Climate Skeptics and Fiction

Why would a climate skeptic be interested in writing fictional stories?

John M. Cape – Author of Poorly Zeroed

Why would a climate skeptic be interested in writing fictional stories?

The simple answer is that they capture our imagination. There’s a real market for dystopian literature. The Alarmists have had great success in this arena.

Nature’s End, a 1986 adventure, featured mankind destroying the atmosphere with poor environmental decisions. Barbara Kingsolver’s Flight Behavior was a poetic piece that dealt with Monarch butterflies incapable of dealing with global warming. Ian MacEwan’s Solar deals with a bureaucrat tackling global warming.

In the cinema, similar accounts blame mankind for environmental disasters of all sorts. The Mad Max series features a world of crazies burning up the final remnants of fossil fuels. Don’t Look Up ridicules skeptics as unreasonable and unscientific people. The Day After Tomorrow depicts catastrophic climate effects leading to oceanic events that lead to the start of the next glaciation.

Virtually all these tales feature a world where mankind upsets the natural balance and then Mother Nature pulls out a hatchet and takes scalps.

In my mind, the climate skeptic pushes plots where nature throttles our characters with natural processes – or mankind inflicts the damage and nature is “off the hook”. For example, the late Michael Crichton wrote State of Fear, a very commercial offering with more than a million printed copies. It’s about environmentalists inflicting damage that they can blame on manmade influences. It’s refreshing and well-written but follows a path rarely trod.

If you’re a writer and looking for a topic to explore, the climate skeptic genre has not been over-mined at this juncture. Granted, it might be a thankless and unloved project for you, but you’ve just got to take your lumps. Also, note that no movie was ever produced based on this particular Michael Crichton creation – so your effort might never see the Silver Screen.

Perhaps a better question is whether you would be happier in the blogosphere or writing nonfiction tomes. Of course, that depends on your personality.

I imagine that bloggers are generally chained to their computers. They must constantly track whatever issue is hot for the day and work quickly to get their two cents on the wire.

The nonfiction reference works are often proprietary. They have some angle of expertise that is essentially their nook. They tend to stick to their lane. They might be scientists or academics creating course materials. They often seek publicity through emails, YouTube videos, and editorial contributions in social media.

The generalists often try to consolidate lots of different themes for readers. It’s sort of like writing Climate Science for Dummies. The critical thing is to document the sources and try to tell it in a way that’s interesting, yet scientifically accurate. Sometimes those two goals don’t go easily together.

That’s where writing a novel gives you a lot more freedom. Your characters can say anything they want whether it’s consistent with peer written journals or not. You can push the story in any direction you want and make anything happen you want to. If you go overboard, you end up in the fantasy genre. If you get it about right, then you can pitch it as hard science. The net result is that these choices don’t have to limit your narrative, but will work better with certain audiences.

One last thing about a fictional approach. Climate Science is a slow-moving process. It’s part of what makes the science so difficult. Make a prediction and wait many decades to see if it happens. Politicians love these types of decisions. Eventually, it works out or it doesn’t, but they don’t need to sweat the outcome for many years; they’ve already left office before it’s ever tested.

Fiction can speed up the visualization of how science will play out in the distant future. It might reveal the truth, but more importantly, it describes the finer points of why the various possible outcomes matter. Books take a while to read, but they also allow you to get past sound bites and more fully develop multiple aspects of the issues at stake.

As Climate Skeptics, we are at a difficult crossroads.

  • Our climate blogs and materials have never been better, yet at the same time, they are not easy to discover for the average citizen.
  • Major search engines deliberately steer searches in the direction of .gov and .org sources – which unfortunately are often neither objective nor unbiased.
  • The reality is that very few people can make sense of the myriad of climate science information tidbits coursing through the daily news and the Internet.
  • Many of our brightest climate skeptic beacons are aging out or have already passed.
  • Political parties take remarkably different positions in this country, but few of our leaders can intelligibly explain the finer points.
  • There’s a lot of material floating around. Some are gems, but many are red herrings.
  • Our media is not shy about reporting that any unusual weather event is caused by increased greenhouse gases. The statistics say otherwise, but they’ll rarely resort to those.
  • Our young have been heavily indoctrinated in this arena and aren’t necessarily up to the task of educating themselves on what’s going on.
  • Activists are doing stupid, but newsworthy things.

If you care about climate science integrity, now would be a great time to take an interest. You can do it the hard way or perhaps you can simply entertain yourself while doing it. If too many of us fail to do so, we will pay dearly for our ignorance.

