The Coral Endures

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

I keep reading endless hype about the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) getting bleached out of existence. So let’s start with some facts.

First, coral is not a single organism. Coral is a curious critter. Coral is a symbiotic partnership between an animal from the Anthozoa group and a microbial alga called Symbiodinium. The microbial algae use photosynthesis to create sugar, and the Anthozoa polyps feed off the sugar. Here’s a description from the USGS.

Figure 1. Description from the USGS article: “The hard skeleton of coral is formed by the secretion of calcium carbonate by the polyp. The cup-like skeleton deposited by an individual polyp is called a corallite. Polyps gather food particles with the nematocysts (stinging, venomous cells) in their tentacles, and feed from sugars produced by photosynthesizing zooxanthellae, a type of algae. The coral tissue protects these algae from herbivorous grazers, and the algae in turn use many of the polyps’ waste products such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and phosphorus. Illustration by Laura Torresan, USGS

Next, modern-type warm-water shallow coral reefs have been around for about half a billion years … so obviously, they must be resistant to temperature changes, including the large temperature swings in the transitions between the glacial periods and the interglacial times such as the current Holocene.

Next, “bleaching”. Bleaching is the natural response of coral to excessively warm or excessively cool temperatures. Or to pollution. Or to siltation. Or to toxic chemicals. Or to the death of the parrotfish or other grazers that keep the coral from being overgrown by other plants.

When the symbiotic relationship comes under pressure due to any of those stressors, the algae may leave the coral’s tissue. And if the stress is due to pollution, siltation, or the lack of parrotfish, then the reef may die.

But if the bleaching is from unusual temperatures, the reef doesn’t usually die. Instead, something entirely different happens. The usual outcome of bleaching due to temperature change is that after the algae die and are expelled by the coral, a different strain of algae that is adapted to the new temperature takes up residence in the bleached coral skeleton.

It’s easy for the new algae to colonize the coral—at that point the coral is like an apartment house where the tenants have all moved out. The new algae can colonize the coral without having to build up the structure. So the reef usually comes back to full health quite quickly.

How do I know this stuff? Hours and hours of scuba and snorkel diving on coral reefs, plus four years living on a coral atoll. I’ve seen the bleaching and watched the reef recover.

Now, as I mentioned at the top of the post, there’s all kinds of hype about what might happen to the GBR, or to the reefs off of Florida and the Keys for that matter, if the ocean warms up and doesn’t cool back down.

However, what most folks don’t know is that a) coral reefs like warm water, the warmer the better, and b) the GBR and the Florida reefs are at the coldest end of the temperatures where shallow-water corals reefs can grow. (And yes, I know there are deep cold-water corals … but we’re not talking about those, are we?)

So let’s start with the location of the GBR. It’s on the northeast coast of Australia, shown in the map below.

Figure 2. Location of the Great Barrier Reef

And where is that in relation to the rest of the world’s coral reefs? Well, very few coral reefs exist where the year-round water temperature is less than 23°C (73°F). And here’s a map of that region.

Figure 3. Temperature range where corals thrive (colored areas), and the area where most corals live (red box).

So … as you can see, both the Florida reefs and the GBR are in the coldest part of the temperature range where corals are happy. And most coral reefs are in the warmest ocean waters. So we know that there are plenty of warmer-water-adapted algae and warmer-water coral reefs.

And of course, this means that if the ocean in those areas of the GBR and Florida reefs gets and stays warmer … all that will happen is that some reefs will bleach, warmer-water-adapted algae will recolonize the reefs, and finally, because of the warmer waters, the reefs will be able to expand polewards.

A final note. Almost nowhere is the open ocean’s annual average temperature warmer than ~30°C. And as the ocean’s temperature overall has warmed, the warmest waters have stayed the same temperature. So a warming ocean is no threat to corals growing in the warmest ocean waters.

TL;DR version? While humans threaten coral reefs via pollution, pesticides, and siltation, corals like warm water. They are happiest where the water is warmest. Corals have survived radical changes in the temperature of oceans over geological time. Bleaching is the natural way that corals adapt to changing water temperatures.

And as a result … all of the hype about the corals and “global warming” is just another part of the climate alarmism scam. They’re not under any kind of threat from warming oceans. Or to misquote Mark Twain, “The rumors of coral’s death are greatly exaggerated”.

w.

PLEASE NOTE: When you comment, quote the exact words you are referring to. I can defend my own words. I can’t defend your interpretation of my words. Thanks.

5 45 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

74 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ferdberple
July 14, 2024 10:09 am

According to the IPCC:

Climate change is human caused. Climate Variability is caused by Nature.

Climate change cannot be caused by Nature by definition. It would be called Climate Variability.

The purpose of the Hockey Stick shaft was to show that Climate Variability was near zero. Thus the blade must be due to Climate Change..

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  ferdberple
July 14, 2024 11:40 am

They fail to recognize that the full range of variability in nature over the eons completely dwarfs any recent change.

don k
July 14, 2024 12:18 pm

Willis, FWIW, here’s an article from NOAA that seems to me to largely support your views. https://www.coris.noaa.gov/about/what_are/

Bill Parsons
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
July 14, 2024 9:05 pm

Your post also appears at the same time as another Jennifer Morohassy diving journal. WUWT is getting organized! Lots of cool stuff to read on a hundred degree day in Colorado.

July 14, 2024 10:01 pm

Willis didn’t as much as blink last week when the dayglow blue staghorn coral backdrop of Pirates of the Caribbean was pounded into rubble by Hurricane Beryls hot-water driven twelve meter seas ?

