guilt and lead them to buy Chinese batteries for electric cars, and solar panels based on rare-earth metals mostly found in China.

It will require the western leaders to grow a backbone (or be replaced) to repudiate the whole global-warming scam, and start competing with China on a level playing-field. If we don’t buy all their rare-earth batteries and solar panels, the Chinese will need to invent something else to sell us.