John Cape is the Author of UnZeroed? the second offering in his Net Zero Policy Disaster series. Brutal Net Zero policies rapidly rid the United States of fossil fuels. Electricity is sporadic, bandits roam the highways, and major cities are rioting. Newly elected President Jenny Almond never expected to win and now faces an even more desperate situation. China remains the only global superpower. Billionaires, the media, and the global warming faithful join forces to stamp out the nascent recovery by supporting the previous President in her reelection campaign.

5 4 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

23 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
July 14, 2024 6:37 am

“…. very few people can make sense of the myriad of climate science information tidbits coursing through the daily news and the Internet…”

Very true. All the people I know personally are highly educated. Not one knows the most basic info about the climate and the supposed climate emergency.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
July 14, 2024 7:38 am

I you Google “climate emergency” up comes”:

H.R.794  “National Climate Emergency Act of 2021” 

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
July 14, 2024 7:39 am

I have never had much trust in government competency, and have always been a skeptic of everything they touch. That was par of why I never believed humans could affect the climate like the coolists and then warmists claimed.

But what really convinced me there is no climate crisis was all their lies. Not just the hockey stick, it was mostly the failed hysterical predictions of no more snow, no more polar bears, uninhabitable tropics, disappearing islands.

(I remember especially marveling at all those Pacific islands which just happened to be exactly tall enough that when the glaciers melted and sea levels rose 3-4-500 feet, it so conveniently and politely left just a foot or two exposed for humans.)

People may exaggerate or simplify when they’re telling the truth, but they don’t lie like that. The only people who lie that much and so much are, well, liars, and they alone convinced me they did not have the truth on their side.

Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
July 14, 2024 8:11 am

After a little rewording:

   “The Pacific islands were tall enough so when the glaciers melted
   and sea levels rose 3-4-500 feet, it left just a few feet exposed.”

It’s going in my factoid file with a link to your comment.

And there’s this from a day or so ago:
The Coral Endures – Willis Eschenbach

Scarecrow Repair
Reply to  Steve Case
July 14, 2024 8:24 am

What?!? You removed my snark?!? How dare you!

🙂 🙂 🙂

Yeah, the coincidence amazed me, and it wasn’t til much later that I learned the corals were hundreds of millions of years old, and had survived not only the 10,000 years ago sea level rise, but the dino-killing comet. To have the arrogance to think we puny humans could match that level of destruction, spread out over 150 years instead of the hours at most it would have taken for for the comet’s effects to spread around the world … it may have been the capper in believing that everything they say is a lie.

I spent about 20 years writing hardware and kernel computer diagnostics, and it became second nature to look for coincidences and possible failure modes. Or maybe I was already attuned to them and that’s why I gravitated to writing diagnostics.

Reply to  Scarecrow Repair
July 14, 2024 9:32 am

“… the dino-killing comet.…”
____________________________

That was one very selective comet. ALL of the dinosaurs, the dominant class of animals at the time perished, but the other classes (frogs, toads & salamanders), (turtles, snakes, lizards & crocodiles) (birds)* (monotremes, marsupials & mammals) mostly survived.

Biological classifications:
Domain, kingdom, phylum, class,
order, family, genus, and species.

The only thing that could kill of an entire class of animals would be disease.

*Birds evolved from dinosaurs millions of years before the comet struck

Reply to  Steve Case
July 14, 2024 11:55 am

Last time I posted “Disease Did in the Dinosaurs” I got lots of down votes. Here’s a chart below of how many dinosaurs have been classified so far. They’re all extinct but but the platypus and crocodiles survive.

Dinosauria
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
July 14, 2024 9:19 am

All the people I know personally are highly educated. Not one knows the most basic info about the climate and the supposed climate emergency.

Joseph, I feel the same way about most of the highly educated people I know. I am neither an engineer nor scientist. How is it possible that I am able with high school mathematics, geography, physical science – done some 60 years ago – to point out major flaws in the arguments of these people? Perhaps it is in the solid grounding I have in logical thinking and careful reasoning gained from the study of languages. The biggest error is equating expert with coherent, clear, concise and cogent.