Must Cook’s Reef suffer a similar fate before he owns to the damage his aversion to science has done in the years since he assured the Solomon’s Times that the real threat to coral was parrotfish?

Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
July 17, 2024 1:53 pm

The Tobago Cays reefs , like those of Bonaire owed their pristine beauty to being spared the almost annual hurricane damage suffered by those in “Hurricane Alley” because they lie five degrees further south, out of harms way because the coriolis force flings hurricane tracks away from the equator.
So reliable is that effect that marine insurance costs much less in the southerly Windward islands than the Leeward Islands and the Greater Antilles to the north. So much so indeed that the most southerly of the chain, Grenada, has to a considerable degree displaced Antigua as the Caribbean’s summer megayacht parking lot.

Until this year- mariners were taken aback when the unprecedentedly large positive sea surface temperature anomaly spawned Beryl earlier than any storm of comparable intensity in a truly unprecedented locale— the horse latitudes north of the mouth of the Amazon!

So what did the hundreds of yachts in Grenada do? Listen to WUWT?
Or run like hell:

Even the Oceanographrer of the Navy was impressed

Screenshot-2024-07-17-at-4.53.05 PM
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
July 19, 2024 9:03 pm

That you should tell your old South Pacific neighbors to take parrot fish off the menu before they drown:
https://x.com/AMAZlNGNATURE/status/1813627378297450894

Since you ask, my Pacific sailing experience is limited to cruising a Kauri Colin Wylde 12 -meter from New Caledonia to Santo by way of Efate, Mossu, Cook’s Reef , Epi, Ambrym, Malekula, Vao and Malo Kili Kili, and crewing Stars&Stripes in the afterguard of the 25th defense of the America’s Cup, as you ought to have read in The American Spectator before amplifying my contempt for you by offering ignorant and gratuitous insults.

My report on Hurricane Beryl is based on up and down the Windwards and Leewards several times and working underwater on coral conservation in the Grenadines with Tom Goreau.

Reply to  The East Pole
July 19, 2024 9:26 pm

PS:

Having coauthored one of the better known Grenadines natural history guidebook, I inspected the coral damage from Hurricane Irma there in 2007:

https://adamant.typepad.com/seitz/2007/04/pyrites_of_the_.html

ADAMANT

Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
July 21, 2024 1:34 pm

The parrotfish riff is a corker- almost as funny as your chloroquine covid cure !

But I don’t think anyone in the Marshalls is laughing,

https://x.com/AMAZlNGNATURE/status/1813627378297450894

or the Grenadines either

Screenshot-2024-07-21-at-4.20.23 PM
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
July 21, 2024 7:09 pm

Your view is risible for two reasons

You have not quantified or compared the respective geophysical contributions of volcanic rock, coral carbonates and living reef organisms to atoll isostasy and local sea level.

Because Parrotfish are territorial, and stay on reefs because they’d starve if they went pelagic, no matter how much coral they scrape, bite or gobble off of reef structures over generations .the sand they pass very largely stays close to where it came from, and however much shoaling it may cause, it has no isostatic consequence, for there is no gravitational difference between the deformational force exerted on the seabed by a coral pinnacle, and the coral sand that erodes from it and accumulates at its base.

Parrotfish biomass has been measured globally and is on average about 150 Kg/hectare. (see figure below) A mature reef of 10 meter average thickness in contrast weighs ~ 1.8 million Kg/ha, which is to say about 12,000 times more, and its volcanic substrate, assuming the average Pacific abyssal depth of 3,480 M, and MORB density ~3.4, about 1.18 million tons.

That’s roughly a billion times more than the parrotfish weigh, which puts them out of the running and amply confirms the Solomon Times commonsense disavowal of your views

But what’s really wrong is your denying that denial has consequences: this is not the first time you have disavowed what you have plainly said.
Telling people tall tales of the South Pacific is one thing ,witness Clunies-Ross’s poking fun at Darwin’s theory of atoll formation in a a mock ‘supplement’ to FitzRoy’s Narrative.

Telling readers naive enough to mistake WUWT for a scientific forum you’ve survived a lethal dose of of a dangerous drug, and that you intend to take more if covid catches up with you is an invitation to public disaster as well as private disdain.

Screenshot-2024-07-21-at-8.43.10 PM
Reply to  The East Pole
July 21, 2024 7:43 pm

Eschenbach has once again adduced and misrepresented a source contrast and compare:

Climate Non-ChangeBy Willis Eschenbach from Honiara

Solomon Times Tuesday, 10 November 2009 08:01 AM

First, there has been absolutely no increase in the rate of sea level rise. In fact, in the last few years it has slowed down… 

The first and most important fact… is that coral atolls essentially “float” on the surface of the sea… The problems in the low-lying atolls are not from rising sea levels. 

They are from coral mining and reef destruction… and killing of the parrotfish that produce the sand required to keep the atolls afloat … “

Is directly contradicted by F figure 3 in Ford & Kench,
Anthropocene

Volume 11

, September 2015, Pages 14-24

comment image

Multi-decadal shoreline changes in response to sea level rise in the Marshall Islands
2.1 Oceanographic setting
The Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) have among the lengthiest sea level records in the central Pacific (Becker et al., 2012) (Figure 3).

Sea level has risen at 2.2 mm/yr and 3.7 mm/yr at Kwajalein and Majuro respectively (Becker et al., 2012). 

Screenshot-2024-07-21-at-10.28.57 PM
Mike Shearn
July 15, 2024 3:23 am

At HotAir it shows “Will Eschenbach”.

Verified by MonsterInsights