Essay by Eric Worrall
“It will take leadership from the top, with aggressive goals.”
Peter Dutton’s nuclear power push does not address the urgency of the climate crisis we now find ourselves in
Alan Finkel
Wed 19 Jun 2024 13.25 AESTTemperatures are rising much faster than anticipated. We must respond with the following rapid solutions
…
Yet, with all this in place, it is surprising to see that the transition to solar and wind power in Australia has flatlined. …
The problem? Barriers.
…
The second category consists of social-license barriers such as landowner resistance, traditional owner negotiations, heritage requirements, and the outsized focus on protecting local biodiversity irrespective of global biodiversity benefits.
Combined, these systemic permitting barriers and the very tangible social license barriers constitute a “wicked problem” that will not be overcome with anything less than an intense and ambitious effort from the highest levels of government, supported by industry and communities.
What can governments do?
The goal must be to lower the barriers urgently. Governments must lead.
…
It will take leadership from the top, with aggressive goals.
…
Biodiversity regulations should also be overhauled to take into account the global benefit to biodiversity, not just the local benefit. …
…
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jun/19/peter-dutton-nuclear-power-plan-coalition-liberal-party-plant-sites-comment
Dr Finkel, the reason a heavy handed approach to the renewable social contract won’t work is power line companies need landowner cooperation.
Thousands of miles of incredibly valuable copper and steel support structures are a tempting target for thieves. It would be unimaginably expensive to mount constant patrols of power lines. Power companies need landowners to call the police when they spot metal thieves, not make them tea and biscuits.
Preventing metal theft without the cooperation of landowners would be a truly wicked problem. In Africa thieves have learned a new trick. They don’t steal the copper wires, which would trigger an instant SWAT team response, they steal the pylon support structures. That way the line keeps running, there is no immediate alarm on the control board, and the thieves are long gone by the time the next storm or strong wind knocks the power pylons over.
So quite apart from the outrage and distress ramming approvals through by force would do to society, there is the very practical problem that a society which has lost its cohesion cannot protect its energy infrastructure. Just look at the situation in South Africa if you want evidence of what could happen to Australia, were the Aussie government to go full fascist with energy infrastructure approvals.
And this is not even considering the greens who actually care about the environment, who would probably be out there dynamiting construction equipment if they lost access to legal means to stop the wholesale destruction of their beloved wilderness regions.
Obviously WUWT does not condone or encourage violence or sabotage – but you don’t have to be a genius to predict the likely consequences of trampling people’s rights, especially in sparsely policed rural regions of Australia. I’ve been to the countryside meetings and seen the anger, the only thing preventing that anger from boiling over right now is rural people are clinging to the hope there are civilised, legal means for them to redress the wrongs which are being done to them. Crush that hope at your peril.
Update (EW): I should have mentioned, most of the rural people I met are willing to compromise, their demand is if the cables are built, they be buried underground, to mitigate the fire risk and impairment of visual amenity. So far to my knowledge power companies have shown no interest in the underground cable option.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Harold the Organic Chemist Says:
ATTN: Aussies!
Using Google, you should search for “Still Waiting for Greenhouse”.
This the website of the late John Daly.
From the home page, scroll down to the end, and then click on “Station Temperature Data”.
On the “World Map”, click on “Australia”, and finally click on “Alice Springs”. The figure shows
the annual average temperatures from 1879 to 2001 and that there is no increase in annual temperature. There are many weather stations in Australia and around the world whose annual temperatures have not undergone any increase at least to the early 2,000’s.D
Since there has been no increase in annual temperatures at these weather station, I have also concluded that increase of CO2 in the atmosphere has not caused any “global warming” as did
John Daly.
We really don’t need any more “renewables” such as solar and wind farms.
Finally, there is little CO2 in the air. At the MLO in Hawaii, the concentration of CO2 in air is 427 ppm by volume. This is only 0.839 grams of CO2 per cubic meter of air. A cubic meter of air at 20 deg. C has a mass of 1.2 kilograms. This small amount of CO2 can only heat such a large mass of air by only a very small amount.
Specific heat, constant pressure Cp
Greenhouse only applies to specific heat, constant volume Cv
The earth is not a closed system.
The earth is closed system. It does not exchange mass with its surroundings, except for the small loss of hydrogen and helium to outer space.
During the day, water and carbon dioxide absorb incoming IR light in sunlight which causes heating of the air. At night water and carbon dioxide absorb IR light emanating from the earth’s surfaces.
BTW, did you check out John Daly’s website?
I do not believe in coincidences.
There is no way it is a coincidence a study connecting climate change to the reduction of the “speech complexity and productivity of politicians” came out as the media has been fighting back against videos showing Biden’s cognitive decline.
It’s not a Babylon Bee article.
https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(24)01331-2
“Peter Dutton’s nuclear power push does not address the urgency of the climate crisis we now find ourselves in”
Australia is responsible for 1.16% of the world’s yearly CO2 emissions. Wake up to yourself Mr Finkel. You are supposed to be an intelligent scientist!