Reply to  Michael in Dublin
July 15, 2024 8:39 am

Yes, it is “logical thinking and careful reasoning”. And thinking for yourself, rather than accepting the popular wisdom. As to the rest, highly educated, but ignorant.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
July 14, 2024 7:25 am

With the media controlled by alarmists getting published in anything is a challenge unless it meets their criteria.

drednicolson
July 14, 2024 7:45 am

The rub with fiction is that in order to tell a good story, people as represented by your characters need to be more important than the ideas they embody or espouse. Any important themes the writer wants to convey should arise organically from the plot and the characters’ motivations in contention. Reach, don’t preach.

(Atlas Shrugged is one of those important novels that nonetheless suffers in this regard, since there are several chapters where Rand essentially puts the story on hold to soapbox.)

It’s also difficult to write a good disaster story because while the natural disaster is the most prominent part of it, it’s an amoral force and as such cannot really be a character, per se. So the drama has to come from the smaller-scale stories of the characters being pushed around by it.

Reply to  drednicolson
July 14, 2024 10:12 am

When I read Atlas Shrugged circa 1981, when one of those speeches started I would just skip ten pages ahead, over and over, until I finally found the speech over, I think around 90 pages.

John Hultquist
July 14, 2024 7:46 am

Our young have been heavily indoctrinated in this arena …”
. . . and many others.
The Wall Street Journal published “Young Workers Fear They Will Never See a Cent From Social Security“, by Joe Pinsker. Comments by ages of all sorts are amazingly varied with many – not all – completely wrong. Most are earning well and voting! Shudder! 🙂

hdhoese
July 14, 2024 8:17 am

“Books take a while to read, but they also allow you to get past sound bites and more fully develop multiple aspects of the issues at stake.” I do not know how widespread it is but at least a few collections including plants, animals and libraries have been closed for decades. There is the question of justification which could be space, economics, and internet availability. The last has been phenomenal but takes electricity and some libraries rent out ebooks. Books, journals and pencils have so far survived many new technologies but replacements in general for many systems for whatever reasons are not new. Are these old systems now considered so much less important that they need to be diminished or even discarded? Journals are certainly expanding at least in some ways however, maybe more centralized.

strativarius
July 14, 2024 8:18 am

Who needs fiction?

Write a novel set against a backdrop of chaos in Sri Lanka as green policies bite. There’s even a potential killer scene as the President flees the country…

strativarius
Reply to  strativarius
July 14, 2024 8:20 am

WHO needs fiction.

GeorgeInSanDiego
July 14, 2024 10:49 am

The “Author’s message” and the appendices to “State Of Fear” were the first detailed rebuttal to the anthropogenic global climate change assertion that I ever encountered. Twenty years later, that rebuttal appears to have passed the test of time with flying colors.

July 14, 2024 11:42 am

Time to watch the 1961 movie “Voyage To The Bottom Of The Sea” again. The Van Allen radiation belt caught on fire and the only way to save the cooking earth from destruction from the fire in the sky was to launch a nuclear missile to blow it out.

Admin
July 14, 2024 6:03 pm

Lets not forget “Fallen Angels” – greens have taken over, and the shut down of CO2 emissions has driven the Earth into a new ice age.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallen_Angels_(Niven,_Pournelle,_and_Flynn_novel)

https://wattsupwiththat.com/book_review_entry/placeholder-title-49/

And Crichton’s “State of Fear”.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/09/29/state-of-fear-by-michael-crichton-could-be-the-1984-of-climate-alarmism/

Edward Katz
July 14, 2024 6:35 pm

The writers and consumers of this type literature are mainly anti-capitalists who would like to see the type of apocalypse predicted or at least a part of it. Of course, since it’s not going to happen they don’t have to worry about losing their creature comforts, but just take them away and add higher taxes and living costs and let’s see how enthusiastic they are about facing reality.

John the Econ
July 14, 2024 6:49 pm

For about 20 years now I’ve been noodling a dystopian novel that is something of a cross between Atlas Shrugged and The Handmaids Tale; When the green agenda erases 200 years of economic and political process and the beneficiaries of that progress get to experience the economic reality of that era without the social norms that maintained order.

c1ue
July 15, 2024 6:24 am

The problem is that fiction involving reality is boring and/or depressing, and not even in a horror porn kind of way. It is the same reason nobody writes about entropy.

michael hart
July 15, 2024 9:21 am

I guess it’s a personal thing, but I have never much enjoyed the post-apocalypse type of SF. First exposure was probably The Day of the Triffids, though the killer plants concept was good.

I enjoyed Iain M. Banks version of SF because it usually seemed to have a happy ending and I always knew it would. The triumph of science/technology/good-intentions over adversity.

Verified by MonsterInsights